Body shaming

THIS FUCKING SITE IS DEDICATED TO BEING TRIGGERED BY LEFTIST NARRATIVES NOW? (Hello (((AltRight)))

Who gives a shit? Women can lose weight, gain weight, they get fat when pregnant, there is Chemicals in all our food…. Girls who are skinny are cunts fucking niggers

I don't fucking care unless she's a redpilled female, then I'll murder for her. Because that's what a man does. He kills, not complains like a fucking bitch on the god damn internet! Plan, do, work, stop feeding the beast!

The old /fit/ post from cuckchan summed it up nicely.

Women see a woman at the top of the mountain and declare it unrealistic, unobtainable and proceed to declare wherever they stand as the new peak of the mountain.

Men see a man at the top of the mountain and aspire to be him.

that's bullshit and it's not Holla Forums… So shut the fuck up

Nice try Chaim. Girls who fuck niggers are invariably fat old hags with no life prospects.

That's not the problem you faggot nigger. The problem is that you made a shit thread with a shitty OP.

does not belong here, on 4chan or anywhere as an OP.

How fitting that I just replied to you once already.

Are you not a Jew at all? Are you a thick as pigshit fat lass?

Do me a favour: Kill yourself you defect. Fat people are unable to birth healthy children and incapable of controlling their impulses.

Women aren't "body shamed" any more than men are (especially since intrasexual competition gets us a long time of women deriding other women). High quality women aren't drawn to neckbeard blobs just as alpha males aren't drawn to Anita Sarkcheese.

Female sex appeal points to her use for incubating, birthing, ans caring for children as well as being properly supportive of the male. Male sex appeal his use for gathering and giving resources, fending off predators and otherwise being a protector, and maintaining dominance. With their roles considered, the top-notch bodies of men and women that have continously been portrayed across mankind's history really aren't strange.

It's intrasexual competition.

Yeah, I guess white knights protest ads with foxy ladies snd vidya with foxy ladies too.

shit thread

Daily reminder: fat shaming is meant to marginalize high IQ women so they breed with niggers.

The woman in OP has markers for having low IQ:

Holla Forums loves to name the Jew but falls for every single Jewish trick.

S
S
S
S
S
L
L
L
L
L
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
D
D
D
E
E
E
E
E

T
T
T
T
T
H
H
H
H
H
R
R
R
R
R
E
E
E
E
E
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
D

I weep for our genepool.

Haha oh wow.

...

SUMMER
SUMMER
SUMMER
SUMMER

Ok, you're clearly a fat chick. Lose weight fatty.

Jealousy runs deep in the female gender. I think it's evolutionary because with unrealistic women around, their chances of mating and pairing plummet and they have enough trouble as it is considering there are more women than men in existence which means no matter what, a very large amount of women will end up invariably alone like takimag.com/article/feminisms_rotting_corpse_kathy_shaidle/print Just look how desperate they are for attention much of the time and how much women tend to dislike one another on a personal level. As for the whole entire notion of unrealistic women, if they were unrealistic, why do they exist?

Here's the thing, if you are in shape it's because you know the health benefits of a balanced diet and exercise and you are striving to be better in every mode of life.

Obesity and generally being overweight is down to laziness, so if a person can't be bothered to keep their body in shape, what are the chances that they bother keeping their mind in shape?

None whatsoever.

Every woman can look good without medical intervention and a bit of effort. People have become lazy.

That's a European trait.

complex issue
women shouldnt be objectified by the jewish media who basically just want all our women to end up as their goy sex slaves
shame is a good thing, its a method of societal control, as socrates said a man should not waste his youth by not finding out the limits of his own body
theres no excuse to be a fat bitch unless you have a genuine medical disorder and no not made up ones, comfort eating is just being a fat bitch

Stop using the enemy's language.

Check your calories shitlord.

fetishized then whatever

Strong healthy naked woman is not even a fetish, it's normal to be aroused by them.

I think insecure fat girls should be sent to concentration camps.

This. A woman should aspire to be healthy, fit and, proper.

Fatty detected.

IQ is meaningless.

Strong independent whore culture, promoting the appeal of riding the cock carousel isnt though
shit like this is unacceptable
a woman should still feel ashamed for getting her tits out in the media for money no matter what you say

For starters: stop being fat.

Oh and by the way, women are huge "body shamers" they just shame "unrealistic depictions of women" (doesn't need to be fictional) which bashes women with good or decent bodies.

Hey hey… it's Cultural Marxism and its quest for the mediocre and the downright grotesque!

That's interracial sex, now that's a fetish.

its all the same shit
theres art and theres porn and what OP posted is of the latter persuasion

Nope, it's interspecies sex.

Tell me all about how IQ has nothing to do with differences in performance.

2nd pic. Isn't that Shyla Stylez ?

fat people are fat and should lose weight for their health and if they want to look good
it's not that crazy
stupid thread

...

there's still libertarians on Holla Forums?!

they're just nationalists only now without the socialism part
its the one thread that binds us all, nationalism

i'm nationalist by some definitions, especially those of people who hate "nationalists", but lots of Holla Forums would consider me not to be and i don't consider myself to be.

why not?
im seriously concerned, are you misguided about what nationalism is?

i don't think nations should be carelessly destroyed and i think good ones should be protected from bad things, like islamic influence. but if i approve of an influence from a foreign country, i don't think people should rally against it. for example, people in my country often complain things are turning too much like a certain other country. i like that other country and most of the ways it's different from mine, so most of those things i approve of.

and if i think a country is bad, i'm fine with it being taken over and run by another country for a while, even indefinitely. and if i don't think a state counts as a real country (bunch of tribes) then i wouldn't mind its borders getting changed, whether to add it to another state or break it into multiple or whatever.

well this all depends on what nation you're from
if you're from some third world shithole thats an understandable attitude
blind patriotism is not nationalism
if your nation is under threat or is dying or is a stagnant uncivilized cesspit and you can recognize that, it should be your duty to strive to better yourself and your nation

really it's true whatever nation i'm from, because no nation is the best at everything: there's going to be something that would be better about any nation if it gave up its customs in that area and adopted another country's. so it actually depends on whether i'm making the right decisions on each different influence. and that's case by case. third world shitholes just have more things they should adopt from others.

it's funny, i'd use "patriotism" to describe my views in opposition to "blind nationalism", the reverse of your phrasing. but that's just semantics.

also i'm not an ethnic/racial nationalist. i'm civic as fuck. i don't think they automatically are just because of their passport, but i think people of any race can be true members of a nation.

in technical terms they can be members of the state
but the connection is between blood and soil, nationalism is distinctly different from patriotism
if the land you were born in is the land your ancestors have lived in for as long as recorded history
if your DNA can be matched to a man buried in a grave 5000 years ago just down the street from your home
then you are the true member of that land, and noone has the right to dictate to you in unreasonable terms your own cultural practices, beliefs and traditions while you live and breathe on that land
no foreigner on earth has the right to walk up to you, trodding on your land and tell you what you can and cant do

the racial agenda gets muddled by new worlders who cling to the definition of white
whites just one aspect of it from a European perspective, geographic location of your ancestors and where you were born is just as important

yeah, i don't believe in that connection much, so by that i'm a patriot rather than a nationalist.

then america is part of no nation, because every single european there's ancestors move their within recorded history. but the natives had no nations, just tribes.

and the falklands are part of no nation, because they had no native population since prehistory.

and if natives adopt the culture of an invader, then they have the right to dictate the invader's law to other natives who have the pre-invasion culture. so if enough native americans have become europeanised, they can make america a nation after all thanks to european influence, even though the majority of the country is foreigners from europe who have no right to disagree with the europeanised natives on modern american culture.

and jews have lived in the middle east since antiquity, so most of the arab nations should be part of israel.

i think culture, not race or ancient history, is what matters.

then you're a bit of a fool and im sad you feel no connection to your ancestors
you're also woefully uninformed on world history

americas the new world, i know theres many here who disagree with the idea but i consider the new world a bit of a free for all
and your ancestors had tribes too once cretin

the falklands weren't populated until Britain settled it, so the islands are now British forever more until someone comes up with evidence of prior human settlement

all irrelevant bullshit to me, im not a new worlder such things dont concern me, the land i was born is my land and has been as far as my genetics and archaeological knowledge can tell for the last 20,000 years at least

the jews hail from a tiny shithole in the mountains of Iraq
Israel and Judea are city states they stole in the 10th century BC through bloody conquest and massacre
and their dominion afterwards barely stretched past their cities boundaries
the jews are an insignificant race of parasites that has survived on the fringes of society outlasting better races like a collective horde of cockroaches feeding on the trash of their betters
no race on earth has lied, fabricated or exaggerated their history as much as the jews

don't. i feel connection to my predecessors, whether or not they're my ancestors.

so your rule is only a rule some places.

nothing to do with the point.

prehistoric bones have been found there. so there was prior human settlement. but it's extinct. so the falklands are the soil or no-one living, by your logic. unless some south american tribes turn out to have descent from the prehistoric falklanders, in which case they may turn out to belong to argentina after all.

wrong. the majority of the people in northern ireland are british. but irish nationalists say they're foreign invaders from great britain and have no right to dictate anywhere on the island of ireland. who's in the right?

kek
politics and religion have superseded common sense in this case
truth be neither of em
even the english that came to Ireland after the Normans took Leinster were just largely anglicized British Celts and cousins to the Irish anyway
theres barely any difference genetically between a roman catholic taig and a prod unionist
the entire British Isles has a haplogroup specific to it
to an Englishman an Irishman is a distant cousin whether he likes it or not
but to an Englishman and a Frenchman or a German the genetic relationship is far more distant

theres a difference between land only settled in the last few centuries and land settled tens of thousands of years ago

therefore its terra nullis duh
Falklands conflict is a bad example
no real natural resources, the people that live there are 100% white British that love Queen and country and Argentina only wanted the islands because they wanted to play a my dick id bigger than yours game with a failing empire
and they got fucked into the dirt for their arrogance

so all that nations are blood and soil stuff and you can't even answer the very question the concept of nations is supposed to answer?

bad example
learn the reality behind what you speak about before you try and point holes
the ideas behind race in Irish nationalists and ulster unionists has been superseded by the importance of religion over blood and soil
theyre the same people, same blood, with different cultures arguing over rights to land they mutually occupy
its stupid

the majority of catholics are unionist. so much it being religion that's running things. learn the reality behind what you speak about.

str8 from kikepedia
starting to think you're a shill

those claims don't contradict.
lrn2math

It's a non-issue.