Why are liberals so rabidly for democracy whenever they win, and so wildly against it the moment they lose...

Because they still believe that democracy is some kind of real thing that actually exists as advertised instead of just some bread and circus for the commoner.

If people haven't figured out that voting is a spectator sport only yet they never will. The truth is impossible to miss

Lord the shill is strong with (((you))).

Democracy worked for the first ~150 years of the US.

Capitalism worked for the first ~150 years of the US.

The most recent ~90 years of the US has been neither a democracy, nor a capitalist economy. It's been socialism lite moving toward communism.

That's what these useful idiots - like you - want. They want it because they don't understand it.

No. Democracy is a tool, of course (((liberals))) are getting so butthurt when their instrument malfunctions.

Do you seriously have to ask this question?

There's nothing inherent in democracy or "government by the people" that they believe in. It's just convenient rhetoric to use when the useful idiots will vote for the radical anti-white policies that they want because it fools the general public into thinking they have a free choice. Once the people vote in a different way than the kikes want, they have to change the form of government to achieve their ends.

THE UNITED STATES IS NOT, HAS NOT BEEN. AND WILL NEVER BE A DEMOCRACY. READ A FUCKING HISTORY BOOK.

"Democracy is like a train; you get off once you have reached your destination." – Ergodan the Arch-Kikeroach

There it is, the dumbest shit I've read all day

Democracy in western nations has degenerated into something completely different than what it was intended to be. You can see it in Germany the most, the common opinion of about 70% of the population is that democracy is merely a tool to keep the "Nazis" out of the government. And that's literally it. They see it as their holy duty to vote against right-wing parties, and think that's the whole point of democracy. This is why they always get so mad when they don't get what they want. For them, there is only one right choice, and referendums are just an exercise to make a cross on the right answer, just like in school.

You need to fuck her into submission to establish psychological dominance.

...

Are these retards not even aware that Hitler was elected?

Good webm

...

I love that liberals had NO response back during the 2012 election season. Puerto Rico voted to become a state, but they didn’t because “more people didn’t vote at all AND voted against it than voted for it,” so therefore “the referendum failed.” When you say that more people didn’t vote at all AND voted for Romney than for the nigger, so therefore the nigger isn’t president anymore,” they would never respond.

Yawn. The pedant.

We all know, it's a republic. I don't care enough to need to write out an enormous post because of the difference.

Although if you want to be more pedantic: we're both.

Why do people believe such things?

wow rude

You are a retard and you have been outed.

There seems to be a divide in Western cukture between two ways of viewing the world: a 'universal rules' model and a 'tribal' model.

Universalists believe in uniformity, and that if you support something in one case you should do the same in all similar situations, and recognize that in cases of other peoples they have the right to do something you want the right to do.

Tribalists view every transaction in terms of its benefit or detriment to their tribe. Because of this, they can oppose an idea they have advocated in the past, the second it appears it would do harm to their group.

Liberals adhere conclusively to the latter model (while professing the first) where conservatives generally adhere ro the first model while professing it.

The tribal model is more effective, especially against people who try to live up to set standards (like lolbergs). Conservatives became cuckolds because they began to fetishize principle over results for the people in their group, and canny tribes were able to manipulate them into surrendering in the name of principles.

Witness George Will, who just left the Republican Party and demands a Clinton win so the GOP can be 'ideologically pure.'

They were indoctrinated in feminist schools and are not emotionally equipped to take a loss gracefully.

They act like children because they were not allowed to mature beyond what would have been common for a 6th grader; even as recently as the 1980- 90's.

When I was a kid it was embarrassing to be handed a participation award. It was like a gold star saying "congratulations, loser". Now they demand it.

Leftists are insane by nature, I've stopped trying to understand them a long time ago. What they need is the return of asylums and massive doses of Haldol.

k

So filter and report me. See if I care.

Not trying to be contrarian, but he actually lost the Presidential election to Hindenburg. He was appointed Chancellor by the President Hindenberg however in 1933 as a sort of appeasement because the NSDAP made huge gains in parliamentary elections (so you're sort of right).

Hindenburg died in like '34 or '35 and the rest is history.

This. It's by definition fact that to be a leftist one must have a malfunctioning brain.

Source;
Parts of the brain can be shut down and one will become leftist.

Holy shit how fucking stupid are you?

It's like you actually believe the propaganda that is shoved down your throat on a daily basis. I expected more out of you user.

holy fug sauce pls

k

Shit I'll try and find it. I'm on not my computer.

archive.is/R2cq5

SSRIs are magnificent tools to make someone a leftist, I know firsthand, got fucking prescribed that shit when I turned 18. Managed to stop taking it and told doctors to shove it.

Some of those zombie eyed drones are exhibiting traits of someone who's on either SSRIs or SNRIs.

And I put it in a tightly wrapped package for you.

lmao this is great. ty

Yup. "antidepresents" and adderall and just about every mental "health" (((medicine))) will turn you leftist.

Look at just about all of them. They have a "chance" to make you more paranoid.

I don't buy the adderall thing. I did a lot of speed as a teen and when on it was not left-leaning, until they fucking put me on the antidepressants.

Amphetamines don't make you into a leftist. Whoa boy are you a massive retard

SSRIs, though. Not even once.

Kill yourself, retard. We require a minimum level of knowledge here.

protip:
NOBODY wants democracy

I have adderall right now and its hype pills for the race war so I dont know what youre talking about fam

Someone should send 2nd pic to guy in OP's pic.

How much is that?

BTW: how does Trump get through the College if College is not supposed to directly represent the popular vote?

The US had a massive civil war only 70ish years after its founding and required the North subjecting its unconstitutional amendments onto the South as conquered territory just to keep the country together

I wouldn't really call that "working"

Read the "side effects".

It is literally "turns one into a leftist"

Yes. You'll feel energized, it is an amphetamine but you won't only use that energy on productive things.

Where do you think all those fat leftist cows get their energy to "peacefully protest"?

Adderall. It's a prescription for fat people because they've convinced them that adderall will lose them weight.

Stop the nogbonics.

Too bad the south got so butthurt over their beloved niggers and got played by Rothschilds like damn fiddles.

self-hatred? :3 :*

it really is summer

Because they aren't honest people. They are insane. Leftism is a mental illness.

Eh.

When I connected the dots I started asking various doctors my family knows (mother is in hospice care).

Every single one of them;

Source;

...

It does make you lose weight, you don't feel the need to eat while on it. I told you, amphetamines don't make you a leftist drone, some of the already mentally damaged leftists are prescribed amphetamines. Soldiers were on them too before they invented modafinil and practically none of them were left-leaning. Amphetamines give you energy and while on them usually kills emotions, which can be helpful in combat. Problems arise when one has overdosed and has crashed.

…

So it does not make you lose weight. It's an appetite suppressant at most.

If you've seen how many people stay humongous and are using adderall as a weight loss pill you'd realize it's not even good at that.

Forget religion, democracy is the real opium of the people.

This is proof that liberals never cared about the masses but only to try and get on a higher step on the pyramid.

Before Brexit there was a power pyramid in the UK with the (((EU))) on top. In order for (((them))) to stay on top they needed shabos goy to mantain the status quo. So they used their power to recruit goys to their side ( women, fags, shitskins, other goys from other countries) but the common ordinary decent people won. This shows something to the world. "Stupid, bigot, misinformed" Jerry crooked teeth doesn't need (((them))).

Democracy in itself isnt what the liberals care about. Its just strategy for them.

In principle there is nothing wrong with democracy, as long as the system it serves is not polluted and corrupted by criminals, degenerates and subversives.

If it were actually one person one vote, and extended only to;

There would be no problem.

Adderall has nothing to do with ideology. It is just an amphetamine stimulant. Tell me how it could "make someone leftist".

What you are describing is a classic case of correlation not equaling causation.

Would caffeine make someone vote more left?

-Thomas Jefferson

Psychosis, delisions, paranoid, excess worry are all leftist traits.

For all the call anything conservative as a conspiracy theory it's literally just projection.

(((you))) seem really worried I'm pointing out CAUSAL effects and are yourself calling them correlative.

I wonder why that is. I'm really worried about (((you))) Ari.

Jefferson - that was USA wasn't it?
England is WAY different, and times have changed a lot.

Wow this.

The thing for me was a few years ago when "bullying" was fashionable. This girl I knew started using a term I had never heard, "bystander bully" meaning essentially not white-knighting for her if she was acting like a bitch.

Turns out I'm one.

It's okay. I'm literally Adolf Hitler.

They got me to quit smoking and drinking which cured me of most of my leftism. Stopped taking them last year.

you should have actually bullied her then
Tied her to a bed and "bullied her"

"You being a shitlord on the internet makes me fear for my life. Stop harassing me."

Next time I see her, guaranteed.

That but extended further. The group as a whole has enough pull because of ((())) being in positions of power that they can effect change that (((they))) want.

She sounds ugly.

You realize that an outsider could say the same about Holla Forums right?

They did just the opposite for me, stopped smoking when I stopped taking the meds.

k?

That's completely irrelevant. It may be true but what is the causal reason for it? Because in most libshits case, it's a "mental health" drug.

It's what I like to call "the retarded nigger effect"

"retarded" is redundant. Literally.

No, but it means the question is invalid and should be removed from the test, likely because of a clarity issue. Fortunately, this was a vote and not a test, and a question of policy, not objective fact. So, much like the question in it, the example is poorly worded and invalid.

t. educationfag

Hey now, don't insult the retarded like that.

Wouldn't you need more than just 52% who answered wrong for it to be invalid?

If all who answered wrong answered the same or similar wrong answers then it's clear that question was misunderstood, poorly worded, or the topic was taught poorly.

Or maybe all your students are niggers, and thus retarded.

Shit. I did it again;

Because your average leftist has no self-awareness and even lives in a echo chamber. They just can't understand that some things have no 'right' answer.

Liberalism just means freedom, Conservatism just means to maintain. There is no pledge to Democracy, Rationalism, Fairness, Civil- and Human Rights or anything else contained in those words, even if the political history of our countries and medial propaganda makes us belief those things are related to Liberalism and Conservatism.

You always have to ask yourself what kind of freedoms a person wants to have, when they describe themselves as liberals and what things a person wants to maintain, when they describe themselves as Conservatives, as every political idea can be made sound like its Conservative or Liberal.

Only by the things people really want can you judge if they are good sane individuals or if they are twisted narcissistic psychopaths.

You made a claim that I didnt believe. Not a big deal at all, user.

They aren't versed in political philosophy at all. That's why. They don't feel loyalty to democracy, they just feel emotions, and mass movements (which can only thrive in democratic systems) are great instruments by which to feel good without doing anything meaningful, especially in a day and age when democracy is portrayed as the only desirable form of government by the Cathedral.

They helped me un-NEET, and collapsed my leftism which had been a result of feeling like I couldn't do anything and being extremely sensitive. But I can see how the opposite could happen to different people.

Commented about it yesterday, it's just pure leftist hypocrisy.

Democracy is one of the things libtards are the most consistent on. They hate it universally because it allows someone who isn't them or their (((elites))) to have a say in things. They just act like they support it when (((they))) win something because it allows them to leverage the "but it was decided by the majority of the people, stay mad" excuse.

They're the most condescending people I've ever seen.

I hope someone makes a compilation of them insulting the intelligence of #voteleave people

I work with one of these clowns. He described Brexit as "tyranny of the majority" and his solution was to have a 2nd referendum where 70% of the vote would be required to win.

Maybe this is a good thing. Liberals have managed to subvert much everything else in the west, they are now setting their sights on democracy. After enough pissing and moaning, maybe they'll make it acceptable to discuss moving away from democracy. In that kind of environment, it would be easier to push some of our more ungood ideas about governance.

more than you have apparently

fug. that is good.

saved.

It's good, but the full version includes a talk about the Protocols as well, and you should watch that if you have not already.

Does anyone know where the music is from?

Leftist Double Think.

the wbm that redpilled me

wew lad

You somehow got even more retarded.

Because they are mentally children in the most complete sense as you can possibly describe. They throw tantrums when they don't get their way.

This is because Liberalism infantilizes the believer and appeals to the basest of all human desires; that you can do nothing and get everything. When this does not happen, they short circuit.

Have you seen the #TrumpGirlsBreakTheInternet feed? These supposed bastions of diversity are spewing the most racist, vile and hateful shit ever at women who support Trump, but it's ok because the victims are white and the minorities are race traitors.

Liberalism is a mental disorder and its only cure is not forced conversion but forced submersion.

Because their aim isn't democracy, it's winning.
Democracy is only useful when it can make that happen.

/thread

Because they play to win. Like we should be doing.

Drop the cuckservative "BUT THATS NOT FAIR" mindset. Makes you look weak.

A man actively afraid of being killed during a normal Christmas dinner is paranoid.
A man actively afraid of being killed when Saracens are storming the gates is being reasonable.

This is part of the silver lining here, as the "post Brexit racism surge" shows that people finally realize they've been duped.
The Remain side would not have been saying shit if it won by a few percentage points. Hell, they actively mocked the Austrian Far-right for demanding a look at electoral fraud when it (conveniently) lost by suspicious postal votes. They would have been over the moon, and would have told all those dumb Brexiters that this was "democracy in action" and that the will of the people should never be overwritten.

What we're witness to is the first time that the left is losing democracy. The rise of Trump, Le Pen, Farage, and other nationalist leaders in Austria, Poland and Germany show that the white man is figuring out their game. And it frightens them, because for most of them they've never in their lifetimes been on the losing side. They don't know how to play from behind. But we do. And if we manage to win hard enough, we'll win for a long time.

We're putting them on the backfoot and they're realizing how scary it is. The only difference is that they aren't equipped to deal with it. We were. And we will win.

underrated post. But extreme libertarians/ancaps follow use the hegelian dialectic to create a synthesis between Tribalism and Universalism, by essentially viewing the tribal model as universal, since it is ingrained in our culture which is in turn ingrained in our biology. Tribalism is still morally consistent as long as you can voluntarily leave your tribe.
The mistake most of you on the alt-right make is believing that means that it must therefore imply that all tribes must me inclusive to anyone who wishes to join. This is not true.

Trump will flip Pennsylvania and Florida. With a few other states that clinches it.

his twitter twitter.com/robfarr97

> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!
> KENNEDI CHECK EM!!!

Because they're little children.

Good stuff right here, never thought of it this way.

CHECKEM

REROLL

It's simple:

Benefits me and my beliefs = Good
Goes against me and my beliefs = Bad

Because they have minds like children who are used to getting their way all the time.
They don't understand that people may not want to do things their way, so they throw a tantrum.
Modern liberals are a reflection of our current society, childish, narcissistic and self-deluding.