Social Darwinism

What do you think of it?

Pretty obvious.

most efficient method of committing human genocide.

If you do not follow social Darwinism, you prolong human suffering. All we would have to do is provide birth control and contraception to the undesirable and inferior races of the world and thus eliminating a large portion of human suffering. By eliminating these impoverished and retarded races of the world, we would earn a moral Nobel prize.

Depends if you're talking about it as a theory to explain humanity, or a system which must be implemented, like communism or faggotry.

Don't you just love word filters? They really add to the conversation. Fаsсism*

How is this any different than what we have now?

Unless you're using the wrong words.
In that case it wouldn't be natural selection if you pick and choose who to murder.

Given the current circumstances surrounding human civilization, the weak are allowed to flourish, so you take nature into your own hands and eliminate the weak based on the current environment. Due to the current state of civilization (welfare state, tolerance of the weak etc..) this measure is necessary.

If we are talking about eugenics, the original idea based on the Nazis wasn't about murdering people. It was about sterilizing the weak. The whole "the Nazis wanted to kill of the weak" thing is kike propaganda.

"People who claim to hate furries with such passion, are themselves projecting their own subconscious desire to expose and express their own true inner furry nature" - Dr. Alyson Havelock (PsyD, LPCC), 'American Psychology Today' (APA, New York NY), Vol. 47, August 23, 2012, p.34.

Cooperation is the law of society. Brute force is for the jungle.


That's not even real social darwinism because you assume people will have to play by the rules. Real social darwinism wouldn't have any real rules to follow. And for that matter a state will have to exist to enforce private property rights so actual lel-faire would devolve into a failed state or exist with a police force, "just don't call it a state!"
Person to misuse the phrase 'natural selection' post #856456395746348
How? Just because you might kill off others doesn't mean your descendants will be any better. You don't necessarily have to be stronger or smarter to kill. There's always just blind luck, strength-in-numbers, or catching an enemy off-guard. To kill because the society will be better weakens to total power.

Imagine this: 2 societies, one has 50 super-men and 100 average men; the other has only the 50 super-men. In all total power by virtue of collective power, which one is stronger? The obvious answer is the former. Case in point, don't buy into the edgelord meme. We made it this far without it, let's not slide back into oblivion. The real problem is that society is stratified and fucked over by economic conditions, so let's just fix that.

Wrong. If you reproduce & don't kill yourself, you prolong human suffering.
Doesn't exist. But I eagerly await your response about how le jewz xD are all "inferior" but at the same time control the world and not realizing that strength itself isn't the measure of survival but rather intelligence and social skills.

We have a social safety net that was fought for by generations of socialist union members. Before, if you were unable to work because you were too old or diseased or crippled, you would die unless you had working family members to take care of you. Now, we have welfare.

Source?

...

...

...

he think we evolved from apes

...

...

...

he probably thinks the earth is round too, stupid atheists

...

Always trust the survival of your race on natural selection. A woman's innate sexual desires and attractions know best, so when they choose a sex partner, they are choosing only the strongest, best genetics to win.

Respect that choice!

...

...

I–i-it's the Jews doing this, I just know it! It's got nothing to do with how naturally confident, muscular, well-endowed, charismatic, alpha, animalistic, or attractive black men are to white girls! Seriously guys!

...

...

It's foolish and morally repugnant

In modern world (third world countries not included) retards can make as many babies as they want and the government will take care of them just enough so that they could make a bunch of more retard babies. But in the meantime, responsible people are waiting for the perfect conditions, that leads to them having less babies or no babies at all.
It would seam that, in current conditions, irresponsible, uneducated, low IQ individuals are more fit to flourish, it would seam that dumbest dirt holds the power on this planet, but in reality they are used as a tool by the powerful to stay in power through democratic vote.
Once the benefits are cut off, responsible people with guns hold the upper hand and are back in power, and the population of artificially created voting masses decreases.

...

different user here, but i'll bite.
how do you plan on enforcing property rights without a state?

that was hard

it's the end of the year, you're going to go on holidays, you arent there to shoot them in the face; if someone walks into your house, it's theirs now, this could even occur if you go on a walk in the park

that's why I hire a security company to watch my house while I'm away

sounds like a trek, i'm guessing i'd also need to continually pay insurance for ambulance services, firefighters, etc. if i wanted them to provide for me.
if only there was some sort of all in one payment i could make to get them all

probably not. in a completely free market, healthcare would be affordable enough to not require insurance.

I'm sure there would be all-in-one services. it's just that they'd be voluntary instead of forced.

i don't claim to know about the intricacies of economics so i can't respond to the price of healthcare, but i don't see what's wrong with current methods of taxation; you grow up in a society and, at least where i live, get free healthcare, welfare if you are elegible, have law and order maintained by police, emergency services avaliable to provide help if needed, and have the borders protected by the military, all maintained by taxation, and when you are able to make money yourself, you pay back into the society to maintain it. it's how the social contract works

the problem is that contracts are only valid if all parties entered into them voluntarily

You voluntarily entered into it by not leaving when you turned 18.

I would accept this if, on my 18th birthday, a representative of the state had come to my house, gone through everything in the contract and then asked if I consent

when you live in the borders of an area of land owned by the government though, ethically, it makes sense you should comply by their laws and regulations

I want to augment myself with technology to make myself better
natural evolution is inefficient


they choose by how much resources males have, dickhead

Pretty good, me and my friend attend this school where there is too little of it.

t. me

And what happens if someone else hires a private security company to go kill you? Since there's no centralized laws that can be upheld by a monopoly of force then technically everything is legal, including murder.

THIS is one major problem with the concept of Social Darwinism.

The other is you'll never get the political support to implement it anyway unless you want to be really Machiavellian about it:

Manipulate all the muscle-headed, degenerate stupid brutes and make useful idiots out of them. Flatter their egos by telling them they are Ubermench or something. Use them to overthrow the system and then purge them from your ranks as soon as you no longer need them.

To whom are you replying?

Not true at all. Women put men into three groups. While they don't name the groups, for our purposes, we will.

Omegas
-completely irredeemable man-children
-no prospect for sex
-often have a deformity or severe autism
-approximately 20% of males, accounts for 0% of the sex happening in the world
-can be any race

Alphas
-highly "sexworthy"
-lots of confidence
-lots of physical endowment, good-looking, tall, muscular, big penis, big lips, abs, big shoulders, darker skin is more masculine, deeper voice
-lower education/intelligence
-lower financial profile/more dangerous "thug"-type
-approximately 10% of the male population, but accounts for 95% of the sex happening in the world
-overwhelmingly black

Betas
-unconfident, "nice guy"
-average looks, small penis
-entire purpose in life is to work and then contribute financially to a woman's well-being
-gets sex only as a means of securing him
-will be cheated on, guaranteed
-70% of the male population, accounts for 5% of the sex in the world
Yes, you might be a beta and having sex with your girlfriend or wife everyday, but you're still getting about half the sex she's getting
-overwhelmingly white or asian

you clearly don't know any 3DPD then
I mean even niggers understands this
you're more stupid most niggers

All wrong.

They can only love the things you buy them.

You've not browsed Holla Forums if you think that's what they believe. Nice strawman, though. Explain why Niggers have on average an IQ below 100.

Yes, if you're a white beta "husband-material" male.

If you're alpha, women will spend their white guy's money on you.

THIS

It's called the NAP. Basically if Jamal steals from you, that means you and I can go cut his arms off and then sell his land to Mcdonalds.

kek

Good luck, user. You are going to have a hard life.

white nationalism is sooo pathetic… I feel pity for those guys

Rather than seeing "white" women (white isn't a race, only human is) as something that is scarce or some retarded shit like that, why not make more white women?

If white women are such valuable resource, simply get more. Easy as that.

White women are least likely to date outside their race. Pic related.

You can't be this stupid and expect me to believe this isn't bait.

what do you mean user? We are part of the human race, but your inability to think scientifically or attractively makes me think you belong to the retarded penguin race

You might as well ask people what they think about the telegraph or steam engines. It doesn't matter what anyone thinks of something that is no longer used for anything which impacts society or the species.

*abstractly

Sort of like the government is doing to taxpayers now.

You are correct about dating, which is when a girl tells a guy she will be faithful to him in exchange for his money. This is very similar to the fact that many prostitutes refuse black clients. White beta guys love to "date" because they think they are locking the girl down, and she will be exclusively his. But there's a big difference between dating and who is actually having sex.

white people conquered the world multiple times and invented everything

if you want that group of people to disappear from the face of the earth, you go right ahead and enjoy the shithole you're left with

Wauw, was that so hard.

You do realize women care about Money above all because it shows how capable you are at producing for her offspring? I like that photoshopped image you posted though, nice touch making them black. Here's the original.

all of those things revolve getting money
you can make money with that
that is just straight money
can be used to earn what else?
money.

But that's not true. Women are not obsessed with making babies for nice guys. What's more, women get more money by being single mothers, so that's why there's more "co-habitating unmarried couples with kids" now.

Women do not choose sex partners based on having babies. Women enjoy promiscuous sex much more than men do. Women choose sex partners based on their virility, their cocky attitudes, their swagger, their height, muscles, penis size, sexual skills. Girls are much more drawn to a low-life thug than a successful doctor.

Making money is not going to make you attractive to women. Being a nice guy is going to make unattractive to women. Professing your love is going to make you unattractive. Having manners is going to make you unattractive. White boys are getting BTFO while black guys are just being "big-dicked thugs with swag" and it's working. Social media has revealed this to be the case (Twitter, Tinder, Facebook, etc). Only "dating" sites (which are full of unattractive single women in their 30s) still favor white guys. Gee, I wonder why the crazy catladys and worn-out roasties who got all the BBC in their 20s suddenly want to be nice Christian girls on Match.com?

Sure. But those are not the things that they actually love. They might recognise that those traits will help you be able to buy her things, but the thing she actually loves are the actual things you actually buy her.

guys I just thought of something we are talking to a poor little white guy
a person that has literally their life and self-value by how to make 3DPD happy.

I don't think he can see the light.


I agree with you that it isn't really love, but 3DPD are smart enough to see that those attributes will lead to getting more money for them
that was all I am saying

built their life around*

While you're out trying to make money, the women you're trying to impress are getting blacked by a drug dealer who still lives with his mom.

I know you're show, but fuck.
I don't care about 3DPD, the faster their role to the survival of the species is taken by technology the better

Both wrong and right. Women do not care about whose child they're having, they only care if that child will be fit to thrive in society. A man that's thrived in society is her best chance at this. There are other factors of course, for some reason a small group of people will always toss away their genes. Mainly due to hormones are the pressure of society i.e Monks, Bronies, fags. Single mothers really do not make a lot, and no self respecting man will go near them except for casual sex. They've already screwed up. It's only because of the safety net of welfare that they can screw up like this.


Nope, you can be a straight 10/10 and have your girl stolen by a mongrel arab
who's willing to give her 10k.

Proofs?

I'm white and I seem to get a lot of attention from non-white girls just because of this. Not, that I'm bad looking. I'll give you that a dominant attitude is guaranteed to get you more than an effeminate one.

I should have proof read that before posting.

you made up for it with trips

if you want to dismember people for stealing, go to the middle east, see how it works out
see this is the problem with ancap, even if the theory had any legitimacy, even if against all odds you got an ancap society off the ground and into working order, you'd have psychos like this user who would do barbaric things to the slightest infringement; not a society i want to live in

Not even an Ancap, btw. However, explain why theft is acceptable but maiming someone isn't.

i never said theft is acceptable; the punishment should be proportional with the crime, and there should be rehabilitation. They maim people for theft in shitty islamic countries. Go there if that's what you want, but don't fuck up western countries with your shitty sand nigger tier criminal justice system

Single mothers are the biggest source of generational, chronic poverty in the West. Despite all the "benefits". Been known for 2 decades now.

WOMAN'S LOGIC

BURN THEM ALL ALIVE

There's the mistake. You think the justice system should exist for rehabilitation.

Already exist, it's called marriage & poor little white guy'd

Thought 8/pol/ of all places would know that

im sorry, i'd just rather not send criminals back out onto the streets with nothing more than further resentment to show for it