As fucking vile as Google is, it still has the best search algorithm out there

As fucking vile as Google is, it still has the best search algorithm out there.
Prove me wrong.

Other urls found in this thread:

8ch.net/tech/ddg.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Dats fuckin racist

Startpage is a Google proxy. Your screenshots don't prove that Google's algorithm is better than any other algorithm, because all the search algorithms involved are Google's. It just shows that Google messes with the results it sends to Startpage.

Gee I wonder which one is more useful

Searx is better

said no one ever

just saying...

Wow those are deep
They should rename it DeepDeepGo

This is infuriating with google.

As fucking vile as Google is
go back to Holla Forums

startpage pulls their image searchs from bing
thats why they're shit

DDG works good enough for me.

go kill yourself

So much this shit. I end up doing yahoo searches half the time.

As far as reverse image searches go, Google is easily rivaled by Yandex now. Google remains number one for general web searches though which is more important.

Also
8ch.net/tech/ddg.html

Searx.me also works really well.

That's because Google has an absurd amount of money and buys out companies on a weekly basis.

Bing is the best image search.


DDG is great but bad image search.

don worry goy we know what you meant :DDDDD

Best text search: Bing tied with Google
Best image search: Bing by a large margin (also safesearch cuckoldry can be turned off unlike Google)
Best reverse image search: Yandex
Best video search: again Bing

The only place where Bing loses to Google is it is not popular enough.

So much this. Google is unusable other than when you know what you will get.

die trans scum

Give reasons why Searx is better than StartPage.

Of course they are. They have gathered the most information.

There aren't just downsides on them knowing everything about everything and everyone inside and out.

you can include startpage in the sites searx indexes, as well as others that may have other strengths

OK, fair point, but that's not the whole picture.

StartPage does it by displaying ads based on search input (no tracking). I have whitelisted them to help with their revenue.

How trustworthy are they and why?

Do they have any CoCks? Any SJW drama? Are they being trasparent? Are they open to my contributions and feedback? I know it's open source, but being open source is just scraping the surface.

Is not really an argument.

eh, in the end it's just someone trying to convince you of something over the internet -- you can justify your trust in startpage's statement by economic arguments but at the end of the day it requires faith. That's why you take other steps, if necessary, to prevent tracking. You don't want to put 100% of your trust in any one system, no matter how reliable it seems, right?

I actually find ddg best for convenience, purely because the !bang system allows you to skip the results page when you already know which resource you're going to want. But searx gives lots of results from everywhere, which is nice. I'm no fanboy for any of them. No product's perfect, that's why these threads keep getting made and keep getting comments.

That's an excellent point. I'm not sure, but I think you're able to run your own instance of Searx, while I think you can't with Startpage. This is a major benefit.

welcome to the information bubble; a safe space right in your browser

satisfying search result

...

Your problem was specifying "white" in the first place. "Whiteness" is the default when talking about human beings. To bring to up is already introducing race to the algorithm.

White people do not google "white women". They google "women". So who googles "white women"?

Non-whites. That's who googles "white women". The algorithm knows this. The algorithm delivers what they want to see.

...

I'm pretty certain that's happening with every search engine.
I'm assuming this is coming from the millenial woes video. Did you watch the second part?

Maybe you should stop searching like a nigger.

Oh it's that one leftist faggot that posts in every thread.

It was the first result in Qwant, does Holla Forums really not know about Qwant or is there something bad about it that I don't know?

Not really trying to shill here because I still find Google to be more useful than Qwant. I use Qwant by default but if I can't find something on the first search I just open up Jewgle and it usually works. Fortunately this doesn't happen often enough for me to really mind so it's worth using Qwant with the knowledge that I'm not being tracked and datamined.

I always install Qwant as a backup search engine. I'm still using Startpage as my main though because I like the site layout better and because ixquick.eu won't work with palememe. Does Qwant normally have better results?

.>>662643
I get much better results on Qwant than I do on Startpage. I haven't tried ixquick yet though, I'll check it out now.

...

The fuck is going on?

At first I just thought it was jewgle being jewgle but I refuse to believe that all 3 of these other search engines are manipulated to push ideologies.
sorry I gotta use binbows for UE4 and I like my tabs.

...

It was already explained itt, no one writes AMERICAN couple in their stock photos, but they write african american to differentiate it from the white ones

The people posting articles about European people art are usually liberals shilling WE WUZ EUROPEANS shit.

Try running you second search including -"african american" if you still don't understand, you stupid nigger.

searx is open source

Couldn't you use Ixquick to get literally the same results?

Google European people's art

I really should have read the thread first

Because everyone in the world is american right?

Google's search is garbage now as they seem to have used 'social media' (reddit) to heavily influence search rankings. Meme bullshit and SJW campaigns get priority.

...

Isn't it a good thing to have one optimized for pop culture and another optimized for porn?

Bing finds both elegantly. Google can't without monkeying with the search until you get lucky.

the correct google search for comparisons sake would be using makes google look for webpages with those words

...

...

Wouldn't that be the microshill?

How about this one?

Bing is actually making quite a few advancements on top of "enter a query and hit search" while google search has basically stagnated. I think Bing is superior to google but I'm not sure how MS will overtake google in marketshare.


Bing is about as good as google on this. The image search was almost entirely portraits and no billboards though.

These faggots keep deleting music off my phone.

Your post proves Startpage is superior. Are you a troll or just ignorant?

That's just a useless feature in Google. Also, Google is not the best and should be demolished. Leave this board.