Post your Political Compass

that's pretty much me

We should make a leftypol compass about our differences.
What axes could there be?
State anarchism? Design market?

Revolution evolution?
Reformism accelerationism?

...

this is an actual value, not trying to be an edgy oldfag

...

What have you got against gays and abortions, comrade?

Glad to say I’ve taken this test at numerous times and points over the years, and the result has been more or less consistent, with maybe some occasional rightward drift, but no one’s ever called me authoritarian

...

I think you might find the fourth international would be down left hand side of the green section, not in the red.

gays…. i don't see whats their function in life because the entire point in life is to pass on your genetics to the next generation. that seems unnatural at that point, all life attempts some type of reproduction asexual or sexual. being gay is neither.

not a problem with their existence, just i cannot figure out their purpose to the revolution.

So the only way you can be revolutionary is to reproduce?

That's pretty idiotic.

this was from quite a while ago back when i was a vanilla liberal

gonna take it again tbh

NO

Who is the white-red-A 0pposite to Hitler?
Also the Stirnerfags in the bottom. my memes are out of date it seems.

Aren't you concerned about overpopulation, comrade? Don't you know that we already use 1.5 Earths of sustainable environmental capacity to sustain ourselves each year? And this is considering only 1 billion of 7.4 billion humans get to live western lifestyle…. If every human lived like westerners we would need 10 earths.

Don't you see that breeding really endangers humanity, not to mention it devalues the human life?

socdem here

You're a socdem?

To the gulag with you sellout!

There is no purpose to life you idealist twit. This kind of teleological bullshit is unscientific as fuck.

For starters, valuing people solely according to productivity is bourgeois as fuck. Secondly, reproduction contributes nothing to the revolution. In fact, childless people may make better revolutionaries because the don't need to worry about their children.

"What do you mean you subscribe to something other than orthodox anti-revisionist marxist dogma?"

We need to raise young revolutionaries comrade!

what is this meme that nazis are authoritan centre?

The right axis refers to economic policy. Adolf Hitler was pretty economically centrist, and followed Keynes pretty closely.

Hitler was to the right. He was considerably more left than today's current leader since they moved so damn right during the neoliberal stage, but he was still to the right.

You don't win a revolution by attempting to out breed reactionaries. Besides, most commies aren't born into communist families (I sure as hell wasn't), since when do children follow the politics of their parents anyway?

Pfff, you're a minority. The religious tend to come from the religious. Same with politics.

My compass now and my compass last year

So peoples consciousness isn't created by material conditions? Holy shit you really are an idealist.

I love that they have no idea.

I'm just saying that upbringing can have a huge influence.

...

Sure it has an influence but it's secondary to other factors. Religious reactionaries breed like rats and yet they are still diminishing over time. If the politics of the parents determined the politics of children we'd still be living in the middle ages.

Yeah but I never said that they were determined by their parents views. And no, we wouldn't have reached the Middle Ages. I still have to make children!

Is killing them a regulation?

marx was against malthusian ideas for two reasons

1. At the most general theoretical level Marx and Engels see in Malthus' principle of population another instance of the way in which bourgeois economists reify social relations.

2. At a more specific level, Marx's answer to Malthus' principle of population is the principle of the reserve army of labor or relative surplus population which he elaborates in the course of his analysis of the general law of capital accumulation (Marx, 1970:612-712).

Go on. Humour me.

No one gives a fuck about your beliefs on parents and their children, because those beliefs shouldn't affect anything. If your revolution involves the oppression of gays, then it's not a communist revolution. Remember that class system that we're supposed to be against?

if the purpose of life was not to reproduce then life wouldn't exist

simply put there would be no life, regardless of the values you want to associate this is a fact you cannot ignore

no the revolution needs people with children, they look to the future of their own children and work towards the betterment of society they will live in, they want them to have something

childless twats give two fucks about society and care more for themselves, because that's all the matters they have no offspring to care about

Huh? I'm not the first guy who mentioned not understanding gay's value. I never mentioned gays.
Sheeeesh. The only thing I said was that we should have kids. It's optional. It wasn't supposed to be that serious comrade

Because unchecked private ownership results in a centralization of economic power which inevitably gives rise to a ruling class. Right "libertarianism" is just feudalism featuring property deeds in place of divine right.

It's a figure of speech.

You can have as many children as you like.

You've confused purpose with function. This is literally teleology. Life has no more purpose than any other lump of matter.

And yet, here I am, advocating communist revolution.

So is left libertarianism concerned purely with the social?

I can have as many children as I want?… :) Thank you comrade!!!!! Bless you are!!

And economic

Why can't I seperate them?

Yes comrade, you have my permission to breed.

here you are indeed that's called an anecdote which was common in russia, it doesn't mean anything factual.

you want to argue semantics that is fine because you have no logic argument for their function. you could feed other children who will reproduce in favor of them.

But economic libertarianism is free-marketism no?

Awwwww!!! I'll tell go tell my wife right away!!! Thank the heave-… I mean thank you comrade!! Blessed you are!
Tonight will be as sweet as a dream.

Hell no!

...

That actually just depends. There are market libertarians and non-market libertarians. Both are left. Both are different from the capitalist right "libertarians" It depends on the school of libertarian thought you referring to. Libertarianism was born as an anti-capitalist and anti-state philosophy.

So what is the crux that separates left libertarians from right libertarians?

But I'm a marxist. Shouldn't I be at least a bit closer to the red box?

One is actually libertarian and is skeptical over the private sector and the capitalist hierarchy (bosses) and wishes for people to take control over the means of production themselves whereas the other only opposes the state power but doesn't give a damn about the private capitalist sector. One is socialist whereas the other is capitalist. I

I just call the right "libertarians" propertarians.

Private property. Right-libertarians believe that people should own land and structures where they neither live nor work and have the people who do live or work there pay them for the muh privilege.

the chart's rigged.
Not being a nancy = libertarian for them, it doesn't matter how many gulags you'll build.

You might be a libertarian marxist, like alot of leftypol.

Not all of Marxism implies authoritarianism.

Well, yeah. I just thought that, since I do advocate the creation of a socialist state that it does not make a lot of sense for me to be so closely linked to anarchists. I imagine that anarchists would object as well.

Aww you're secretly one of us… :) Nice to have you on board comrade.

Not at all, libertarian Marxist's and anarchists are closer than Marxist's and libertarian Marxists. Most of the beliefs are interchangeable, except for obviously the state, but that's basically the main point that separates them. Look into autonomists, its like the middle ground between anarchism and libertarian Marxism.

...

When exactly did Marx himself define the necessity of the state? As far as I know he himself mostly was a critic, and never really went into what to replace capitalism further than "associations between workers." Why can't someone want the state to immediately dissolved while still coming from a marxist standpoint?

#notallmarxists

Hahaha good one

well…

the state is a dictatorship of the proletariat, as to not be controlled by the ther classes

when all classes have disappeared then logically there is no need for the state

Except when it is though, like the USSR its following attempts on the same model.

Faggot

I know what you are but what am I?!…
Yeah, thought so bitch.

A redditor.

I've never used reddit. I don't have an account. I also don't have FB, Twitter or any social media shit except an email. So you got it wrong you fool.

Wow, no need to cuss so hard!

Hahahaha I'm so sorry.

Mayyyyne I'm from the south west of my country and yeah south west the best

the entire chart is captialist scum

Join the alternative:
Communism!

Most of these questions can be answered with "it depends"

what a liberal

Make way Commie Scum

Ewwwwww
GAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!

ayy fellow #BourgeoisiePatriot :^)

...

As I said: GAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

whats the matter kiddo, feeling stumped? Nothin personnell kid

This is trash tbh fam

...

tbch famalam, i think ur feeling a little burnt kiddo :O

…yeah, coming from the guy bending down to a politician he will never really know. Go get fucked in the ass you piece by your God Trump you little shit. In case your religious: this is just idolatry. And no, I don't support Bernie. Fuck off

+420 Stumped by English Language

Ha! Capitalizing the word "language" and forgetting to add in a period at the end of the sentence really proves your lack of punctuation skills.

Lad you're a Hillary supporter? Green party?
Changing flag cause this is getting confusing. You should make more flags and put on IDs maybe

Cuck Status:
-Bernt
-Sad!
-Angry
-Low Energy

Oh, yeah. I'm a very very angry person. You better run.

No, of course not.

You need some stress relief, something to believe in.

I do believe in something. I'm a Christian

I was thinking something a bit more tangible

Well, I have a family and my community.

They can't have much less value than they currently do.

samefag? what the hell is this thread?

...

Who knows?

I do :^)

Who?

Me

I knew you were responsible for this mess of a thread all along! It wasn't me at all!

Nah man c'mon I posted a screenshot I mean I don't even have Paint installed I promiced trust me

all me btw

Hahah nice tricks you got there! It was actually all me!!!!!!

it was actually me friendo :^)

I suspected it all along…

...

Yes, nobody answer this. Everybody concentrating on agreeing is better.

Agreed!!

I haven't done one of these in a while. looks like I moved a fair bit further left. Additionally, how well do you think they placed sanders and the other US noms on their chart?

Rick is the smart one and morty is a naive retard so I'm a little confused as to who's side the original creator is on

typically, rick is intelligent but lacks empathy, and morty has empathy but lacks intelligence. when either of them do something on their own they fail, but when they voltron it up their actions save the day (and leave a trail of destruction, terror and chaos in their wake, typically)
the more you try to pick apart Holla Forums the less sense it's gonna make

Get on my level

...

it's been a while

Based libsoc square

date me

the Pleistocene