An argument for Multiculturalism

I think it's okay for two cultures to combine since all cultures stem from the same principles. We are all one people, we are all one race.

People of different cultures have different values and philosophies, expecting them to live in close proximity without unrest relies on all involved respecting others beliefs without trying to change them.
There are cases where this has worked like like western Europe between 1950 and 1990 and there are cases where it hasn't like the middle east between 500bc and today.

The only way to make it work is to screen those cultures you allow to mingle to make sure they are fine with others holding different values. I think in the west this requires limiting the immigration of those from the middle east as they have never been able to except others point of view as just as valid as theirs.

I'm Filipino, its the most westernised place in Asia, those in mid east mainly see west as great evil etc, immigration for here in UK needs to be controlled more, parts of London and Leeds are like Islamabad, white people and Pakistani don't mix at all

You're talking about political ideologies colliding based on various wars in that era, not cultures together as one single identity. Go home, libfag.

If either cultures or ideologies clash without mutual respect you are going to have issues. See 'merica today for what happens when ideologies collide without maintaining open communication.
It's the libtards that severed the lines of communication leading to shit getting so bad

global conflicts in the early 20th century may be similar to ours now but they aren't the same. Politics have taken a whole new face and do not represent our current system.

National Socialists back then were right wing as fuck, now they would be seen as left wing as fuck, just an example.

The terms "left" and "right" have been corrupted to the point they have no meaning. National Socialists back then where socially authoritarian and economically limited socialism.

People keep trying to use a single term to describe both social and economic policy when in reality very few people have the same stance on both of them because in every case I can think of off the top of my head that's retarded. eg. Social libertarian and economic libertarian are very different things.

National Socialism on its own is a left wing movement. However, NatSoc in Nazi Germany combined with Fascism is center-right (barely).

National Socialism on it's own will always be a left wing movement, regardless of what anyone tells you.

You niggers just can't keep this shit in Holla Forums
Retards.

Holla Forums is dead and has been for over a year at this point. I enjoy talking politics without the board I'm talking on having a moderator bias either way meaning Holla Forums is the only place left bar /k/ when it's in relation to military action.