Stefan Molyneux

Moly Quotes 'The Color of Crime'; Serves Up More Race & Crime Red Pills

In his video about the Dallas Police Shooting, Moly drops truth bombs about race and crime, citing Jared Taylor's Color of Crime publication for the statistics.

Video:
youtube.com/watch?v=4UMYh_vTr0w

Other urls found in this thread:

colorofcrime.com/2016/03/the-color-of-crime-2016-revised-edition/
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886913000470
link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11292-012-9163-y
blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2008/02/pentecostals-are-stupid-unitarians-are-smart/#.V3_pwnQkqM9
youtube.com/watch?v=V2Bdo2XJxu0
jewishgeneticdiseases.org/jewish-genetic-diseases/
youtube.com/watch?v=U2RVIi6M7oM
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence
youtu.be/4UMYh_vTr0w?t=792
youtube.com/watch?v=pD6zGqcNF64
youtube.com/watch?v=EezCjAzeHsQ
youtube.com/watch?v=ovHYqp0ZxUI
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLL5Xc79JeO1WdUFVeVbX6B80zl0Z8wMS-
youtube.com/watch?v=MOnQPXuU81Q&feature=youtu.be&t=25m50s
8ch.net/pol/res/6631742.html
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intelligence
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Good video.

He red pills better than anyone else.

For newbs:

colorofcrime.com/2016/03/the-color-of-crime-2016-revised-edition/

Here's one of the studies referenced in the video:

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886913000470

bump

Bump, get the word out folks.

Embed related, kinda.

Highlights.

"Because the media won't tell the truth…"

link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11292-012-9163-y

bump

...

We're going to have to sort that out lads.

5:08 to 5:20

It's a fact that Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ of any group.

What's your point?

Doesn't stop them being inbred and mental desease prone.

since only the smart ones survived the darwinian process has resulted in an intelligent inbred population

They're not inbred. If that was the case their IQ wouldn't be so high.

They're as inbred as the Icelandic people, meaning not actually inbred.

Do you believe that if public figure doesn't talk about the JQ or believe in "Jewish Conspiracy", they cannot be helpful?

That's a silly idea.

lolbergs are going to defend the MSM narrative to their literal dying breath

my dick lured me into way more threads than my brain. Should I be ashamed?

Excellent attempt at derailment and D+C, Moshe

Here have a bump, heeb

...

I DON'T LIKE FACTS

You're mentally deficient you know that?

Molyneux is good for redpilling because he is good at presenting his case, and he uses extensive empirical, quantitative facts to back himself up. And that's the problem.

Empirical data, numbers and statistics are important and are testable, verifiable and checkable. Problem is, the only things that actually work at convincing people are "qualitative stories and narratives" that involve personal experiences, "feelings" and anecdotes. For some reason, people elevate that bullshit above raw numbers and data as far as importance and weight. How can we change that? How can we fight against that? Numbers and data doesn't work on some people, what the fuck is wrong with them?

...

One thing I learned from the Gex video is that some people will ignore actual footage of actual things actually happening if it's from a badthink source or supports a crimethink point of views

somebody post yuri explaining this

Attacking on the two fronts, both logical and emotional is best way.

result of 15-20 year long demoralization process

...

Don't fight it, use it. Get people to see the reality with their own eyes, there is no better or faster way to red pill a normie than to show them video evidence and allow their emotions to carry them to the place logic wouldn't. We should be pissed off. We should be angry. We shouldn't be guilty.

You will never be able to change that. Most people are too stupid or can't be bothered to form conclusions that are backed up and derived from empirical data themselves. And even if they do, the resulting cognitive dissonance and / or wrongthink drives most away.

Rhetorically speaking we want to craft a narrative that is grounded in the reality of data AND that evokes a fuzzy feeling in your stomach, which makes it easier to believe; The conjunction of dialectic AND rhetoric.

Leftists / shitlibs / MSM / whatever you may call them, propagate a narrative that, over the years, has become one that is purely rhetoric: Facts don't matter, they're even a hindrance! The warm and fuzzy feeling that you get when you believe that you're fighting the good fight or whatever bullshit is an almost insurmountable opponent for the broader masses.

I don't think we can convince the masses by ourselves. Our narrative, for it's grounded in truth and empiricism, is no feel-good-story -.Reality has a sobering effect on most people. No, the left and its organisations and henchmen will continue to fuck up more and more, bigger and bigger. This will drive people to the right.

Does this asshole just try to capitalize off every American crisis? I hear he even converted to Christianity just to get more donations from his followers.

I wonder if we could find a religious group with higher average intelligence. pic related
blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2008/02/pentecostals-are-stupid-unitarians-are-smart/#.V3_pwnQkqM9

Based on these SAT scores
UU - 124 IQ
J - 120 IQ
Q -119 IQ

...

You're so close molyneux.
Not for long.

Moly is good for redpilling libertarians and cuckservatives.

They are people who like to think they just care about logic and facts and data. But in reality, only Full Spergs are this way — they are more likely just people who will need to know that a position is grounded in some facts and logic before they allow themselves to swayed by emotional rhetoric.

But Moly — as much as he claims to be about facts and reason — has been using emotion and rhetoric a lot lately. He's actually pretty good at it. He can give a rousing speech.

He has admitted in videos that he did not used to appreciate how important rhetoric and emotion were in persuasion, but now he understands that facts and reason alone are not enough.

Once there's enough facts / evidence / data to assuage doubt and provide credibility, it is the emotional narrative that really changes "minds" and motivates action.

Pretty based, Moly. Pretty based.

At this rate he'll be full Holla Forums by election day

He already is as Holla Forums as it can get for a somewhat popular YT personality. Ever tackling the JQ WILL get him in all possible trouble and he probably knows it. He regularly points out average IQs in demographics and its implications but refrains from mentioning hereditary mental problems in, say, ashkenazi jews for obvious reasons. As the overton window shifts we'll probably see him talking about white genocide in the near future - When it's feasible and safe to do so.

Well he's already speaking against anti-whites and anti-white racism.

Black Pigeon Mailed

It appears that there may have been attacks by Israel or the Clintons(is there really a difference?) against Black Pigeon Speaks for their video on Hillary Clinton's involvement in the conflict in Syria.

Luckily, I saved the video when it was first released and have re-hosted it here:
youtube.com/watch?v=V2Bdo2XJxu0

I have suspected for a while that the BPS group does indeed browse 8pol.
Maybe we can get an "Anonymous" comment on it from them?

Wow, way to fuck my tabs. My bad.

Thank you. I didnt see the video in full length and a few days after it was gone. Wondered if it was something I dreamt. Good work anno

...

Exactly as second user says. One thing is putting in caps lock gas the kikes race war now on an imageboard while you're bored, another is having your reputation, income, etc, at risk when presenting such redpilled ideas.

I knew a fat as fuck female to male trans lesbian who worshiped this dude, once he started going 14/88 she freaked the fuck out.

Many of them are extremely inbred. The usual study groups for inbreeding are Amish, Mennonites, and Orthodox (Ashkenazi) Jews. Jews are well known for high rates of incidence of genetic diseases.
jewishgeneticdiseases.org/jewish-genetic-diseases/


Bloom Syndrome
Canavan Disease
Cystic Fibrosis
Familial Dysautonomia
Familial Hyperinsulinism
Fanconi Anemia C
Gaucher Disease
Glycogen Storage Disease 1A
Joubert Syndrome 2
Lipoamide Dehydrogenase Deficiency (E3)
Maple Syrup Urine Disease 1B
Mucolipidosis IV
Nemaline Myopathy
Niemann-Pick Disease
Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Tay-Sachs Disease
Usher IF
Usher III
Walker Warburg

3-Phosphoglycerate Dehydrogenase Deficiency
Abetalipoproteinemia
Alport Syndrome, Autosomal Recessive
Arthrogryposis, Mental Retardation and Seizures
Bardet-Biedl Syndrome
Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase ll Deficiency
Congenital Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia
Congenital Disorder of Glycosylation la
Dyskeratosis Congenita, Autosomal Recessive
Ehlers-Danlos VllC
Fragile X Syndrome
Galactosemia
Multiple Sulphatase Deficiency
Polycystic Kidney Disease, Autosomal Recessive
Retinitis Pigmentosa 59
Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome
Tyrosinemia l
Wilson Disease
Zellweger Syndrome

Alpha-Thalassemia
Ataxia Telangiectasia
Beta-Thalassemia (B-T)
Corticosterone Methyloxidase Type II Deficiency
Costeff Optic Atrophy (also known as Type III 3-methylglutaconic Aciduria)
Cystic Fibrosis
Familial Mediterranean Fever
Familial Tumoral Calcinosis
Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydogenase Deficiency (G6PD)
Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy (HIBM)/GNE Myopathy
Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Type 2B
Metachromatic Leukodystrophy
Polyglandular Syndrome
Pseudocholinesterase Deficiency
Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Wolman Disease

...

Ashekenazi Jews aren't a religious group. They're an ethnicity.

That's why I specified Ashekenazi, as the other Jewish ethnic groups do not have such a high average IQ.

I was speaking in overall terms.

Where were you when this happened?
youtube.com/watch?v=U2RVIi6M7oM

ITT: retards assume IQ is a valuable measure

The inherent fallacy is in definition of intelligence.
How is it measured?
IQ supporters speak as though there is an absolute definition of intelligence when there is not and has never been such an absolute definition.
If so where is it?
IQ is clearly biased. There is no rational argument that proves it as encompassing all intelligence.
Unless the maker of the test is omniscient, or at very least the most intelligent being of all, how then can the test be assumed to have no flaws?
The simple truth is that the maker of the test is indeed asserted to be omniscient, but of course this is impossible.
Basically the idea of intelligence has been perverted into an abstracted false deity.
This is enabled by retards who want to define themselves in terms that a psychologically lobotomized slave can understand: a number on a linear scale.

TL;DR IQ is for uncreative worthless slave-ass scrap meat

See:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence

Wow, it's actually real!

Incredible!

Here's the TL;DR version for any lads who don't want to read this autistic post: My feelings beat facts - like the fact that all the smartest people have higher IQ's - pure coincidence!

Now I want to know when is he going to interview Kevin Macdonald?

your desperation to fit in using pretentious terms of endearment obviously shows you to be the brainless slave that you are.

stop talking forever. the human beings are having a discussion.

(checked)
This is incorrect, inbreeding preserves traits as much as it expresses genetic diseases. It's entirely possible (though not recommended) that you could fuck your sister, have a child and the child would be completely fine.

It's even possible that you could have generations of inbreeding where intelligence is unaffected or even amplified while either no diseases are expressed, or other diseases not related to intelligence are expressed.

Inbreeding doesn't automatically = potato.

If there are already potatoes in your family, however, inbreeding would most certainly make potato farming more likely.

Stefan doesn't even have a clue about what was said in the Oversight and Governmental Reform hearings.

youtu.be/4UMYh_vTr0w?t=792
"A day or two ago…."
When what was said just hours prior was MUCH more damning.

Links for the Lazy:
youtube.com/watch?v=pD6zGqcNF64
youtube.com/watch?v=EezCjAzeHsQ
youtube.com/watch?v=ovHYqp0ZxUI
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLL5Xc79JeO1WdUFVeVbX6B80zl0Z8wMS-

it tests for pattern recognition AKA the type of intelligence that is conducive to mathematic and scientific development (the type of shit that advances civilization).

Fixed the typo ("epidempic") at the end.

You have just stolen the concept of IQ (by acknowledging the existence of retardation) in an attempt to suggest that IQ is meaningless.

topkek, m8 - you fucking retard.

Molyjew literally says that Jews are smarter and defends jewry and yet you keep sucking his jewish e-celeb cook

(trump approves)
(trump approves)
(trump approves)
(trump approves)
(trump approves)
(trump approves)
(trump approves)
(trump approves)
(trump approves)
(trump approves)

Kennedi quads confirms!

Now that I think about it isn't the allegory of the cave just Plato shitting on the normalfags of the day?

what the fuck does that mean? advances toward WHAT? You just casually remarking on the meaning of life like somehow the answer is obvious.


god i'm talking to a bunch of fucking animals here

basically we have a bunch of totally braindead fuckwads here that are so desperate to fit in to a society that blatantly rejects everything that makes them unique that they will suck any dick that flops out of the trousers of authority and accept the load as a golden nugget of truth from GOD.

Critical thinking is so hard and unnecessary….all the answers have been found out and all the glory taken by the Sacred Holy Sages of Academia so there's no point in thinking anything through for yourself….that's PSEUDOINTELLECTUAL

Have we almost fully converted Stephen?

Watch this if you don't understand why IQ matters:

youtube.com/watch?v=MOnQPXuU81Q&feature=youtu.be&t=25m50s

it means the reason why we are discussing this on a message board on computers connected across large distances in western nations, while niggers in Africa are raping children because they think it will cure them of their AIDs.

what a smart guy this is here

Hahaha again - You're kind of undermining your own argument by suggesting that anyone who believes intelligence can be measured is stupid/retarded. You might as well say "words don't exist". Of course they do, faggot, YOU'RE USING THEM TO MAKE THAT STATEMENT. Calling someone a retard is certifying the idea that intelligence can be measured.

this

8ch.net/pol/res/6631742.html
8ch.net/pol/res/6631742.html
8ch.net/pol/res/6631742.html

by this time next year

KEK WILLS IT

darn

...

how does it feel to know you will never touch the puss-puss?

You've said essentially nothing that can't be distilled down to "I'm a fucking hippy, a virtuoso, and an original thinker". You're no such thing. I've heard "pseudointellectuals" present the same non-arguments you have a thousand times. Perhaps you're projecting…

And I don't think you understood what I was writing because you simply restated your "me smart, you dumb" bullshit while pretending I didn't make an argument. Go look up "self-defeating argument" and stop subjecting us to your stupidity.

Sorry you got fucking schooled, you can stop displaying how torn your ass is any time

some one really needs to kill all of you

at least you are outing yourself as a faggot redditor, can't stop stroking your ego for one second. TOP KEKKELS

Didn't this guy use to be hardcore left?

What the fuck happened?

Not an argument. Now that you have even less of an argument to make than you had before, you resort to petty insults and insinuations that you have somehow proven something. You've done nothing of the sort. There is a reason actually intelligent people have consistently higher than average IQ and mental retards (clinical) have an IQ no greater than about 70. These numbers are in a sense an arbitrary scale, yes. But clearly they describe reality accurately. Higher IQ means you are literally more intelligent in an objective and easily observable sense.

An "e-celeb" who is able to keep his threads up without having them deleted.

i love watching peoples progression into being red pilled

Realized the only realistic socialism is one based around a united nation?

stefan molygay is ==A JEW==

all is babbleing is a combination of distraction and derail of the real topic.

he belongs to alex jones and paul joseph watson.
he is an idiot and most of his conclusion lead to a dead end.

he is preaching: "my mama is a jew, but i no longer talk about that. white people are good, but black people a good too. black people just have a slightly higher crime rate but ignore that. jews are white. red pill, red pill, i jaust want to talk a lot bla bla bla bla bla bla bla.

i created a fake account and posted as if im a real woman, ooops, i accidentally posted it from my own account instead of the fake woman account, 4chan is cool "


of what i analyzed of stefan molyjew, he is a total nutcase. he is quite able to pretend as if he is sane but in reality he need medication.

The only thing I don't like about him is how uppity he gets sometimes, I feel like it would give normalfags an excuse to call him "le crazy mad republican"

I guess now is no time for muh PR though, his emotion shows that it's genuine.

holy shit how are you things real

you are indistinguishable from chat bots
all of your communication is completely unoriginal

your entire vocabulary consists of memes

Literally not a fucking argument. And this is not a meme. YOU ARE LITERALLY NOT ARGUING ANYTHING. I specifically explained my point of view to you and presented an argument, you have once again replied with an empty statement that argues nothing.

you sound like a nigger, a cucked liberal or a jew trying to excuse race differences in intelligence and the outcomes this produces.

intelligence is not a social construct moishe.

that our enemies are on average more intelligent as a group (ashkenazis at least) and successful precisely because they are intelligent is a fact that cannot be argued with.
if our enemies intelligence makes you insecure and is enough to demoralize you then you are a weakling and a coward.

As much as I like Stef, please, enough with the fucking shilling.


He's a Utopian thinker (or at least was), at some point he realized that Western culture was the only culture that could possibly ever achieve it. Now that Europe is being flooded with shitskins - he saw that the west could not sustain their culture for long. The rest is pretty self-explanatory.


Not an argument

you said the words "reason", "consistently", "accurately", "literally", "easily observable" and the emotion you got from saying these words made you believe you were right.

you made absolutely no point. you do not have an "argument". You just have an opinion which you did not explain. But what's worse than the lack of explanation is how you give yourself credit for being rational because you parroted some special "smart" words.

You are trying to define the conversation in terms of "arguments" as a first measure in appropriating the terms of the conversation in general. You are incapable of communicating with anyone you initially disagree with. You are conditioned to respond defensively until the end, even if you end up defending against your own point of view. You're programmed to be contrary. You immediately seek to cast the "other side's" terms as being disagreeable. You define the "other side's" words according to your initial uninformed, unreasoned perceptions of them.
Basically you think that you are on even ground with everyone here no matter what and that there is no possibility that anyone could possibly be more right than you and this overrides all of your rational faculties (if you have any left).
Basically you're a casualty of the obvious pitfall of anonymous communication: you don't hold yourself accountable and you don't allow yourself to be held accountable.
Basically you're human trash as a result.


holy shit get help….from a speeding bullet. You're a living meme. There is nothing left for you. You've totally thrown your mind away. Get killed FAST.
are you being fucking serious right now? way to walk into the swinging door.

Also just to note, I am 100% ashkenazi jew, so by your own logic I am smarter than you, and therefore I am right and you are wrong.


just shoot up your school already jesus lol

...

You have stated that IQ tests are irrelevant and IQ is not a good predictor of intelligence. I asked you how is it then that literal geniuses have above average IQs and clinical retards never get above 70? You still haven't answered because you have nothing to fucking say to such a simple statement, since it would force you to accept that IQ is correlated with real world observable intelligence. Now go ahead and reply with another meaningless post that conveniently ignores EVERYTHING I just said, you degenerate fucking faggot.

The user below me is not making an argument. Disregard his opinion.

Not an argument.

Samefag

What are you talking about?


how does having higher intelligence guarantee that what someone says is correct?

all the race differences indicate is an an iq average for members of that race.
the ashkenazi average is 115, the white average 100.
But the white population dwarfs the population of ashkenazi jews, so there are probably way more high iq whites than there are ashkenazi jews.

you don't understand what you're discussing, so fuck it.

No, I stated something more precise. You paraphrase using the adjective "good", which basically means nothing because of how variable its meaning can be. This is an example of you making a copy of your opponent's argument in your head, dumbing it down and then converting all the terms to ones favorable for your programmed behavior of espousing yourself in opposition.

Basically you crunch reality down into a retarded version for you to play with while you maintain zero accountability for yourself.

And anyway your "argument" changes the subject. The question I brought up is 'WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE' and 'HOW DO YOU KNOW WHAT IT IS', which of course falls outside the realm of 'identity ideology' and the circlejerking that is common here.

The point I had was that because no one can accurately define it, it can't be accurately measured.
Therefore IQ cannot measure intelligence. It measures the quality of being perceived as intelligent, which is inherently extremely subjective, not objective at all. The "objectivity" perceived derives from social authority which is variably across societies and is therefore not objective truly.
Basically IQ just measures how "good" you are for the kinds of micro-tasks that comprise useful jobs in the western economy.

Trying to say it's anything else makes you a fucking dogmatic retard. It's true definition is simple enough in all respects.


you spoke like a retarded and i tried some bait on you. anyway you got trolled of course im not a jew and I have no idea what my IQ is.

Watch this.

You keep ignoring what I'm saying faggot, must be very hard for you to face this simple truth. You ask "WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE" so that you can pretend it is some kind of abstract concept that nobody can pin down. Nobody can accurately define intelligence? Really? According to you maybe. Good memory, good reasoning and logic skills, good language skills, etc. are all examples of intelligence you obtuse retard. IQ cannot measure intelligence? That's why actual geniuses ALL have very high IQs and ALL clinical retards have very low IQs. That's right there it is again, this same statement you've ignored for like five posts straight now. This has absolutely fucking nothing to do with jobs whatsoever. You can be a genius and not hold down a job. Yes, the higher your IQ the more likely you are to have a higher income, the correlation is there, that is ALSO an example of intelligence, not because of "western jobs" whatever the fuck that even means, but because being more intelligent means you can and will do better in school, get a better degree, and then prove a valuable employee which will allow you to continuously get promoted, or you will be smart enough to make your own money somehow. A stupid person with a low IQ makes little money because they are too stupid to do a job. Not because of "le evil oppressive western economy" but because they are just fucking stupid. IQ tests do not even test for these "micro tasks" they test objective general intelligence such as your ability to reason and think logically. Is that not an example of intelligence? Are you going to YET AGAIN ignore the fact that geniuses have high IQs and retards have low IQs?

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intelligence

noun
1.
capacity for learning, reasoning, understanding, and similar forms of mental activity; aptitude in grasping truths, relationships, facts, meanings, etc.
2.
manifestation of a high mental capacity:
He writes with intelligence and wit.
3.
the faculty of understanding.
4.
knowledge of an event, circumstance, etc., received or imparted; news; information.
5.
the gathering or distribution of information, especially secret information.

definition 1 is measured via IQ tests.

you're that turkish homo with the chink bottom aren't you?

sage

Stop responding to him. He's just playing semantics.

The rebuttal is very simple.


Okay? No one believes otherwise. IQ tests don't represent intelligence, they represent g factor.

g carries very strong correlations in a lot of situations - high scores on IQ tests uniformly translates into higher long term income, lower reproduction rate, more scientific papers produced, etc.

There's nothing subjective about that. Kill yourself.

actually almost EVERYONE believes that IQ represents intelligence. Because they are retarded cattle that believe anything authority tells them at face value.


I already told you, you're retarded. Literally cognitively disabled. Stop trying. You lose.


holy shit won't you learn your fucking lesson?
"Good" doesn't mean anything. Your good/bad paradigm for judging the world is completely fucking insane. Your brain is a hard plastic toy.
You talk in superlatives. You have horrible reading comprehension. You're a fucking failure. Die.

actually almost EVERYONE believes that IQ represents intelligence. Because they are retarded cattle that believe anything authority tells them at face value.


I already told you, you're retarded. Literally cognitively disabled. Stop trying. You lose.


holy shit won't you learn your fucking lesson?
"Good" doesn't mean anything. Your good/bad paradigm for judging the world is completely fucking insane. Your brain is a hard plastic toy.
You talk in superlatives. You have horrible reading comprehension. You're a fucking failure. Die.

IQ is a reliable predictor of social status and late life income

in summary you are factually wrong

maybe that's just my useless insectile specialized high IQ brain :)

Holy shit, how does one go through SO MUCH mental gymnastics. The word GOOD is now subjective too? Your dumbass would have me believe that there is no such thing as good logic skills? That there can be no objectively good reasoning or language skills? Holy fucking shit, you are so far up your own ass trying to hide from reality that this is the type of shit your fucking retarded brain comes up with. When two people are faced with a basic logic problem and one of the solves it with ease and the other cannot even comprehend the solution when he is told what it is, you are saying one of them DOES NOT have better logic skills than the other? How fucking retarded are you?

fucking kek

this is what people who aren't fucking retarded call CRITICAL THINKING

Define good.


about what I said like ten things

Good for you. As I said, you're just arguing pointless semantics. People describe IQ as if it's a metaphor for intelligence, and not a measure of g factor which is correlated with outcomes associated with intelligence.

Wow, you're a real smart cookie for discovering this. It's called vulgarization and it serves a very valid purpose: convenience.

Stop responding to him. He's clearly some underageb& from another site trying to stroke his ego with muh rational debate. It's never going to go anywhere.

what the fuck is wrong with you
why do you adopt memes as part of your identity?
how do you justify this to yourself?
you would adopt ANYTHING to fit in, even this bottom-of-the-barrel low intelligence low social status bullshit. Because you're desperate and insubstantial. You have no identity.
You literally could not express yourself without memes. It's all you know.

Just kill yourself, you're ruined. You're trash.


ANYWAY
I'm right about everything and everyone who disagrees is a totally insecure brainwashed piece of shit. You have no arguments at all. You are just pissing and moaning like a retarded animal over your opinion.

You have no perception of context. You suffer from permanent myopia. This is why you are shit. This is why you have no success, no creativity, nothing interesting about you. This is why you adopt memes as your personality.

You. Are. Nothing.

that doesn't make any fucking sense

THIS HOUSE IS CLEAR

one more thing


god you are all fucking retarded

Yes, it does. People say "high IQ," and everyone understands they mean "highly intelligent".

I told you from my first post why it was misguided. Nobody (here) believes IQ = intelligence. People might use as a metaphor, and it is a misuse of the term, but we understand the subject well enough that when someone uses the more technical 'g factor', we know they're talking in detail.

So, you're wrong to think that it's limiting anyone's ability to think and discuss with critical depth. Instead, vulgarization allows us to introduce complex subjects into a casual conversation more easily. IQ can be quickly referenced without giving its accurate technical definition in a case where it would only cause confusion when faced with a narcissistic teen desperate to prove his 'deep thinking' and intelligence through petty nitpicking.

You're projecting.


No one cares about signalling. Have you seen me use any "kek" or whatever? You can tell you're new to anonymous posting because you haven't learned to divorce your ego/identity from the discussion. It's obnoxious, self-centered and a waste of our time.

Stop posting and lurk more. This is the last response you'll get from me, newfag.

Again you completely fucking ignored everything I said. I just fucking explained to you how GOOD can be used to describe the relative power of peoples' intelligence. One person has BETTER logical reasoning skills than the average person's, therefore that person has GOOD reasoning skills. Somebody who has POOR reasoning skills in relation to the average person's reasoning skills has BAD reasoning skills. This isn't fucking rocket science, and you are being purposefully obtuse so that you don't have to face the argument that IQ matters. Or maybe you are just one of those low IQ retards which means you are incapable of comprehending what I am saying.

Fucking checked and lügenpresse confirmed.

Youtube channel names are not unique, you could make an account with the same name and picture and post the exact same thing. Real proof would have been if both linked to his official page.

Muh e-celebs, shut it down now!!!

BPS is a subversive linked to Jewess Firestarter Media, idiot.
In fact molly shares the stage with MGTOW activists and is Jewish.
He is just riding the wave for clicks and trying to establish hi self in a leading position in the new right.
BPS, Molly, Firestarter Media - Jews running "control both sides" game.

and no one bothers to reason out what intelligence actually means

that is exactly what most people here believe and are expressing

yes that is what people actually believe but they get completely consumed with these shortcuts and the foundation of their thought becomes rotten because the little matters are "below them" and their "high-level" understanding

Le Kek

No you're just fucking stupid. You're just tossing around literal synonyms and synonymous premises.

How do you determine "better"? What is the proof of better? How do you know its proof?

For other topics this type of questioning might seem to strenuous. But we are dealing with the perception of perception here and any flaw in our idea of perception to begin with will create an error exponentially greater than any other error.

Better as in there are 10 logic problems, person A solves all 10, person B solves only 5 and cannot comprehend the solution to the other 5. Therefore person B is WORSE at logic than person A. It's not that complicated. That is the point of IQ tests, although they are obviously more complicated than that. Your entire tactic here is to try and invent a non existent complication so you can ignore the reality of IQ.

DUDE of course you can make up some circumstances to fit your definition

but logic problems are NOT what made humanity dominate

its an entirely existent complication: reality. No one has quantified reality. "IQ" implies otherwise. It funnels people's ideas of their potential into a narrow channel of what is most profitable not for themselves, but for others to whom they have no common interests (employers etc)

IQ doesn't measure self interest, self awareness, or awareness of society. These are the traits that allow people to become powerful. These are the traits that matter most for true success and freedom.

That is why they are devalued and worker traits are valued. The elite don't want a public society of competition. They want their private society where only the "worthy" can compete in a set fashion and they want the public to have a toy version of society that occupies them with work to support the super-society.

That's the end of it.

It's an average and it doesn't apply to all of a group. Judging from his argument I can guess which side of the distribution curve he's on.

Well, i think Molynose isn't even in a conspiracy with other jews. Jews on their own will gravitate towards ideological leadership positions. It's in their blood.