No human being owns another

Rights don't exist in that they are a concept. A useful concept which, if recognized in the land, prevent massive violence from erupting at all levels, reducing men to mere animals.

Governments which fail to recognize the rights of life, liberty, and property inevitably decline and fall, depending on the severity of their violations.

Similarly, individuals who ignore the rights of others will inevitably be killed.

tldr; if you don't recognize rights in others, you are a nigger. Governments that don't recognize rights are governments run by niggers.

The only rights which should exist are negative rights, i.e. the right not to be harmed. Positive rights like 'you have the right to force other people to do this for you' are retarded and should not exist.

gun rights!

...

Typos are not equal to a misunderstanding of the correct term to use; how many keys do you need to fuck up to turn you're into your?

You are an idiot. A Libertarian society is completely up for grabs. Whichever majority decides to flood into a country is allowed to do so. There's no such thing as libertarian nationalism. There's no border regulation in a libertarian country.

Nice semicolon faggot.

How much do I need to debunk this crap. Border regulation was never a thing until recently because it is unnecessary without a welfare state. Libertarian societies are self-regulating as people who don't fit in will simply leave to find a place where they do.


False. There is nothing that precludes nationalism, ethnocentrism etc. in libertarian society. We would probably see more homogeneity of cultures as they revert to their natural state. You could have your own exclusive communities with only your own race if you wanted.

Yes it was. The border, in the USA for example, was heavily regulated from the beginning until the civil rights movements in the 60's. The USA was meant to be for white Europeans only, and not for smelly shitskins. Having open borders in the USA is relatively new in the context of its entire existence as a country.

Yes, you could, but the country as a whole would have open borders. You can't rely on state control of the borders in a libertarian country. If some shitskin race decided to flood the country, they would be able to and then eventually overtake those homogeneous communities.

Sure thing buddy, and do you have an issue with my correct use of the semicolon?

...