Mozilla Firefox 51 will launch with support for the Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) built-in to the web browser

...

Other urls found in this thread:

lwn.net/2001/0301/a/rms-ov-license.php
youtube.com/watch?v=5QU7IoDoVX4
boards.4chan.org/g/thread/56369254
my.mixtape.moe/wclmbe.mp4
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56381870#p56386853
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56387200#p56387549
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56378282#p56381701
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56378282#p56381216
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56378282#p56381139
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56377675#p56379384
ebay.com/itm/HP-LTO-6-Ultrium-6250-SAS-Internal-Tape-Drive-EH969A-684881-001-/282115311766?hash=item41af620896:g:c~MAAOSwRgJXmWEk
ebay.com/itm/Hp-1-2-Ultrium-LTO-6-Cartridge-MP-2775ft-2-5TB-Native-6-25-Compressed-C7976A-/182179584226?hash=item2a6abfd8e2:g:qH4AAOSwMNxXabBy
backupworks.com
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Kill me.

Nice gimmick that noone going to use since audiophiles got their own CDs, vinyls or hard drives with music in FLAC and other people won't stream 40MB of data to listen to 7 minute song with headphones/speakers without proper sound quality which allow to enjoy lossless audio.

Personally I'm excited for e10s and Wayland backend support in release channel.
Mainly so I can have a fucking dark titlebar under GNOME, but also because Xwayland has that annoying draw artifact on resize due to X.org itself.

X.org also seems so slow to me after using Wayland for three months. I can't even bother to go to an X.org session anymore, even to play videogames.

Also this is because pointer locking protocol isn't implemented in Xwayland, for 3d videogames. Once it is, there's no reason to go back.

this

/thread

Audio codec support is the least of FFs fucking problems.

They should implement FLIF which actually has the progressive decoding advantage.

AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA

CHROMEFAGS IN DAMAGE CONTROL

>>>/furry/

Kill yourself.

Found the tard

You really need to be a "special" kind of person to think progressive is an exclusively political term.

I'm sure chiru.no will be pleased to hear this

Year of FLIF never ever.

As someone who likes the GPL(v3) and prefers copyleft licenses, I think a permissive license would have been more suitable.
See also: lwn.net/2001/0301/a/rms-ov-license.php

LGPL would have been just fine. There was really no excuse to release FLIF under GPLv3, not even preference for copyleft. Fuck, MPL itself has some amount of copyleft.

It's even more retarded than that.

Are we going back to the days when each word processor had its own printer drivers built in?

DOS would be an improvement over Win10 though.
As would a simple 386, like the one Linus had when he started writing his kernel.

firefox some years ago
firepoz today

The sad part is I can guarantee you aren't trolling and that you're actually this stupid.

No, really, how many outdated copies of libavcodec am I going to have simultaneously loaded in RAM at any given moment in the future?

Lossless formats are not for listenting even outside the internet, they just store sound data in case you want to further process it.

fuck off

Why would I not listen to my FLAC files? What do I gain by transcoding them to MP3 instead?

storage space

Are you for real? FLAC + MP3 takes MORE space than just the FLAC file, and the MP3 adds absolutely nothing. It's just a degraded version of the FLAC.

...

delete yours flacs then

Web 3.0 guize!

...

wew
Explain your reasoning for thinking progressive decoding is good.


>>>Holla Forums

I'll just leave this here.

What you could technically do is encode pipe the flac into mp3 in real time and listen to the song that way, while no data gets saved. This is the most agreeable way to listen to music

Looks like they have a couple of audiophiles at Mozilla now.

The Internet has not yet learned how to be lossless. And I think Mozilla is going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place.

It is not going to be the lossy place that it once was in the last decade. FLAC and png are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for the Internet to make. The Internet is now going into a lossless mode, and mp3fags will be resented because of our leading role.

But without that leading role, and without that transformation, the Internet will not survive

Ebin.
youtube.com/watch?v=5QU7IoDoVX4

boards.4chan.org/g/thread/56369254

Congratulations Mozilla.

You're only 4 months behind
Microsoft's
browser.

Ogg/Opus replaces MP3. FLAC replaces WAV.

why

friendly reminder that the last MP3 patent expires on 2017(or 2018?)

Friendly reminder that MP3 is the JPEG of audio formats, and needs to be replaced with any of numerous more efficient successors.

tard status confirmed

it's good for low bandwidth connections when you want to preview the file as it downloads. it's got nothing to do with hillary clinton

...

MNG was dead on arrival, get real. They made the right call with APNG.

my.mixtape.moe/wclmbe.mp4

It supports flac and not ogg? Hmm....

...

...

...

Retarded.

Just got 7 day banned from 4chins for posting Here are the highlights:


Did I get the hotpocket high score?

Some of my non-offending posts that got deleted:

rbt.asia/g/thread/S56381870#p56386853
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56387200#p56387549
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56378282#p56381701
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56378282#p56381216
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56378282#p56381139
rbt.asia/g/thread/S56377675#p56379384

...

A used MagStor or equivilent drive runs about 2-9 thousand bucks. And a SINGLE tape like the one pictured on the low end is 1.3 grand. Do you know how many fucking hard drives I could get with that? Raid for days my nigga.

I see LTO-6 drives for $1200

ebay.com/itm/HP-LTO-6-Ultrium-6250-SAS-Internal-Tape-Drive-EH969A-684881-001-/282115311766?hash=item41af620896:g:c~MAAOSwRgJXmWEk

and 2.5TB tapes for $43-$70

ebay.com/itm/Hp-1-2-Ultrium-LTO-6-Cartridge-MP-2775ft-2-5TB-Native-6-25-Compressed-C7976A-/182179584226?hash=item2a6abfd8e2:g:qH4AAOSwMNxXabBy

LTO-7 will drop down in price when LTO-8 is out

1) That's a 10-pack, you stoned doublenigger, meaning $22.983/TB. For comparison, the cheapest HDD on PC Part Picker is $26/TB.
2) LTO-7 just came out, so the prices are a bit inflated. LTO-6 & LTO-5 carts are about twice as cheap, at ~$10/TB: backupworks.com
3) "$2-9 thousand"? The same website sells brand new LTO-7 drive for that much.
4) For what it's worth, dealing with 25-128GB/disc media, BD-R is also hovering around $10-$20/TB.


Same, though I see a few LTO-6 drives that sold for as little as $600.

...

You are starting thinking, dumb FLACCER. A few days of thinking more and you will realize you should delete useless bloat stupid FLAC's.

I guess we should've just burned all the film reels because VHS was good enough.

???
This is an English-only board. Return to your designated street.