Are we more extreme than literally Hitler?

It doesn't require the importation of other cultures into it either.

That's a lie, and yes they went to work camps.

chechar.wordpress.com/2013/05/01/ns-on-homosexuality/

All I know is that the SA was flooded with fags and Ernst Rohm was a raging homosexual.

You seem pretty sure of that

Well, yes. Point where National Socialists imported pajeets, niggers and muslims.

Well, it's just the logical outcome of WW2. We see what happened with Hitler being too lenient. The jews have forced this response on us.

The first post is always a shill

That's because they didn't have any negative influence on Germany, the jews did.

Nah, Ernst, the leader of the SA was a faggot.

bump

Hitler imported indian culture with his fascination of hindu myth.

He allied with muslims and had niggers fighting in his army, not actually segregated like the other Allies troops.

So let's just ignore all these brown people and fight only the jews instead.

I agree with you on the Aryanism thing being silly, but I don't see how treating your allies well is bad.

Daily reminder.

Well, they are not deserving allies.

The italians were bad and the japs fucked up with Pearl Harbor.

The muslims also fought horribly but that's expected.

For some reasons, the niggers weren't purged.

Ancient India was Aryan. There's nothing wrong with that.

Secondly, NS had a healthy racialism and appreciation of nature's diversity. However, since things have been so fucked up since that time, just pure hatred of other races is like a survival mechanism at this point, since everybody is being unnaturally forced to live together and such a population boom.

Why shouldn't they have ignored them exactly? Like I said: they didn't have any negative influence on the west (because they didn't live in the west), only jews did.

Then NS is a cucked form of white supermacist.

Look at this picture:

You have black nazis but the neo-nazis are all white.

Do you know that or is that what you read from jewish history revisionist sources?

Ah, I see. Your ideology has a strict clause to purge all niggers even if they are in nigger countries.

Because they have been traditional enemies of the other white men?

The fact Germany is lucky that it only wars among the european nations does not make the niggers, pajeets and muslims not a threat.

that's because it's thinly veiled pro civic nationalist D&C bullshit

Let's entertain that thought, you mean you wouldn't purge jews if they are in a jew country?

How exactly?
How are they a threat? Just don't take them into your country and they are no issue, are you retarded or are you just baiting?

Educate yourself

8ch.net/pol/res/6241778.html

8ch.net/pol/res/6694702.html

Are we more extreme in terms of ethno-nationalism than the Germans were? Absolutely.

Contrary to the narrative from the jewish press, the Germans weren't white supremacists at all. It's not hypocritical that they allied with Japan or allow muslims into the Waffen-SS because they never sought to exterminate all the races of the world.

Hitler merely believed in the value of racially homogeneous societies and wanted to re-establish Germany as a united country of only Germans. He had no issue with Italians or Japanese, he just wanted them to stay in their own countries. Jews were the predominant threat to a racially unified Germany because #1 they weren't Germans and #2 and pushed for mass immigration and the dissolution of German identity so that they could better blend in as a minority population.

If they are not influencing europe, no…

You must be some alphabetic agent.

Various arab invasion and nigger slave trades? The chimpout in Haiti?
Yeah, because the arabs and niggers are just harmless if you leave them alone, as proven by history.

Good question actually. Jews have long been a persisting non-integrating, infiltrating out-group, a thorn in the side of other nations. But if they had always stayed in their own land, I wouldn't see a reason to genocide them, no.

Let's just say that we're not planning on building unnecessary and costly concentration camps.

Sardine-packing will be a huge industry for a while.

Always the first post.

Every goddamned time. Maybe you should change strategies?

Uh, yes? What harm did they do to our people when they were stuck in Africa? Who cares if they kill eachother?

Just like how the arabs didn't influence Europe.

The arabs invade, the jews subvert.

Germany was never invaded by arabs
You're giving me a really strong FBI vibe or you're just an edgy 12 year old that doesn't understand the Holla Forums ideology.

i'm ok with fags been here since /n/ bietch

rohm was gay u faggot

just because gay marriage/adoption/pride parades etc are fucking abhorrent doesnt mean i give a shit what people do in their own homes

as long as you dont bother child-rearing productive people or their children I dont give a shit what you do.

after all,

"Goebbels once poked fun at the antediluvian moral concepts of the reactionaries and the tractarian spirit of their priggish bedfellows. Hitler seized the cue and whipped himself into one of his furious tirades: ‘I abominate prudishness and moral prying…What has it to do with our struggle? These are outworn notions of reactionary old women like Hugenberg, who can only visualize national rejuvenation in terms of virtuous customs and austerity. ‘League of Virtue’ and ‘Christian-German Table-Companions’, ‘replacing the material losses of the nation with spiritual gains’– and all the rest of that tawdry patriotic mumbo-jumbo. Our uprising has nothing to do with bourgeois virtues. We are an uprising born of our nation’s strength–the strength of its loins as well, if you like. I won’t be a spoilsport to any of my men. If I demand the utmost of them, I must also permit them to let off steam as they please, not as it suits a lot of elderly church-hens. My lads are no angels."

pp 5-6
Sex and Society in Nazi Germany
Hans Peter Bleuel

If you behave like a prudish old lady, the men and wmen of a country will never respect you. you will never wield any power, and it is in Holla Forums and the New Right's interest to discard your hand-wringing as the irrelevant bitterness it is.

get your dick wet loser

It's hardly cucked. There's nothing wrong with appreciating nature's diversity. It's only stupid if it means you are destroying yourself in the process (what's currently going on).

They develop ship and raid and kill white people. If you believe the Egypt was white meme, then you would know the niggers and arabs destroyed Egypt.
If only. Remember Haiti?

Bingo. Also the only reason Hitler was interested in eastern mythology was because of synchronicity shared with occidental mythology that all points towards the tetragrammaton.

He was definitely looking for it. He believed that technology existed but that belief shouldn't be construed as 'appropriation of indian culture'. That's fucking ignorant.

I've never read anything that disputes that. In fact I just read a speech by Himmler, linked in this thread above, that mentions Rohm being gay.

If jews aren't in europe and don't own european banks or industries, they can't subvert…
And arab invasions have always easily been dealt with.

No one in their right mind would genocide arabs, niggers and jews in their own countries, just leave FBI.

Europe was invaded by arabs.

I guess Germany never cared for that fact?

pajeet religion is where the swastika and "aryan race" term comes from, hinduism in General is breddy redpilled

Why would they give a fuck? Hitler was a GERMAN nationalist you fucking faggot. Do you even understand what nationalism means?
I'm done talking to you, you're clearly retarded.

They can control from afar, because jews are both a racial and religious group.
The crusades failed.
Yeah, I will leave.

Celebrate your diversity, m8.

Walking aids regularly shitposting the place doesn't mean you belong here, all degenerates go into the oven.

SHILLFIRE MISSILE

Next time please do not tell me Hitler fought for as the last hope of Europe again.
Nationalism means protecting your nation i.e. your people.

The germanic people had been raped, killed and enslaved by muslims, niggers and pajeets.

If Hitler's nationalism was the real deal, he wouldn't ignore those facts.

Disagree. They were using niggers and street shitters as axillary forces to fight the French and British as they shared a common enemy.

They weren't going to genocide them and weren't going to let them into Germany because they knew it would ruin the character of the nation. Hardly cucked.

Jews and leftist shit in general is more extreme now too, its only natural

SHILLFIRE MISSILE

Guess the crusades bever happened, the holy roman empire just stood there huh?

SHILLFIRE MISSILE

Guess the crusades never happened, the holy roman empire just stood there huh?

Actually, they were black germans.

Hitler did not revoke their citizenship, did not purge them and had them fight in his army with white troops.

This is cucked compared to the fact even the US segregated their black division.

Uhm, the HRE fought against muslims.

Hitler allied with muslims.

hold the phone
Are we being DDOS'd right now?

Agent S. Hill, extremely poor work. Hand in your gun and badge, immediately.

fair enough. they were a tiny insignificant minority at the time though and unlike the jews they didn't hold any power to subvert.

Hitler and the German people explicitly said they fought against the Soviets to save Europe from jewish bolshevism.

As stated herein.

Can't run away from the truth.

And they did. Well half, at least.

Without Germany the Soviets would've rolled over whole Europe, reaching Atlantic.

That's probably true somewhat, but the jews and leftists have been promoting the idea that Nazis are THE most extreme and violent and hateful political ideology that could ever exist on planet Earth. They weren't extreme at all and were actually pretty mild compared to modern states, eg., Zionist Israel.

I'd never respect a used goods woman. For men the issue is more nuanced but who would ever respect a sexual degenerate fetishist? Even those who follow a faggot are not worthy of respect, let alone the faggots themselves.

So was he a german nationalist or an european protector again?

If he was the latter, he shouldn't ally with fucking arabs, niggers and especially turks.

wat

There is no such thing. Do you mean descendants of the french negro soldiers from WW1? They forcefully settled maybe some two hundred thousand in the rhineland after WW1.

you sir are simply dumb, you probably do not know history, the west ended that with a coalition fleet of the dutch/english/french and destroyed the barbary pirates in the 16th/17th century to stop this white slavery

in Germany's time they did not have this issue at all,
is the Nazi's time they did not have a)arabs living in their countries b)africans living in their countries

also at that time the WEST still had the rest of the world as their colonies

*Forcefully against the will of germans, obviously.

There were niggers in Germany before WW1.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Germans#Nazi_Germany

So I guess the arabs should be forgiven for their centuries old crimes and we should be cozy with them?

Ha.

Nope. Oldest swastika is 12k years old and found in Ukraine. It is carved on a piece of mammoth bone. It's a symbol found almost all over the northern hemisphere and most likely comes from the Big Dipper's orientation compared to the North Star, which indicates time of year.

Why wouldn't you ally with non-whites to defeat common enemies? That makes no sense at all.

Alliances don't mean you have to except millions of them into your country who ethnically replace you or anything.

Because these non-whites are already the enemies.

I guess you should ally with ISIS to beat Israel?

He was both.

None of these groups posed any threat to Europe whatsoever.

He supported arabs in Arabia in order to undermine the Brits in Middle-east.
Niggers were of no consequence to the German war effort, and thus didn't need to be addressed in any form like the Americans had to do with their segregated unit structure.
Turks? Go read a history book you homunculus.

the swastika doesn't originate with the indian people but with the indo-european tribes.

norse-mythology.org/symbols/swastika-ancient-origins-modern-misuse/

Citation needed

Wanking on internet forums is now extreme. Bunch of retards.

I miss you Hitler.

I know there is a pic of an anime girl drawing a swatiska but it doesn't cover the depth of my feelings.

I miss you Hitler.

Citation needed

I'm not sure how you can leap to faggotry from that quote. It just sounds like Holla Forums complaining about fanatically religious Cruzcucks.

We all, lad.

We all.

If so, he shouldn't ally with traditional enemies of Europe.
Ignoring the various arab invasions, the arab slave trade, various nigger chimpout in colony (Haiti).
The Middle east was supposed to be white before the arab invasion, remember Iran?
They existed and were freely admitted into the wehrmatch, if Hitler hated them so much, why did he allow them in the first place?

dailykos.com/story/2011/05/26/979480/-The-Republic-of-Turkey-Nazi-Germany

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Germans

I know. Just feeling depressed and tearful. We need someone like him so badly. I miss him so much.

I'm crying like a little bitch missing him.

you're not very good at constructing arguments, are you

Hitler was "more sun than lightning," that means the Fuhrer incarnated as Adolf Hitler was more of a spiritual father/medicine man that laid down the preparatory work; more of a prophet than a warlord, one that churned up and unmasked the enemy, leaving him wounded and exposed. What will be required these days is more lightning than sun, since the sun is already established as the National Socialist worldview that hangs in the sky of our hearts. Now we and/or subsequent generations get to clean up the exposed refuse, turn it all into ash, and allow the Golden Age to rise out of it like a phoenix.

There were certainly more "extreme" elements in the NSDAP though, Himmler for example, and I'd wager Bormann as well, among others. And you'd better believe that the Wehrmacht that encountered the Judeo-Communist brutality first hand wanted nothing but to completely wipe out the Red Menace.

For the record, we're not "bloodthirsty, violent, racist maniacs" either. National Socialism is passionate and romantic, but also lucid.

I'm not sure how you can leap to faggotry from that quote. It just sounds like Holla Forums complaining about fanatically religious Cruzcucks.

This is why you should reject imperialism. It leads to unnecessary racial conflict

This is what I will never get, being a balkan slav.
What the fuck is everyone in the west and their grandma doing trading with turkey. Even during Ottoman times when they were still spiking balkan christians and doing forceful conversions.
Turkey is cancer.
Has been.
And always will be.

Trade with russia could have allied the christian world regardless of differences. Instead fucking alliances with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Israel and god knows what other cancer.

Cherry picking.

In Africa.

What would he hate them for? They were barely a problem for Germany back then.

Why did everyone else allow people to fight for them? To fight against the enemy of course.

France drafted 800k negro soldiers from their colonies to fight in europe for WW1. Germany didn't.

Not really.

It's an apt metaphor because the "allies" Hitler sought to gain were bad and not trustworthy.

Lets put this into perspective

We all know the reallity of western civilization and the ramifications of Hitler defeat. Its up to everyone of us to decide if Hitler foresaw this future.

Personally i believe he did .He knew all this would happen and thats why he went to war.

FDR baited them into it and let it happen after having intel that they were gonna retaliate for his embargo. He wanted a good excuse to draft Americans into a war they saw as just another European crisis that the US should stay out of this time.

Are you actually calling for no cooperation between different races at all? All races should just continually fight against each other and one is left standing?

The niggers in Hitler's amy either comes from Germany or they were volunteers from North Africa.
Miscegnation, the hurting of white demographics.

Because Germany didn't have any fucking African colonies.

And good luck, now I'm laughing at the black nazi pictures.

I actually call for white supremacy, yes.

The non-whites, except maybe asians, will always unite against white.

And Hitler played right into their game by actually supporting Japan's decision and declared war against America.

think of a predator, like a lion or a tiger.
in its natural habitat, it is majestic and awe-inspiring. dangerous, definitely, but as long as it isn't disturbed it will be content to attend to its own matters.

now take that same animal and trap it in a cage, poke it with sticks, bind and shackle its feet, all the while shouting and threatening it.
that animal is going to fucking tear you to pieces the next chance it gets.

we are the latter

They aren't, he didn't.

None of these were hardly a threat to the Europe of 1930's. Or are you just after petty revenge? Hitler should bear grudge to all negroes because some American ones nogged in Haiti?

There was like two of them. You don't make nation-wide policies based on a number of individual too small to matter in the slightest.
So quit your whining about that.

About Turkey You think trading with foreign nations is "betraying Europe to its traditional enemies"? Phew lad, hang all the Dutch then.
You should familiarize yourself with the timeline of the war. The non-aggression pact was signed to secure occupied Greece and to free up troops for Operation Barbarossa.

But it did. So hardly an alliance.

That's a shit metaphor. Comparing ISIS to imperial Japan is ridiculous. Just because some elements of moslems are subhuman savages doesn't mean there aren't other non-whites that are worthy allies.

You guys should have filtered him from his first post. He'll continue to strawman until the thread is dead and is already almost 30% of the thread. Basically filling it with garbage.

This is what we call controlled opposition.

You are not serious about saving your people from oblivion.

Imperial Japan didn't do a single good thing for Germany.

They actually drained Germany's resources, same for Italy.

I'm not serious about it, not compared to you gentlemen who creams yourself over how diverse the nazi army was, sure.

You are an idiot.

He mentioned miscegenation in the french occupied rhineland explicitly in Mein Kampf and attributed it to jewish influence. NSDAP stood for relocation of foreigners to their countries of origin, not for unfounded senseless hate.

They sure did before the end of WW1…

So Germany should have fought against both Japan and the US?

The US attacked german ships in the atlantic and heavily supported the soviet union.

...

Hitler was a fancy Englishman.

Hitler didn't want to build a wall. Hitler didn't want a race war. Hitler also didn't have to deal with a diversified and vibrant homeland. If he lived in modern Europe or United States, he would have been more extreme like much of Holla Forums.

Because Hitler was put in power by the industrial elite who later lost control.

All due to respect to his oratory skills, but he was a shit statesman and we have the comfort of prior experience, better access to information and the armchairs we sit on.

...

That's called evolution, OP. We become stronger than those who guide us.

posting fucking shitskins and nipsto show how "non-racist and multircultural" nazis are
just fucking kill yourself

There are many things that the Third Reich got wrong, but respect for the diversity of the human species wasn't one of them.

You will never be able to convince your people with immature hateful rhetoric.

That's arrogance talking.

The situation now in Europe is, may I say, more serious than when Hitler came to power. So we NEED to be more extreme to achieve the same goal - preserve our race.

I hate this meme.

We need to move beyond mere idolization and be able to take the best ideas from across the entire political spectrum.

this lad still thinks we're on a spectrum
like the dichotomy between left vs right still exists or is even relevant anymore

Yes, you cuck, it's called Darwinian winnowing. The only place that matters is the first one, the golden throne, the supreme position. Everything else is submissive and secondary. And there's room for only a single apex predator among the sub-clades of humanity.

Now fuck off.

You don't understand the Third Reich if you still pose this ridiculous statement, thus you're one of the last people that should talk about it, especially what it did or didn't do.

TIL

are you aware that the word 'spectrum' doesn't imply 1 dimension

Here's the thing: the average stormfag is such a loser that they wouldn't even work with other races to fight against a common enemy. If they were about to fall off a building and a black guy offered his hand, they would scream "GET YOUR DIRTY HANDS OFF ME" and slap their hand away. As they fell to earth, in the distance a faint "niggerrrr" might be heard.

Yes, Hitler wanted to fight a clean war. For example, the flying ace Hajo Hermann bombed a ship which was full with Sherman tanks and was headed to the Soviet Union. The ship didn´t sink, but the crew had already left the ship. Hajo Hermann asked his superior if he was allowed to shoot the crew as they re-entered the ship. Eventually, his superior asked Hitler what to do and Hitler ordered to get new bombs and do the job properly by sinking the ship. This is fucking stupid, the Germans were completely outnumbered and had no resources whatsoever. When the Soviets entered German territory, they killed literally everyone, the Germans should have done the same.

...

If you unironically think Hitler wasn't extreme enough, maybe you should take a big, deep long look at yourself and re-evaluate your beliefs, and think about what it would take to put such beliefs into practice in the real, modern world.

Especially the people who don't think any white person or nation should ever in any circumstance come into contact or co-operate with non-white persons and nations. I am thinking that those who think such a thing haven't really thought their worldview and possibly simply do not have the intelligence to do much beyond regurgitate the dankest of Holla Forums memes. Luckily, these people who embody everything that is wrong with the "skinhead neo-nazi" stereotype will never have the misfortune to actually find themselves in a position of power.

im not that affluent with modern americanized panglish so no im not

Hitler was (is) mentally beyond any person here. He was simply enlightened.

the split that matters is globalism vs nationalism, and believe it or not there are many leftist types that exist who would be able to support nationalism if we purged ignorant controlled opposition

Most people in the war did that kind of shit. Some people deviated from this, but those are only individual cases. Only the Japanese really didnt abide by this, because they are ruthless, soulless ant people. It is and has always been bad form to shoot sailors/tankers/aviators who had to bail on their vehicles.

Perhaps you should educate yourself in theoretical physics and mathematics before showing your ignorance

The thing you don't understand and what the user you quoted was talking about was that National Socialism is already a syncretism of "the best ideas from across the entire political spectrum." Saying that you think NS is either right wing OR left wing is simply showing your ignorance.

Hitler was already trying to get rid of the jews in 1933 though see haavara agreement

I agree that Nat Soc was an attempt at this, but clearly it didn't work out.

We can be inspired by the originators of the ideology and make use of our hindsight and knowledge of the present day to be able to adapt the message.

There are a few reasons why it didn't. They were diplomatically isolated, up against greater (numerically, economically, militarily) powers, their allies made fatal strategic errors, they themselves made strategic and tactical errors during the war.

None of that has anything to do with the ideology behind the NSDAP. National Socialism a guide for governance and society, not a rulebook to the art of war. WW2 didn't prove NS or fascism wrong just as WW2 did not prove the ideological superiority of Liberal Democracy or Communism. That image you posted might be very apt in your case, what would you do differently to Hitler had you been elected in 1933 if you think you know so much?

By far. Many poster actually want to kill everyone with any non white blood, while literally Hitler let even 25% kike people stay IIRC

I think we can all agree that Himmler was a psychopath, even if he was inspired by morally sound philosophy.

All the other issues you mentioned are extremely relevant, a coherent strategy requires knowledge from many fields.
Diplomacy, military strategy, economics et cetera

No, we cannot, why?

That full on esoteric autism.

Its like if you gave the "your oaths are broken" guy a good deal of power.

Military strategy is not ideological. Economics was not the issue, Germany turned from a destitute shithole into an economic world power in 6 years. Diplomacy, well they took what you can get. You could argue that they might have won if they hadn't allied Italy and Japan but I don't think that's a good argument. Other than that what is the issue?

No, probably not even on the same continent, as a matter of fact I didn't even read most of the thread, I was venting, hoping someone would take note on not to idolize a fucking failure as their own personal Muhammed.

Japan, yes. Italy, no.

Italy was actually a pretty important ally. There is no scenario where Germany could have defeated the USSR one on one. Millions of spaghettis fought on the eastern front. 130k Italians were casualties in Stalingrad alone. And speaking of Stalingrad, Germans were less than 50% of the fighting force in that battle, and less than 50% of the total Axis casualties were German.

Lets not pretend that Germany couldn't have avoided war with Britain and America.
I am of the opinion that they handled Poland very poorly.

You can fuck right off.

The guy didn't have the stomach to watch executions, let alone enjoy them.
Like most NSDAP leaders, Himmler was a sensitive man.

He was a very religious person, that does not in any way make him a psychopath

...

The term "esoteric" exists precisely because of people like you and no other reason; people that can't seem to grasp the finer details.

Judging by your posts thus far, this inability extends beyond anything metaphysical.

You literally just added "blood" to it, which is entirely a addition of your own with no real basis.

Nothing besides the word "blood" in that sentence is "psychopathic", frankly I don't think you understand exactly what psychopathic means.

As said

means he cannot be a psychopath

GO AWAY BMW! You are all a bunch of cucks and your board is a shit. I never should have taught any of you fucks anything!

All gays are child molesters. If you don't have strict sexual morals, you don't have a morality.

It has all the basis, he just doesn't understand a thing about it and is probably a Christian.

I apologize for not being an avid user of /asatru/.

The Nazi's first meeting was in a gay bar, many of the first prominent leaders in the party were gay, and literally all of the brown shirts were faggots like milo (milo is literally a brownshirt).

The nazi's only hated the femme faggots.

To say anything other than the above is delusional. Learn from history, and maybe start going to gay clubs to recruit your brownshirts or something.

Erecting a nonsensical strawman, are we?

You literally just made up that he did "blood rituals" or anything dark like that and you for some reason relate esotericism with "psychopath".

I guess you belong to the gentlemen on the right side of the picture. Please stop watching Shlomo's WWII Documentaries, Movies and Games and realize that National Socialism was a political movement that doesn't belonged to one culture. Hitler and the NSDAP doesn't hated other people just because they where different, but because of their behaviour towards other cultures and nations. National Socialism is about loving and caring for your country and your people and not about hating others or labeling them as inferior. Different nations and cultures who both follow NS could always live peacefully alongside, by celebrating the similarities and respecting each others differences. Within and beyond Europe.

endchan.xyz/.media/0cb4ef38b1494f7a68dea14011bf1673-videomp4/alias/Adolf Hitler - The European Army.mp

The Jews where hated by Hitler because they undermined and destroyed cultures and nations for their own greedy goals and practiced the complete opposite of National Socialism, just as they do today. And to make sure that nobody will ever again practice real National Socialism, they poisoned the well of NS by spreading their anti-NS propaganda of lies. Such as that all Nazis where bloodthirsty demons who only felt hate for the world and wanted to kill everything that wasn't like them. People who recognize the truth in the teachings of Hitler's Mein Kampf and the movement of National Socialism will be corrupted along the way by the dark propaganda of the Jews and will probably end up as a Neo-Nazi who is tattooing half his body, takes drugs and only knows violence.
National Socialists were righteous and honorable men, close to nature and with love and passion in their hearts and not a bunch of violent thugs who don't know what respect means.

National Socialism is about loving your own culture, nation and people, but also about respect to other cultures, nations and people who give the same respect back. National Socialism cares about TRUE cultural diversity by preserving those cultures within their nations with their people, separated but still caring and respecting each other in a friendly way. Unlike the Jew's Marxism who destroys all those cultures by mixing them up in order to create societies who are pleasanter for Jews to live in. And the most barefaced thing about all that is that they who "celebrate diversity" the most are the greatest threat to the very thing they love so much. And if you hate different people and cultures solely on the ground that they are not yours, than you didn't get NS at all. You can hate other people and cultures if they actively try to destroy your own, that's not a problem, but don't hate or destroy them when they don't pose a threat to you.

Hate Niggers for killing whites just because they are whites, hate Muslims for killing non-Muslims for being non-Muslims and hate the Jews for destroying everything good in this world to satisfy his greed. But do not hate other people on the other side of the world who doesn't care or know about you, do not hate other cultures who leave yours own alone and respect your right to do the same and do not hate other nations for things that were done long ago by a complete different government.

Don't be Nazi, but be a National Socialist.

You mean the club they took over from faggots, kicking out all the faggots and turning it back into a useful location?

Rest of your post is horsefuckery.

Okay this is a fair criticism, perhaps a more accurate assessment would be that he was prone to delusional thinking.

Is anyone going to defend Phillipp Lenard?

No.

The moment Hitler became the leader of the NSDAP he formed a paramilitary wing that would literally murder communists in the streets and wage war on the German government when the NSDAP was banned.

Depends on how true the "Poles slaughtering ethnic Germans" meme is and how much was just propaganda and jingoist excuses. Fact of the matter was that Hitler's demands were reasonable: Danzig, a city less than 15% Polish (~5% Polish in 1918 rly makes u think…) and a highway connecting Danzig and East Prussia to the rest of Germany. Poland's diplomatic hardline was mainly a result of Britain's influence, who preferred the rise of communism to the rise of another German power.

If you pop by the "Nazis in Space"-thread, you'll see that anons very much are against Jewish psychics and the theory of relativity.

As was Philipp Lenard.

So in a way, yes, I'd defend him.

10/10 post. Well put user.

Is there any basis for that in the actual theories themselves, or does it rest wholly on the fact that Einstein was himself a Jew?

It isn't certain that Britain should back the USSR, there was significant sympathy for Germany in the pre-war period.

I think it was mostly the latter. Einstein stole his work (bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm), remember. Hitler was also convinced Charlie Chaplin was a Jew, so it's not like he was right about literally everything.

I watched a discussion with weev and his friend who was trained in engineering if I'm not mistaken. I admire his dedication to empiricism which is definitely a core component of genuine scientific research, however I'm afraid he he lacks the requisite background training in theoretical physics to be able to dismiss the ideas of Einstein.

People like David Hilbert and Werner Heisenberg were vocal opponents of Lenard and everyone educated in STEM should understand the relative importance of these thinkers.

Hitler formed a paramilitary wing of the NSDAP the moment he became the leader of their party and they went out and slaughtered political enemys.

When the German government outlawed them they became cells waging war on their own government.

So no we are not as extreme as Hitler.

You can say that but I think history showed the most likely scenario with Britain. There were people like Mosley but in general the WW1 propaganda hadn't yet worn off. Germans and Hitler especially thought far more positively of Brits than vice versa.

I mostly agree with the sentiment, but don't you think that more skillful diplomacy from Germany could have tilted the balance?

There was probably a lot of personal rivalry and grudges involved with the Lenard's movement and thus could go overboard, but I don't think it hurt the German scientific progress that much.

While some ingenious people were alienated, getting rid of the nepotistic clique inside the universities was worth it imo.

Hilbert was part of that clique, even when German, so naturally he was adversarial towards Deutsche Physik movement.
Heisenberg on the other hand is a special case. He might have been the best thinker Germany had to offer, and naturally he was protected by the high rungs of government from overzealous physicists.

And neither of those men relied on theories popularized by Einstein.

Nah. I don't. I'm not a meth-addled degenerate.
National socialism is literally the German manifestation of fascism. It is entirely linked to the German people.
Top fucking lel. Give the cucked egalitarian-lite "nationalism 4 every1" meme a rest, will ya? Non-whites are inferior. I'm not about to pretend otherwise. White civilisation and the white race is the epitome of human evolution, and we have every reason to revel in this fact and actulaise it in the form of global dominance and the subjugation of weaker peoples. You're still trying to reconcile your libshit egalitarian worldview with racial nationalism. I don't blame you. I too used to be a naive proponent of "mutual respect and ethnic nationalism for all", but then I grew up and realised that no such mutual respect has ever existed, or will ever existed. Human race relations have always been and will continue to be zero-sum. You either dominate your racial inferiors and exert your will over them, or you end up getting the boot on your own throat.
Oh you precious, precious child. You actually believe this, don't you? You really are a cute one. You're basically just spouting the liberal talking points of "world peace for all! luv and respect 4 every!". I hope that you'll one day grow out of the kiddy-pen idealism and realise that there will never be "mutual respect and peace" between races and peoples. The only constant in nature is the endless spilling of blood and the drums of war. It's about time we embraced this never-ending struggle to be on top of the food chain and assert our dominance over our inferiors. If you do not assert your own superiority, then you are sending a message to your natural racial competitors that you are weak, and they will waste no time coming to overrun you. We live in a world with finite resources, and different races that hold their own interests at heart. Our two separate peoples are forever in conflict with each other for these resources. Do you think chinks or other non-whites care about your lefty universalist ideas of "mutual respect and tolerance"? Lol. Their interests lie with the Chinese people, and they wouldn't hesitate to destroy you in order to better themselves. This is exactly what our mentality should be. Eat or be eaten. We hold no duty to anyone but our race. We have every reason to want to subjugate foreigners for the benefit of our people, just like humanity has been doing for millennia. Humans have never gotten along on principles of "mutual respect" and never will. It's time to grow up. The superiors ought to dominate the inferiors - such is the will of nature.

but the first kkk leader war proven to be a jew

I don't really see how. There was to be no negotiations with Poland, Germany's only option was to either escalate and invade, or back down. It's really telling of the whole situation that the Allied powers declared war on Germany after invading Poland, but not the Soviets when they also invaded a week later.

oaths voided

Einstein was one of the originators of Quantum Mechanics, second only to Max Plank. So Heisenberg definitely owed a lot to him.
As for Hilbert, he helped mentor Einstein to enable him to create the General Theory of Relativity. He even independently arrived at the correct theory before Einstein published his results.

I agree but it's questionable if, at this point, our pathological altruism has destroyed us and proven to be a fatal flaw that exterminated our brand of humanity. When I look simply at demographics I'd say the best we can hope for is violently purging our own countries and fortifying them against invasion, and pulling back. It will be a long time before we can be aggressors on the world stage again, we simply don't have the numbers. And that's with what we have now, which will drop during the transition back to strength (if we make it), perhaps significantly.

Retards like these straight out of Stormfront are the reason Holla Forums is turning into a laughing stock.

True

What you say is mostly true but you're not going to get very far as a politician on that kind of platform. We live in a world where chinks can press one button and turn the planet into a nuclear wasteland. Since that's the case, pretending that "nationalism 4 every1" is the road to world peace while acting for the selfish gain of your own nation only is the real optimal strategy.

Sounds like a good plan. Maybe we ought to stop importing Muslims and had niggers into western nations and temporarily ally with the Muslims and teach the Niggers (((who))) really bought them form their Negroid Masters. Then when the parasite it removed we Give the Niggers there true kingdom Israel. Then they can be Kangs and Shiiieeet, they would be too stupid to cause problems for White Ethnonationalist. If the Mudslimes start shit after we help them get rid of their greatest enemy then well will have to sort things out. However I have a felling that once Europeans abandon the degeneracy of (((Liberalism))). They won't be so trigger happy to AAAAllahhhhhhu Akkkbarrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!! *But seriously, if the Alt-righters know whats best for them, I suggest they keep that "phalanx" shit in the closet.*

I think there might have been a possibility for a different outcome if the danger of letting the USSR from gaining control in Europe was better communicated. All of this probably needed to have at least a decade before the war broke out

I think there might have been a possibility for a different outcome if the danger of letting the USSR gain control of Europe was better communicated * (mb what is editing)

You know shills love to play both sides so they have a strawman to beat on.

This is what we like to call Dunning–Kruger syndrome.

Remember kids don't fall for the lies of controlled opposition

No. The Jews were hated by Hitler because they undermined and destroyed Germany and the European people. There was no universalist ideology at play there.
Oh right. You're still into the whole "we're the real non-racists! We're really the diversity-lovers. We're really the supporters of universal ethnonationalism" cuckery.
Hitler outright talked about superior and inferior races, and rightfully viewed negroes with disdain. You've constructed some bullshit anti-racist cucked narrative to neuter whites from realising our inherent superiority, and reclaiming our rightful place at the head of the world like we did during the Imperial era.
Nothing about respecting or loving other peoples or cultures in national socialism - just loving ones own people and wanting the best for them. You've tacked on this extra shit to justify your racial-egalitarian faggotry
What you're describing is a cucked pacifist ideology built around neutering the greatness and dominance of our race all for your weak ideas of universal respect and egalitarianism, when no such things exist. Whites are superior, and whites ought to actualise this superiority. We have no reason to "respect" inferior peoples. We have no reason to "preserve" them. As dictate by nature, our only obligation is to the further survival and propagation of our people, regardless of whether that means some foreign shitskins get the short end of the "mutural love and respect" when we steamrolled North America and affirmed our dominance in this continent? No. We had racial feeling and glory, and we recognised that in this world of eternal conflict and struggle, you either eat or be eaten.
I don't give a shit about your beloved "tru diversity". I care about the glory and dominance of my race, as dictated by nature, and the actualisation of our superiority.
I don't "hate" other people and cultures. That's pointless. I do, however, view them as our natural threat and competitors. I absolutely do not consider them our allies. And you want to know something interesting? They don't consider us allies either. They recognise that there will never be such things as "world peace" or "mutural respect", nor do they care about creating such things. They do, as we should also, want the perceived greatness of their people asserted.
You still apparently do not get it. All people and cultures are forever locked in a battle with you for dominance, resources, and control. The moment you are weak, you are subsumed and destroyed. There will never be mutual respect with muslims, and nor should we want there to be.
I do
I don't particularly care whether muslims kill non-muslims. Only when they start killing Europeans.
I hate the Jew for destroying my race and civilisation. I wouldn't give a shit what Jews do in Palestine if they didn't meddle in our politics, manipulate our leaders, lobby our governments, and demand we send our men to die for them.

Hitler is a centrist by any historical measure of politics. Buchanan is slightly left. Trump is a liberal. Most everything to the left of that is the twilight zone.

That's irrelevant. I'm not trying to be a politican at the moment. I'm trying to tell the truth. The two are mutually exclusive.

...

Nigger, I've never once been to stormfront. I got redpilled entirely on Holla Forums.

As far as I can tell from the shitty "propaganda" stormfront spews out, they agree with your egalitarianlite "nationalism 4 all" drivel

Yep, we are supremacists and imperialists while Hitler was a nationalist.

This is what happens when retards actually believe that leftists are sincere when they say flooding our countries with subhumans is all about "celebrating diversity."

Rehabilitating the nazis with pictures of niggers with swastikas lmao.

not an argument

that doesnt count the fuckin closet faggots who infiltrate here.

I mean it's just a website it's not like you need a secret key to get in through a hidden door. Also most gays are psychopathic so the shit that normally gets thrown around to "get rid of the normies" is shit they fap to.

this.

Not to chime in on the conversation or anything, but I want to let you know you obviously already know this that you're right in saying that the "nationalism for all" period is temporal, and that eventually you get redpilled into complete white supremacy, I went down the same path

Lies. I will always be loyal to the Idea of the NatSoc and Ethnic Nationalism .

>>>/oven/

not saying your wrong but endchan is rather culturally cucked itself tbh fam.

You think what you are saying is in someway insightful, but you are sorely mistaken.
Trapped in ditch by false dichotomy, chasing your own tail.
Educate yourself in natural history and evolutionary theory.

Praise Eris

sure sounds like tumblr in here

If there's two lessons that history teaches, it's that might makes right, and you either eat your enemy or get eaten.

What he's saying is what is obvious, that we're in a fight for survival and we should act like it, just like every other race does. If we don't start putting our group interests first, we're done. Honestly, we've failed to do that for so long, we may already be done, but let's try it the other way and see what happens before going silently into the cold dark night.

actually yes
2 or more dimensions are called a field (like electromagnetic field)

But user ethnic nationalism means that, if you're white, you're a white supremacist. Mexicans would be mexican supremacists, blacks, etc. That's the way it works faggot.

The thing is, with an attitude like yours YOU are the one who is going to be crushed into dust, not the subhumans you hate so much.

Then you're basically no different than a >muh feels liberal who wants to live in a padded box of warm and fuzzy non-racist opinions.

You're basically just an egalitarian liberal with different talking points.

You'll grow out of it eventually. I used to be like you. You seem to still be under the impression that motivations of liberals and anti-racists are good in principle, just misguided. You seem to believe that if you just convince them of how "national socialism is the real non-racist ideology that values diversity", you'll bring them to your side. What you fail to realise is that these liberal's intentions are not pure. They don't give a shit about "diversity". All they want is the complete eradication of our race and people, and their pet non-whites recognise this. Non-whites are not our allies. They benefit from our destruction, and want to see it continue. No shitskin would advocate racial nationalism for whites, because their interests lie with ensuring our people never regain our independence.

You'll eventually realise that all non-whites have an inherent interest in our destruction, and all libshits overtly want us dead and gone. After you figure this out. the realisations of white supremacy and the need for us to reassert ourselves will flow.

It'll happen, mate. Just wait

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_theory

wake me up

I wish Holla Forums was more like Hitler and accepted based faggots like Milo.

No, recognizing our group identity and fiercely fighting for it is the only way we won't be crushed. What the fuck do you think our options are at this point? It's either that or bow our heads to the waves of demographic replacement and turn into dust in the wind. Frankly, I'd rather die on a battlefield than watch our entire race turn into ashes because no one was willing to fight for it.

Too bad faggot.

Do you think you're enlightened because you think your race is inherently superior?
Every single race think they're superior dipshit, always have always will.
Every single species has serene confidence that it is superior, get over yourself.
You prefer your own culture and civilization because you programmed to do so.

Yes.
However, the idea that Holla Forums is bloodthirsty, violent and racist maniacs are totally and completely true.

GTKRWN RWDS

Wake the fuck up nigger, where the hell have you been?
WE'RE ALREADY BEING CRUSHED INTO DUST.
This is literally the intentions of non-whites and libshits. They want nothing short of our whole destruction. By arguing on the principles of "muh mutural respect and love 4 all races", you're arguing from a position of weakness, as though you're asking permission from leftists to allow you to live. You aren't asserting your race as superior. You aren't demanding your ability to survive. You're making a meager, weak attempt to appeal to the left's universalist egalitarianism without realising that they aren't ideologically constistant, an their end goal is the death of our people

We either assert ourselves as the superior race we are, and strike pride in the hearts of other whites, or we enable our destruction

Are you fucking dense? That's his entire point. It's not "enlightenment" it's realizing that every race puts their own interests and needs first, that it's a competition, and there is no prize for being the nice guy who lets himself and his people get eaten.

National Socialism has his roots in Germany, yes. But that doesn't mean that other cultures couldn't adapt to this and can use National Socialism with their culture as a base.

Congratulation, you think like a Jew. Just replace white with Jew and non-white with Goyim. You are like a libtard who says that he loves diversity, but does everything to damage exact the same thing. Your attitude destroys nations, cultures and people including your own and yet you belong to the people who scream the loudest that they want to preserve those things. You are completely on the kike train.

WEW.

It seems that you haven't read my previous post at all.

Yeah, I didn't say otherwise. So it's pretty redundant to bring that up, since it's the main core of National Socialism.

Nowhere within my post I ever said that we shouldn't make the best out of our nations and it's people nor that we should hold respect or tolerance towards those who don't deserve anything of that. If you actually have read my post, than you would have understood that I said that we should hate and fight against everybody who tries to do harm to us.
I never said that we should become slobs and just trust that other won't exploit us, in fact I said the complete opposite.
I never said that we should love and tolerate people that want to do harm to us, in fact I also said the complete opposite.
What I said was that we shouldn't act exactly like the people we would hate for their behaviour. The core of National Socialism is integrity and not hypocrisy. If two opposite powers come into conflict the superior one should not only win, but will win since it's superior. And that's why National Socialism is there to make the best out of what we have, if such a conflict would appear. But what you are suggesting is not wanting to make the best out of yourself for protection against a inevitable conflict, but for aimed submission of others by activily searching a conflict.
If you want to dominate others for the sole purpose of satisfying your desires… well than you are nothing but a Jew and want your nation to be like Israel.
You are either doing this purposely or, what I think the case is, you are projecting your personal grudge against leftists on me since you don't agree with my point of view.

If you hadn't noticed whites are on the brink of extinction, clearly we aren't quite as dominant as you seem to believe. But if you seriously intend on moving beyond online circle-jerking you might want to be less concerned with ideological purity and more concerned with pragmatism and realism. Aren't you preaching realism?

I know my race is inherently superior. It's not really a matter of discussion
Good point. So why, again, should I settle for your cucked egalitarianism when clearly other races do not think like you do, and want the supremacy of their own people?

Whatever other shitskin races think, it's very clear that whites are at the top of the food chain. If we were to reassert ourselves, there would be no questioning who's on top.
Do you have any proof that species other than humans have any concept of superior and inferior?

Do you believe that just because a nigger thinks his race superior, that it actually is? Whites are indisputably the superior race based solely on the civilisation, high culture, and scientific and technological achievement we have produced.
And I'm also "programmed" to want it to prosper, even if that means at the expense of other such civilisations. There is nothing wrong with this.

whoa, whoa, whoa. nobody's saying you have to respect anyone. i'm just saying there are historical faggots who produced works of genius, and there are faggots who are ==more or less== regular dudes, but faggier. these people should be allowed to go about their business, I say. they have no interest in shoving it down our throats (so to speak).

it is the communist Jew, not the faggot, who is behind the estrogenation of the white man, and the whipping up of hatred and resentment against heterosexual, red blooded people. it is THEY who benefit from the decline in our birthrate.

if you merely leave people alone, drug addiction and venereal disease will kill off the unhygienic.

calm the fuck down you nigger. i have never even been on that dead board. ==we== are the bureau of memetic warfare.

You've gotta be kidding me. News flash buddy: With the demographics as they are now, whites are gone, if we stopped all immigration today. The only way the white race survives is if we start aggressively pushing out and killing the other races infesting our countries, if we don't, we will be bred out of existence BY THE IMMIGRANTS ALREADY HERE. If you want the white race to survive you're going to have get your hands bloody, there is no way around that, there is no peaceable solution, and there is no defensive approach that will save us.

You know he had Rohm killed, right? You really think Hitler would approve of a pro-racemixing Jewish faggot like Milo? Are you serious? You both need a noose.

Pragmatically, we are going to die off as a race if we don't purge our nations. Realistically, we have 5-15 years to start doing this before it's a completely lost cause, depending on the region.

I Believe that in order to have a functional non degenerate society it has to be homogenous .
National unity by race and culture. NOT RACE ONLY
There's many white ethnics, i dont believe in pan european supremacy . I Refuse to let any Anglo replace my Culture just because his culture is also white.

We forum now.

And Stormfront has always been an insult, most of their mods are LEA for fuck's sake.

Can we agree that the first order of business is to reclaim our homogeneous homelands?
I frankly don't care about disagreements that we might have.
What are YOU going to do to save our people.
How are you going to convince our cucked kinsfolk to realize the danger that they are in. If you are spouting ideas like plans to genocide all other homonids from the planet to you really believe anyone is going to join your movement.

No idiot, I love my Nation, I love my Race and i love my Culture.

Only be understanding the concept of Nation, race and culture you will be able to respect other nationalistic cultures and races . Semitics Religion have undermined nationlism and national unity for centuries. Imposing World domination and Supremacist Ideals In all nations.

You think you're smarter than Hitler, Schlomo? You're not. Gas thyself. Nazism has room for based faggots, whether you like it or not.

be strong white man, i don't want to live in a homogenous race kind of world

No. I think like a pragmatist who recognises the true nature of race relations and civilisational interaction - not some naive idealist universal liberal with slightly different talking points.
You really are a naive fucking fool. You actually seem to believe that libshits are honest in their intentions when they say they want "diversity". They don't. They don't give a shit about diversity. Their motivations are, and always have been, the destruction of our race and our replacement with foreign non-whites. The diversity meme is just a smokescreen for their true intentions. You're foolish enough to believe that if you try to convince libshits hard enough about the wonders of nazism and how it "really does value diversity and mutual respect", they'll join your side. What you fail to realise, is that libshits hate whites and want us gone.
Again, I don't care about your silly appeals to universalist moral platitudes I don't adhere to. My interests lie with the white race and our further dominance and prosperity. The health of inferior foreign cultures plays no part in that. Just like our people paid no mind to the redskins when we colonised America and turned it into something great.
You're trying to equate the destruction of foreign peoples to the destruction of our own people. Stop this. I want to preserve the White race and our civilisation, and ensure our furthered prosperity. The well-being of non-whites has no bearing on this.
Actually, you did. Or at least heavily implied it. You're implying we have a duty to respect and preserve the cultures and races of foreigners simply for the sake of "muh principles", despite the inherent inferiority of them.
A people only "deserve" whatever they can secure themselves through blood and conflict. This is how it's always been and will continue to be.
There is no hypocrisy in wanting the supremacy of your people. I don't abide by your universalist principles, so the idea that I'm hypocritical for wanting to preserve myself while disregarding the preservation of others is laughable and wrong.
So your ideology is entirely geared around being pacifist and reactionary instead of actualising the true potential of your race and expanding into foreign lands. I have no reason to accept this. What reason should I have to neuter the interests of my people for the sake of foreigners?
My "desires" are based around the prosperity and greatness of my people - something any sane individual should want. I don't care about destroying foreigners out of sadistic pleasure.
My problem with Israel lies with their manipulation and control of white nations to do their bidding, not their existence in the first place.

The only way whites can survive is if we formulate a long-term plan to create a white-ethnostate and act on it. America will never be a majority white ethnostate. We're well on our way to being Brazil. We need to save Europe and make our diaspora back to our native lands.

Why do you think people here are constantly talking about a collapse, or a true emergency, or massive killings across the country? The only way we're going to convince our people to join our cause is in the midst of a desperate situation, since that is when group instincts reawaken and can be tapped into. Until that happens, there is no way to convince these people, not my way, and not your way. But when it does happen, you can bet they're going to be sympathetic to people who want to fight back and kill for them, rather than just talk about how accepting we should be of the people actively trying to destroy them.

As do I.
I understand the concept of nation, race, and culture perfectly. Probably even better than you do, because I recognise that racial relations, and conflicts between civilisations have always been, and will continue to be, zero-sum. Might makes right in this world of eternal conflict and bloodshed.
TOP FUCKING KEK. Are you implying that Rome was "undermined by semites" into being a powerful imperial empire? Listen to yourself. Supremacism and imperialism are facts of the human condition. Be proud in the fact that it was your people who prospered over all others.

not quite understanding that we are the exact opposite, exclusive / hierarchical, honestly it is pretty obvious why you cunts have been ineffective. Low IQ

Go watch The Myth, culture is an extension of race, it's the natural order of a people. It's the reason composite populations are so dissonant. IN TIME, SON, YOU WILL SEE.

Faggot do you even know about Constantine I?
Do you think its a coincidencethat the first Roman emperor to convert to christianity decided to Create the Solidus (Literally a Gold Coin) and separate civil and military authority undermining the national unity of rome.
Read a fucking history book

He had Rohm killed because Rohm thought Hitler wasn't socialist enough and wanted to overthrow him. Hitler caught wind of the plan and had him rightly eliminated.

Had nothing to do with Rohm's faggot status

and you cunts have? With your "muh pr" egalitarianism, where you meagerly ask the left for permission to exist as a race, while appealing to their universalist and egalitarian platitudes they actually don't give two shits about?

War is justified when it is to defend your people. Don't think that the average morally upstanding citizen is going to agree with your program of prolonged warfare and genocide.

this tbh
If Israel was just a small nation that seeks to give a good life to it's people and struggles against an endless horde of mudslimes and manages to succeed, I would have some admiration for them.
This is however not the case.

We should use all necessary strategy at our disposal to subvert and overthrow the current neo-liberal elite. Whether this involves violent revolution / civil war or anything else you can think of I am open to ideas.

Didn't shitler set up Israel as part of his "kick the jews out of Europa" plan?

"Morality" doesn't exist once survival kicks in. What you consider an "average citizen" won't exist if a true happening occurs, it will be a brutal fight for survival and if whites come out on top, they absolutely will support the destruction of their foes.

Im out , You fuckers dont know shit about the history of any White culture . Let alone European Heritge and traditions.

Keep Shilling for Imperialism and White Globalization.

...

Don't give up on these kids, their heart is in the right place they are just angry and ignorant.

Remind me, why did WWII start?

Churchill wanted war.

My friend, human psychology is more nuanced than you seem to believe. It is true that when people are cornered with no way out they will lash out to defend themselves, but if you want to be able to understand and influence people you need to learn psychology.

I recommend reading Carl Jung

Truly the most insufferable of cunts. Take your holier-than-though shit and shove it up your ass.

Maybe if you lurk around here a bit longer, you'll begin to realise truth and reality just like I've done.

Churchill was subverted by Jewish Marxists, and other miscellaneous traitors. Prior to that he was sympathetic to Germany

youtube.com/watch?v=P9nteHa8KoU

another source

ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p498_okeefe.html

No, a genuine stormfag would grap his hand, say "thanks" then push the nigger off the building.

...

Wew this thread is pulling out all the stops.

Well I guess your not all that bad for a nigger. Exception that proves the general rule.
newadvent.org/fathers/25023.htm
you can go fuck yourself kike

If you want to learn more read Rosenberg's memoir.

ia800207.us.archive.org/23/items/MemoirsOfAlfredRosenberg/RosenbergMemoirs.pdf

For those of you with a better understanding of history maybe you will understand why I personally would prefer aristocracy and monarchy

part of was meant for

Yes.

Hitler did not do the Holocaust but we will.

*breathe out* Wow, I don't even know where I should start.

I have read you post now several times and recognized some patterns.
1.You only view the issue from a subjective point instead of a objective one. Yes, NS is about your own Nation and your own people. And when I say "we" I also only mean we for us (my nation, my people). But when I talked about NS I explained it from a neutral point of view, that includes all nations who could use the concept of NS. So don't get me wrong, I couldn't care less about how other people handle their nations and vice versa. That's one content of NS, that a nation is complete independent and must take care and responsibility for themself.

That's what I mean. If we speak from the historical point than only German NS existed, but I was talking from the theoretical and neutral point.

Like I said, I never said that we should preserve them. We have no reason to preserve them, but if we don't have a reason to harm them either, than we also shouldn't do that.

2.Your concept of "we" or "us", respectively "them" and "others" is kind of spongy, since you sometimes talk about "whites", than you talk about "races" (white is not a race) and about "culture". It's hard to figure out who you see as an ally and who not. Where is the line you would cross? There are several nations of people of European descent, with several different cultures and yes, even with different races. Because "whites" are not a race, since between the European people are also minor to major racial differences. So who can have NS in your opinion, only Germany since they started it, all European nations like Norway or Italy, or all nations who have the will to do it? So should "whites" fight against each other on a international level or maybe even on a intranational level, since there are also minor cultural differences within the regional population of a nation? Where should it start and where should it end?

Global diversity by cultural/racial homogeneity on a national level, that's what NS is about. The Jews want to genocide all races/people/cultures by mixing them together (except their own), while you suggest the same just by destroying/dominating/exploiting other races/cultures. The worst part is that you never specified the "race" issue.

And the different races among the "whites"? Does this also count for them? Should Anglos rule over/exterminate Slavs and Germanics do the same to Anglos or the Scandinavians to the Celtics? Where is the line? There is no line, since that line is just a fluent passage.

3.The things you "mostly" agree with me on are used to tell me that I'm wrong. That's some level of paradoxical mindset you have here.

4.You sure like to insult your opponent. You should know that swearwords won't compensate content.

That's because their numbers were so low that they didn't even bother with them

I have been here since the beginning, maybe you will be able to learn new ideas from other people, but I'm not too hopeful honestly.

You know, people might take you more seriously if you didn't talk like a redditor. Just some constructive criticism.

Meme magic, son.

Pick one fam. Dont worry you know better than all Historians

quick-facts.co.uk/religion/semitic.html

To deny the Abrahamic connection is to deny Christianity itself . But you dont know history let alone theology.

All Abrahamic religions come from Ancient Near Este and NorthEast Africa.

(filtered)
this guy is a shill

They didn't have to live with them. They did not know who they were as we do, and it is in the German nature to give new people the benefit of the doubt. It is a dangerous feature to have, but still valuable; exemplified through the bond we formed with the Japanese.

Lmao, you fuckers spent too much time developing your "ethos" on imageboards if you throw shit out like "muh pr."

So apparently they can purge homos, the gypsies but not the jews AND the niggers?

What was wrong with Hitler?

New flash bitch, niggers were living with germans even in Nazi Germany.

…how many niggers?

seriously this is very low energy D&C Shilling tbh. You ought to try harder next time Mordecai.

Sources say 2000-3000 but one is too many.

Were they grouped or diffuse?

They were unallowed to marry white women and some were sterilized, but Hitler for some reasons did not purge them, which is the easiest thing to do compared to other purging.

I guess he loved the nigs.

Germany shouldn't ally with the japs period.

The japs cannot help Hitler but Hitler can help them.

If not for Pearl Harbor, it would take the US some more years to decide to invade Europe and Hitler would at least have time to rebuild his forces via draft in western Europe.

2000-3000 with those restrictions is reasonable. I can see why he allowed them. At that level they're probably worth the risk for the experience dealing with them can give society.

Yes he did.
They not being a threat does not excuse you allying with them.
Yes, because he claims to protect the GERMAN NATION, this means he has to protect the germanic people who were killed by the nogs in Haiti. Instead, he did nothing.
One was too many, even for Hitler's scheme of "aryan purity".
The fact Hitler has to cuck up to turks and instead of retaking Constantinople speaks royally where he lies.
So I guess Italy and various eastern European countries never "allied" with Hitler because they all declared war against Germany in 1944-1945.

Worth the risk?

Why?

Why feeding them and clothing them when he could have deported them?

It's just fucking insane to think about, considering how extreme were Hitler about jews.

Yeah, kinda like how we allied with the mujadhideen to beat the Soviet.

Come on, it was dumb.

The muzzies deserve extermination.

Im done wasting my time with Illiterate people

Because it teaches you the horror of dealing with niggers so you don't one day open your gates to 6 million of them.

Jesus called jews fake jews and proclaim christians are the real jews.

If that isn't ultimate jewry, I don't know what is.

inb4 but we are real jew goys

Holla Forums is much much worst. Jews created us… We're beyond good and evil. That's why Christcucks are leaving and being replaced by the New Man.

I just want to spend a day in 300s Rome.

How did everything go so wrong?

It always comes down to jew.

Jew creates Christianity to infect the goyim, but a bunch shabbo goy as the AUTHORITY OF MORAL, then put the jews as AUTHORITY OF FINANCE.

They are smart.

Yeah but how did the Christian cult win over the other "Roman" cults? Evola had a book on Mirthalism, Europe would be very different if it had won out.

Promise of the afterlife.

It was easy, accept Jesus and you would be in heaven.

And don't forget to give the Church your money.

Praise Kek Holla Forumsrother, well said.

Can't speak for everyone on this board, but I certainly am. One of the things I learned from WW2 is that when you're dealing with Jews you should not show any mercy to them and their minions nor should you expect them to show it to you.
If I'm in any way involved in any kind of position of power or on the battlefield when SHTF, I'll do whatever I can no matter how "cruel" or whatever, in order to prevail.

Why would you want to fight honourably against such a despicable enemy anyway. The kikes have a saying 'eye for an eye', lets make it a head for an eye the next time.

Prepare fore the KEKOCAUST

Well duh! But I'm also aware that there are several types of liberals. The ones who you just explained, who are totally aware of their actions and the consequences and the ignorant sheep like liberals who think that all people of all races are friends of each other like the Teletubbies and who don't understand why Jerome beat them up for no reason or why they got raped by Ahmed.

Again, "white race". I already wrote enough to that here

Again, "own people" and "foreign people". You know that "whites" can be foreign people within other "white" nations, right?

Yet again, I spoke from a objective and neutral point and with "we" I meant every nation for itself. It's not the duty of Poland to preserve France or the duty of Japan to preserve Mexico. Every nation has only the duty to preserve themself and if every nation would do that, than we would have a cultural diverse world (I bet that triggered you), which includes dozens of different European ("white") cultures and nations.

So accoridng to you, Niggers who loot the shit out of a town deserve everything they have looted, because "rule of the jungle". Or should whites do this among themself too? That's just anarchism.

And that's what it's about. As long as other nations do their own shit, in their own nation, without bothering each other, everything is fine. As long each of them say and act like "If you leave me alone, than I leave you alone". That's what I was talking the entire time about. But you suggested the entire time that as long as "we" are the strongest we can do as we please, just because we can.
If some small and military weak nation on the other side of the world just live peacefully without bothering anybody, should according to you, be conquoured, exploited, genocided and overall completely annihilated, just because we can like you said here "A people only "deserve" whatever they can secure themselves through blood and conflict"? This is NOT National Socialism.

Yes you have, because we are talking about National Socialism. Violent conquest is NOT part of National Socialism, since violent conquest or simple war can be happen in every kind of ideology or form of government. It's not based on view points, but mostly on circumstances. That's one of the many reasons why National Socialism has such a bad reputation, because people mix their personal concepts in it.

The premise of your argument hinges on a purely materialist and universalist worldview. You have created for yourself a hierarchy of values that rationalizes your belief that European civilization is 'objectively' superior. This is why you think that 'realism' is synonymous with 'accepting the truth that we just have kill all jews, wetbacks, niggers and gooks'.
Materialism is a idea that originates from semites.

What?

So you don't think whites are superior to other races?

Semites actually practice semite supremacy, so maybe we really should learn it from them.

Violent conquest is not part of NatSoc, yet they try to rationalize themselves as Teutonic crusaders who invaded and conquered Baltic and slav land.

Why would I want my people to become spiritually Judaised. We don't need to learn from other races, we are perfectly capable of being totally self sufficient.

Because it means your race would be fucking safe and rule the fucking world.
We learned things from other races and improved them. Gunpowder from the chinese, cacao drinking from the south american aborigines.

Every race thinks its superior to others though. I think that colonialism and slavery is not a good idea since it inevitably leads to race mixing, however if our people need more land to settle I see no reason to conquer a land that is populated by some vastly inferior race like negroes and deport or cleanse its native population. Literally nothing of value would be lost.

Glory be unto Kek. I am ready.

inb4 imperalism was a semite ideology

Maybe, but that was because of the circumstances Germany was in after WWI and not because of National Socialism itself.
Imagine a blank nation where National Socialism is installed, this is what I try to use as a basis to define National Socialism in a neutral way, that ignores all the details of cultural and historical background of a specific nation.

Where I differ with the Holla Forums mainstream, is that I've come to understand from my study of history and biology that conquest of new land and 'cleansing' of natives has never occurred just because a particular tribe / species decides to commit genocide on a whim. The real driving force is natural selection which operates beyond the realms of human control (except eugenics perhaps), novel mutations are the key developments not power hungry warlords.
For example, after the Indo-European tribes domesticated cattle they acquired new mutations that allowed them to metabolize lactose. This directly lead to an explosion in the number of people who could be supported by a given amount of land.
What you need to do is not only value the things you admire about Western Civilization, but understand that there are many other evolutionary niches that exist, and the plants and animals that most effectively fill that niche should have our respect.

Except there is no such thing as a blank nation.

People have roots, have traditions to define them.

It cannot just start blank.

Even hitler didnt have the balls to gas faggots it seems so yeah.

But Holla Forums, if you're a white supremacist trying to protect your own race, isn't supporting the annihilation of other races who were subjugated by modified history and jewish media, make you a hypocrite?

Poisonous ideology does not count, as it could come from any race.

...

Hindu myth was forced on India by the Proto-Indo-Europeans, though. So at any rate it's better than (((Christianity))).

I aware of that, but if you want to define the concept of a Ideology, you must ignore the circumstances where the ideology is used in, since they would alter the concept of that ideology.
Like when the product of a chemical reaction can be changed, by altering the temperature or the pressure, even when the educts stay the same.

They will purge themselves eventually or swallow up the whole world like insatiable locusts. They should have been left as hunter gatherers walled off from society. But of course cheap labor meant that we had to give phasers to mountain lions.

You didn't understand my post. I'm not for an unnecessary conquest or genocide and am all for cooperative relations with other races like Asians and countries in South America and even some from the ME like Iran and Syria.
But what if in the future European countries get overpopulated and our people need more land and resources?
Why would it be wrong to conquer and settle a part of African land that is populated by completely useless people that would probably get exterminated by nature alone if it wasn't for our help? China is taking advantage of Negro "countries" as we speak btw.

NO (((Christian))) empathy is dead here. We realize that in the end, we will be destroyed if you don't genetically engineer and nanobot their asses.

Why?

Because Caste System and natural barriers do not work. Eventually the shitskins poisons our blood and IQ drops and everything turns into India/Mexico/Middle East

They've been around longer than us and lived like animals. They won't die off, we will. Unless a mad Scientist takes action and changes Nordic genes so that they can't race mix. At which point they will see us only as food or aliens to kill. So we must kill them with nanobots because diseases evolve and will kill us back

Good way to put it.

I'm not going to dictate what happens naturally due to population grow / decline. Obviously I want my people to prosper.

Part of the problem currently is the massive explosion in the population of the developing world, which is the principle driving force behind the invasion of our countries.
Thankfully we know exactly why this has happened, European technology and massive food exports. If we just shut down global trade these parasites would shrivel up and die.

Who do you consider white exactly.

Who is considered so shitskin they are not allowed to exist? We know there are invasive species but that is usually obvious.
Africans/Arabs and the like didn't flood Europe with their genes until they were allowed and told to. All other attempts were militarily destroyed. If they're so inferior in intellect how they possibly go about the genocide of an entire race? Not even Hitler himself was able to succeed, however close he may have come.

It's because these shitskins are getting shipped right into our countries and it's not just regular shitskins, it's the lowest of their shitskin society that's flooding us. You're forced to live with that garbage so it's only natural you develop a hatred for them. We also live in a time AFTER WW2 with the knowledge of how they treated Hitler and what happened to him.

I have no problem with the sandniggers or chinks or any other people who wish to remain in their own countries and do well there.

Another reason you might want to consider is that the tropics and warm climates seem to breed lazy, and stupid creatures. I'd much rather dominate the temperate and arctic climate zones

Back when Holla Forums when it was just open-minded people discussing politics, people liked Nazism and Hitler after realizing it was actually a respectable regime and that after accounting for everyone's crimes, the Nazis actually came out on top compared to the allies. The sentiment among Nazi Germany and those people who came to respect it was that whites are more civilized than everyone else, so things like genocide and the like are beneath us. Now that Holla Forums is flooded with braindead reactionaries… well you can see the effect.

Cue the stream of >(1)s and pepes you'll receive for going against the echo-chamber.

M8, I agree with you, I was just stating that we should take what we need when such situation arises. If we need more land, we should take it, this is a natural thing to do.

Yeah, wait for when our economy completely collapses and all the shitskins start flocking towards our countries by the millions, what's happening now is just a beginning. Hopefully most of them will genocide eachother before they organise and reach our lands.

Also
Kek, wouldn't call it that as it's not really developing on its own but is rather artificially sustained by us.

If a developed nation with a developed race conquered land (not yours) for the same reason would you allow it?

So apparently even Adolf Hitler isn't extreme enough for Holla Forums

I don't agree. There's not enough evidence to back it up and too much evidence against it. Just look at civilisations like Ancient Egypt, Greece, Sumeria etc.
The only reason I see why people in more tropical areas are lazy and inferior is because that's just where Negroes and Arabs originate from. And what about Australia? There's no sign that they're getting lazier.

Honestly the genius of Hitler was to be able to gather people from many different walks of life and backgrounds. Not just hawkish militaristic reactionaries but nature loving idealists. We have a lot to learn still.

*as well

Nigger I came here in the first exodus.

There are no crimes in war - only victors and losers.
Whoopty fucking do. The Nazis were "morally" superior, yet lost anyway. Maybe if they weren't so "moral", and actually killed the Brits at dunkirk, or played dirty more often, they would have won.

The only times you've replied to this thread have been to bitch about "stormfront", jack off faggots who agree with your shitty opinions, and spout "muh hugbox" memes. You haven't provided anything of value. Fuck off.

That would depend on whether them conquering land made them stronger. If a foreign race was conquering lands, and the resources/power they acquired made them a threat to us, then I would most definitely stop them from it.

Hitler gathered the ex-commies and dregs of society, put them on the right course, and turned them into his street-sweepers. National Socialism and Fascism are entirely militarist ideologies. Stop trying to paint these ideologies off as hippy pacifist shit, because that's untrue.

I'm not playing your game faggot. There is the Nordic . They are the originators of all that is "white".

White = master race of HomoSapiens, of which niggers are not apart of.

We need to keep the line going if you want "whites" in the future.

Mixed whites, slightly mixed whites, not saying they are bad but we need to preserve the garden of aryan genetics or slowly degrade into the planet of the apes

Hitler's biggest flaw was not selfishly preserving Germany alone… and preparing to kill all shitskins and Jews with a mega weapon. So we could hunt the rest down and become the Barbarian master race we were meant to be….. NOW OUR SPECIES WILL BLEED TO DEATH

Who died and made you king of threads?

into the fucking trash

Bullshit

That was his greatest failure.
Believing he could gather shitskins and idiots and Italians and Japs to help him in the great cause of Nationalism vs. International Finance.

Hitler should of selfishly prepared the Aryan race and Homosapien species for a mega weapon to kill them all, and not given a fuck about African Erectus or what Communists do to the world

He split way too much white blood.

Launching war on your fellow Europeans was a fatal error.

He should have willingly brought them into the Reich.

I would suspect if you would have taken any of the Allied forces soldiers and showed them what would become of their homelands after they won, and they would have surely joined the Nazi Army.

maybe not but the skulls and intellect….

Obviously this would require much longer time spans to test the hypothesis.

However it is my opinion that the unique perspective and outlook of our people originates from our hunter gather ancestors who domesticated wolves ~50- 70 thousands years ago, we were apex predators along with wolves. Even today if you look at patterns of diet westerners consume a far larger percentage of their calories from meat compared to any other culture. And it probably started developing even earlier than that, Homo Erectus colonized Eurasia ~1.9 million years ago, the PC narrative on the out of Africa theory is extremely distorted.

regardless if they are shit skins or not if they are willing to combat the (((larger threat))) then why not ally yourself with them? deal with them later.

So you think that Germany could have successfully fought against all the other great powers simultaneously without any allies?

Wrong…. And that's why Hitler failed

Shitskins are the larger threat. Jews are a mongrel race with psychopathic inbred tendencies. The great WAR isn't about your shitty little European States. It's about the planet and who will rule it…. us or shitskins and mongrels

All they did was compromise the Reich. HE shouldn't have fought at all if there was any choice… Whatever it took, even letting Stalin have Poland. He should of developed a nuke or a plauge to kill Jewish power off, not ran around playing Napoleon on the battle field.

He fought the wrong war

Explain to me how you are going to convince a majority of people to either vote for a opening militaristic fascist leader with making concessions for the less hawkish components of our populations.

An alternative is military coup and return to monarchy

Shut up (((Christian))) you fucking traitor degenerate. You piece of nigger shit

I agree that WWII was a mistake.
However we arrive at the same conundrum, how do you get someone elected without compromise and accommodating people from other persuasions who otherwise would support nationalism

I'm not playing any game with you. Just asking who you consider white, which apparently is still up to argument for a lot of people.

I guess that makes sense, an example being muslims waging wars to spread islam.
But would a "preemptive" strike be justified even if there was no evidence of military threat?
Would you consider them just have a military a threat in itself?

You think that Monarchy originates from Christianity?

amazon.com/Birth-Nobility-Constructing-Aristocracy-900-1300/dp/0582369819

More specifically aristocracy

Hitler's policy was all about reuniting the German people. He would have lost his face if he let any Germans be tormented by foreigners whether in newly formed Czech Republic or Poland.

The allies main opponent was Bolshevism at the time.
Imagine if all the immigrants flooding into the countries of today were armed and were militarily
organized, its basically the same thing.

Axis*

When I said allies i meant the alliance of the axis lel

How long? Sumer was one of the first civilisations that we know of. Do you also think that shitskins living in Northern European countries will with time become Nordic and hardworking?

Which was never considered normal, except maybe for countries in the far north where it was hard to grow anything. Romans for example rarely ate meat. Meat was considered food in case of emergencies like war or other food shortages.
Even soldiers who ate a lot more meat than civilian population were not eating it as much as we are now. We did always consume more diary products then other races though.

And I'm not shilling for veganism or any retarded crap like that, but I do think that we eat too much meat. It was considered strong food that takes a big toll on the body back in the days.

No. You acted like a typical obscurist Redditor where you questioned/denied the existence of the white race to suit your argument. White is a race. Your denial of it doesn't make it any less true. Anyone of ethnic/indigenous European ancestry is white.
I'm referring to entirely genetically foreign populations like non-whites. Whites, although having their ethnic and cultural differences, are fairly close genetically and belong to/have contributed to a larger civilisation that we call "European/White/Western Civilisation". If you're trying to imply that a Russian, Italian, Brit, and German are as different to each other as they are to an Arab, Chinese, African, and South American, then you're just a disingenuous idiot.
Now you're shifting your argument entirely. Before you were arguing from a position that we should all try to create a world of "mutual understanding and respect" and how the subjugation/destruction of other people is wrong, and how our ideology really promotes diversity, yada yada. Now you're trying to come across as a neutral, saying that no nation holds any responsibility to any other, which is entirely true and something we were never arguing over.
The existence of international cultural diversity doesn't bother me. The idea that it should be our ultimate goal to preserve it, and that subjugating other populations for our own interests is morally wrong for this reason, borthers me. I made that very clear
No, you're just being disingenuous again. You're trying to apply rules of external societal interaction to the internal of society. Laws about stealing and other such morally wrong acts exists to keep the funciton and unity of society together. In between races/civilisations, there exists no such duty or necessity, hence the subjugation and imperialism that occurred throughout history.
Although I agree with you with this on a practical level, you tried applying some moral foundation for it. The reason I would leave other countries alone and not give a shit about their activities is out of my own self-interest, not out of some moral duty not to get involved. If it became in my interests to invade and colonise a foreign land, then I would obviously support it. Our nations have no obligation to not expand and colonise.
Again, you completely misrepresent my position. My argument isn't to kill these people out of sadistic pleasure, and for the mere creation of carnage. The only reason I would invade a foreign nation and colonise them with our people would be if this was in our best interests. If some tiny insignificant country wants to keep existing, and is inconsequential, then so be it.
There is nothing in National Socialism, which is an offshoot of fascism that says violent conquest is wrong. In fact, fascist Italy, which shared the same ideological framwork as NatSoc to a certain degree, was set out to recreate the Roman Empire.
Mix personal concepts into it? Kinda like what you're doing with your pacifism?

Yes.

Stop blaming Christianity for your personal faggotry.

As opposed to a non-material worldview, as in one not existing in the material world? You make no sense
So you're a cultural relativist who believes that every culture is equal? Into the trash it goes. Can you tell me with a straight face that Africans and the "culture" they have produced is objectively on par with European civilisation in any capacity? Where is their masterpieces of art? Music? Where are their great philosophers? Poets? Writers? What great technology have they produced? What deeper insight into the world we live in have they given us? You're trying to cover your thinly-veiled egalitarianism with this idea that "superiority" is subjective.
Materialism is an idea that originates from a material world. What are you implying? That our world isn't one grounded in the material? That reality isn't material? Don't be a fool. Nowhere did I imply that materialism is the be-all end-all

Trump is right about one thing we need to be willing to name our Enemy. Calling Communist Jewry the Soviet was our first mistaken in the Cold war. Our second mistake was ignoring this venation of Conquest's Laws of Politics.

"Any organization not explicitly anti-Jew sooner or later becomes Jewry."

Proud unafraid Catholic here, bro. What're you gonna do … cryyyy?

...

Northern Europeans have historically relied more heavily on livestock and hunting compared to other people. It is the key difference between us and the middle eastern and Oriental civilizations.

Agriculture isn't the only sign of civilization, the Europeans were the first people to domesticate animals, not just for food but as companions.

-First domesticated Dogs
-First demesticated Horses
-Invented the first wheeled vehicles (only independent discovery I believe)
-The Chinese and Europeans have the oldest recorded proto-writing
etc etc
European dominance in innovation isn't something new.
Agriculture does seem to be a prerequisite for a large accumulation of wealth though.

He's going to type "hurr durr muh kike on a stick" and stomp his foot in anger as he throws a temper tantrum in his room. I'm not even a Christian but I hate these fags that stir up religion in every thread. Just let all the Pagans that post Viking/Greek/Roman pictures be, and let all the Christians that post Crusaders/KKK pictures be. In the end most people on Holla Forums are pussies that will never get anything done and will only engage in internet fights with bluepilled retards.

All that salt pouring out of your fingertips is a wonderful sight indeed.

Please go and read Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Shakespeare, Marlowe, Newton and Goethe.

Yes materialism as a philosophical idea was spread in the west by (((Spinoza))).

The origin of the unique European outlook is actually European polytheism, as practiced by the Ancient Greeks, Celtic and Germanic tribes.

norse-mythology.org/

Most people on Holla Forums coming from Europe don't give a flying fuck about racial superiority, nationalism and other mein kampf shit.
They just wan't islam and poor people from 3. world countries kicked the fuck out.

Funny thing is that the whole "kike on a stick" thing never bothered me. It's just not offensive. It's like the new generation of petulant children burning bibles and claiming they beat Christianity.

When I was in high school, it was "Xtianity" and "you cannibalize a zombie!" My faith is my own and I wear it without fear.

I wonder if chappy up there shows his power level without fear …

Dubs of truth, of course we are more extremist than the Nazis, we know the consequences of their failure, they didn't

Because the "Jew" of the bible where worshiping Moloch and/or Baal. Jewry is Satanism. Particular traits such as Usury, Parasitism, Pushing Degeneracy, Hedonism, Materialism, Greed, Lust, Gluttony, Sloth, Wrath, they are soulless devils that use power to temp man towards worldly trappings and enslave them in sin. Sin is literally the death of the civilization (entropy). And that revelations was a warning against Globalist Zionism. That the Whore of Babylon was a metaphor warning against "multiculturalism" and "free trade", because Don't you remember the myth about the Tower of babel? Babylon was a Multicultural Fedora tipping utopia that destroyed itself and the fallout lead to the separation of mankind into nations with distinct tongs. You are really so thick-headed that you still don't know that religion is just primitive applied memetics? That the stories are PARABLES but their value can only be maintained if superstition is kept at bay. Are you really this low energy? Or are you just a Kike pissed off that people are naming the Jew?

...

Northern Europeans aren't the only Europeans though. I agree with the rest of your post, just pointing out that our ancestors didn't eat as much meat as we do now.
Food also used to be a lot more nutritius because earth is exhausted from planting the same type of plants on the same fields over and over so we can produce enough of it in order to feed such a number of shitskins and other dumb people in our societies.
I think that's why we eat more meat than we used to. Just take fast food for example, I don't feel fed from eating there, it just feels like I have something in my stomach and that's it.
It's probably why we have such a high rate of cancer and fat people, because you need to eat a fuck load of this crap to feel fed.

Our civilisation needs to drown in its own shit for all the degenerates to die off. We'll probably have a new Renaissance when it happens.

And modern day Christians aren't even aware of that fact. The fact that the bible can be interpreted in any way you like means that it is not an ideal meme, besides for the meme itself since it will always survive on despite mutations. You go from having Aquinas name the Jew to today with evangelicals saying that the 3rd temple needs to be rebuilt and other sects allowing general faggotry. Christianity has been lead astray just like the Jews that Yeshua tried to get to were lead astray.

This is all assuming that the Christian cult in Rome legitimately pushed Yeshua's word and not purposefully cucked Rome from the inside.

not giving a fuck about Jewry and race is what got you cucked in the third place Brit/pol/. You should have taken Hitlers offer of peace and been smart enough not to let (((freemasonry))) and (((classical Liberalism))) destroy your natrual hierarchy. Hey, what is done is done, water over the bridge. What is important is what to do now and Jewry is right up their with getting rid of Sandniggers.

Yes the modern Church in most all its incantations is Poz'd but it still is a tool to red pill normalfags. Just see all the Red Pills Mel Gibson and his Father has dropped over the years. It was learning more about the Spanish inquisition that Red Pilled me to the Jewish Question originally. These lessons in history are important.

Pretty much this. Both Paganism and Christianity have their place in European history. The thing is though, people on Holla Forums are not 100% identical. There are varying different opinions on Holla Forums. Some people on Holla Forums either hate Christianity or Paganism while I don't have any qualms with much of what the religions have taught. Some people on Holla Forums shill for Vladimir Jewtin, I however, see him as another Communist. Some people on Holla Forums mainly in this thread, are pro-homosexuality, while I see homosexuality as incompatible with White Nationalism/National Socialism due to not being able to reproduce, the harnessing of STDs, the lowering of the lifespan, high suicide rates and high suicide attempt rates, all of this being completely against the 14 in 14/88.

jej

I meant to say only be maintained if subversion is kept at bay. quitting smoking had a sleepless night

One of my uncles fought urder Patton, did not have a problem at all killin' krauts. Neither would I have, in his situation.
Fuck a jew. I care nothing for them.
But if one of you wannabe Nazis fuck with me , I'll blow your stupid asses to hell with this Luger that my unc got of a dead Kraut in North Africa. I'm holding it in my hand while I post.
Fuck you Nazi numbnuts. You are not the solution, you are as big a problem as the Kikes.

Central banks wanted to flatten and annihilate an Independent Germany who's value backed monies threatened the global economy and (((certain))) peoples wealth.

Nice shitpost/10

They are not real Christian, They dont know where their own religion began or any other basic theology knowledge.
The most insufferable thing as a former member of the roman catholic church is how they distort christianity to fit their narrative .

Adolf Hitler played nice and, unfortunately, he failed as a result. This time around will almost certainly be our last chance at success, so we can't afford to play nice.

I hope fellow anons begin dehumanizing yourself, if you don't then you won't survive but a second.

I think most people are against genocide even if they hate the jews and think they're a problem.

The Nazis were elected on nationalistic and socialist worker values. At some point they decided to throw all pretense of civilized behavior out of the window.

Even war has some rules.

"Even war has some rules."
The first rule of warfare :
There ain't none.

I'M NOT FUCKING SAYING THAT ISRAELITES ARE THE WESTERN EUROPEANS OR ARYANS I'M SIMPLY STATING THAT THEY WERE WHITE
Check out embed related, it might be an eye opener to some more secular White Nationalists.

When the people you're fighting follow no rules or have any semblance of morality, and when your whole country and way of life is crumbling around you all the rules are up and it becomes a place where anything goes.

The Germans became a dog pushed into a corner, they were bound to fight back fiercely and violently because they knew if they lost the Allies were going to punish them severely which they did.

If we fail like the Germans did we'll be fucked worse than them, we'll be completely wiped out and suppressed much worse than they ever were.

All other cults had promises of afterlife user.

Only a jew would try to force such unnatural memes.

Probably the Christianism of Rome time was much Bolder and much more Will to Power (as long as you took your oaths to Christ) than today.

"You cannot look at the same river twice" - Heraclitus

Wasn't there a man who constantly criticized the NSDAP for being too moderate? I'm pretty sure I read that he crashed parties and ranted about how the Jews need to be killed and not deported. Some Holla Forumsack must have gotten his hands on a time machine.

"Adolf Hitler played nice and, unfortunately, he failed as a result"
Yes, Hittler wasn't bad, just misunderstood.
They gave his ass his Lebensraum, but it wasn't enough.
You Nazii wannabes ought to be pissed at him, not us 'Muricans that had to fuck him up 'cause he begged for it. He declared war on us, remember ? And the moron started his shit with the Reds, and did not learn anything from Napoleon's folly.
You can't fix stupid.

You could of just sided with Hitler at the start of WW2, and tell Britain and France to eat a dick.

Alliance with Japan basically forced him. Had his relations been different with Japan he would've avoided the whole Pearl Harbor incident like it was a pile of burning shit.

War with the Soviets was inevitable just like how all of WW2 was inevitable. Stalin was building up an invading force to invade the rest of Europe while it was in disarray, you'd have to be blind to think he wasn't. Hitler knew that he had to take out Stalin now rather than later or else he would've gotten too powerful and rolled over all of Europe, but he didn't plan for Japan to spark a war with the US due to FDR's war mongering in the region so he ended up having to fight a two front war. In addition to that, his generals who were heading Operation Barbarossa refused to establish proper supply lines and prepare for a winter war due to their arrogance that the Soviets would be taken out before winter which didn't happen. Add all this together and everything began crumbling due to Hitler's allies being literally retarded and his generals being over confident and disobedient.

It's very popular for normalfags and (((historians))) to always blame Hitler for causing Germany to fail, but in actuality it was due to internal chaos in the military, bad allies, lack of resources, and having the whole world against them that caused Germany's defeat.

Roosevelt was a POS that cost tens of millions of white lives and allowed the proliferation of communism, which almost resulted in nuclear war. If the US was to be involved, we should have fought the commies alongside the Germans.

t. burger

"You could of just sided with Hitler at the start of WW2, "
We didn't want to side with anybody at that time, It was your Euro family feud, and we pretty much wanted to stay out of it, even though we knew the euros were going to drag our asses into it, whether we liked it or not. We did not make the mess, we just had to clean it up.
Hitler wasn't as bad as the history books make him to be, but he damn sure ain't eligible for sainthood, that is for damn sure.

The American people wanted to stay out of it, FDR on the other hand did all he could to get America into the war.

If you didn't know this already, FDR repealed the neutrality act, enacted lend-lease giving tons of aid to Britain and the Soviets, illegally had the Navy destroy German supply vessels in the Atlantic, stopped all oil trade with Japan which put its whole military and economy on brakes, and during negotiations with the Japanese tried to force them to cease their war with China which he knew very well they wouldn't do.

FDR was a war mongerer who very well could've prevented the US getting into the war and not get millions killed in the process, but he didn't because he, just like Churchill, wanted war.

So we sold Britan shiploads of tanks, fighter planes and small arms and tried to cripple the japs by with a oil embargo?

I'm not a complete Hitler worshipper, but I do think a lot of the things he said were true, I don't agree with SOME of his opinions, actions, etc. but nonetheless nobody is perfect. I'm more infatuated with the Romanian Iron Guard because their leader Corneliu Zelea Codreanu's story is the most heroic and fascination (even more so that Hitler if you ask me)
Polite sage because I'm going to sleep, goodnight niggers.

Hitler should've kept passive agressive on USA.

There was a chance that pacifists even in case of defeat wouldn't pull the muh holocaust card for 70 years.

Also invading USSR. He should've learned something from Napoleon. And Napoleon did reach Moscow, got fucked anyway. Hitler almost reached Moscow, but even if he did, he would be fucked anyway.

If he was patient and waited 5 years in siege with neutral relations with USSR, UK would've been chocked.

...

If Hitler waited 5 year to not declare war on the Soviets, Stalin would've already built up too large a fighting force and likely already conqured all of Europe with ease.

See

psncube.com/?ref=ZSpVHIHxc

Not that I disagree, USSR was always for world domination.
Imagine Hitler spent those 5 years making defensive preparations, trenches, landmines, and all that jazz against an incoming Bolshevick force.

In the meanwhile it would stave off boredom while UK barked. It was those times where patience was necessary. I guess the easy wins at Poland and France gave too big of an adrenaline rush.

...

Then so does Marxism and Jewery

Hitler killed off several thousands of the master race, for what ? Like I said, they gave him his godamn Lebensraum . But the son of a jewish bitch wanted more.
WTF DID YOU NAZI FELLATORS EXPECT ?

Yes, we have nukes now to this obvious slide.

DEFINITION OF CUCKED

...

You're making a repeat of the failure that was the Pacific Wall. Defenses can only do so much, and when the enemy breaks through and you don't have the proper fighting force to deal with it then you're fucked, just like with the Pacific Wall. It's the same reason why Hitler invaded France rather than just sat down at the border of Belgium and defend it while trying to get peace offers through. He tried to offer peace and once he knew that it just wasn't going to happen he invaded because he also knew that eventually they would get through and start taking Germany.

The only plausible way Hitler could've won is if his generals actually became realists, established proper supply lines on the East, fortify the Pacific Wall further and allocate distribution of defense equally all along it, and Italy was less retarded. Even with this though it's still equally possible the allies still get through the Pacific Wall and it forces Hitler to fight two fronts allowing the Soviets to rush through into Germany.

Germany was simply going to loss no matter what. There's not a whole lot one can do when the whole world is against you.

A Christian interpretation of our myths

So we should rape nuns then because they have to have the baby and will forgive us?

Holy Christ, I meant Atlantic Wall. It's getting late and I'm tired as hell.

Nigger Christianity was based on Sumerian Paganism. Yahweh, Elyon ect are different gods, just like their are lesser demigods like Moloch and Baal. Sabaoth. Elohim actually means GODs plural. Considering how much you claim to hate the Jews you don't seem to know very much about your enemy.

Yes Vatican II is Kiked up fam. Can you cut out the D&C shilling and take you piss chirst with you Goldstein.

Heaven forbid we sell weapons and such to other countries because saint Adolph the dumb did not not like it. Fuck his dead kraut ass. I'd drag his skull out of the grave
(if he had one ) and jizz in both eye sockets.

Fixed.

"FDR was a war mongerer who very well could've prevented the US getting into the war and not get millions killed in the process, but he didn't because he, just like Churchill, wanted war."
Let me ask you this, smart guy. Should they have rolled over on their backs like a puppy pissin' on themselves and let the Nazis take control ?
I guess not, Hienrich.

If they lost as defensive, they would be seen as martyrs rather than evil nazis.

We all would have better quality of life now.

Best translation of Mein Kampf? Anyone?

Wow. you just don't realize how impressed I am with that, really.

...

Stalag or Ford.

"If they lost as defensive, they would be seen as martyrs rather than evil nazis.
We all would have better quality of life now."
Only Muzzies think this ignorant-assed shit.

As a german i can tell you that Hitler is moderate compared to Holla Forums. Thing is, Weimar was moderate compared to modern Germany too.

White is NOT a race and YOUR denial of it doesn't make it any less true. White is just a american term used to sum up all people of European descent living in the US for the sole purpose of distance them from the people of African descent they refer as blacks. Black is also not a race, since there are several different African tribes with different genetic make up. Of course the European races are genetically closer to each other than to other races outside of Europe, same goes for the African races. Still as farther the people live away from each other the bigger the genetically differences and therefore Phenotypes are, since the interbreeding is more unlikely the farther they live away from each other. Have you ever compared a Finn with a Greek? Honestly, the Greeks are closer related to Turks than to the Scandinavians. There is no solid definition of "whites", but the closest thing to that is the term Europid, which is subordinated to Caucasian, since Caucasians also include many middle eastern people. You can say that "whites" belong to the same race-family-tree, but it's still hard to determine since many people try to include several races within certain terms, which is mostly hard since the racial differences is fluent, especially now since the modern travel.

Caucasian>Europid>(?Whites?)>Germanic, Nordic, Celtic, Slavic>farther sub-races

But hey, what do I know, I just study Molecular Biology. The point is that I don't want to use the term "white" since it's just a generalization, which allows collective blaming just as the distribution us success. If the Europeans would use the term white so much as the Americans, then soon some Latvian farmer can be blamed for the American slavery or Australians can be congratulated for finishing the Gotthard Tunnel. That view is the ideology of the lowest common denominator, which will get you always exactly that, the lowest common thing as the new default.

No. That's just that what you interpreted into my post after you got triggered by it

But since all what you did was just interpreting my words as you pleased and declaring those interpretations as my intentions, I will take the freedom to do the same.
After that point your opinion about me was already set into stone and no matter what, because you have decided that I'm your enemy which means that everything I say is wrong, even if it's that 1+1=2. No argument nor validated fact would be able to convince you that the cool and hardcore Hollywood Nazis weren't in reality like they were presented. It makes you angry, that they weren't ice cold super soldiers who wanted to cleanse the world of all filth and stomping everybody who stood in their way. It makes you angry, that they didn't hate everybody else, that they had good connections to non-Europeans like Muslims and Japanese, that they respected "weaker" countries like Hungary or Romania or that they even fought alongside Africans during the occupation of northern Africa. It makes you angry, that they only wanted to live as a sovereign Nation without the international influence that bled out their country and it's people from the inside and from the outside. And it makes you angry that they did not only wanted all of that for themself, but also for the rest of Europe, which was the reason why they defended all of Europe against the Bolshevism. You are not only just mad, but you also projecting your own issues on your opponent by calling him names and what else. Deal with it.

The main reason in our arguing seems not to be a political basis, but rather on a ethical one. The problem is that you are just an ice cold bastard who would kill a person for a few bucks as long as you don't have to fear any personal consequences for doing so. As long as there is no absolutely need for survival there is never a morally right reason for starting a war, killing people and destroying nations. According to you, you would conquer Venezuela for their mineral deposits just because you would like to have them, as long no other country would threaten you with any consequences.
If we would go father here of right and wrong it will never end and I'm to tired to spend the next few ours about the differences of personal justice and public law.

First of all, I'm not a pacifist. If a person doesn't go around and start punching people for why the fuck not, it's called common sense. If I get threatened or attacked I will fight back with everything I have, but that doesn't mean that I must walk around and search for fights. Was Hitler also a pacifist, because he wrote peace offers to France and Britain, because he never wanted a war with those? Do you really think that avoiding avoidable fights is the same as pacifism or fear? Get real.

Don't bother answering this post since I won't do it either, because I have said everything and there is nothing more to say about.

… you should maybe take a look at the lower left corner.

Multi-kulti is Hitler's delayed posthumous revenge on the shabbos goy Whites who defeated him.

Difference?

...

this tbh.

Compared to the KKK, yes.

KILL YOUR MOTHER

Fucking shitskins man I swear

What Jewish logic is this?

I don't think nonwhites should exist, period.

No, user, you are the controlled opposition.

Put it this way: if France had demanded free military access through Germany after having been ruling over them for one hundred years, would Germany have been rational to refuse that?

Absolutely this.

Get the fuck out of here.

This is basically just a rehashed "You need to racemix to survive" meme or an "It's inevitable, goyim, just accept it!" meme. There is absolutely no reason why we should not eventually get rid of all nonwhites.

I guess the humans and Neanderthals got along just fine then. They cooperated; they obviously weren't competitors. My Neanderthal best friend says so.

Nothing you just said is any reason for me to want nonwhites to stay alive. Even if I were part of an inferior race, why would I want to keep superior competitors alive?

Guess you don't wash your hands either, faggot.

This is next level shilling.

Cuckservative detected.

The pragmatic and realistic view is that all nonwhites need to, one way or another, vanish from the Earth, lest we come to the brink of annihilation and replacement again.

0/10 not even trying.

Just stop.

Could you be anymore of a shill?

Not a square millimeter of territory, Schlomo. The US has the best chance of being a white ethnostate.

Explain to me how white nations can be replaced and destroyed if nonwhites don't exist.

Honestly where the fuck did you come from, or are their universalist nationalists on Tumblr now?

That is realism. We can't be threatened by them if they don't exist, and recent history has proven that we can't afford to risk it.

Don't worry. I oppose slavery and think nonwhites shouldn't exist.

Explain to me exactly what is wrong with the 100% effective solution of eliminating them completely. Why go for the half-ass measure of hoping they won't become a threat again?

At the turn of the century whites thought it was assured that nonwhites would die out, and now look where we are. This has proven that betting on nonwhites always being nonthreatening is absolutely stupid.

They should not exist anymore.

Found your problem. In today's electorates with traitors, morons, and nonwhites no truly worthwhile candidate is getting elected. Best we might hope for is a gradual shift, but that takes effort and time, neither of which we have in excess.

The world's going to be a big disappointment to you.

That's a funny way of spelling "FDR and vested interests."

For someone so adamant about US isolationism you sure seem to care what happens to Europe.

Get the fuck out of here. Next you'll be telling me that "German" is a construct and that there are only Bavarians, Saxons, Prussians, etc..

You're not even trying.

Yes, Hitler was way too nice, that's what did him.
nigger, fuckin' please.

"If Hitler waited 5 year to not declare war on the Soviets"
Hitler didn't have that luxury.
You know if a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass, genius.
GODAMMIT, THE STUPID IS STRONG WITH YOU FAGS, i SWEAR.

I bet you work on the truck business.
Plebeian scum

...

in*. Still sleepy.

They tried to merge all their shitty gods together to get one unified desert theocracy going. Religion is a pseudo extension of internationalism, while (((they))) may not have a physical presence in one place it doesn't matter if the people living in that place primarily believe in some Semite god. Abrahamism and internationalism go hand in hand.

Drinking the Jewish koolaid

youtube.com/watch?v=vOulsEGvSCo

Sauron represents universalist semetic influence.

How is this in any way relevant to anything I said? When were Tolkien's writings even mentioned?

...

"The pragmatic and realistic view is that all nonwhites need to, one way or another, vanish from the Earth, lest we come to the brink of annihilation and replacement again."

ia801407.us.archive.org/14/items/ManTechnics-AContributionToAPhilosophyOfLife193253/SpenglerOswald-ManTechnics-AContributionToAPhilosophyOfLife193253P..pdf

Yeah, we are, but times are more extreme now.

Well they didn't have them flooding their societies. I mean I don't have a problem with pajeets and muslims fucking around in their own shitholes. Niggers, though, have to go, the wildlife of Africa is more important; I guess the Kalahari bushmen can stay since they're practically wildlife themselves.

youtube.com/watch?v=suLkDkj8OpQ

Ok Boromir

youtube.com/watch?v=tanpDhkretk

"Sauron represents universalist semetic influence"
how about we live in the real world instead of fiction bullshit for a change ?
I KNOW IT WOULD BUST SOME OF YOUR TENDER BALLZ, but it must be done, ladies..

Contrary to your simplistic view of the world, mythology and ancient wisdom are a part of the 'real world' and you need to learn if you want to be able to ensure our survival

The War of the Ring was workplace violence.

What idiot, who can't write a sentence?

Tell me succinctly why we shouldn't endeavor to eliminate nonwhites.

Okay, seriously, mate, what the fuck are you going on about? Can you not make your own arguments anymore?

You want us to embrace the ideology of our Jewish overlords, and psychotic Muslim shitskins.
It is compromising our ability to stay focused on the key objective which is securing our homelands.
We can debate the merit of 'dominating all life' after achieving this objective.

youtube.com/watch?v=K3VOf3CBGvw

No, Adolf actually did something.
He didn't just post on reichchan and krautbook.

"No, Adolf actually did something."]
Like what, besides blah, blah, blah ?
when it come down to the nut cuttin'. he come up way short, sonny..

Something I agree with you on is that we need to stop apologizing for our greatness, but what made us great wasn't Semites.

youtube.com/watch?v=K63PN2bxAXE

No, I'm speaking of practical realities while you try to cloud the issue by obfuscating, citing vague could-be metaphors, and then making retarded assumptions like "If you kill your enemy, he wins."

Answer the following:

Answer those instead of trying Jewish arguing tactics like making proclamations along the lines of "Your enemy does it therefore you can't."

Multi-step process, friend. Kick nonwhites out of white lands –> reduce nonwhite populations –> colonize more land –> kick nonwhites out –> reduce –> repeat until there are no more nonwhites.

Fuck off, you kraut wannabe. If you bitches were as bad as you pretend to be, you might amount to something.
But you don't it is what it is.
No, i'm not a god- damn yid, I despise them as much as you do.. That shill crap won't work here,

Don't put words in my mouth, I would die to protect my family.

It's not so much that we can't effectively use Jewish / Semetic ideology because of practical concerns, but that we have an entirely different nature. We need to be able to understand the unconscious mind of European man if we are to be successful.

Become the chancellor of Germany.

gas teh kikez

A) I was summarizing what you effectively said. B) When the fuck did I mention your family? Literally irrelevant.

Sure, dude, it's white nature to lie down and die. White nature means that we'll never be able to take steps to ensure protection in the future, so obviously we should never try.

Okay? And what part of that translates to "We need to keep nonwhites alive"? I'm not talking about how to market this shit, I'm just stating facts about what needs to be done. Nonwhites go or whites go, it's that simple.

Family, meaning ethnicity, meaning race.

Like you I am extremely frustrated with the paralyzing childlike naivety that seems to be innate to Europeans. However we do have in built psychological mechanisms that will allow us to recognize danger and act in our self interest if we take account of this weakness that we clearly have.

"gas teh kikez"
Hopefully soon.

that's exactly what a kike would say, shlomo

Do you use "species," "subspecies," and "genus" interchangeably too?

Good to know, but this has basically nothing to do with your constant "We're the real lovers of diversity!" and "Nationalism for everyone! World peace!" shilling/shitposting.

Family has a much broader meaning than specific scientific classification schemes.

Only when you make it clear from context, which you didn't.

Hitler and the Nazis weren't even extreme m80.

Holla Forums why can't you just stay in your safe space?

Probably
Holla Forumsacksmwould go out of their way to kill every African, Jew, Muslim, Turk, and many other ethnicities and religions rather than expel them from their ancestral lands like the Nazis did

This, and I absolutely fucking hate it
This isn't the ideal that Hitler and the National Socialist party worked towards, they the Germans to be proud of their race- not hate the other races
Not quite sure who I should be angry at though, the jews for starting the lie that National Socialists absolutely hated every other race or the retards that managed to fall for it

White-hating kikes and mudslimes are not deserving of your kindness.

This is exactly the kind of shit that the Jews wanted to happen, can't you see? It's divide and conquer at a much larger scale than the usual shitposting shill you see every now and then

If anything, the question we should be asking ourselves is how do we unfuck it?

"One was permitted to behold a plurality of norms; one god was not considered a denial of another god, nor blasphemy against him. It was here that the luxury of individuals was first permitted; it was here that one first honored the rights of individuals. … The freedom that one conceded to a god in his relation to other gods – one eventually also granted to oneself in relation to laws, customs, and neighbors. Monotheism on the other hand, this rigid consequence of the doctrine of one human type – the faith in one normal god beside whom there are only pseudo-gods – was perhaps the greatest danger that has yet confronted humanity" Nietzsche discussing native European spirituality

Am I the only one who wants to eradicate Islam just because non-muslim traditional middle-eastern chicks dress hot af?

Like fuck, the dick wants what the dick wants, and the dick wants me to end muslim expansionism to let these beautiful flowers flourish

hijabs can be cute though the girls working at maccas in my town are fuckable

We're already divided, you dumb brown muzzo cunt. You think because we have something to say about Jews, we don't dislike mudslimes? You're wrong.

Islam and browns are a cancer on this earth. Lurk more.

It was a top Nazi himself who said you shouldn't do battle with jews using your values of virtue, since the jew will exploit them and use them against you.

Mudslimes aren't much different, just look at what's happening in Europe right now. Go and see what their kindness has brought them.

i think jews are much more extreme than anything in the world

You need a Don Vito Corleone slap in the fucking face. YOU COULD BE A MAN.

The Nazis weren't privy to a future with billions of armed third worlders possessing their own discrete national hydrocarbon infrastructures.

They weren't privy to a dystopia of dozens of millions of third worlders living in Europe and the West whose home countries will not accept deportation.

Semites are the cancer of the world, it is not necessary to drag every other ethnicity into the shit regardless of whether you think they are subhuman degenerates.

Convince me a Roach should live.

What's wrong with it?

So? That was obviously stupid of them. Why do we have to imitate it just "because Hitler did it."

You're a talking leftist propaganda poster. Opinions here are more nuanced than "I hate niggers, so let's kill them all." And another pro-tip for free: not everyone is a national socialist, so trying to appeal to True National Socialism™ is nothing more than poor rhetoric on your part.

Reeks of "Real Racists™!" and "True Conservatism™!" though. How about you actually provide an argument instead of "Not true National Socialism"? Because all that proves is that perhaps "True National Socialism" is in need of some rethinking.

You can't divide and conquer competitor groups, you fucking moron. They were never together to begin with, so you can't "separate" them.

"Nationalism for everyone!" and "Look how tolerant I am!" is just rebranded leftism.

The solution is breaking away from the rest of the world, rejecting globalism, rejecting imperialism, defending our homelands by whatever means necessary. Many of the problems you perceive are directly caused by our domination of the world, the only reason niggers are multiplying like rats is because we are providing an endless supply of food, medicine and technology. Similar story with the muslim world, they are a bunch of lazy entitled degenerates who sit around all day doing nothing having everything attended to by slaves. We have the power to shut off the supply chain, to starve the parasite.

Hmm. I can think of another solution easily within reach that doesn't mean eternal vigilance and courting destruction.

Perhaps you could explain what is wrong with this option.

We shouldn't be burning bridges, lest you want a war on all fronts
Is that projection I see?

We're not using our virtues to battle the Jews, we use our virtues to gain allies against
the Jews

They were more concerned about the fact that the Jews were going to turn white men against each other
There's a reason why he left invading Poland as a last resort, there's a reason why he kept sending treaties to Great Britain
Shame I can't find that screencap about Piludski

Just because I said we should cooperate with other races hell, not even that- simply redirecting that rage to the cause and not the symptom should be enough doesn't mean I want Europe to be infested with shitskins

Did you forget the fact that Hitler managed to obtain the help of Arabs, Niggers and Japs?

Learn what projection is.

Stop posting.

This is cognitive dissonance, holding a principled position requires intellectual consistency.

I believe in radical aristocratic values that all great European civilizations have upheld in some way shape or form. Leftism is a manifestation of the Semitic worldview abstracted from religious texts.

Eternal vigilance is the price that we pay to survive. Life is endless struggle.

Fucking he'll is it really that hard to figure out.
Common interest, non whites fought against communism. That doesn't mean they would have let them stay.

We keep our traditions because they're beneficial, dumbfuck, not just because they're tradition. Or do you go on tribal raids and shit in the woods regularly? Do you use that brain you presumably possess?

It means you promote allowing that possibility to happen. If there are no nonwhites they can't overwhelm whites, now can they? There is literally no reason not to eventually get rid of all nonwhites.

You honestly can't tell the difference between being allied and being part of the same group? This is basic stuff.

Explain which bit is cognitively dissonant. I'll be interested how you can spin "Whatever is best for whites" as cognitively dissonant, but feel free to try.

Your choice, but I will freely mock those "values" if they lead to white destruction or court it.

And yet the other poster (and you, earlier in the thread) were making points barely distinguishable from a leftist. What does that say?

That's like saying you shouldn't buy a more reliable car because you'll still have to have it inspected.

Why go for the more risky option when it provides no benefit?

No, that's not what they're claiming, they're claiming it means we can all celebrate our differences in our own countries and sing kumbaya because multiculturalism is the cause of all the world's problems and as long as we let diversity exist separately all conflict will cease. That and/or that it is "immoral" to seek the maximum benefit for your own race.

Effectively it's just leftism (or its subset: cuckservatism) that acknowledges a little bit more of reality.

And what makes you think that the traditions and goals that the NSDAP originally had is not beneficial?

And what makes you think that nonwhites, without Jews pushing them to do so, want to overwhelm whites? Look at the cause, not the symptoms

After you get rid of all the nonwhites, what do you think will happen?
Will you be content with the white man ruling the world or would you continue on and press the claim that x is not white and therefor should not be removed?

I never claimed that they were part of the same group, nor did I ever claim that whites and nonwhites should be grouped together
If anything, what I've been saying this whole time was that whites and nonwhites should have their own prospective borders and should be allies together

The Jew's main strength comes from turning groups against each other through lies and deception, they have no real strength of their own- you're doing exactly what they want

Good point.
Regarding NationalSocialism - my parents lived through the last years as kids and like any system there are people who are more equal than others. For the bottom dwellers life in a system is never really that good. Lots of rats would badmouth you and you had to face the secret police. I think many people on here have a rosy picture of a "strictly ordered" society. If you are not able to perform as expected you are basically regarded as human garbage.

Hmm. Why is the continuing existence of nonwhites not beneficial to whites? That's a tough one.

Because we are competitor groups, genius. That's nature. The Arabs didn't require any prompting to replace us, nor the Mongols, nor the Chinese, nor the Africans in Haiti. Did humans require Jews to replace Neanderthals or Dinosovians? The law of nature is conflict to extermination. So long as competitor groups to yours exist they are an existential and eternal threat to your own survival.

Or do you seriously believe that without Jews nonwhites would feel no urge to try and put us down, when we have the power to completely destroy them? Hell, what the fuck makes you think they'll want to stop living in white civilization?

On top of that, they're a waste of resources. We're nowhere near to getting off this planet, and I have no problem making nonwhites poorer to make whites better off. Preferably they'd just disappear though.

The cause is nature, you myopic simpleton.

Inevitable conflict. As is the law of nature. Unless we discover aliens. I doubt at that point anything would be up to me though, but I would rest easy knowing whites will have it safer.

It wouldn't be a matter of "x is not white" in such a world, since everyone would be white. It would be "x is not Anglo" or "x is not German," for example. As I said though, it probably wouldn't be up to me by that point. Still, white groups are so similar that I doubt any similar situation would arise for hundreds if not thousands of years. It would likely function as Europe did prior to mass contact with nonwhites, which I'm fine with.

Besides which,
is just fucking retarded.

Yes, you did. That's what "divide" means. If they aren't part of the same group, there can be no "dividing and conquering." You're stuck in a deluded fantasy of teaming up with nonwhites to kill Jews, which is just leftism with a NatSoc face.

Which is fucking stupid. What that means in practice is white altruism taken advantage of again and we end in the same situation on the brink of extinction. Take your koolaid and sip it somewhere else.

Who are you expecting this to fool? The strength of the Jew comes from turning groups against themselves, not against each other. Different racial groups being against each other is natural, and requires no Jews. What Jews do is sap the strength of the successful and use it to cut into their enemies' strength, usually to turn a profit or out of sheer hatred.

Stop living in a deluded fantasy of racial brotherhood. It's absolutely disgusting.

When the NFP was semi-formed over at Meadhall, we had a resembling of libertarian-nationalism. In the short year+ that we've been around, views have become completely ethno-nationalist based.

I saw it in the voting patterns. People here simply became more Fascist. The fucking overton window has shifted, enormously. And you don't realize it yourself.

The talk of deporting spics before the Summer was seen as heinous, now it is merely an uncomfortable truth that we rarely bring up around non-whites. The quiet talk of, say revolution if Trump fails, is whispered around in circles.

Let's not pretend the Nazis didn't commit heinous war crimes such as mass executions, deportations and yes even, straight up executions of Jews in the USSR. However, we are by far, far more extreme for a pre-war Germany.

At least by another ten. We don't just have nationalism, we have active dislike for others. Whereas the Nazis did not care for others, we actively dislike them. And in a war-like situation we are far more disposed to do much more awful against our opponents.

Nonsense.

Let me guess, you're (((British))))?

That does nothing to solve the problem already existing within our borders. Demographically we already have enough immigrants reproducing like rabbits to shove us out of our own nations even if we stopped all outside immigration, today. And their home countries will not take them back. Leaving us with only one option if we want our countries back.

>>>/britpol/

yes

Are you two idiots seriously having a debate based on the premise that the NSDAP wanted to kill all non-whites?

you guys used to be a empire…

now look at you.

Did you read what I said, 'defending our homelands by whatever means'

It is not a law of nature that all the hominid species need to occupy the same evolutionary niche. I wonder if you think you're a professor of evolutionary biology …

Crooked teeth subhuman detected.

Coming from your logic, it is because whites would have an enemy to unite against, rather than simply face off with each other

Competing with someone =/= he is your enemy

Yes they did, the Jewish promises of riches in far away lands, rather than to simply stay within their nation and improve it was what prompted them- make no mistake, I don't view rapefugees with compassion, the greatest solution would be to simply ship them off back to their homeland

Doing something simply because it's the law of nature or acting solely upon your instincts makes you nothing more than a beast. It is the end goal of man to overcome his natural boundaries- to strive to become greater, were that not the case we would still be chucking spears at each other like a bunch of niggers

Your ancestors viewed other tribes as threats as well, but in the end all those tribes managed to unite and form a nation
Even now, you're seeking to form bonds with other whites to fight back against nonwhites

Would you still rest easy, knowing that the path you pursue right now will result with brothers fighting against brothers?

If anything, all you're saying seems more akin to the Bedouin philosophy claiming that, in the end- everything will always result in conflict. Which is why the sandniggers were less prosperous compared to the whites, although the Bedouin might unite once an external threat comes, they do not stop fighting amongst themselves- the white tribes on the other hand stayed unified afterwards

Racial brotherhood ist the reason why whites were successful, I urge you to stop thinking with sheer rage it makes you look like an edgelord

I hope to god we may have.

Not quite.

I bet they probably saw that they were working together to creater Ubermensch through technology.

Only the Jews are against this mentality (and frankly while I have some skepticism about modification, I think they should go fuck themselves)

...

A natural consequence of Machiavelli.

I bet some jews subvert the system in the opposite direction to other Jews.

Especially those that use the internet to greater extent.

only because they are manipulated.

Only one race actively seeks the destruction inadvertently - the same one Hitler wanted to rid off.

And it was Jewish obsession for money that drives them to push this. They don't want the ponzi scheme to stop yet.
This obsession for greed happened because of Jesus Christ.
Those without greed simply chose to follow Christ. The remains were those that couldn't accept that - the greedy and sinful.

Black people are simply low in IQ and are therefore easy to manipulate.
I personally want to turn them into ubermensch, not manipulate them.

The Talmud is very clear that the Jews totally rejected Jesus, however there are still the seeds of the slave morality within the teachings of Christ. That's not to say that we can't learn from it.

Yes because he is too lenient on the non-white people.

There isn't, the meme has just been manipulated or has evolved in order to become that.

I think that happened when Rome became properly involved.

I don't know why this hasn't motivated Christians to uncuck themselves.

There is some ugly confusion in this thread. Nazism was never about "white people", but about the Nordic race (the most noble of the Aryans). And contrary to what people here say, the military system of Nazi-Germany consisted of a racial hierarchy.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schutzstaffel

Norway was considered a racially purer nation than Germany, and thus it was intended to make Norway a protected SS-nation even within the Germanic nation.

Neither USA, Canada, UK, nor Spain, or Italy would be part of the Germanic nation. Most of the people posting in this board would never have been part of it.

Nazism was never about curing the world of genetic decease, but about preserving the Nordic race, and creating a Nordic nation for us to live in.

Let me tell you a little story:
In Norway we have a snail problem. There are some snails that in recent years got imported inside plant soil, and it is spreading rapidly across the whole nation. Every summer you can read stories in the newspapers about how to kill the snails and asks people to motivate children to go about and exterminate them. Of course the call to exterminate all snails, and especially to have children do it, offended some woman. Now she claims that the snails lives matter, and that it is us humans that harm the planet.

Of course this is offending black people, because they realize that the same rhetoric protecting them is now used on snails, and thus they are not more worth than a slimy creature literally destroying all our crops.

So what's the point of this story. Well you are just like the black people in this story. The black people want all humans to be equals, but they feel the need to rank on-top of snails.

And you want all white people to be equal, but everyone else to be lesser human beings. This is never how it was, and you need to understand that.

He was small time. This time they have no where to hide since they screwed with everyone globally. Even the US who helped save their ass.

I'm certainly not advocating a policy of erasing the ethnic and cultural differences within the European people. We all have our unique qualities that should be preserved. But unless we put aside our differences there will be no future for any of us.

I wonder what happened?

I don't think anyone here is saying or thinks that all European peoples are equal or were intended to be included in this "Germanic state" that you're talking about.
Funny how you mentioned Waffen SS when it was the first army of united European people fighting against international Jewry and its what we need to do again if our nations are to survive.

Think again, it is because the dissident right is generating new ideas.

This.

Not through extermination.

But by "bringing them up to standard".

Weak men cut down trees that have become overgrown and pesky to take care of.
Strong men prune them so they grow higher and stronger.

At the same time, if you prune them too much - they become like bonsai plants. They do well, but do not reach their potential.

Oh my god, so you are gonna send fellow nazis to teach the brownskins?

You realize the liberals have done that right?

But only within the nation.

And for that to happen, a lot of "white people" would have to give up their freedom and accept to be classified and discriminated.

The wrong way.

They flooded their countries with them.

I want to flood their countries with us.

Either way, we will be one united race one day.
The choice is either - illuminatism or ubermenschism.

Blacks will still retain their identity.
They will just be smarter.

Intelligence itself should be enough to prevent ethnicities from destroying each other.. on Earth.

In space we might be creating new communities though. We will have both globalism(or universalism) AND nationalism.

Nationalism to promote identity. (also a natural consequence to help globalisation work)
Globalism to promote the entire human race so no one is left behind and we infact further our possibilities.

Left or right - they are on the right track.

I disagree. People will do this by choice.

You tell a black person - "want to be aryan-like but still black" they will probably say yes.

This thread has taught me that is more divided on the world then I previously thought.
Well done.

The fuck, colonialism again?

No fuck you, next time we come back, we kill them all. No countries for them.

Ian Smith was wrong, no amount of education can make the niggers do the right thing.

...

Please don't speak for niggers.

The fuck is with these brown-loving nazis anyway?

There's always racial brotherhood, ethnostates bound by alliances/federations

Alright we're done here. Ignoring racial realities in favor of culture and education, where have I seen this before?

You don't know my background user.

I dunno.

Someone already suggested it?

Might analyze it and fix it.

It doesn't matter who you are, the fact you think you can make nigger smart means you are going to waste a shitload of everybody's time and money.

The liberals and the communists?

race not real it's just muh racist/economic situations

This being the natural state of things, and thus the most peaceful and creative. People will self-segregate according to common vibe which is reflected in the culture they share, the race they live through, the intelligence and wisdom they all grok. Some societies will be more advanced than others, but again this is natural.

All souls may be made of the same energetic stuff, but we are not all alike. Some prefer to incarnate in Whitopias, while others prefer to incarnate in Browntopias. It all depends upon where we are at.

I'm not going to stop at niggers user.

ALL people will need to "unlock themselves". Just like we did with stones at the dawn of man.

We do need to knuckle down on the 'how' though.

Then I might as well shoot you first and save the fucking money.

Like how all the refugees in Europe will leave on their own after realizing their own nationalistic spirit?

Not exactly in this state of affairs.

There are too many people.
And too many to have a naturalized form of humanity.

We need to advance some people for the short term, keep the natural for the longer term.
People should be able to make that decision. Then they should have the ability to revert - just like we are able to go camping.

Are you one of the ramzcuck retards by any chance?

Why is this a waste of money user?

We spend money on computers all the time.

I thought the same thing, and then I realized that they tend to group together within Europe. At schools minority children group together and separate from ethnic Europeans.

Yes, spending time on fucking anime is more worthwhile than spending money on niggers and arabs and pajeet, because at least I know the money is not wasted.

Stop calling yourself a nazi, you are a liberal.

They form gangs and shit to bully ethnic europeans, you fucking retard.

They also move to the major cities to live with their own kind.

Well, why don't they return to their shitstain homeland huh?

Oh that's right, it's not like they don't want white money and white wimminz (or even white boys and girls) or anything.

You're a moron user.
You might need what I suggested.

That being said, some money might be used for it as a luxury.

But what I suggested before is a necessity, not a luxury. Like public education.

Yes, let's spend more money to "unlock the potential" of niggers and arabs.

Honestly, I'm out.

You and your brown-lovers need a bullet to the brain.

And no, the money is not wasted because I actually enjoy anime.

Smart niggers and arabs do not entertain me one fucking bit.

What the hell are you talkin' about, Cletus? We're God-fearing, freedom-loving Americans who think the best way to spread freedom and democracy is the way Israel does it: by exterminating the people who don't share their values and replacing them with those who do.

pic related: It's how we used to do it before we were pussified by the liberals.

Yes, you are right. But they still group together. They don't want to have white friends, or live in a white neighborhood.

How do you fucking know?
Have you seen them before?

On another issue - these countries are beginning to delve into using technology that could potentially destroy ALL people on Earth. Do you want dumbasses to control this?

Lastly - I bet we might modify our selves to go beyond what is naturally possible too.
Now I'm skeptical of the moral duties around this - but frankly it's out of our control. People WILL modify themselves and children one way or another.

It's not simply unlocking them. There's a reason for us personally why they need to be unlocked.

Those countries are falling to bits and this will begin to affect our countries soon.

They just form gang to groom white children to rape them instead.

Or molest white girls in a crowd.

Nigger, the solution is we exterminate them. It's the cheapest and most effective solution.

No niggers, no arabs, no jews, less problems.

Plenty of "smart niggers" on Youtube, they still do not mean a goddamn thing and I wouldn't miss them if they are gone.

For arabs, see the various muzzies that are in the UK, very smart, but very fucking evil.

They want to have their cake and eat it too
Niggers and dunecoons were never good at planning for the future- let alone the livelihood of their country/race. The Jews presented them with the option to have as much riches and women as they wanted, they even saw it through by controlling the legal process and giving Jamal a slap on the wrist whenever they diddle a kid

Waste of resources and manpower, it would be much more efficient to convince them that it would be better for them to go back

So apparently, one bullet to the brain is more expensive than thousands of dollars spending to "convince" them to go back.

Yes, intelligence is not the only thing that make the Aryans pure. Moral, community, love of nature.

Holy shit, this cuckoldry.

You win.

Who said anything about money? You can convince other people by different methods, sweet talking, lying, making conditions to live here practically unlivable or even just a simple show of force is more than enough to make them run back home

Yes let's gas the jews user.
Let's also gas the niggers.

Look I don't like the white genocide either, but genocide in any form is stupid when there is potential in people.

If the dog bites people, train him.
If the breed bites people, eugenics to stop the behaiviour.

I agree with eugenics, not extermination.
Eugenics prunes trees.
Genocide cuts them down.

All that require money and more effort to shoot them in the fucking head.

Shoot them enough and they will leave on their own.

Nazies called it the "final solution" for a reason user. It was a desperate last resort.

If a dog bites me, I kill it, no hard feelings.

I train a dog to not bite me in first place, if it does, it has failed my education and I'm a failure at a teacher.

I might just shoot you for the hell of it.

Then nazis are cucked.

And I refuse to be this cucked.

Go right ahead and see who dies first, nigger lover.

What if you are the dog user?

Are you fucking 12 or something?

You have a nigger mentality to this issue.

What was it that was "cucked"? I don't get it.

>more effort to literally talk to them
Are you literally retarded or are you just joking?

All of you Christian just pretend to be the new Chosen people . You even go so far to claim that jews are white.

Apparently if you want to help other races at all you are cucked.

The reality is that the guy is Jew-tier insecure about his race.
Probably faps to sissy porn.

But I'm not a dog.

Based on your logic, extermination is apparently a hard decision, never mind that the brits and americans have done this shit before.

I guess the nazis are even more pussied than colonial-era brits, frenchies and americans.

This
To a Jew, wanting to be superior is to cut everyone down rather than improve themselves

Yes, that is literally more effort than rounding them up and shoot them in the fucking head.

Yes, help other races when they happily destroy yours.

I will say that is cucked.

The fact you browse here and are not ruling the world MAKES you a dog.

There is always something bigger.

All you can do is do what makes you bigger in order to secure yourself from bigger things.
Alternatively, you can show the bigger thing why it needs you.

They sound exactly like a jew..

If white people were to blitz right now you would be risking the entire white race.
Furthermore you would be limiting the potential of the human race that can be found in non white areas.

Another thing, the nations are needed to diversify ideas.
But mixing them in the country destroys that diversity.

I would happily leave in a dog eat dog world.

Your future of cucked racial diversity, spare me of that shit.

I cannot believe "nazis" happen to be this cucked, I would note that I would not refer to myself as a "nazi" anymore.

kys

Yeah, all that potential in Africa and the Middle east, just waiting for you nazis and your nazis sweet talking to unlock.

we wuz nazis and shit

You should go with "jew" . You will find you have more in common with them , they are even "winning" and they look "white"

That plan is fucking retarded
You'd need to have search parties to go from household to household looking for immigrants- which requires people who are willing to do so, and might risk increasing tensions between your population (ie. non nogs) and your regime, after that you'd need to secure a location where they can't just run off, and finally gunners who are willing to relentlessly gun down civilians
If anything, having troops go around gunning down shitskins left and right is cheaper and more effective- but even then you'd definitely be at risk of having civil unrest because of that; on top of that you have to also find people who are willing to do that, and arm them

Yeah, if the jews practice racial supremacy, I find myself to have more common with them than you cucks.

There is no potential YET.

With bigger minds there is HUGE potential.

There's no I in team.

You need all players user.

Good , now you are honest. Maybe if you had read a few books in your life , you woudnt wasted 5 years of your life calling yourself a nazi.

Dude, you can use the military or your own RWDS vigilante squads, I don't give a shit.

Gunning down shitskins are cheaper and faster than talking and "convincing" them.

How can you leave when that requires resources to leave?

You can't, you just fucking obey until you can leave.

And my solution allows ALL people to leave and go their own ways potentially.

I never wasted any years calling myself a "nazi".

Only months, barely, I never subject myself to nazi idea because I realize they were the weaker ideology compared to the 2 capitalism vs communism duality.

But now I realize they are cucked, just like the two.

If we kill them all, we would have more than enough resources to sustain ourselves and build a shitton of spaceships.

It's the millions of niggers and the money that go into feeding them that are holding whiteys back.

...

What makes you think that the military will be a-ok with that?
And good luck finding vigilante squads and not expecting repercussions

Shitskin or not, they're still unarmed civilians no matter what way you put it- it would take years of social engineering for that practice to be acceptable

Truly, these are the end times

Human is a species, not a race.
Nationalism doesn't mean you're on the same team as all the other nations of the world. It means quite the opposite in fact. I haven't really been following your discussion, but it seems like you're arguing that we should invest resources into improving racial out-groups. If that's the case, then you are cancer and you need to be gassed.

When the military finds out the niggers and arabs are burdens inside their own organization, and niggers and arabs will kill white military men in a heartbeat.
We expect repercussions, and we welcome it.
You would need millions of dollars for that campaign.
A 5.56x45mm or 12g is less than a cent.

And honestly, you think someone tells them to go back and they will go back?

Why didn't the jews just leave on themselves when Hitler told them to leave then?

Good for you , you should read a couple of books before jumping ideologies this time. Illiterate people really lower the quality of any political board.

I mean lesser than a dollar.

Certainly would make it easier. Which is why it's the wrong method.

I bet Rothschilds think like this though. Easiest solution is best. End justifies the means.

If you ignore the best solution, you are the parasite user.

No, I think I have read enough of your shit.

Well, stupid me for getting the easiest and cheapest method.

I never said that. I only said that being intelligent is not enough.

In the case of intelligent blacks, you can not trust that they have the other qualities. That is what makes Jews dangerous - some of them are extremely clever.

Aryans have a basic instinct of moral and justice. That is why you can trust them, and that is why western nations function so well and have so little corruption.

There's nothing evil about the Swastika. Just because Hitler used it does not mean the symbol is a "hate symbol."
After all, the Nazis used an eagle for their symbol, too…and the U.S. does the same…does that mean the American eagle is a "hate symbol?"

No, user, this is never over.

Good luck with the white world domination plans
illiteracy is certainly an asset you possess.

Do you want a coup to happen you fucking retard?

Who is this "we" business? Also you literally just admitted that you wanted a civil war between whites

You underestimate the common pleb's trust in authority, whether it be the government or someone wildly known
Because the jews are a resilient bunch, they know what they want and they'll make any sacrifices necessary to see that happen- need I remind you of the times kikes taddled on other kikes just to save their asses?
They saw that Hitler was a threat to the grand scheme of things, the grand kikes don't care that little Schlomo over here gets burnt not literally, but I guess it can be taken that way too if it means they get to secure their goal

Thank you.

With racial war boiling, it's becoming a reality soon.

As you can plainly see, trips of truth.

Why?

I consider myself as being from my country, do what I do within and for my country, yet respect that the actions of other countries could destroy my country.

You have two options:
Destroy the other country.
Or negotiate.

That is why I like Trump, he's a negotiator.

Then don't comment.

Humans are not mere predators, that's why they dominate. Predators are not as much for any reason other than breeding.

Predators die out if there are no prey around.
I want to make us something of a mix between predator, pack animal, colony and something that is both introverted(solo) and extroverted(social).

If there's a pragmatic solution that is better than another, use it.
Otherwise that's laziness.

And that is too bad.
Because one day we will probably meet other ayyliums that act jewish and are MORE powerful than us.

We need to learn tactics user. Yet at the same time we need to see where they fail.

I agree. You are the parasite.

Dubs are wasted on you.

last comment meant for

Himmler and his SS vilified differently people who offended the state.

If you actually read history like a white person you would know that he did the same shit during the Blomberg/Fitsch affair.

Ernst Rohm was planning a putsch with the SA and the abwehr intercepted phone conversations, messages, couriers, etc and eventually Hitler decided he had to put an end to it.

You do understand that before this Rohm and Hitler were great friends? They exchanged the familiar "du" with each other.

Yes, I would, if the niggers and arabs show them as traitors, uniting the whites would be easier.
Racists who hate niggers, jews, arabs, people like me.

Yes, cucked white deserves the rope, much more than non-white because they have tainted themselves.
So apparently, you think jews are a special bunch, while niggers and arabs are dumb brutes who would just listen to what you say.

Holy shit, fucking nazis, thinking the jews are ONLY problems in the world.

Makes me sad that the commie symbol still stands while the swastika is hated everywhere, despite of the fact that communism as a whole did more terrible shit

That's not how you check dubs, user

user we all have that instinct.
Aryans just adhere to it best.
Intelligence will make people understand what is best better.

But it needs to be significantly higher than our current intelligence. Nobody is that intelligent. Not even whites or asians.

Yet we have the best means and ability to create that situation.

That's silly.

Nearly everyone except normies wants a coup. But which ideal will come out on top.

What about the out-groups in your country? What about people who don't agree that it's "your" country? Where do they fit in in this cucked nazi scheme?
There are people who are my ethnic kin that live outside of my country, because that's just how the borders happened to be drawn. I will always prefer them to my "countrymen" who don't belong to my tribe. Civic nationalism is garbage.

I will comment every time I see a dumb phrase like "the human race" used on Holla Forums.

fucking headaches mate.

At the end?
Really?
Thanks, I'll remember that.
I was on halfchan for years before the exodus, but came there after the invention of this game…so I guess I never really learned the rules.

I'm worried about China to be honest.

Korea, Japan and Taiwan are very, very nervous. It's about to go even more postal than the west I think.

They get to leave with their shitskin friends.
I'm sure they'll be very happy in a non-white culture.

You do know that a coup or a civil war also results in dead whites, right? And I'm not just talking about cucks either
Apart from that, your nation will be in crumbles- perfect for a neighboring country to swoop in for the kill

If anything, your plan is starting to sound more convoluted by the second

They're the instigators behind things
Get rid of the cause, and the symptoms will follow thereafter

That's okay, not everyone understands the joy behind repeating digits

China can't do shit, not with Russia breathing on their backs over Manchuria- there's also the fact that it would be pretty fucking hard having an East Asian coalition against China, let's not forget the Spratly's situation either- the ASEAN won't just stand there while China decides to wage war over one of their (potential) allies

If you don't get the jews to leave, how do you think you will make the non-whites to leave, dumbass?

This user gets it

Nice dubs , but he doesnt understand the principles of nationalism. the poison that is foreign influence (cultural and economical) and that internationalism has always been promoted by the same entities.

You revert the damage.

But first they need a country to return to user.

Make them want to go back.
I find it funny how mexicans don't like Trump saying "go back".

Are you saying Mexico is shit?
Then fix the fucker.
Can't fix it?
Then we'll fix it for you so you fuck right off for good.

The individual countries sort out this issue.
It's a big deal because the majority is not indigenous yet have lived for a long time.
I am (partially) indigenous though and I respect that I need that fucking majority or else our country will be invaded.

America has a similar situation. It needs white people or it begins to decline.
If the native population is good to go - let them have the land. By that time the native population will probably include whites who are in my situation.
Legitimizing our right to stay.

The Jews have to leave, of course.
I'm not with the percentage of Holla Forums that would rather gas them with Zyklon-B insecticide, I just think they need to be removed from banking, universities, publishing, & the media, and then relocated to Israel.

Yes, and happily, because it means the anti-white government is hugely dismantled.
If that happens, we will fight back to defend our nation. It makes no difference if we have to leave under a cucked government and an enemy government.

As opposed to your plan, to motherfucking spend more money into more dem programs to "educate" the non-whites or "convince" them to leave?
Jews are a problem, but they are not the single responsible for every evil acts in the world.

Even if you solve the jewish question, there's a shitload of other questions for you to solve. such as the nigger question, the arab question and the cucked white question.

If the jews have to leave by force, then so must the other non-whites.

Holy shit, do you really believe all the non-whites are really harmless little bunnies who are only evil because the jews taught them to?

Did you just say we should fix every shitholes shithole in the world so the refugees can go back?

Like what the fuck are you smoking?

Yes.
The enlightenment user.

They will need us and may allow us to enter.
But if what they do threatens national security through weapons manufacture or the neglect of citizens (which leads to them flooding to our border) we need to intervene.

It's in our personal best interest.

The first wave of colonisation fucked these countries by neglecting their natural abilities (which pail in comparison).
The recolonisation will be fixing the shit we started with the knowledge that "there's no other way"

I'm so done with this shit.

I'm not sure if fucking Hitler believed in what you just wrote.

You are a cuck, a huge cuck.

Put it this way:

Cultural influence from another country isn't exactly a bad thing either though, that's how things started out- the problem is when your countrymen start throwing away your own culture and decide to idolize another

Along with loads of white families, buildings, and infrastructure
None of those grows from trees you know, and if anything your solution is starting to sound less cost-effective and longer than mine

And what makes you think that you still have the will/manpower to fight? Especially with your country in flames and your military in shambles, you'll be rolled over before you know it

What's with the quotation marks? Also, I never said anything about educating them

They're behind the important evil acts in the world though, such as multiculturalism and (blind) racial hatred

Same as what I said before, there's a reason why putting them in camps was called the final solution- they would be sent there while Germany would work out where to send them
It wasn't until the war that the mass starvation and mercy killings started, and that was mostly because of Allied bombing of supply lines
If anything, with how much they've been spreading their lies (and how much of them believe it) the simple threat of "death camps" will send them running to Israel- same thing applies for other races

As for the cucks we'll simply try to convince them, or maybe just make them follow the shitskins that they love so dearly

But as I've said before, it's important to have a realistic goal in mind- so I doubt half of the shit either of us have been saying will be the case

I'm sure he didn't.
He lived along time ago. His method is outdated.

The ideas must really hurt that brain user.

Get some rest.
We have ALOT of work to do in our countries individually.