Abortion

No, you didn't, because you weren't in a position to have consensual intercourse with a woman.

So if I had sex with a woman, if I pulled out would that be murder?

Do I leave sperm in my balls and wait for an opportunity to impregnant a woman?

No because the egg was not fertilized. Contraception is not murder.

That's preferable to masturbating yes but if you're talking about preserving life masturbating isn't murder.

Why is contraception not murder?

Because killing a foetus (life) through abortion is not the same thing as putting a wall between the egg and sperm so they never meet.

Nevermind that until the third trimester What is inside the uterus barely even resembles a human, there is no reason to bring a life into the world that will almost certainly suffer.

Postmodern theology != postmodernism

Hello all my /christian/ friends

egg and sperm are both as alive as the embryonic cell they become

The question of whether a fetus can or cannot be considered a living human is besides the point when it comes to questioning the legitimacy of abortion. One cannot be a proper leftist and be "pro-life".

Take for a moment to consider the argument that an unborn child has the right to live. To be sure, it has as much of a right to live as anyone else. So far in, that no one has the right to live.

What about the bourgeois? Do they not have a right to live as much as anyone else? But as leftists, we would deny them that "right" in the pursuit of our own better interests. It is permissible to slay them as long as their self interests conflict with our own

So to is the interests of the unborn child in direct opposition to the would-be mother's interests. The relationship between a mother of an unwanted child is in many ways a mirror to the bourgeois-proletariat relationship. To prioritize the desires of that child over the desires of the mother can only stem from spooks such as morality, religion, culture, and perhaps one of the greatest spooks of all; the value of a single human life.

And because one such life is in immediate danger of ending, some respond emotionally and protect the "rights" of the child over the "rights" of the mother. Would you protect the bourgeois from revolution, because they too deserve life? You can see here that the argument that "all deserve to live, and therefore we cannot take lives" falls apart immediately.