Rewriting Dictionaries

Some of you may remember a couple months ago when someone noticed that Google had changed their displayed definition for "fascism" to say that racism and nationalism are primary tenets of fascism.

fas·cism
ˈfaSHˌizəm/
noun
noun: fascism; noun: Fascism; plural noun: Fascisms

an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More
Nazism, rightism;
nationalism, xenophobia, racism, anti-Semitism;
jingoism, isolationism;
neofascism, neo-Nazism
"a film depicting the rise of fascism in the 1930s"
(in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.

As anyone who was already aware what fascism really means would say, nationalism may or may not be involved in fascism but racism has nothing to do with it.

This was troubling, mainly because most young people get all their information through Google. It's clear this is political, "coinciding" with the MSM and political establishment stumbling over themselves to call Trump a fascist and a racist at every turn. And now the most popular knowledge engine in the world is confirming the lie than nationalism and racism are fascist.

When that happened a number of other online dictionaries were checked for their definitions, and none save a handful even mentioned racism or nationalism. It was just Google and their primary dictionary source, Merriam-Webster (who has gotten very political for a dictionary and has been tweeting jabs at Trump).

I checked again today and found that this lie has found its way into nearly every online dictionary. The tables have completely turned in the last couple months where before only a few mentioned racism or nationalism when defining fascism, but now there are very few who don't.

What does this mean? This is a prime example of history being rewritten and language being altered and shifted, before our very eyes, to suit a globalist agenda. Every main source of online information has been infiltrated, most notably Google and Wikipedia.

Other urls found in this thread:

8ch.net/tech/ddg.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Yes, this is partly why it is so aggravating trying to debate about nationalism and fascism outside of /pol without coming off as a supremacist. Both sides are using same terms to imply vastly different things.

The only way to effectively fight this is coming up with new or modified terms as old ones get smeared. Ultimately it would serve to create a competing narrative, which would be very threatening from (((their))) point of view.

I'm torn on how this should be addressed. On one hand, I feel it must be a losing strategy to give the globalists ground in re-purposing common words. Eventually we'll probably be painted into a corner if we allow this blatant effort at Newspeak to continue.

On the other hand, fighting it may be ineffectual. It'd have to be done on a case by case basis, correcting people every time the misuse fascism or the other words that have been co-opted.

Also on rereading that Google definition for fascism, I saw that while it lists nationalism, xenophobia, and racism as synonyms to fascism (which is ridiculous) it also lists anti-Semitism and isolationism as synonyms.

That sounds dangerously close to saying anything that isn't a pro-Jew multicultural globalist state is fascist.

authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy;
kek
Just shows the world that globalist NWOfags just use these words as interchangeable insults against any kind of nationalist resistance

Nationalism and fascism are like bacon and eggs.
Racism and fascism are like artichokes and eggs.

The Left got the idea to call us fascists, because the word is easy and roles of the tonque like racist does, but if you study fascism you will realise that a fascist government needs to be neither nationalistic, nor racist.

Nationalism and fascism seem similar on a surface level. Nationalism is a pride in your country and its culture and identity, and wanting to protect that. Fascism, while state-based, has little to do with nationalism. It may use nationalist rhetoric, but fascism itself has nothing to do with nationalism, only a lust for power and an authoritarian state.


Exactly. Nationalism and racism have nothing at all to do with fascism. But fascism is widely regarded as a bad thing, so by attaching nationalism and racism to it and then popularizing the term, it shifts public opinion.

A shady move, but a clever one.

beyond rage right now

No shit. Those things don't have shit to do with fascism, but the globalists are associating these terms with "fascist", a term that's widely understood as negative, in order to engineer our very language to support the globalist agenda.

I'm really only remotely a fascist in the sense that the commies polarised me, but the rewriting language would make me ebul by association for even being isolationist.

So fuck it.

So which online dictionaries still have the proper definitions?

Encyclopedia Britannica is mostly on the level, for one. Funny enough. Urban Dictionary is also somewhat reasonable. That one's a mixed bag though.

Why is anyone paying attention to how Google defines anything?

op literally explained this. because it's how the youth get controlled.

Because it's what people read and take for granted.

By now, most people have accepted what Google tells them as truth. And at first, that was fairly accurate. Back then, Google only reported the results. But times have changed. Now, Google serves very specific political agendas but have not gained a reputation for this, so they are still considered a pure "search engine" even though they alter their results to suit specific agenda.

The main issue is that so many young folks take Google to be a paragon of rationalism. They don't think of Google as a political source, they see it as an avenue to view the truth. And this is the danger. People consider themselves to be rationalists, search their questions on Google, and get hugely biased results to the point of falsifying dictionary definitions. That's fucked.

I thought it always let people pay to affect searches and rank? Otherwise I don't know how google ever grew, it wasn't much of a search engine back when.

I'm not sure how they grew. I'd always assumed it was because they offered more accurate search results than most, and grew from there.

Nowadays they still offer accurate search results, but it's only thanks to the detailed profile they've built of each user, their interests and such, and even then it's put through their political filter.

Google's an advertising company. See: AdSense.

The search engine is a "free" service that they use for data-mining sold to the highest bidder and further advertising which feeds into the AdSense thing by taking your common searches and delivering ads based on them.

It sounded pretty implausible to me that the Elders at Google were sitting around altering specific definitions to suit their goals. I wouldn't expect a tech company to be able to muscle their way into dictionary-writing business or much bother with it. Looking into it, it seems they just copy paste all their definitions from the Oxford American College Dictionary. Oxforddictionaries.com has the same definition of fascism.

But who's writing their definitions, and deciding to change what? I can't find any names so far, but I'm curious as to how many of them (((echo))).

Advertising is definitely their bread and butter.


I'm sure not everyone at Google is on the same political page. But there are enough (((globalists))) in their ranks to alter the public perception, especially given their pre-existing reputation as a pure knowledge engine.

Making every word describing things you are supposed not to like mean the same ambigious "evil" is aggravating. Might as well call everything "evil" doublenonplusgood.

This is a clumsy, basic attempt at gaining control of public perception.

On the bright side, it's still possible to subvert it and inform people of the actual truth.

On the dark side, we can only expect their attempts at thought control to become more insidious from here out.

IT's over nigger. 50 years from now we'll look like fools telling kids to pick up a old dictionary to learn the true meaning of words.

Pray for world war 3 that will wipe all technology or else…

)))someone((( needs to write a dictionary with all words defined by their true meanings.

Really we should do everything that the kikes have done

We should write Objective Theory

The backlash approaching these evil fucks is going to be biblical when it hits. Children of the Imperium will be reading epics of it aboard their starships.

If things kept up at their current rate you'd be right, but shit is quick swinging back from the left.

I don't remember using google until 200-ish. I think it was faster then other search engines/webcrawlers, whatever they were called back then. I always compared a few a time if I could. I think altavista was a favorite at the time that wasn't covered in shit like yahoo.

No they don't.

If you sign in, don't clear history, etc. And none of that is actually how you get accurate search results, that's just targeted results.

and therefore not accurate.

Google has been the go-to for many years, and you must know that.

They certainly do offer accurate search results. Other engines may be better in some aspects, but Google is generally the best overall. At least for now.

You don't need to sign in for Google to build a profile on you. Your IP address. Your GPS location. Your phone, if you have an android. The things you usually search. The websites you usually visit. Even if you clear your history, Google retains their info on their end. This has already been demonstrated.

And yes, their results are put through their political filter. Most recently (and it's ongoing), there was a scandal where if you went to search Crooked Hillary, the suggested search is crooked hillary bernie. Crooked hillary is obviously the main search term and should be advised by a purely rational search engine. But Google has been corrupted by political influence. The guys who started it aren't even involved with it anymore.

Changing definitions is one of their main weapons at subversive propaganda. I was actually curious a couple of days ago about the change of the meaning of fascicm, and this is what I found by researching the dictionaties (in an ex-communist country)

1929: "Dictatorial government established in Italy after 1922 to oppose the anarchist excesses and achieve the reforms necessary for the country's economic recovery"

1939: "Political doctrine of fascism. - Fascism emerged after the world war as a patriotic reaction against the terror of Italian socialists and Bolsheviks, which he defeated decisively and quickly. In 1922, their leader, Mussolini, was called upon to take the reins of the Government, after which the Italian currency went up immediately."

1957 (this is when the communists were in power): "The most reactionary form, outright terrorist dictatorship of the imperialist bourgeoisie, that through the oppression of the working class and of all the progressive elements of society, and by suppressing democratic freedoms, aims at maintaining the power of the bourgeoisie and preparing wars of conquest. International Fascism is the mortal enemy of all peoples around the world fighting for freedom, independence and life."

2009: "Ideology that appeared in Europe after World War I, which was the basis of extreme right parties, characterized by extreme nationalism, mysticism, violence, social demagogy, promotion of racism etc .; political regime established on the basis of this current."

So as you can see, the current definition is upgraded from the marxist one, to fit the current narrative and to be used as the boogeyman for your liberal (non working class) normie.

I have to wonder how many other words that we use without thinking have been altered to suit this agenda.

This stuff has been going on a couple hundred years, at least. There has to be at least a few other examples.

That is exactly the Globalist's strategic plan user. Ultimately the goal is to brand all Christians, and particularly Christian white males as terrorists to wrest control away from us.

Of course. 2004-ish I would guess.

My point about accurate results is based purely on search terms, quality pages, views, etc. Not targeted to individuals or rankings shifted or hidden based on money or political censorship . That makes it purposefully inaccurate.

I know they keep info on their end, but most of the targeting is done the easy way.

How so? Because it is most popular? People will make fun of me for using duckduckgo because I'm still a pleb, but what does google provide for the user? Personally I haven't found a better replacement for satellite view of google maps, that's it.


It seems to only have mattered for communism, propaganda and PR alone are meant to manipulate, but don't seem to completely redefine things that way.

I started using Google when I worked at IBM and a coworker told me it was better than our internal software called Blue Pages. It was light years better than anything on the market, and this was 12 years ago. Pretty sure they have had alphabet help (I mean the parent company is now called Alphabet…come on…)

yeah, that is when I first specifically remember everyone using it as the default.

Maybe, doesn't really matter compared to how they are now. What was the slogan, 'don't be evil?' Probably projection even back then.

Google's original slogan was indeed "Don't be evil."

They've since removed it.

...

...

Actualism or integralism work well

...

I also use DuckDuckGo, but that doesn't mean that most people don't use Google.

And given that Google is clearly making specific efforts to alter public opinion, this is of major concern.

wew lad

Fascism isn't inherently racist, if anything you could put that under NatSoc

they just started throwing extra shit into their already ambiguous definition

Yea its a problem because 95% of internet searches are done using it.

DuckDuckGo actually is just an 'anonymous' Yahoo search by the way.

I think the image searches are done through Bing.

That shit


Is much, much closer to the actual meaning of fascism than

but thats never what happens
its more like a light Hivemind

the one powerful figure is only in power by the people that like him and his ideas, and an administration that shares his vision and want to see it through

By the end of WW2 Hitler was making some pretty fucking stupid military decisions and since he declared himself supreme commander of the army he had the final say so his generals went through with his orders even when a lot of them disagreed with him.

In other words no it's not like you are saying it is at all.

You're a pleb, use Startpage at the very least, GoyGoyGo's anonymity is a Jewish lie.

What are you talking about?

This is entirely off topic.

I've heard that before, but seen no evidence. I admit being a pleb in this though

If start page is just anonymised google, does that mean things google hides, pushes, adjusts still affect you?

Kinda, but every time you restart your browser, even without clearing cookies and cache, you should be reset as if you're a new user. Basically, it's Jewgle behind a proxy. There are no bullshit definitions either, first link it gives for definitions is dictionary.com


There would need a massive scale exposure of their rewriting of the English dictionary on socia media and provide legit alternatives to the masses if you want to try and stop Jewgle's USSA-backed newspeak project. A bit like teachers in colleges did with using kikepedia as a source. But we all know normalfags are retarded, so good luck with that.

Happy, faggot?

...

ok, so DDG is bad.

What do we use then? Letters to the library of congress?

thanks, will look into.

I use startpage, haven't heard any bullshit about it yet.

Enigma also used to mean "sent from Heaven by God" but now it's some shit like a person is mysterious.

I don't see what these have to do with being primary definitions of facism. Facism is simply big brother authoritarian government controlling your life and if you speak out you get killed.

So communism is fascism to you.

I say it's time to reclaim fascism. Libtards will accuse you of being a fascist no matter what, so why the fuck not?


Very interesting.

I said nothing about communism and my words weren't meant to be made into implications for faggots like you to pick apart to create your own meaning for.

Communism to me is about the shitty economic system it creates and lack of private property.

but if they were also authoritarian and killed dissenters, it would make them fascist with your definition.

That's a problem with you and your made-up definition, not those who apply in a way you don't like but don't cover.

If you define a bed as a raised platform with four corners, don't bitch when people point out a table.


just like bigot, racist, sexist, misogynist, etc.

Common qualities don't make them equal. They are different sides of a coin, one the zealot left, one the zealot right, with only those in authority as the winners.

You should go back to what ever place you came from with your newfaggotry.

Sorry I can recognize shitty government when I see it. Authoritarianism as a concept is complete garbage.

Then your definition is incorrect –"Facism is simply big brother authoritarian government controlling your life and if you speak out you get killed."

I'm not a fascist by the usual definition, so I'm not saying this because I am offended. I think you just can't spot an obvious logical flaw. Seriously, go read a book that teaches basic logic.

What fascist countries did not have an authoritarian/totalitarian governmental control over its peoples lives?

Forgot to add
"George Orwell wrote in 1944:


You are asking a question that fixes nothing. Does communism not also fit in your original definition of fascism? If so, your definition is shit. If you just mean authoritarian or totalitarian, then use those words.

Those are slurs. Fascism is a valid political ideology. Don't be a fucking cuck. Own up to your own beliefs. There is literally nothing stopping you besides fear of social stigma.

note the quote at
fascist has been used as a slur for a hell of a long time now.

My point is that when people call you names like that, you can't just disagree and tell them why they are wrong. They use the words, defined however they see fit, purely to rustle you. You either tell them what shit people they are for their weak attack and disregard them, or go full shitlord with it. I think I'm agreeing with you unless I misunderstood something.

Yes, I think we are in agreement. If I'm a Fascist you're a Pinko. Inflammatory shit like that. If Trump has taught us anything, its to ALWAYS take the offensive.

I remember looking this up in college and there was no mention of racism at all. Furthermore there was no mention of Nazism either.

...

huh

read Holla Forums's page about it.
8ch.net/tech/ddg.html

...

Misogyny was the first one I noticed. It used to mean hatred of women but now it is defined to encompass general sexism. If that's the case then what the fuck is the point of the word?

...

Oh look, this picture again.
It must be really hard to spend 5 minutes checking if stuff is actually true before posting misinformation.

I'm not going to bother explaining everything but here's a few that should convince you that whoever made the pic is either dumb or malicious.

Yes, DDG might use nginx. And nginx is often used as a reverse proxy, and reverse proxies often terminate ssl. This is because there is absolutely no reason to keep an encrypted connection between the reverse proxy and the application server, these are usually in a private network. The point of ssl is to prevent mitm attacks, there is no need to have it in your internal infastructure, in fact it just complicates things and makes them less secure.

And there is also nothing wrong with displaying the user agent or ip when the client(your browser) ask for it.
It only becomes a problem if they log your searches with that information in a database so they can look later at who searches for what.
Whether they do that i dont know.

Nevertheless, I don't recommend this search engine, I don't use it myself.
I have not done extensive research on which engine is safe.
Just know that this image is misinformation.

Nice try guys, but:

Fascism is anti-democratic ultra-nationalism (which can revolve around race or culture or civics and usually includes expansionism)and a strong state centered philosophy, fascism often has themes of political violence and revanchism and national greatness at it's core. It is a collectivist belief, and usually means nationalized corporations with minimized public influence (Or corps that do the government's bidding) as well as some form of nationalist state issued philosophy that is primarily reactionary with revolutionary themes.

Racism, Xenophobia, Anti-Semitsm, jingoism, isolationism, rightism are not intrinsic to fascism, but they are not mutually exclusive to fascism.

Authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism are intrinsic to fascism, as the fascist state always has a strong basis on Führerprinzip "The Leader Principle" - as individuals and corporations are expected to obey the leader in the name of the greater good. As well, Traditionalism is key to fascism as fascism always claims roots in the native culture. Fascism always gives paeans to traditional religion and idealized native culture as way of legitimizing power.

Manipulation. I argued with a generic lefty not long ago, turns out some preacher ranting about men being pussies is misogyny, not just the term 'pussy,' but that there are different standards for men. Leftists use everything at their disposal as a ratchet to increasing fuck others over.

It's said that only a small number of women are feminists these days, but they accept feminist arguments, they repeat the same things, and women always defend women. Spade.

This is a good thing. It preserves the peace.

...

Fascism has nothing at all to do with nationalism, let alone racism. It's just another example of a government seeking to overstep its bounds and grow in power.

A fascist government may utilize nationalistic rhetoric to gain popular support, but fascism itself is hardly different from any authoritarian government.