Brasil getting Soros'd

What does leftypol think about this?

Dilma Roussef impeached.

New guy is Michel Temer.

Michel Temer is buddies with Arminio Fraga Neto, ex Pres of the Brasilian Central Bank and ex associate of Soros Quantum Fund.

www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2016/04/1759919-vice-michel-temer-articula-reuniao-com-economista-arminio-fraga.shtml

Soros had already tried interfering with the elections by propping Marina Silva of the Greens last year.

democraciapolitica.blogspot.it/2014/09/marina-e-marionete-de-george-soros.html

Open Society opened in Brasil last year as well.

brasil247.com/pt/247/rio247/191227/ONG-de-George-Soros-vai-se-instalar-no-Brasil.htm

Other urls found in this thread:

risingupwithsonali.com/brazils-right-wing-is-wasting-no-time-in-undoing-progress/
youtube.com/watch?v=iF2IaPa7e_Y
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Oh, so you're saying Soros wants to oust the socialist president for the centrist vice president who is more aligned with his big banking interests? That's surprising.

risingupwithsonali.com/brazils-right-wing-is-wasting-no-time-in-undoing-progress/

Time for revolution

Soros is a bigger threat to revolution than any other Liberal porky, even Clinton or anybody like her, and is almost as bad as the Koch brothers just in a different way.

He sets up an institution, his "Open Society Foundation", to fund social justice and progressive movments, campaigns, organizations etc, which follows the long tradition of capital finding a way to assimilate even that which threatens its negation as a source of power thus perpetuating and even strengthening its hold over the society. This is why any Social Democratic dream of revolution through reforms (which even some posters here have unfortunately fallen into) ultimately fails, people like Soros ultimately find a way to use it to their advantage. On the Conservative side, Capitalists have gotten to the point where they think they are untouchable and can do basically whatever they want, and that is why their corruption of politics has become so much more visible in the last few years. But this is why someone like Soros is so dangerous, because by "playing it safe" and "giving back" he's allowed to get away with things that are even more corrosive and in the long term more damaging then many things people like the Kochs or the big familes (Waltons, Rockefellers etc) do.

On the other side, his funding of certain progressive, liberal, or vaguely "left-wing" elements provides fodder for Alt-Right shit heads, particularly the most Nazistic, to spew their retarded Jewish control conspiracy rhetoric with renewed gusto and confidence. The best talkers/posters among them convince ignorant people using examples like Soros.

Honestly at this point I'm convinced that, at least as far as North America is concerned, it is the Liberals that are the biggest current threat. Even though the overton window, particularly in America, is still far to the Right, the Liberals are dangerous because they have begun to work with the Conservative and Reactionary elements of their countries for their own personal gain. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Liberal elites have ever actually done anything for people outside of their own class, but in the past they acted as a sort of counter balance to the Rightist elements. Now they simply tolerate and collude with them, and in Soros's case, wait in the wings playing it safe until they fall so that they can take their place.

Also daily reminder that David Koch called himself a "Social Liberal" and after the Republican party's implosion this year will probably start giving money to Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Debbie Schulz

youtube.com/watch?v=iF2IaPa7e_Y

Good post, m8.

t-thanks

Just like he's trying to remove Orban and Kaczinsky in Eastern Europe and replace them with centrist leaders that fit his agenda.

Yeah I'm saying exactly that.

Soros is the puppet master of Clinton.
And yeah I agree with that. Libertarians hate the Koch brothers for infiltrating their movement.Soros is the exact equivalent on the left side.

Don't sage wanker.

ok sorry bb

KaczyƄski doesn't have any governmental function

Please explain
"Well they're the exact representation of what I'm promoting but because of how fucking nasty the results are they shouldn't be a associated with my cause"?
The bourgeoisie can't profit from worker-causes, it's an oxymoron.
Soros appeals to SJW shitheads and gibs me dat reformists and they have no problem taking his side if it means he can keep their movement alive.

Tell that to Barack Obama

...

A jew associated with banking interests interfering in another country's internal politics? Mark me surprised!

damn ur cute

All politics aside, you belong in the ovens

Well okay, his party. You get that.


They aren't. Billionaire bribing their way into politics to have the government regulate or de-regulate in their favour isn't free market.


He doesn't directly profit from them. He just learned that left leaning voters are easily controllable and distracted via identity politics. Meanwhile, his puppets like Clinton,Obama, Hollande etc push privatizations en masse and he is the first on the list to get the share.

I mean, the whole point of removing Dilma and install Neves or green Marina Silva is to have one of them privatize Petrobras and the other major commodity state owned companies.

He did that in Eastern Europe in the 90s, he's doing that again in Ukraine right now, he tried that in Egypt and he'll try that in Brasil.

...

It's agreed upon social protocol on Anonymous imageboards to not fuck everything up with attention whoring. I do find it interesting that the board with the highest percentage of namefaggots is the only leftist one. Almost like leftists are more likely to not know proper protocol/be attention whores.

Not an argument

...

He's also a CIA informant, so theres that