NY Times: Dozens of U.S. Diplomats, in Memo, Urge Strikes Against Syria’s Assad

Dozens of U.S. Diplomats, in Memo, Urge Strikes Against Syria’s Assad

archive.is/AbJ9m

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Institute_for_Near_East_Policy
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Stephen_Ford
sdjewishworld.com/2010/11/11/with-egyptian-foreign-minister-at-her-side-clinton-continues-to-criticize-israel/
nytimes.com/2012/02/09/world/middleeast/us-and-israel-split-over-how-to-deter-iran.html
nytimes.com/2012/11/08/world/obamas-other-cliff-is-in-foreign-policy.html?_r=0
archive.is/tOOjC
archive.is/8CDTD
twitter.com/MarkLandler
twitter.com/nytpolitics?lang=en
youtube.com/channel/UCwnKziETDbHJtx78nIkfYug
archive.is/kol1p
youtube.com/watch?v=N294FMDok98
archive.is/FSGdO
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

(((Diplomats)))

Checked for slimy traitorous cunts ready to send someone else's children off to die for Zion.

How about we just admit that the rebels/ISIS/etc are worse than the status quo, let Assad take back over and send all the rapefugees back? Seems like the most sensible position to me.

what are the odds of this starting WWIII ?
anyone know?

_________
(((Washington Institute for Near Eastern Policy)))

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Institute_for_Near_East_Policy

(checked)
Fucking stop. No more sandnigger adventures.

> The government’s barrel bombing of civilians, it said, is the “root cause of the instability that continues to grip Syria and the broader region.”

> During a debate in June 2013, after the Assad government had used chemical weapons against its own people, Mr. Kerry brandished a State Department report that argued that the United States needed to respond militarily or Mr. Assad would view it as “green light for continued CW (chemical-weapon) use.”


I WANT NAMES!

based Mearsheimer and Walt are based

No match for the barrel bombs!

Is it safe to say that these State Department hawks are probably part of the Victoria (((Nuland))) Jewish neocon contingent that we have also seen make very aggressive moves in Eastern Europe?

NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMES!

The state dept has been pozzed for decades
They constantly push for the US in intervene around the globe

Yes user, it's most likely the workings of (((Neoconservatives))) to keep pushing for destabilizing Syria. They'll never give up because they're at war with existence.

There is a UN report concluding that Sarin attack was launched from rebel-controlled area.

They are straight out lying here. Is there a mechanism against this?

______
Former CIA intelligence officer Michael Scheuer alleged that prior to Ford's removal he was traveling across the country inciting groups to overthrow the government.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Stephen_Ford

stop bullying assad you filthy kikes

this. the media keeps perpetuating this lie and its bullshit. isn't there something in the shillary emails that basically said they were going to give chemical weapons to the rebels and blame it on Assad?

(((John Kerry))) is head of the state department.
His real name is John Kohn.

ISIS are our government's team because (((Saudi Arabia))) and co. want a Sunni state in between Syria and Iran and Israel is assblasted about Assad.

Yeah. We have done a lof of extensive research on the subject.

> sdjewishworld.com/2010/11/11/with-egyptian-foreign-minister-at-her-side-clinton-continues-to-criticize-israel/

> nytimes.com/2012/02/09/world/middleeast/us-and-israel-split-over-how-to-deter-iran.html

> nytimes.com/2012/11/08/world/obamas-other-cliff-is-in-foreign-policy.html?_r=0

Holy shit. I always thought he had a goofy looking face. Supposedly his mom was episcopalian and his dad was catholic, and his paternal grandparents were conversos

Don't forget that Assad blocked the pipeline which made the Eurozone buttblasted

WE NEED THE FUCKING NAMES!

It seems NYT claims to have 'obtained' this memo - someone get on Twitter NOW and start asking for the names, and get the rest of the Twitterfags to amplify the signal.

Not sure about that but here's an email of Hillary that Syria must be destroyed for Israel
archive.is/tOOjC

Also article on Sarin incident
archive.is/8CDTD

> twitter.com/MarkLandler

> twitter.com/MarkLandler

> twitter.com/MarkLandler

> twitter.com/MarkLandler

twitter.com/nytpolitics?lang=en

twitter.com/nytpolitics?lang=en

twitter.com/nytpolitics?lang=en

twitter.com/nytpolitics?lang=en

We should probably dismantle the entire State Department if we ever get the chance.
Seems to be full of

You'll never the know the culprits specifically unless we obtain the list of names.

Those people could then stick around and filter into positions of greater power.

That's why we need the names tbh fam.

Purge every Jew from the USA, all 6 Gorillion of them. Make us a Christian nation again, uncucked by the stupid belief that Jesus is coming back. No need to pay the 3 billion shekel ransom, the jews aren't hiding Jesus from us.

welp, looks like they really want to push for WWIII just in time for the elections.

Fuck that shit, I want heads!

Based and redpilled.

First things first.

If we can get our military where it needs to be, where we can neutralize an ICBM, or Metal Gear, or any nuclear threat, I think it could be a good idea to just let Israel and Saudi Arabia nuke each other.

Those semites do nothing but subvert and destroy. Let them have it out with each other.

METAL GEAR????

These kikes just don't give up.

The (((State Department)))

Just restrict funding. Easy to do and no messy negotiations. Government shutdown? Bring it on!

US always was secular nation you cultist nigger.


Innit a great plan? War means no elections - cuckbama will become gay emperor of burgers forever.

The US was always secular and Christian. There's no contradiction.

fucking kikes
fucking king nigger
like they didn't already commit to this, "two carriers have been underway for a few days" - user

that looks interesting, but it's unreadable


this

What a world huh.

They really are frustrated with Syria not falling already. It was supposed to happen years ago, and then they could focus all their attention on Iran. The moment Syria falls we'll see a big media push to go after Iran.

For any of you who want background on the Syrian conflict from a Russian perspective, I really recommend this channel.

youtube.com/channel/UCwnKziETDbHJtx78nIkfYug

...

$20,000,000,000,000

they only have 6 months left to get what they want done, so they are going all out.

Have to start a massive war now so the the incoming president won't have the political capitol to end it and get a second term if he does so.

Is it even logical to start a war in an election year?
Like 18% think that US should try to change the Syrian government.
archive.is/kol1p

The two things that can save Assad are 1) Obama continues to refuse to do shit 2) Russia hardline backs Bashad and forces the West to let it go. 2 is pretty damn possible, and this very fact might be why Putin recently said if Hilary is elected war with the United States is inevitable, because she will do it anyway. As you can see in this letter there are plenty of people chomping at the bit to do it, damn the consequences.

If Hillary gets in, she will pretty much attack Syria almost immediately. Wouldn't be surprised to see a massive surge in Russian military activity in the coming months to prepare.

If those theories about (((ISIS))) doing massive attacks across the USA on July 4th are true we'll be getting involved in Syria even if Trump wins.

I really dont know whether this is just sheer stupidity, (((lobbyist))) brainwashing or corruption.

With Jews as (((diplomats))), who needs enemies?

The article should read like this:


Dozens of U.S. Jews, in Memo, Urge Strikes Against Syria’s Assad

...

GOOD LUCK ASSAD

You'd think we would learn to not involve ourselves in the civil wars of other nations by now. Also the state department is full of neocohens and kikes. Their opinion is shit and is just going to cause more mass murders when they get pissed off at us again even further.

This

youtube.com/watch?v=N294FMDok98

Honestly, at least this point, the Russians should just put Iran under its nuclear umbrella or straight give them nukes. It would save them money in the long run instead of needing to intervene personally with airstrikes and now nobody would move a finger due to risk of nuclear annihilation and peace would be restored.

That already happened though. Russia sent in air support and completed their mission within a few weeks IIRC. If things flare up again, it's not going to be much for them to take the lessons of Afghanistan (for both them and the Americans) and burn opposition forces to the ground without a damn for anything else previously attempted.

If Clinton is elected, she is sure to topple the Assad government for her neo-cohen supporters.

Al-Assad and the SAA have fought against islamists for half a decade, with their people suffering terribly in the process.

If all that is made moot by some fucking satanic granny, I'm convinced that there is no justice in the world.
Only evil, violence and useful idiots.

there it is

And why do (((Americans))) think they should be responsible for fixing issues on other sides of the globe again?
Oh right…

Russia just responded by cluster bombing American-trained terrorists in Syria.

BWAAHAHAHHAHA!

Kek, so direct that It hurts

Kek, so direct that It hurts.

Fucking amerikikes. I can't get drafted next year, you better get Trump in the white house.

Wait. Isn't this bad for israel?

Isn't it (((Assad)))?

(((Because)))

John Kerry Is Said to Side With Diplomats’ Critical Memo on Syria
archive.is/FSGdO

Bumping
GOOD LUCK ASSAD

Can someone give me the scoop into the whole Syria debacle? Why did we usurp Gaddafi? What were the motives? How did the Arab spring play into it?

Polite sage for derailing the topic a bit.

ISIS wants the destruction of ALL the kings and dictatorships in the Muslims world. Your idea is nothing more than conjecture.

Putin isn't doing enough, really. If he gave em a nuke, nobody would even bother. Assad is an interesting individual because he's not like their neighbors in their crazy leadership. Watching an interview with him, he was very intelligent, unlike Saddam. America as a whole doesn't have an interest in wasting more money and lives on Syria either, especially to help and further arm ISIS.

a number of reasons
one was for oil
one was that the French wanted to prove that they still had muscle in Africa
There are also lots of lucrative contracts with major European and American firms
Another was potentially the fact that Gaddafi was trying to get African countries to jump out of the current world currency standard

CIA/Mossad operation to disrupt the Arab world, get rid of unfavorable governments
Long term part of the "Which Path to Persia" plan

I wouldn't be surprised if the only thing keeping Obama out of Syria is the fear that it would push the electorate towards Trump further since he's been critical of Obama not siding with Assad so as to stamp out ISIS.

It's more the fact that the Russians are entrenched there now, and they gave Assad modern AA and transferred modern fighter craft to him, piloted by "volunteers"

US intervention in Syria would likely mean war with both Iran and Russia

Right, I'm familiar with his gold Dinar, his socialistic policies for his peoples and the like; the economic basis for the war is there, but I was looking for more concrete ideological evidence. Names and the like. Who benefits? What reasons? Why?

China to the fray also. The Chinese have said years ago if US touches Iran then China will help the Iranians.

Many have an interest in Persia, more than just Russia. China is one. In a way, they can ransom even more if the North Koreans decide to nuke US bases in Korea and Japan if they attack Persia and the North Koreans could bolster their position as well as get a committed aid such as oil from the Persians.

Do we have a list of names yet?