Dear, anarchists. Practice what you preach and stop and practice anarchist lifestylism...

Dear, anarchists. Practice what you preach and stop and practice anarchist lifestylism. Don't fall for stupid idpol and keep in shape to protect fellow proles. Don't be these hypersensitive children and if you're a social anarchist, be kind to the individualists and accept them as comrades. Also, explain to the fucking progressives why a state can't be trusted and what it's there for.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualist_anarchism
infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionG
anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secA3.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Bookchin is that you?

Terrorism it is then.

Haha ehhh, I hesitate to condone terrorism. Violence towards the biological well being of other humans alienates outsiders and gives fuel to the pigs to demonize us. Also, it could be seen as hypocritical as an anarchist who imposes themselves on others is manifesting the authority that we're supposed to be against.We need to aim towards both evolution and revolution.
Oh and I forgot to mention, GET ARMED NOW! NO ANARCHIST CAN BE PRO GUN CONTROL. When the insurrection arrives, it will be the statist scum that will take the trip to the gulags.

Where are these "lifestyle anarchists" you speak of? I've yet to come across any anarchist theory or literature that hasn't involved grouping together to advance the anti-statist or communist cause. If it's the individualist, consumerist Western mindset of the past few decades that you're referring to, then I'd hardly call that anarchist in nature.

Individualists as in individualist anarchists. I.e.: mutualists and other left-wing market socialists. The stress is in taking direct action in life and participation in propaganda and the formation of groups.

Individualists are the egoists, illegalists, insurrectionists, not the mutualists or market anarchists.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualist_anarchism
infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionG
anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secA3.html

That isn't correct.

kek

Well yeah, those are some.

Anarcho-individualism has 2 lines of thought, one is moral individualism (Mutualism and Anarcho-Capitalism) and Ego'ist individualism ( illegalists,insurrectionists and post left anarchism)

This split happend when Benjamin Tucker the main thinker for Anarcho-individualism moved towards Ego'ism.

Eh, don't even count the anti-state capitalists as anarchists.

Sure.

Even if they are a bastard child they are still related in history of Individualist Anarchism. Calling it Neo-fuedalism would be more accurate tho.

How are they related?

Yeah, that's correct.

They're related by history. That son of a bitch Rothbard liked the anti-state thing going on with anarchism but deceptively downplayed the anti-capitalist components of it while he tried to make anarchism look like something that was merely about being anti-state. Rothbard discarded the labor theory of economics that the individualist market anarchists all held and swapped it for the austrian school shit. He just replaced the power of the state with the feudal power of the private sector.

So the same way Bolsheviks and Nazis?

Well those stupid Nazis incorporated leftist terms like "socialism", symbology and language in order to lure/trap leftists into the party. I think Bolsheviks ended up being traitors and made the revolution look like a coup d'etat

Its actually a verry weak relation as the only connection with Anarchism being that the inventor of Anacho-capitalism (Rothbath) is inspired by aspects (the moral concept of sovereignty of the individual against the state) of Tucker his writing and not by the idealogy in the whole. Rothbath has more in common with liberalism than anarchism.


In a way, Rothbath is inspired by anarchism in the same way that mussolini is inspired by socialism and syndaclism.

What is the difference between a revolution and a coup d'État?

Revolution is a whole change of political and economic conditions, Coup is a takeover of an existing goverment structure by force. A state could be used to do a revolution but if it will be succefull is verry questionable as the population is alienated from state authority. (And the people can only get authority if you get rid of the state wich is the centralisation of force/authority and essential an alien power)

They're similar but to be clear, what happened during the Spanish Civil War with that fucker Franco was a coup d'etat. A betrayal from a group within the a part of the state. In this case from the military.

Yeah I agree. Rothbard is a liberal figure and not an anarchist one by any means. I always tell people this but if the anarchist movement had been strong in the US, and if those stupid statist socialists had not undermined anarchists, Rothbard would have never been able to come up with his "libertarianism" and "anarcho" capitalism shit.

Anyway OP what do you want us to do?
Propagate for anachism and all that?
Are you also fimiliar with current anarchist theory and its development?
Have you read any Bookchin or McQuinn lately?

Fuck yeah bro.! or sis…
Trust me, it works. My parents are Catholic conservatives and I convinced them. Now when I ask my father what we should aim for, he tells me that we need to establish an anarchic system. hahaha. We are in serious need of more thinkers, however and learn to speak with supporters of social democrats rather rather than tending to solely hit against our polar opposites.

I do notich that around me people have a huge general distrust in the state for all the regulations (vehicle mods and property laws) they oppose and that we are not allowed to defend ourselfs against bulgary and all that. People also kidna mistrust the huge corporations (Cause of the work conditions) and are more comfortable around small businesses, most folk here wants to start an own business and remain small and do the work themselfs.
I think if Mutualism with a little bit of leo tolstoy inspired protestantism would be propagated here then it woul be wildly popular. Individual autonomy is also popular thing here.

Also are you new to this board or website, you got a bit of unique and kidna normie style of typing youknow.

Yeah there was after all a tradition of christian anarchism around which should prove very useful when speaking with conservatives. They should be convinced that the capitalist and the politician do not have the same interests as us proles and that obedience to these institutions is a form of idolatry. The general anti-religiousness in the Left (which is understandable) is probably a big turn off for them. Market anarchism would also do very well with them as they have the effects of the Red Scare and pro-market rhetoric so embedded in their heads. The americans outsource their jobs here and the shit people have to deal with is incredible. I encourage people to join the IWW

and yeah I knew about this board but not for long.

What part of taking capital out of the hands of the very worst capitalists does not weaken their position?

Trying to buy only from shitty guys instead of extremely shitty guys IS an attack on the extremely shitty guys. Instead of buying from the guys who run the system you try to buy from the Petit bourgeois, which isn't at all communistic, but is an economic weapon to loosen the chubby porky grip, the more people who take part, the greater the effect.

epin

epin
epin

epin
epin
epin

epin
epin
epin
epin
epin

Yeah but it's not enough. We need stronger actions.

Do you guys also think that the new left is dieng in rapid rate? Also anyone familiar on what the anarchists are doing in Greece? It was pretty popular there but nothing is happening.

Also Anarchism general.

What specifically do you mean by the new left?

Post 1956 Leftism, post modernism, Idpol, Foucault influenced theory and all that.

yeah that's what I thought. It's getting ganged up on pretty bad everywhere and it lead to many dumb tendencies. There are many "leftists" who just suck. Classical leftism needs to be revived.

Or take the good parts of all the theory's (Like the stuff from the Situationalist International) and create new theory that fits the 21'st century better. The Communists have Zizek to create new theory and we have now the post left and Libertarian municipalism (Not a fan tbh fam, but its being tested in Rojava)

The future is a bit grim tho with Populism going on the rise and popularity of Capitalism with asian values.

Tankies like to call the SI new left tho

It should be part of a network of strategies sure. Just because it isn't enough by itself doesn't mean it doesn't have any value at all

bamp

Ayy this.

I wouldn't mind seeing some more experiments tbh. I guess Rojava has its thing but there's been no real talk about the transition from theory into praxis since the 60s/70s, but you also need a strong movement for that to happen. imo largely passive resistance (as in smashing the state tomorrow has its issues) seems like the only thing until the world goes full electric dream or we get something like market socialism.

trotsky did nothing wrong tbh fam