Anime Nazi Thread

ITT we ruin the appeal of anime by equating it to nazi shit

ITT we slide the politics board with a thread that is not about politics

this is the most autistic thread ive seen in a while

that's not how you spell improve

and anime's already done

what else need the natsoc treatment?

You will never ruin anime for anyone. They are already comfortable with being the lowest of lifeforms

...

wtf i hate anime now

You mean that medium that already has tons of Nazi imagery? I don't think it's going to matter that much.

Now this is something a little different.

your waifu is literally trash
skeletons beat jews every day

commie girls are better

do they? or is it simply a propaganda tool to trick anime fags. Also checked.

why is erica such a perfect qt

this is now an anime nazbol thread

What in the fuck is a nazbol?

...

national bolsheviks. People who thinks that sjw's approach of "there are unlimite nubmer of genders" is as bad as marxists "there is only one" and understand that Hitler was cuck who sold out his people to capitalists (probably jews) and wasn't even able to remove them properly. Good, honest people btw

A national bolshevik.
Essentially imagine the average nazi breaking into your home, raping your women and children and then shooting you in the head, but make him wear a russian uniform instead of an SS uniform.

Nazbols are the Holla Forums response to Holla Forums nazis.
And yes, that means they don't actually do jack shit just like Holla Forumstards and just shitpost all over every other board while jacking off to their pretend dreams.

So now instead of only having one group of bored armchair "redpilled" activists, you got two!
Aren't you happy?

If I knew that was on the menu I'd be nazbol, too

It's actually on EVERY menu.
EVERY political extremist long term goal is to murder and rape.
That's the ultimate redpill.

but do I have to be party-member or just regular solider is ok?

Your best bet is to just join the anarchics.
They don't give a shit what you wear and they'll just let you do whatever the fuck you want during a revolt.
As long as you don't have open fascists tendencies they'll let you blend in.

ugh, but anarchists never got into space

I'd probably (if forced) to be apart of a nazi-commie regime be a lot happier under any other commie regime that's for sure. Albeit very uncomfortable. How about you on nazi-soci? You?

what a weird fucking anime.

That cliffhanger at the end was just fucking bizarre and out of place in what I guess is supposed to be some sort of tourist ad.

top quotes :

When will you illusioned shitposters realise that your authoritarian ideologies are all shit to various degrees?

The best societies are founded on the principle of individual liberty, libertarianism the by far the superior ideology.

I do like some ideas of natsoc but it can work only on paper. It was invented by jew, and when Hitler tried it it turned out to be just very authoritarian capitalism, aka fascism. Stalin on other hand managed to do fuckton things much better, shame he didn't drop his marxists believes.

He lifted made 3 million jobs in the first year of office and eventually got everyone employed. He deported the jew by the boat load and, if it wasn't for the nazi soci regime running themselves in the grounds militarily, they would probably still be a thing to this day. It was pretty much him against the entire world near the end there, yet he still put a pretty big dent on it. Far more loses were on the allies side than the axis. He received 6 combat metals in ww1 as well. He also gave welfare, free healthcare, housing, etc.
I know a lot of people like saying it was "hurr" capitalism or socialism. But it was really neither. He wanted to get rid of todays shit capitalism. Just try reading some of Mein Kamph, you'd probably end up agreeing to most of it (although his writing style is crap). He also assimilated both socialists and conservatives in one party. Exactly what you should do in nationalism. Also, please read pdf related. It wasn't capitalism or socialism really. He really did love his people and they loved him back. It's something everyone neglects too. The fact is, the system was rigged for his people.
What you mean kill 12 million christians under atheist policy? It's not right, nor was gulags. He was also democratically elected. No one democratically elected actually cares about the people. They only care about your votes that's it.

God I hate Dutch people, how can they be satisfied with life when their country is being overtaken by Muslims?

What we have today isn't proper democracy, as say the Greeks had it or the Swiss currently have it; representative democracy is shit, but direct democracy truly represents the will of the people.

Pick one. Turning two halves of the country against each either isn't nationalism in practice. What you need to understand is that both democracies and- direct democracies- seek to tyrannize people who aren't the elected majority.

*other

I disagree with your dichotomy that it is one or the other. Just because Uncle Addy is in charge doesn't mean everyone is going to fall in line and become nationalists. Suggesting that democracy is destined to always be half and half is also wrong.

Actually nevermind, when you begin cracking down on dissent most people will fall in line, but not out of nationalism, but fear, so I guess I concede that point.

Really though, turning any group against each other just for your votes is wrong under nationalism. This really isn't just a fact of "how many numbers both parties have", it's if your pointing knives at each others throats over meaningless issues. Just look up the definition of the word nationalism. It's not applicable to democracies at imo. You need to love your own people and try to understand each other (right or left wing it really doesn't matter, they're generally the same party tbh) otherwise you've failed at nationalism and have become the very thing you didn't want in the first place.

How do you suppose democracy turns people against each other? Does NatSoc just magically disappear all differences of opinion? Democracy provides an outlet for these differences to be openly discussed, rather than hoping that one man up at the top gets it right.
Besides, when you take away the vote, freedom is always next to go. Just look at the gun control measures taken in Nazi Germany.
I happen to like guns, so I think I'll give it a pass.

IDF girls > commie girls > aryan trash

yep. there's really no left or right economics. there's logic and there's neocon logic. them, trying to set the mark between right and left economically, is just them being (((them)))

...

Those quotes are just plain fucking lies. Cite anywhere where either of the two actually said this. Also, read pdf related. They actually deregulated the guns in nazi germany for it's citizens.
How else do you get votes? By going against other candidates, who have different interests.
I never actually said this. Just that people should try to understand each other better and love each other. Not that people won't have differences in opinion, just that they shouldn't be so hostile about it. Just look at any democracy, direct or not, and see how they all fare. They all have had civil wars, democides, etc.
That's just a plain lie.

Forgive me, but I'm not about to read 50 pages because I'm arguing with someone on the internet. You'll have to give me a TLDR.
You're talking about representative democracy, I'm talking about direct democracy.
How do the people express their opinion to their lawmakers? Sure, if you take away people's involvement in the political process they won't be so invested in it, and naturally this will reduce hostility, but they also have lost their voice.
What are deportations, work camps, persecution of people with different opinions, religions, ways of life, etc. and what was the holocaust?

They basically deregulated all assault weapons/shotguns/ammunition. Some regulations were given to pistols, but that's it.
They're basically the same thing. They just look a little bit different on paper and that's about it.
Via mail.
He was mainly focused on deporting all the jews out of germany through mass deportation to Israel. There were work camps, but most people in those work camps (if they died), was because of the typhus epidemic.
Hush hush. I really don't feel like making this into le "holohoax" thread. Image related. The jews and Russians lied.

Also, about the work camps I forgot to mention. Both America and the USSR were both guilty of this too. USSR had the gulags and America had Japanese concentration camps that also made them work.

...

Look at Switzerland and look at USA. Not the same.
And if you're ignored, too bad, because your voice can be shrugged off if the dictator disagrees. You have a lot of faith that this one person is going to be benevolent and not an opportunist.
What about the Russians, Poles, Gypsies, commies, jehovahs witnesses, people who disagreed with the nazis, who also got sent to work camps?
So my Jewish friend lied about his grandparents dying during the holocaust? OK. The Jews who mysteriously existed before the war then were no where to be seen after, what about them?

I never denied this, not sure how you think this is relevant.

Yeah, they may be a bit different but the fundamentals are the same.
Hitler was benevolent and was never an opportunist.
The other nationalities were more or less bullshit. The jews was accurate, but having a reliable witness out of any of these camps (by any of these nationalities) is to remain to be seen.
Depends on what you mean by the "holocaust". The allies (mainly the usa) used firebombs and indiscriminately bombed factories/highly populated areas with citizens to gain a foothold in the war and submitted that as evidence of what le nazis did. They had no honor at all tbh. Also, simply dying or going missing after the war doesn't mean she was killed via le "holocaust". Also just watch video related. Any jew in under nazi germany in 1933 is qualified as a holocaust victim. And another thing is, other eyewitnesses of the supposed "deathcamps" nullify the other eyewitnesses. If there is no consensus of how stuff happened in the holohoax (which there wasn't), then I can only believe that the holocaust is a lie. Also the confessions were gained via torture. Most of them even had their testicles crushed and irreparable in the process. Not real confessions.

Also, I forgot to mention, if his grandparents don't have their remains in someones hands (about 5 pounds of bone fragments and 3 pounds of ash), then they don't have the evidence necessary to say she died under the holocaust. For as much as you and I know she could have lived in Israel or died over typhus.

oh my
Hitler doesn't exist anymore.
Well don't you have a high standard for evidence. Here's some claims for you to try and debunk then:
The fact is, it's mainstream historical fact that the holocaust happened. I don't have access to the evidence nor do I know where to find it so you asking me to prove that it happened is pointless. You'd be better off sending your questions to a qualified historian.

There's no point in arguing with a communist I guess. Also, good luck with your pseudo nationalism.

Can't prove that Hitler is dead or that Red Army soldiers raped Berlin? Guess they never happened.

5 lbs x 6 million = 30 million tons of bone fragments… where is this to be found? oh that's right, they made it all up.

Still waiting for my proof, until then Hitler died of old age and all those women claiming to be raped are liars.

Well, there are actual pictures of them invading Germany. As for Hitler, they had a picture of him dead too. Although it doesn't look very much like him. So, I really don't know.

They invaded Germany yes, but no mass rapes occurred. I've never seen any proof of it. As for a picture, even back then they could doctor photos.

Every fucking time. Kek really wants another World War.

I yearn for your dirty commie jude blood