Children of race mixing

youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMNj_r5bccUyYzJ5G1GgvfM59JEpDkteX

maybe 'divided by 2' since you don't understand population distributions

Not a valid argument. This would be less of an issue if there were more mixed people

If you don't catch my drift, move to China and find yourself a marrow transplant

I'm sorry for your loss, but next time learn something about standard deviations and probabilities therein before you post again.

I understand population distributions, but if my IQ is 120 and I marry someone with an IQ of 100, my children are not likely to permutate into 70 IQ black skinned Zulus like many would suggest. They will probably have an IQ of around 110, of course the mean inching closer to that as I have more children

I am a single man, not a standard deviation. Population bell curves mean nothing to me or to my progeny

AROUND HALF BLACKS ONLY PARTIALLY RELAX

how many of those albinos don't have all their limbs because of the nigger magic they contain?

Of course.

But it's a risk factor unique to racially mixed couples, and as long as racially mixed people are a minority it serves as a argument against miscegenation.

These are not mutually exclusive. Every person with a 3 digits IQ knows that.

Health and behavior risks of mixed-race teenagers:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/pdf/0931865.pdf

Intimate partner violence issues:

cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf

Interracial married couples are less educated, poorer and more likely to divorce (pg 2&3):

pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/chapter-1-overview/

Intimate Partner Violence in Interracial and Monoracial Couples:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3611980/

I've always maintained the counterintuitive position that white nationalists should promote good relations with the mixed race community. We're more redpilled than average, much like whites who live around minorities are more redpilled than whites in homogenous communities, because we have experienced the negative aspects race mixing first hand. We're immunized against charges of racism and have no more of a connection to foreign ethnic groups than we do to whites. If white nationalists incentivized our cooperation just by offering a helping hand, we could help end the creation of new race mixed peoples while ourselves coalescing into a homogenous community (wherein the worst elements could be dealt with appropriately.)

Your failure is in categorizing us into a single group when we are incredibly heterogenous and in no way operate as a group. One half black person can be just as different from another as you are to an Asian, both genetically and culturally. So in effect they are mutually exclusive, not with regards to race mixing in theory but certainly with regard to race mixing in practice from the mixed race perspective. So no, charges of "muh bell curve" do not bother me in the slightest because I don't care if other mixed people are retarded. I have the advantage of having no race alongside the disadvantages.Its a blank slate. What does matter is the position I take in my own life, and the future of mixed people to come.

why is there more area under the white curve? the area under the curve should be 1 in both cases correct?

Sure you are, buddy.

Given subsaharan genetic diversity it is likely. Still it's only the Out-of-Africa populations though that had the mutations and cranial capacity needed for 3-digits IQ.

don't forget, the supreme gentleman was a white azn rapebaby

That's quite an euphemistic way to say "paying the toll".

you can be useful tools, but you can't be allowed to breed and in a White society you will feel inferior and inevitably rebel.

Ninety Two Percent: Examining the Birth Trends, Family Structure, Economic Standing, Paternal Relationships, and Emotional Stability of Biracial Children with African American Fathers

Tiffany N. Calloway
Independent

June 2, 2015

Abstract:
This study examines the birth trends, family structure, economic standing, paternal relationships, and emotional stability of biracial children with African American fathers. For study implementation quantitative research methods were used. Questions were asked through a questionnaire that was administered to 1000 women spanning the united States that were equally ranging from 3 different racial groups; Caucasian, Asian, and Hispanic. Participants were recruited through the internet, radio, and news. This study finds that 92% of biracial children with African American fathers are born out of wedlock and 82% end up on government assistance. The results of this study make it very clear that biracial children with African American fathers are fatherless on a scale much larger than the public may realize.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2625893

You can download the paper by clicking the "open pdf in browser button".

I think we are just years away from full automated cotton picking machines.

You lucked out man.

t. over 160 sd15 IQ white masterrace.

Fucking Aussies!

enjoy your childrens' regression to the mean

There needs to be a company that screens people's DNA, and matches them up with people similar to them. That would solve everyone's problems.

I don't know what I should feel for that man.

I just did the free demo and got "between 122 and 129". Did you pay for the full one?

...

Except you actually carry dormant genes from your relatives, so your children will actually be the mean between your family and the family of your wife and not just you and her as individuals.

There isn't a single gene for IQ which is why geniuses don't breed true.

(scaled to ethnic composition of US)

I could tell you all manner of reasons why blacks failed to evolve after knowing them intimately. They cannibalize each other, literally and figuratively. Africa is an incredibly diverse continent ethnically and Africans themselves have evolved in such a way that promotes genetic drift while adequately negating the negative effects of inbreeding. As a consequence in their ethnically competitive environment they seemed to have developed the general tendency to destroy anything slightly different themselves. If an advantageous permutation arises in a group of Africans, such as high IQ, and the subbumans think him strange, they will kill him and consume him (again, literally and figuratively) no matter what benefits he brought to the community. Whereas in other areas where competition from others was less of a concern than the immediate need for survival against nature, when a somewhat strange person built something amazing, others would tolerate him and his progeny would continue his legacy. This is one of the many reasons why Africans failed to "progress."

You're making demands of a group that doesn't exist yet while you yourselves are in no position to make demands of others. Like I said, what would benefit you is a positive attitude towards mixed people while adamantly defending the purity of your own people. Destroy us and you may well find yourself in the same position that led to our creation. Allow us to exist separately from you under the right conditions, and you might gain an ally capable of covering your strategic bases. Like I said, your biggest weakness is other white people, not any external threat, and "race mixing is bad" coming from a mixed race person carries a lot more weight in their ears than when it comes from "literally Hitler."

Once the immediate problems are dealt with, if mixed people are encouraged to coalesce under eugenic conditions rather than to disperse (and hide), then we can discuss an exodus out of white society. The usefulness of us to you is as a buffer population, and the usefulness of y'all to us is as a racial patriarch. Russia isn't intent on "genociding all the subhumans," Russia is intent on doing whats best for Russia, and if that means good relations with China, Iran, and Syria than it doesn't have to mean marrying them.

This is the low-tier "muh bell curve" response I told you all about. How do you think this mysterious regression works, user, when I do not carry the genetic material necessary for a regression to any theoretical mean? I only carry at most two alleles at any one gene locus.

Nice

As it turns out humans are not pea plants and purely dominant/recessive gene interactions are a rarity.

feels good

As it turns out though geniuses can breed. You're right that there isn't a single gene for IQ, but based on fundamental principles of genetic it is theoretically possible to breed for higher IQ. It would just take upwards of a century and total control over thousands of people's mating habits (which is notoriously difficult with women.) To make matters worse, it'd be hard for any experimenter to control large swathes of high-IQ people like lab rats.

Truthfully, someone on an IRC gave me a voucher.

No, the more children the dumber. Your genetic material weakens. Look at old lefty cunts where the man is the wrong side of 50 and the cunt is 40 something. Some real monsters have been created the past 10-15 years.

Top kek's. Hope you're trolling and aren't that big of a tard. I think it's the later…

You have? Oh my gosh and no ones listened to the walking abortion? You're equivalent to trannies in number and EVERYTHING white nationalists find abhorrent.

You don't speak for anyone but your dumb bitch self.

So go play… oh right, you're already playing Jew games.

Really playing Jew games. Got his deformed paw out for gold.

No, I'm afraid what is going to happen, is we will genocide you out of existence.

In the other paragraph you talk about teaming up hahaha. This poor dummy doesn't know if he's coming or going. Just put a gun in your faggot mouth.

Ah nice, user.

That's not exactly true, more mixes mean more types in general. It's not like all mixed race people are compatible with the same mix.

When it comes to stuff like hereditary diseases it is usually that simple. Also I think what user was pointing out was a statistical conclusion and not a Mendelian/molecular one.

Feels bittersweet.

Meh

I don't know about you other [sub-]genius anons, but I definitely know THIS feel…

polymatharchives.blogspot.com/2015/01/the-inappropriately-excluded.html

Well I'm just speaking in principle. I realize that there is a realistic limit. But if I could create a thousand children with me and my wife, and you measured all of their IQs or other traits, it would be pretty much an average of the two of us.

kek

Mixed people are no more likely to carry discrete hereditary diseases than pure bred people are. As far for statistics, one of my points is that mixed people are only a population excel spreadsheets. If two mixed people, both of good genetic health, marry, its not as if their children would regress to a mean of all mixed people. The key point in practice would be not to marry indiscriminately.

I'll just say one thing about blackballing: anons who talk about some planting evidence on people when they are a threat to someone are right.

Your kind is an abomination in that you and your progeny can and will easily blend back into my population.

Thankfully, as genetic testing becomes wider people like myself can vie for higher relative North Euro admixture. Especially if I reproduce by purchasing an ovum from a 'qualified' genetically tested woman and hiring a surrogate to bear the pregnancy.

Can't trust modern feminist laws. Fathers who want to do it right, and can afford to, do it with a surrogate (not a wife).

to the status quo, not someone

Checked.

Sven this right here is why you are the ones being genocided out of extinction

Yeah, you could in theory. However you wouldn't accomplish that in a century. More like 250 years with a lot of controlled inbreeding. The point still stands that IQ heritability is not a single gene direct transmission from parent to child otherwise two genius parents would have genius children. They don't.

The point I'm making is that "I'm a single man" is a fucking retarded statement that belies a lack of understanding of the subject matter. If 'a single man' with 120 IQ breeds with a 100 IQ woman your 1st born isn't a guaranteed 110 IQ with some "genetic weakening" with additional children.

That isn't how or why regression to the mean happens. If you are a 120 IQ outlier and all of your full blooded siblings are 100 IQ you are most likely not going to have a bunch of 120 IQ kids. You are actually not extraordinarily more likely to have 120 IQ kids than your average siblings. Especially true if you are an outlier based on parentage. Is half-nigger the product of a 140 IQ and 100 IQ parent, or is he basically genetically a fluke born to two average parents?

You would only guarantee a 110 IQ progeny with a 120 IQ and 100 IQ pairing if literally 100% of every member of their respective families were at that IQ level and there were no genes present for the potentiality of any alternate outcome in the offspring.

No, it would not.

wew yea thats rough

i guess mankind has reached a glass ceiling with regards to IQ

okay lets get into the meat of the matter then. no, the children are not guaranteed to have an IQ of 110. They may have an IQ of 90, they may have an IQ of 140! Honestly, who knows. That's why I made the point about "if I had a thousand children." The mean would in fact be a mean of my wife and I. The proportion of alleles in a population will stay constant barring any selection or genetic drift, neither of which are relevant to our situation.

BUT, if my IQ is 120 and my wife's IQ is 100, we could probably assume that they would have on average a "white" tier of intelligence. which of course might range by as much as 20 or 30 points, in fact I can remember the standard variance but there is a limit. intelligence is of course genetic.

The ultimate point is that if I'm genetically fit and my wife is genetically fit, we aren't likely to produce a statistical mixed average, even if we are mixed

Are you talking about the body and organ harvesting done to albino Niggers by their fellow Niggers for Nigger magic? If so then all of them will have been attacked regularly for their Nigger magical properties.

oh i can't read apparently

if you have a box containing 2 copies of every number between and including one and ten, and you shake the box and draw 10 numbers randomly one thousand times, then you take the average of every drawing, and eventually take the average of all the averages, what do you think the ultimate average will be?

let me tell you its not going to be "3"

RA The Rugged Man is a jew?

What you're missing is that your 120 IQ by itself doesn't mean a whole lot for your kids unfortunately. You need to look at the intelligence of your immediate and extended family coming from the pic related branch. If the whole branch as an aggregate are talented 10thers you might get decently intelligent children. If they're super bixnoods then there's a good chance they will be at or below 100. Also there are more factors than IQ such as nigger temperament etc.

>tfw white, 6'2", and tested by a specialist IQ of 155

Shit I took that screenshot so long ago. I think it was him vs some white shitlord and he was butthurt. That was a moment of butthurt.

Unfortunately for you the contribution of numbers in your box is actually -1 or -2 to 10 because you are contributing elements that are not directly expressed in your genetic makeup but you carry and will pass on to your offspring none the less.

Again, IQ is not a single gene and so it is not 100% heritable. You do not have just your genetic makeup that is active. The "numbers" in your "box" are also contributed by your ancestors even if they are not actively expressed in your genetic makeup.

Regression to the mean is not a multigenerational phenonena, which is what you are suggesting. It happens directly in a single generation. Genius IQ parents whose parents and siblings are average are much more likely to have average children than genius children.

Are you the regressed offspring of supergenius parents? Or are you a total outlier among a clan of bixnoods that interbred with white lumpenproles? Your offspring will regress to the mean of your clan because it is their genes they are inheriting. Your full blooded siblings carry your genes. Are your siblings all 120+ IQ? Or are you a fluke?

Have you ever taken an intro level biology class? I have exactly two alleles at every gene locus and most of them are active to some degree. If I carried a 60 IQ bixnood gene at a single locus it would probably impact me phenotypically. In the event that it was completely recessive, as you said, there are many multiple genes responsible for different characters and so the effect of "sleeper" genes is negligible in most cases. The only time such genes are very impactful is in the case of mutations, especially nonsense or frameshift.

You don't seem to understand that by the same measure that you think I carry secret bixnood genes, I may well carry secret genius genes and my children will just as soon turn out blonde haired blue eyed aryans as black skinned bixnoods

In any case your conception of genetics is laughable

Did you seriously use the fucking kikes’ “argument”?

So you are half-nigger but you are phenotypically 0% negroid? Sure.

Why don't you answer the question. Are you descended from bixnood and white lumpen? Or are you descended from geniuses?

...

Lol. I answered the questions using a random number generator (so about 1/6 answers are correct) and got [pic]. I don't think the test is accurate.

It is entirely possible for a mixed race to have one non dominant disease expression and not express for it on equal or more gene pairs because the other half doesn't have the right match for it, when the mixed race has kids it's entirely possible through sheer chance that the genes with the expression for the disease to carry on and never give the gene that doesn't express it. If your the first or second generation and the kid is the third then that is a practical guarantee the lineage will be stuck with that bad gene.

You should really study up on genetic inheritance and how mixed race are essentially playing roulette every time they have a kid for having awesome gene matches or completely bad mix ups each time you have a kid. On top of that unless you luck out and find another mixed race with samey genes to yours then only a mere fraction of what you have will be passed on because you only have half of a half of genes from one pool and half of a half of another pool of genes.

Retard.

Only libshits believe that shit.

OP, if this is the means by which you think you're going to convert a civcuck, then you're coming from the completely wrong angle

Arguing about nigger IQ won't change your friends fundamental opinions on the concept of nationhood, race, and what forms the basis of a successful society. What you need to do is deconstruct his fundamental assumptions about what constitutes a genuine nation, where that nation draws its strength and identity, and what ultimately ensures that nation holds together. You need to convince him that a nation and culture is intrinsically linked with a single unified racial family, and that the entire idea of a multiracial nation is entirely oxymoronic. Tell your friend how humans are naturally tribalistic and ethno-centric, and how any population of foreign races will always ultimately result in these groups engaging in ethno-centric behaviour. Tell you friend that a nation without an identity built around blood, history, culture, and the shared struggle of ones race, isn't really a nation at all, but rather a bunch of random people living in a random location, all subject to the same soulless political system and economic policy. You need to convince your friend that a nation should exist for the betterment of ones race, not the other way around. Civic "nationalism" is truly a filthy concept that perverts the very idea of nationhood into soulless state-worship instead of a deep primal love of ones people.

No, I think only people with IQs above southern Arizona summer high temperatures feel confident enough to post.

You still gotta fuck off with the rest of your negro compatriots.

Cry more, your tears are salty good!

I'd be he's like and got his IQ from a website and thinks it's in any way accurate.

Look. More libshits who think an IQ can possible be taken on a website when 90% of what's tested isn't Q&A in an IQ test.

I'm just curious to know how many took online tests and how many took official tests applied by authorized personnel such as neuropsychologists.

Everyone in here claiming a high IQ took an online test.

Smart people don't admit they're smart, don't brag about being smart, and don't claim they're smart. Stupid people, however; do claim they're smart, brag that they're smart, and say that they're smart.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
archive.is/a88dD

I really need to get a DNA test fam

Go to target.com right now.

...

Every. Time.

...

This one's even less subtle

No, I had to take a series of tests administered by a psychologist. It consisted of things like math, word definition, spatial problem solving, patterns, etc.

t. halfbreed; we most certainly do not look nearly that good on average.

yeah, it was a debate against Jared Taylor

it was brutal

but i don't think he's a kike

I can tell you're a nigger, Tyrone.

Of course it's not. It's an online IQ test.

Real IQ tests are day-long batteries administered by trained professionals.

Every last online IQ test is a scam.

You mean like how Raven's Matrices aren't Q&A?

Because this isn't some Facebook personality quiz if that's what you're implying.

It's no $300-$500 examination, but it's not utter garbage. That test was normed against other well known tests.

Now this is your Holla Forums faggot. It's lefty to downplay your strengths. "Don't make the less fortunate feeeeeel bad!"

You're a riot. Why are you even here?

...

I may not be a genius but at least I can comprehend what I'm reading.

Has anyone here actually taken an IQ test that wasn't online and/or free?

Couple months ago, went to get mental eval and came out with 115 IQ. Half Irish-American, half Moroccan-Spanish with a bit of native American.

50% irish-american
50% moroccan-spanish
x% native american

do you even math?

IQ is another Zionist straw man argument. IQ stems from research funded by the Rockefeller Foundation that was introduced as part of the eugenics movement to demonstrate the inferiority of people of eastern European descent.

The average jew's IQ is 20 points above the norm… surprise surprise. Considering the white norm is at exactly 100, the implications are clear as an apology for justifying why 1.5% of the population constitutes 45% of enrollment in Ivy league schools, 42/45 cabinet posts under Bush, and similar disparities in other positions of authority.

Those attempting to plot the blacks are equally misdirected for reasons that are self evident as per their lifestyle. But in case you are still scratching your heads over the obvious, see the attached map.

In the civilized world, the chicken (intelligence) did not come before the egg ($), but a few hundred million foundation "research" dollars thrown at apologizing for the issue will sure leave anyone thinking this to be the case.

...

> KENNEDI CHECK EM
> E
> N
> N
> E
> D
> I
> .
> C
> H
> E
> C
> K
> .
> E
> M

It's funny because some geneticists (I can't find them) says breeding within your isolated "race" is better for you because your genetics are more compatible. They say mating with third cousins is actually better because they're far enough away from your immediate family but their genetics are compatable enough with yours.

IT IS TIME MY BOTHERS

Don't Icelanders have some of the best genetics in the world because they have been relatively isolated? I remember reading how geneticists go there to study the population.

You're wrong, actually, if wealth is responsible for white intelligence, why do East Asian countries have higher average IQs than White countries, despite being impoverished until westernizing?

The reason for White success are the high achievers, the people with very high IQs, and they are much more numerous among Whites than any other race, because our bell curve is much wider.

White wealth is a direct result of white intelligence. Asians are good at imitating and maintaining, Whites are good at innovating.

Holla Forums get out

Really you bring up the big problem with IQ: it measures nothing useful. I fully agree with what you're saying about Asians having higher IQs yet whites being the innovators. Yet we're considered lower than Asians per this metric, which clarifies how worthless IQ really is for reflecting relative brainpower. What matters is not just simple calculations/reasoning abilities along a designated path; computers to do that. What matters is results.

As per the issue of the wealth, here's what I read a couple of months back:

"Consider, for example, the results from Germany obtained prior to its 1991 reunification. Lynn and Vanhanen present four separate IQ studies from the former West Germany, all quite sizable, which indicate mean IQs in the range 99–107, with the oldest 1970 sample providing the low end of that range. Meanwhile, a 1967 sample of East German children produced a score of just 90, while two later East German studies in 1978 and 1984 came in at 97–99, much closer to the West German numbers.

These results seem anomalous from the perspective of strong genetic determinism for IQ. To a very good approximation, East Germans and West Germans are genetically indistinguishable, and an IQ gap as wide as 17 points between the two groups seems inexplicable, while the recorded rise in East German scores of 7–9 points in just half a generation seems even more difficult to explain.

The dreary communist regime of East Germany was certainly far poorer than its western counterpart and its population may indeed have been “culturally deprived” in some sense, but East Germans hardly suffered from severe dietary deficiencies during the 1960s or late 1950s when the group of especially low-scoring children were born and raised. The huge apparent testing gap between the wealthy West and the dingy East raises serious questions about the strict genetic interpretation favored by Lynn and Vanhanen."

theamericanconservative.com/articles/race-iq-and-wealth/

You, sir, have some reading to do on what "leftism" really is:

xroads.virginia.edu/~ma01/Kidd/thesis/pdf/protocols.pdf

hol up nigga and go back to 10th grade

Asians statistically have a higher average but lower spread/ standard deviation. In my experience, this is also true anecdotally.

When everyone smart enough to criticize a tyrannical communist regime gets shot, the IQ drops. You can see this in China. The harsher the regime, the bigger the drop. This is why Equatorial Guinea has a massive gap even between it and its nigger neighbors.

...

its because above IQ 140 people begin to see that half the profession is based on horseshit. If they were given power within the profession they would cause too much trouble as they blew the whistle on lots of charlatans and also they tend to uproot and expose sacred myths as actual horseshit.

Oliver Heaviside was a good example of this.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Heaviside

thats how bad-ass he was

...

What is this shit? Clearly you don't belong on this board because you're spouting liberal, equalist horseshit.

FYI liberals hate IQ tests. Liberals love thinking it's money, environment, etc etc, so they can feel good in that one day all "the bad stuff" will be taken care of.

Confirmed for ignorant, or 'educated idiot.'

Filtered so I don't waste more of my time.

Pleb tier.

If you'd actually tried to study genetics you'd find its infact offspring between whites and asians that end up more fucked than those from between blacks and whites.

Stop propogating the meme that WF/BM ever happens (D&C) and when in doubt hang yourself, but before you do make sure to hide your anime body pillow so you don't hurt your family even more from the embarassment that is your life.

post issues of white/asian breeding

perhaps he's too much of a … Supreme Gentleman to do so. Or maybe he's taking a nap on a Mattress, girl

Is that one of them?

Bump

erectuswalksamongst.us

The Fiqure free test only goes up to ~130

...

Inb4 California calls for a referendum for intependence from USA to join Mexico.

lol american politicians

Wow you're as smart as an average white person. Take the fire challenge.

I am unsure if this has been shared yet but here you are if it hasnt been. a bunch of research articles

pastebin.com/tGMEhbhf

They're ugly m8. Get over it.

We're going there.

I wish i could bleach some of these genes.

This is way beyond pathetic

I've given my life up to memes and loyaly serving Trump as Osttruppen. It's the least I can do for being a redpilled abomination

i never asked for this

just don't breed and you're good.

those cunts are hideous. They become better looking the more white they get. I'll take a pure breed over a disgusting mongrel shitskin any day.

this is why racmixers should die
DAY OF THE ROPE WHEN
that includes you nigger get out of pol

Look up "regression to the mean".

...

Is it me or do African genes stay dominant in a genepool for fucking ages and then dormant in a genepool for fucking ages.

So what you are saying is i should infiltrate the bluegum community?

Sure
And don't forget to remind the shabbos leftist goyim of your ethnicity, I'm sure they'll find it hard to call you racist once you point out that they're the true whitey and need to check their privileges.

OY VEY

...

any opinions on this (pic related) passage from an essay by evola? makes sense to me.

oops pic related

Mostly bullshit. Hybrid vigor—if vigor at all—dissipates after the first (hybrid) generation. Usually it's followed by something called outbreeding depression, which is basically the exact opposite of hybrid vigor.

So when farmers use hybrid crops, for example, they have to use F1 hybrid seeds every time; they can't use seeds that came from the crops they harvested last year, because the hybrid vigor and esp. consistency of the F1 hybrid is lost in the F2 hybrid due to sexual recombination. This is the mechanism by which Monsanto forces farmers to buy seeds from them every year.

Human fertility is optimal at about third- to sixth-cousin range, though any pairing between persons with a MRCA (most recent common ancestor) within the last few thousand years is fine. For White peoples, this means Europeans, generally speaking. Once you get out past Eurasian-ish populations like Ukrainians it gets pretty sketchy pretty quickly.

Mostly bullshit. Hybrid vigor—if vigor at all—dissipates after the first (hybrid) generation. Usually it's followed by something called outbreeding depression, which is basically the exact opposite of hybrid vigor.

So when farmers use hybrid crops, for example, they have to use F1 hybrid seeds every time; they can't use seeds that came from the crops they harvested last year, because the hybrid vigor and esp. consistency of the F1 hybrid is lost in the F2 hybrid due to sexual recombination. This is the mechanism by which Monsanto forces farmers to buy seeds from them every year.

Human fertility is optimal at about third- to sixth-cousin range, though any pairing between persons with a MRCA (most recent common ancestor) within the last few thousand years is fine. For White peoples, this means ethnic Europeans, generally speaking. Once you get out past Eurasian-ish populations like Ukrainians it gets pretty sketchy pretty quickly.

Except for the fact that the F1 hybrids you speak of are only made by crossing plant pedigrees that exhibit uniform homozygosity (for you nonscience fags, that means they all look the same and are genetically identical).

The F2 hybrids in this case of course fail miserably because they have been painted into a genetic corner through artificial selection. Any organism that breeds via natural selection, however, (i.e, humans, you fucking mongoloid) will not have this issue, because both parents are already a genetic composite of thousands of generations of vigorous natural selection.

...

Well if we never aim for it, it'll definitely never happen

actually anyone who isn't completely fagged out by now likes IQ tests, because they know that IQ is related purely to SES. More nigs have lower SES on average, so that makes all you easily confused stormfaggots think that that means nignigs are inherently more stupid.

I hate to be the one to break it to you, but lowbrow (they call themselves "traditional") whites are also included in this, which is why white children in poor areas of the country have lower IQ's then their more-fortunate white peers (a fact which explains a lot about you, nigger).

But don't believe me….believe the science. Oh wait, you'd rather believe the shitty copypasta graphs you cucks pass around like coin-fingering jews. Must suck to be this dumb.

Search up the average income in Moldova
Then search up the poverty rate in Moldova
then search up the average income of blacks in the US
Then search up the average IQ of Moldova
Then search up the average black IQ in America
Then fuck off back to whatever Reddit shithole you washed in from, you massive fucking faggot

I got a million fucking 1947 reichsmarks for you if you are truly that dumb, you sloppy cunt

not an argument, kiddo.

You just got yourself BTFO and this is the best response you can come up with? topkek. Did you miss the bit where I pointed out that the national poverty rate in Moldova is 48.5%, and the International poverty rate of moldova is 8.1%, that is, making less than $1.25 a day?

Moldova is a third world country, and yet still has a higher IQ than the blacks in America that are showered with welfare and gibsmedats, cutesy of the white majority. No amount of mental gymnastics will change that

fuck off back to Holla Forums with you.

hmm tricksy with the numbers you are, but standard of living is a thing.

the standard of living for blacks in America is orders of magnitude better than the standard of living in an impoverished land-locked post-soviet nation sandwiched between Ukraine and Romania. In Moldova the population isn't showered with multitudes of gibsmedats and handouts, and yet they still have a higher IQ than niggers in America

Keep trying, cuck-almighty

and welfare is an entire different topic. Why are 42% of food stamp beneficiaries white?

No able-bodied worker should be on the dole, regardless of race, IMHO. Ideally, the only people receiving government aide would be the weak, infirm and elderly.

You know, the sorts of folks that we used to actually care for in a family with extended local-social net. Most here would say "to teh ovens wtih the scum!1!!," I suspect.

whites make up 60% of the population. You're just proving that minorities take more than their share of the population.
No non-white should be in America to begin with.
That's right. Prop up the dysgenic weak with government assistance. Such a great idea!
Stop moving the goal-post, you disingenuous little Reddit shitstain
Nice job outing yourself as a drop-in from some liberal shithole site. You're clearly not from around here

pic related

If an industrial accident cripples your hard-working vaterfamilie, (or you, if such applies) would you be so idealistic? Also note I didn't say anything about the "dysgenic" reproducing, only that it was our responsibility to care for the elderly and infirm.

Such traditional family values you espouse.

and truthfully I don't care if nigs aren't as smart as whiteys. Even if there's a less than fair chance that it could be the case, I won't discount it out of hand. I doubt enough non-biased studies have been done to either prove or disprove. The data that is available, however, suggests a stronger correlation to SES than to race. Get someone to do some real science on the matter instead of passing your junk stats around though (or compile the data yourself; it only takes access to a uni system with a good database to do a metadatafilter and some time not spent fapping on stormcunt, and then talk to me.

the fuck outta here with your "no nonwhites in US" tho. Maybe if you were Icelandic, or Rus or something, i just miiiiiight buy it. Maybe.

US is, was, always has been and always will be a mutt country though. when some nigger fucks your granddaughter you'll be so vewwy mad about it, I know, but you know the old expression though…."an Indian in every woodpile" (so I doubt you're as white as you think you is)

As an Asian, is it okay if I ever get it with a half-Asian?

yes.

As long I can do as I please with my time I'm good
t. Ex-neet

poor whites do better than poor blacks, and honestly i feel like you haven't gone to a community college, or taken a look at Africa within your lifespan cause IQ tests and studies are doing nothing more than confirming suspicions.

wut?

so what you're saying is that if you arent 100% white then you aren't white? is that what im getting from this?

a mutt country of "white mystery meat" not a mutt country in the sense that you are speaking of

the fuck outta here with your "no nonwhites in US" tho. Maybe if you were Icelandic, or Rus or something, i just miiiiiight buy it. Maybe.

I might buy it if you started with a "white" country to begin with, but the French, British and Spanish fucked so many redskins and blacks within the first hundred or so years (and honestly well past then) that they got to the US that by the time you get to nowadays, the idea of a pure white bloodline is complete horseshit, unless you're the faggiest of WASPS or the most degenerate of inbred hillfolk.

I'm saying that the realistic chance exists that you and many of the people you know aren't 100% white, simply because that is a total unicorn when it comes to general US white lower and middle class. Doesn't bother me at all, but it kinda ruins the finish on that white paradise that you're hoping to see in the US, not to mention demolishing junk science conclusions.

Even if the findings you posted are completely error free, again, the results don't mean as much when both the whites and the blacks taking the tests are mutts. ~25% of the average nig's genome is white Euro with a sprinkle of NA, while ~10% of whites carry up to about 10% nig and NA blood.

If anything, I'd consider white (especially in the US) to be more of a culture than a genetic race, and therefore a spook. Black is also largely a culture (again, talking in US), one that often promotes ignorance as a virtue (one of the few things that I consider to be true degeneracy).

That fact, (along with being poor) probably accounts for the difference in IQ. This study will probably never be done, but I would wager my left teste that if you took a bunch of hoodrat whiggerfags and tested them against a similar group of black hoodfags you'd see identical IQ results and standardized test scores.

but of course

what did they mean by this

context

Traditional family values have nothing to do with government handouts, you blatant redditor

that's good, because they aren't
Nah. You're just making excuses for a blatantly inferior racial group. All IQ tests do is confirm that niggers are in fact inferior. It's not like it wasn't already self-evident
No it doesn't Poorer whites do better than wealthier blacks. The example of Moldova I provided blasts your shitty theory out of the water.
They're junk because you say so? Because they don't agree with your preconceived notions that whites and blacks are completely cognitively the same despite thousands of years of separate evolutionary pressures? Okay bud. Keep me laffin
not an argument, famoolia
Why? lol. All non-whites should be expelled from every white nation. This is our land. We conquered it. We cultivated it. We built the civilisation that defines it. Everything about this nation is defined by our race. Why should we settled for anything less than white self-determination and independence, free from all foreign racial influence?
You couldn't make yourself look like more of an autistic shitlib redditor if you tried. You even talk with that infuriating smug arrogance that defines them.
This is objectively bullshit. You're literally engaging in historic revisionism. The whites in America are pure Europeans, with only a fraction of whites having >2% non-white dna. America has always been a white nation with niggers tagging along. Nogs should be shipped back. They're a blight on America.
So nice job outing yourself as a nigger too. You make it too obvious. You nogs can't help but feel some misplaced sense of gratification knowing you're destroying the genetic lineage of our race and turning us into identityless mongrel shitskins. You can't match our brilliance, so you have to drag us down to your level. It's very obvious

Except this is blatantly and objectively untrue. You're only trying to force this idea that America is completely mongrelised because you want to justify the further destruction of the white race. It doesn't take anyone with even half a brain to realise you're spouting total utter horseshit.
Nah. Fuck off with that. Even Hitler of all people didn't believe the one drop rule. You're grasping at straws.
This is completely bullshit. about 10% of whites have 95% white DNA, which means that 10% of the population has at MOST 5% non-white blood. You're so fucking dense you don't even realise that America had anti-miscegination laws since before it was even a country, and only after 1967 were they ruled unconstitutional.
Topkek. Get the fuck off this board if you're going to spout complete pseudo-scientific drivel. "White" is genetic. A shitskin will never be white.
Fuck off back to Holla Forums.
No, black is a race, you leftycuck faggot. Race is not "cultural" it's genetic. Race determines he quality of culture, so shitty races (i.e. blacks) will produce shitty culture (i.e. black culture).
Moldova's average IQ is 97, a whole standard deviation above blacks in the US, despite Moldova being a third-world post-soviet country. Poor whites also do better than rich blacks. You have literally argument. Your ignorant assertions do not constitute a refutation.
there have been studies done proving black IQ is lower even for poor groups. You just reject them because you're an anti-science egalitarian cuckold who loves to suck nigger dick for those warm and fuzzies you get from being an ethno-masochist. Liberals are defective human beings.

>130 mulatto master race, mostly right brain

...

75% mulattoes will tend to be dumber, but 25% will tend to be smarter.