I can't get behind Fascism because eventually the leader dies

Slide thread confirmed

Sorry for my prior bump

So exactly like Communism?
So exactly like Communism?

It is a dictatorship until your imaginary referendum that will never happen happens.

I always wondered about this.
How is the power transferred to the younger generation in a potential NS government?
Transformation into a monarchy ala the French Republic post Napoleon?
Elective monarchy?
Picking the successor?
Transformation into a republican government like Cincinnati relinquishing control?

wew

ia902607.us.archive.org/24/items/NoneRosenbergMemoirs/RosenbergMemoirs.pdf
pdf page 107

ia801305.us.archive.org/13/items/HitlersRevolutionByRichardTedor_383/HitlersRevolutionByRichardTedor.pdf
pdf page 98

This statement makes you seem very disingenuous, as does your image.

A false statement for which you have no supporting evidence.
Based on my time on Holla Forums, which is significant, there is no evidence to suggest a majority of the user-base does not support fascistic policies, if not outright fascism itself.

You are acting very disingenuous, and your argumentation is inherently flawed.

It also seems likely you are attempting to pull a consensus crack or D&C job, which makes you seem all the more disingenuous, and thoroughly untrustworthy.

Also, nobody really cares what you can get behind - in the case of fascism, it won't matter what the inactive majority do, only the actions of the active minority will matter.

IOW: Nice blog post, you shill faggot, but nobody cares what you can get behind.

Go back to making nigger-cuck threads, you're better at that - not that its a difficult thing to do, mind you.

And yes, you do seem like a sissy, for the record.

Behave in a less disingenuous fashion, or I will destroy your thread.

You get one warning.

Meritocratic selection.

Whoever is deserving, will lead.

Inorganic selection methodology will always fall to subversion, producing an unfit leader.

There has been 7 strawpolls about this on both Holla Forumss to this result unless you do it at 3am where the basement larpers are the only ones on.

How'd Germany do after it got Pozzed? Its a white utopia now right?
Italy?
Spain?
Only one that is fine is Pinochets Chile and he was a Jew Lover.

Who decides the merits?

Kill yourself cuck faggot, if you're a mod fuck on off to reddit or TRS or MPC, I refuse to worship a cuck faggot mod who gets triggered by opposite opinions. If you're just threatening to spam I'll just filter you.

The Romans did it pretty well… Up until they didn't.

Sulla retained power to set things to rights, and then gave up his power.

Caesar claimed to intend to retain power to set things right, but then never gave up his power.

This is the hazard of any form of governance wherein an individual is placed into a position of power.

The 2nd Amendment is conceptually viable, in that it exists for the purpose of ensuring that, if such a person in power attempts to engage in tyrannical manner beyond a 'reasonable' point - that is, beyond the point wherein such power is necessary to set things to rights - then the people have a means via which to defend themselves against such tyranny.

The two concepts are, and I would wager should be, in constant and unending competition with one another: Giving power to a man is often required to maintain the society, but can result in tyranny; providing people the means to oppose tyranny is often beneficial, but can result in harmful uprising if societal context is not effectively maintained.

😂👌

Man, this thread makes me sad, cuz you are obviously a newfag and instead of lurking and reading the metric ton of books on this subject you just made a stupid thread instead.

Straw polls are not valid evidence - they can be, and no doubt will be if someone like you is at the helm, manipulated via proxies and the like, to suit a narrative, such as the one you are presenting.

After it got pozzed?
You mean, after the Monarchy/National Socialists fell from power?
Under a democratic system?
They did quite poorly.

It wasn't far off under both the Empire and the National Socialists.

Italy did poorly because of inherent flaws in Fascism with a capital F, and mismanagement thereof.
That doesn't suggest, in any way, shape, or form, that fascistic policies are universally harmful or undesireable.

Spain was a mess and your attempt to hold that up makes you seem further disingenuous.

That's arguable m8.

Alfred Rosenberg covered all this in his memoirs. Skip to the Political Testament section at the end. Or you can continue not knowing what you're talking about.

archive.org/details/MemoirsOfAlfredRosenberg

Rosenberg was in charge while the boss was in jail.

The Roman Empire was a republic not a dictatorship.

I've been here 6 years and there is no argument that shows a backup plan in case the leader doesn't want a referendum to ever happen.

Nobody, that's inorganic selection.
Merit defines itself - if you attempt to define it, you are creating a breeding ground for subversion of the system.

I'm not a mod, I'm just a user, and I don't care what you think.
Behave like less of a shill faggot, or I will kill your thread.
I'm being generous in giving you a second warning.

It won't matter.
It never matters.
The thread dies when discussion ceases, and most users will not filter for the sake of discussion in your shit-tier thread.
So it will die.
Last warning.

Authoritarian-Worship logic

No, the Roman Empire was a dictatorship, or more specifically, an Empire.
The Roman Republic was a republic.

The Republic died when Caesar rose - Sulla could have destroyed the Republic, which had become a dictatorship with him at the helm, but he chose to step away from the power to preserve the Republic.

Kill yourself

Last chance:
Yes or No question.

Do you deny that strawpolls can be manipulated by proxies?

Do you deny that people who shill on Holla Forums would do exactly that to promote a narrative such as you are now shilling?

autism

No

You have absolutely no evidence to support this claim however.
inb4 hurr durr believe me faggot or else
Again you can take your threat and shove it far up your ass.

Follow these steps to political enlightenment

for bonus points:
Roman Liberty masterrace, checking in!

Like you cannot imagine.

You didn't answer the second question.
I'm waiting, giving you the benefit of the doubt.

The rest of your commentary is panicy damage-control rhetoric, and so it is ignored entirely.

I didn't answer it because its a loaded question, rephrase it or I just wont answer

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

lel filtered

Hey, faggot. Go ahead and "kill the thread". I want to see what you come up with.

It wont matter.

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

On it m8.

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

LOL… he doesn't realize you can filter ID.

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

So how is that different from any other/the current system?

By not describing merit, you just leave the door open for others to describe merit, and they will describe their own qualities as having merit. You cannot disagree without attempting to describe what merit is and is not.

He also doesn't realize that at this rate it will take him over an hour to bumplock the thread

Oh, I know.

I also know most people won't take the time to filter over a shit tier thread like this one.

Meaning discussion dies.

You know it too.

That's why you're panicking.

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

Oh, I don't have to bumplock it.

I just have to kill the discussion.

And I have a dynamic IP, so, there's really nothing that can be done to stop me.

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

He's obviously severely autistic. I always enjoy a justified report on someone that I know will lead to a ban though.

Its okay, I have a dynamic IP - banning me will accomplish nothing.

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

Hes more or less exactly like a leftist who will cry if they can't argue or get their way

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You argue like a Leftist.

So I argue on your terms.

This is the thread you chose.

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

except Communism is the endgame and IS suppose to be maintained in perpetuity.

Also I think most here would prefer the use of an authoritarian strong arm to bat away the leftist cancer, than be stringent fascists for the sake of the ideology.

The important point right now is to purge the infection. What we come up with after can be hashed out then, and most likely it will be some sort of Republic system.

Feels pretty good tbh fam.

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

Sure if you mean hamster years

The Republic - Plato
Mein Kampf - Adolf Hitler
The Prince - Niccolo Machiavelli
They Myth of the Rational Voter - Bryan Caplan
Against Democracy and Equality - Tomislav Sunic
Democracy: the God That Failed - Henry Hazleft
A Critique of Democracy - Michael Anissimov
The Problem of Democracy - Alain de Benoist
The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century - Houston Stewart Chamberlain
Democracy and Freedom - Houston Stewart Chamberlain
The Concept of the Political - Carl Schmitt
The Myth of the 20th Century - Alfred Rosenberg
For My Legionaries - Corneliu Zelea Codreanu
A Defense of Aristocracy - Anthony Ludovici

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l

Hey faggot, in between spamming would you mind answering my question? Geniunely curious

You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.

This thread is dead.

l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
o
l
You present yourself as entirely disingenuous, untrustworthy, and frame your argument in the context of easily-falsified (a condition you deny) evidence.