Traps aren't gay

The formula as follows proves why futa can be more straight than you think.

There are 3 prominent sexual attributes that determine something's spot on the gay spectrum. Body, breasts, genitalia.
A man usually has all 3 attributes in their respective male versions, and vice versa for women.
We can assume that these attributes are worth ⅓ of a man's/woman's/futa's/trap's gay index.

A man being 1 (⅓ + ⅓ + ⅓), and a woman being -1 (-⅓ + -⅓ + -⅓).
Futa, having female breasts, female body type, female genitalia, and male genitalia, being -⅓ + -⅓ + -⅓ + ⅓ = -⅔, only ⅓ away from a full female.
A ladyboy, having female body type, female breasts, and male genitalia, being -⅓ + -⅓ + ⅓ = -⅓
A trap (there's a difference), having female body type, male breasts, and make genitalia, being -⅓ + ⅓ + ⅓ = ⅓

We have to determine a threshold to determine whether or not something is gay.
It is clear that a man on man (2) is a peak of gay, the highest or lowest rating one can reach when it comes to basic 2 person intercourse.
It is clear that a woman on woman (-2) is another peak of gay, despite people calling it lesbian.
A man on woman (0) is the absolute for straight. So, one can infer that the closer to 0, the more straight, or less gay. And, the higher an absolute value, the more gay/lesbian, right?
Now, here's the most important part of this theory, as having to do with the observer of the porn, rather than the sexual matter. What would be less gay? A man watching two guys fucking (2), or a man watching two women fucking (-2)? Of course, it would be the lesbo porn, since it has nothing relating to the sex of the observer, while the other gay porn does. The same applies to women. A woman watching two men fucking (2) is less lesbian (gay) than a woman watching two women fucking (-2).

So, since there are no girls on the internet, we know the lower a number, the less gay it is, according to these criteria. At last, we go back to futa and trap porn.
A futa fucking a woman would have a gay index of -1⅔
A futa fucking another futa would have a gay index of -1⅓
A ladyboy fucking a woman would have a gay index of -1⅓
A futa fucking a ladyboy would have a gay index of -1
A ladyboy fucking a ladyboy would have a gay index of -⅔
A futa fucking a trap would have a gay index of -⅓
A trap fucking a trap would have a gay index of 0, the same as that of a man and woman fornicating.
Any other variation than these, concerning futa, traps, and ladyboys, would be gay, since anything of greater value than 0 is gay.

What the fuck is this literal faggotry, attempting to rationalize your homosexuality by claiming nothing is homosexual about it?

You're gay. Get over it.

...

...

Resorting to namecalling? It seems I win this debate, and it's official.
Traps aren't gay, deal with it.

...

traps have female 2ndary sexual characteristics. U discern some1s sex based on that, cuz u dont getto see the genitals.
And when its sex, theres no ugly man around and she can be cute to a dick just with her around. Its gay if its male on trap, but totally not gay, when its trap on female

I never said I like traps. They're just not gay.

tl;dr that shit, blogger.

Traps are gay as hell. Futa fuckin a chick is less gay than straight porn

OP is a faggot ergo traps and futa are gay.
QED

Traps having sex with women is less gay than a man having sex with a woman.

...

another trap thread? leaving. came here to sage

Thank you OP, haven't laughed like this in years

Traps are men you fag. Futa is a women with both sex parts. Futa is less gay than straight porn but traps… Traps are fags that just dress like a girl.

...

Still less gay than men.

dubs
But what if your a girl would it make them gay for looking at traps. Then its gay, but if its futa then its even less gay

But its still gay. Futa fucking a girl isnt gay at all

Anybody who says traps aren't gay are gay themselves. A trap is a man who dresses up as a girl to trap a guy into having sex with him, hence the word "trap."

Heild

...

This is just pathetic

That's where you're wrong, kiddo.
Genitals are the main determinant, closer to two thirds of the index. You can have a tomboy or masculine-looking woman, but as a guy you can still have proper sex with her. A woman can have proper sex with a man even if he is effeminate.

Going away from the formula stupidity, it's how the single elements mix altogether that matters. Ice cream with chocolate sauce is delicious. A beef patty with BBQ sauce and mustard is great. You swap the toppings around and you ruin both meals.

The dick in the mixture ruins the feminine side of the trap. That is why it's gay.

Pardon me Professor but I think you're off in the value of the breast coefficient. Man-tits are a very real thing, and I think we can all agree that man-tits do not make an individual more woman-like. Your math is skewed and I won't entertain you any further unless the man-titties conundrum is answered.

...

Why are you retards replying to a bait thread?