its naturally occurring in other species which have none of our own cultural and moral norms, therefore we can assume that it is natural.
You can argue that "its wrong" based on some cultural scale of morality, but you cant argue against its natural occurrence. Thats something thats not open to your own personal interpretion.
The word natural means the same thing for everyone. You cant move that piece.
...
culture and morals are natural
user, homosexuality in animals, is a deviation from what is normal. It is not the natural course of things. Like a duck who's parents have left it, so a dog comes along and (if the dog doesn't eat it) it thinks that's it's mommy. It will even try to bark.
So all ducks should have dog mommy's? You are taking an exception and trying to make it a rule
I just told you: YOU CANT REDEFINE THE MEANING OF THE WORLD NATURAL TO FIT IT WHAT THE MORAL SCALE YOU WANT IT TO FIT.
you can talk about the practicality or usefulness of such moral scale, but you cannot argue about what is naturally ocurring in nature without the intervention of human made norms.
You cant be that fucking thick. FUUUUUUUUUCK.
I am saying some exceptions are natural, and naturally occurring within nature you dumb fuck.
The problem with using natural and normal interchangeably is that natural also refers to things that exist in nature and gay animals exist in nature therefore they're natural by definition.
natural natural natural what does even natural mean anymore natural natural.
What part of deviation are you having difficulty with, user? There are animals that are borned deformed. That deformity naturally occurred. Does that mean the deformity is the right way? of course not.
that doesn't mean deformity is unnatural either, what is it with you and thinking natural somehow refers to the morality of something?
Teenagers are all whores.