It does not matter what you call it, whether "classical republicanism," "libertarianism," "the views of the Founders" or even "Ron Paulism," the idea is clear: opposition to the Federal Reserve, a very limited government, opposition to entangling alliances, standing armies, foreign wars, and a pro-liberty attitude in general. Such an attitude towards the present decrepit "evil empire" of America seems the best, most sensible view an informed person can take towards things.
So what about the Third Reich? How many people who agree with what Ron Paul has to say about America also admire the achievements of Hitler and the National Socialists? I certainly do; but at the end of the day, the Third Reich was a dictatorship–wasn't it?
I believe that there is room for reconciliation for an appreciation of Hitler's achievements and the sensible worldview advocated by the American Founders. Hitler's struggle is predominately nationalist in form, whereas the struggle of the Founders was about liberty, personal accountability, and a limited government.
When we combine the nationalist struggle with that of the Founders, what results is not "American Fascism" or anything like that, but really just the articulation of everything a modern American should concern himself with. The modern American fights the same nationalist struggle that Hitler did, in that we want to free ourselves from fractional reserve private central banking currency manipulators/price controllers and globalist forces that curtail our national sovereignty and democratic power; as Americans in particular, we want to reduce our government's size and scope, rid ourselves of the Federal Reserve and a debt-based currency, halt our Zionist wars, etc.
As such, the goal is not to adopt the forms of National Socialism but its ethos. To admire its struggle, if not its own national concerns. In this way, we will understand our dual appreciation for elements of the Third Reich while also holding political views that for our own country that seem opposed to it in form.