Official Laura B Thread

Official Laura B Thread
EXTREME Perfection Edition

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_erotica#Legal_issues_in_the_United_States
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

Thread reported. All reports are catalogued.

Child modelling threads are in violation of U.S. Federal Law. Depictions of even a clothed child violates U.S. federal law 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4), and 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(E) if they constitute "lascivious" exhibitions of the genitalia or pubic area Im sure theres at least one pic which fits this criteria ITT . The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has defined "lascivious" as "tending to excite lust; lewd; indecent; obscene; sexual impurity; tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations." Hence Candydoll and other "child modelling" agencies have been shut down.

You have been notified.

...

...

...

...

...

...

test

How did the test go?

...

Bad. I tried uploading a webm in but it's blank.

Global Report filed upon mods failing to delete child pornography thread.

STOP POSTING LAURA B

STOP BEING A PEDOPHILE

I've had that happen quite a few times lately.
Very suspicious.

STOP LIKING LITTLE GIRLS

...

STOP CONSUMING PIZZA

...

...

STOP POSTING UNATTRACTIVE GIRLS

...

...

Can you post the set where her and another girl are dressed like Mahou Shoujo? Thanks

...

This one?

Also what the fuck is a Mahou Shoujo?

Yes, that one

A mahou shoujo is a magical girl

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_erotica#Legal_issues_in_the_United_States

Child modelling threads are in violation of U.S. Federal Law. Depictions of even a clothed child violates U.S. federal law 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4), and 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(E) if they constitute "lascivious" exhibitions of the genitalia or pubic area Im sure theres at least one pic which fits this criteria ITT . The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has defined "lascivious" as "tending to excite lust; lewd; indecent; obscene; sexual impurity; tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations."

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Child modelling threads are in violation of U.S. Federal Law. Depictions of even a clothed child violates U.S. federal law 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4), and 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(E) if they constitute "lascivious" exhibitions of the genitalia or pubic area Im sure theres at least one pic which fits this criteria ITT . The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has defined "lascivious" as "tending to excite lust; lewd; indecent; obscene; sexual impurity; tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations." Hence Candydoll and other "child modelling" agencies have been shut down.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_erotica#Legal_issues_in_the_United_States

...

...

...

...

...

...

You're awesome OP this set is adorable. Thanks

...

...

...

...

I left for a while so…
OP has been recreating this thread,
a moralfag is reporting it.
and mods have been deleting it.
for 4 fucking hours!?
That's impressive dedication, One of them must be a bot.

...

/End

...

I'm getting very mixed messages from the hotpockets lately.