Er ist wieder da

what's Holla Forums opinion of this movie?
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

Other urls found in this thread:

argenteam.net/movie/90095/Er.ist.wieder.da.(2015)
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Its actually really fucking right wing tbh

I guess it is, but kinda weird Hitler started liking the Green Perty and at the end had his own "neo-nazi" supporters. It seems like they deleted some scenes somewhere.

My opinion is you're a faggot.
not too bad though

:^)

Er ist wieder da is an amazing rad pill for non-Germans especially. I doubt that t'was its intention (more likely to stain the modern European Right, was that) , but Hitler never says anything that a common sense layman could disagree with. The Truth shines through. And whether or not it brings about any good depends on how many Germans can shrug off the suffocating cloak of Self-Hatred that has been forced on them by the post Frankfurt School school systems they were forced into.

although the intention was to warn people of the possibility of populist uprise, the film ended up being a major red pill.

I remember some user saying they made a redpill cut of the movie, anyone know anything about that?

good movie user, i was shocked to how based it was. theres a bit of POZ in the end, but you know they had to throw that in least, the movie never see the light of day.

TO THE user WHO MADE THE EDIT:

Did you manage to upload it anywhere?

Is there the edited version going around?

You do realize national socialism is responsible for inventing deep ecology. It's obviously a reference to that.

Unintentionally fairly redpilled, and in a way that makes the film unassuming. Worth a watch.

The book was better.

They made some petty changes to it, like having Hitler shoot a dog for no reason.

It's still pretty red-pilling, though. The interviews with actual Germans are good.

shitty thread OP see

I wholeheartedly concur.

Although I wouldn't call the changes petty, at least not the changes to the ending. In the book the ending was happy and promising, whereas the movie was downright depressing.
I can see why they made the changes, the book painted Hitler much nicer than the usual propaganda, so the movie had to end on a down note to put all the nice parts with Hitler in a negative perspective. But that doesn't make it any better.

Book Ending (spoiler, duh)
The film guy Sawatzki and Hitler's secretary, Krömeier, get married. Sawatzki is working on Hitler's election campaign, Krömeier is pregnant and invites Hitler to Christmas because he is "practically part of the family".

Movie Ending (spoiler, duh)
Sawatzki goes crazy after he realizes Hitler is the real Hitler. He tries to kill Hitler but fails and is committed to a mental institution, with Krömeier crying at the sight of Sawatzki wearing a strait-jacket in a padded cell.

Oh I remember that thread.
I have no idea what editoranon actually changed however.
I think there was a torrent?

...

Trashed.png

It made Hitler actually into a Good guy which was suprising to me since Germany is very hush..hush about Nazism and Hitler.

They tried to make a movie that made Hitler look bad, but somehow made him look somewhat right.

If they didn't add in that final sequence reminding the audience how bad Hitler supposedly was, it would have been a pro-Uncle Adolf movie.

The satire rubs me the wrong way, I don't like how Hitler is portrayed, but seeing real life Germans show disdain for the current political situation and speaking their mind freely is very uplifting.

looks good, gonna watch it

Requesting redpilled edit of the movie

I hated how they made Hitler shoot a dog for no fucking reason.
Getting his eye color wrong also upset my autism, but not bad overall.
Made me want to read the book.

anyone have a torrent to the english subtitle version?

This was my feeling after seeing it, so I bought and read the book. The book is told from Adolf's perspective, meaning that much of the side character subplots are less focused on or not even present, which I liked. The dog shooting never happens in the book, either.

And Hitler shooting a dog would be completely out of character, the man loved animals, with Nazi Germany's animal rights laws being the basis of the ones we have today.

...

argenteam.net/movie/90095/Er.ist.wieder.da.(2015)

Dropped hard redpills on race-mixing

It's funny that the only way they could make him look bad was to have him do things that Hitler would never have done, like litter or shoot a dog. Other than that, it was surprisingly good for something coming out of modern Germany.

What?

he kills a dog 20 minutos into the movie, it becomes an important plot element later

I enjoyed it. I can see why right-wingers rallied to it.

SAGE AND REPORT FOR ZERO EFFORT.

...

Havent seen the movie, why is there a little faggot dog instead of a german shepard?

There is no possible reason for that image to exist nor is there a reason to post it.

...

Its the one that get shot by Hitler because Hitlr is ebul.

But hitler loves animals, dogs in particular.

the dog bited him

Oh, its ok then.

Shooting the dog was extremely out of character, instead of telling Germans to let go it reinforces them to be sorry forever to the chosen tribe, and Hitler unintentionally is more alpha than the rest of the cucked Germans.

It's like that film "Hitler: The Rise of Evil" that I watched in high school, it shows Hitler in WW1 losing his shit yelling and trying to kick a dog because it wouldn't obey his orders, then he chases after it (then a shell falls, which is the film's explanation for the real incident in which everyone in a trench was killed except Hitler).

It's like to these people, historical accuracy takes a back seat to making Hitler out to be some kind of super-devil.