Scrooge

Are you joking? "Real Jews" are the likes of Soros, they'll keep themselves going at all costs.

Dickens was Holla Forums-tier

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_the_work_of_Charles_Dickens

That's because to the jew, satan is only the wrathful aspect of yahweh. Cosmogonic dualism in Christianity wasn't an inheritance from judaism.

No Alec Guinness as Fagin, mah dear?

youtu.be/pigmgUCxg_0?t=3m6s

Alec's portrayal was amazing, but Moody (and to a smaller extent, Kingsley) captured Fagin perfectly. After all, it was his nature.

this. Elites are terrified of death. That's when it's time to pay the piper.

Kikes hate Dickens. A Christmas Carol basically revitalized a holiday that had become moribund (deemed papist by stupid protties). I guess that's why they've been trying to strip it of all religious significance.

Jews worship Mammon

kek

I thought that they worshiped a volcano god?

You know what…I'm converting to judaism. The jews were right. Christianity is just an early form of socialism. Capitalism is meritocratic and rational. I'm tired of the ignorant mob pontificating to me how I'm bad for not wanting to help their stupid fuckup asses.

...

Christianity is literally a slave religion. What do you expect?

very nice gets gentlemen. Hivemind indeed.

lolbergs in a nutshell

Scrooge was a hero. He got suckered in by commie bullshit.

Greed is good in a market free from violent intervention, or the treat of violent intervention. In order to get money, one must satisfy the values of others. Greed thus becomes synonymous with love for your fellow man. This was largely the case in England at the time Dickens wrote his novels. Only when you bring in private or government violence or threats of such can greed cause harm to the people.

They worship Yahweh in public, and Ba'al Moloch in private.

1. Caring for your fellow countryman is not inherently a commie thing. Altruism existed before communism.
2. People get into unfortunate situations without being at fault. It's rare but it happens. Especially in a society with no social safety nets like the on in this story. What if tiny tim needed costly medication due to his illness, an event they couldn't have foreseen?

I get where you're coming from but you can't just deconstruct every act of kindness as communism. That's paranoid as fuck.

That is nothing but virtue signalling. Wealth accumulated through honest means indicates you have done that much good for society.

Read the post.

Tim's life is not inherently more valuable as Sid's but scrooge potentially knows the kid personally and would feel additionally sorry purely because of that.

You're entirely ignoring that we're biologically inclined to be altruistic and that a behavior as displayed by scrooge just indicates sociopathy.

You've completely removed your arguments from any reality and venured into the la-la-land of abstraction to the point of absurdity.

But I'm not here to get into disgussions with some ancap fucking retard. Have a nice one you autistic piece of shit.

I always thought that story was more like some Commie shit with the way that the rich guy was such an unrealistic asshole but now I've realized that Jews are literally just like that and this perfectly shows it.

This is one of the most autistic things I've ever read.

Honestly, it's the state's fault more than Scrooge's.

100% Jewish

and that's the part where the goyim suffered mass deception.

Wow faglord you sure convinced with your hot opinions

Bump.

Wanting to help your fellow man is not Communism, user.
Jews love the selfish free market shit. Hell, one even tried to claim being a selfish, money-grubbing cunt was a virtue.

what about natural selection mr. eugenics?

Natural selection includes state action, you autistic lolbergtarian. The state isn't a magical entity that acts outside of nature. Coercion is natural as fuck. The problem is when you coerce people to do things that destroy the community like communists do, not when you oppress those destroying it.

Remember: no class war takes two sides in order to work. Class collaboration means no class war by the workers (communism), and no class war by the capitalists (liberal/libertarian capitalism).

If you call to overthrow the institution of property, then you get the rope.
If you call to let the market be free from national duty then you get the rope.

NOT COMMUNISM BUT NATIONALISM

NOT FREE MARKETS BUT PATRIOTIC MARKETS

Kikes pls go.

Switzerland has no minimum wage, and some of the best income rates for low lever workers in the world, maybe even the best, not sure.

You know why? Because the bosses and the workers stipulate between themselves what the fair rate should be.

Patriotic markets are basically protectionist free markets.

As in free trade, but with tariffs and shit.

Libertarian Nationalism

no.

But what if the workers need more wages but the bosses don't want that? Just because a group of bosses are a bit humane doesn't mean all are, even one inhumane corrupt boss is a great problem.

this is Holla Forums, stop shilling.

No. How can you be loyal to the cause of your race if you allow any degenerate market activity inside your borders?

If we ban certain drugs we are restricting the free market for the good of our citizens. If we ban faggotry, we are doing the same, as we are using coercion to override using property for gay clubs and so on. It's the same if we restrict the spread of commie pamphlets, ironically.

Muh NAP.

Just nationalism, not (((libertarian))) nationalism. America was never lolberg like you want it. Look up the whiskey rebellion, when Washington cracked down on faggots who didn't want to pay taxes.

If you have just tariffs, and a completely unregulated market inside, then you can be subverted from within by media businesses.

We should absolutely be able to stop the media businesses becoming traitor. I don't care if that's not "free" because that would make them free from duty to the race. Responsibility is important. Nationalism is not an individualist enterprise where you can just freeride on other people saving our race for you.