Is Incest the Hidden Key to the Future?

It's been reported that women often lose sexual interest in their partners after about a couple years, indicating the sexual monogamy may not be optimal for the chief concerning of making bitches horny. However, no man wants to be a cuckold, either, and cheating results in powerful negative feelings. How did certain Aryan populations handle this in the past?

For one, the ancient Celts sometimes featured marriages where women were married to a few brothers. This unconsciously incestuous union between the brothers–whether they're gay or not–likely muffled any latent jealousy.
For an unrelated example, if your brother and you fucked your mother daily, you wouldn't be jealous of your full-blooded bro giving your mom the creampie. Thus, a union between brothers.

Does this carry on to fucking bitches to whom you're not related? Well, in some circumstances it might heighten jealousy, but NOT if gender parity is preserved, that is, for every man, there is an equal number of women.

Societal implications
A greater percentage of men will be able to fuck, and from a younger age. Gone will be the days of being a horny 16 y/o when you can fuck your brother's GF. The GF will not lose interest as quickly, since there's two of you, and other women will be attracted, through a biological hack, to men because they perceive fucking going on. (In a monogamous context, this would mean that there's a man who's very fit and desired by women, but in this case any snatch is magnified.)

This allows for greater openness of female sexuality, as they're more open to fucking wildly and in groups, but everything is still responsible and no cheating outside the group occurs.

Other effects
Fucking in the household will likely lower the age of consent and people will calm the fuck down about sex. It will probably make incest between full-blooded siblings and parents more common because there's lots of fucking going on in the house. This is actually okay, because there's birth control.

Economic effects
Basically, the most efficient and sustainable way to live is to either own a house and rent it out (while still living in it–lest one becomes a Jew landlord) to strangers, or to live in said rented house. Well, inviting strangers into your home takes a lot of trust, and roommates will typically lack cohesion. And too, those who do not own the home will not accrue any property value. With this new system in mind, homes will be paid off and will be kept within the property of the family. Family houses will be less intolerable for those living with parents because your parents will be happier and have less of a stick up their ass, and children will be calmed with less "muh house, muh rules" kind of shaming.

A reduction of housing cost, happier people, and perhaps one or two to stay home and tend to cooking and whatever will make food costs cheaper and the food healthier, as convenience food ads up.

Overall, it reduces wageslaving.

...

I want these (((social scientists))) to fucking stop already with this nonsense. Humans are clearly geared for monogamy the boomers are the ones who ruined marriage for the rest of us. This whole divorce nonsense is a strikingly new phenomena in the history of humankind

Drawbacks
Well, here it comes: paternity, or the lack thereof. Nothing is more important for a man's soul than making sure his efforts go to his actual children. The greatest failure of this marriage strategy is that paternity will be a source of concern. It is possible to perform genetic testing for each child, and see which one belongs to whom in this modern age, or for the women to have exclusive sex with just one man while trying to conceive–so one needn't really drop ensured paternity altogether. However, one could argue that this fractures group cohesion, as knowing your child will make you treat him/her better than the other children, who would then understand that it is their uncle fucking their mom, and not one of their "fathers." It's probably a tension that's worthwhile, but one can also consider just being ignorant of which child is really yours, since you can be sure that all children in the household are related to you, since you were a band of brothers. It all depends on the group.

3DPD ruined marriage due to lack need for it
it just started with the boomers

It's all whatever. When you die and go the astral plane, I doubt you're gonna wait for your wife to get there, and be faithful to her and her alone until the end of eternity.

It's best to get a group going, and stay loyal to that one group.

And anyway, women do get tired and sex dry–I think you know this. The only thing that gets them aroused is the thought of fucking a new man for some reason.


We have birth control. Plus, real incest will probably always remain a minority phenomenon.

Thread theme in embed related.

Yes I would wait for the woman I love in the 'astral plane' thats what making a promise is all about. You can rationalize your cuck fetish however you want, but don't go pushing an agenda.

What if she stops having sex with you and makes your life miserable? Or she just plain doesn't care about you anymore?

Give up on women altogether, live with it, or go on to the next girl? (Serial monogamy.)

…But you are right about keeping a promise. My wording wasn't precise; she's going to remarry in her lifetime if anything happens to you when you're both young.

I really love this thread. I want to live in this world its too beautiful to be true.

I agree with OP, nothing wrong with incest.

You are making this implication that I would marry a cunt. She would not remarry because I would marry someone who felt the same way as I do about that(ie not getting remarried)
You should only get one marriage in a lifetime.

...

why do you think this? If anything, I think it'd be polygamy with one guy and multiple females.
That's definitely what happened when agriculture was introduced. Not sure about before then.

if you want to see want that world looks like. read jabcomix

It was not the law retard. People had obligations and a family to look after. People didn't think about themselves like people in current year do.
The man went to work and slaved away to make money for his family and bang his ugly wife when he got home. That's how life was then.

Because the reason why is for the paternal protection offered by a male who stuck around and raised the kid was advantageous. If cavestacey just fucks every cavejamal on the block then they have no reason to raise the kid and protect both of them if it is not his offspring.

So you're saying that if the legal and social changes (like welfare, "gimme half your shit and child support and stuff for life" laws, and "mu strong independent womenz") that now free men and women from NEEDING to fulfill any such obligations had existed back then that divorces still wouldn't have been as common back then?

It actually seems really natural to me, come to think about it.

I mean, we have all these horny teenagers stuck in a depressing situation of having their sex drives at their peak, yet being unable to fuck.

I even advocate a patriarchal mindset to go along with this; ancient Celtic men were said to have the power of life and death over their wives.
Well, I'll not go that far, but women want to be dominated. It doesn't matter if you're masculine or not; they just want you to be more masculine and decisive than them, especially when they have their choice of whom to fuck. Women actually have a varied sex drive.

To be clear, many have strong preferences, but it really goes either way so long as you satisfy their need of being submissive to you.

Women should be owned, and emphasis should be placed on treating them as sexual objects
Well, with due respect, of course. I'm not saying we should abuse women, no; rather, women like being objectified (by men they love, but also just in general). Watch video related.

The thesis was that there's an implied sexual friction between brothers when they're fucking their wives, which binds them in unison. That's the key to the future.

The secondary effect of this is that people will have a more relaxed view of incest, and AOC will drop a little. Sounds 10/10 pretty good to me.

I think that the reason we have those things is that it is a band-aid trying to fix the amputation of the family unit from our society tbh.
Its a false hypothetical because those things are a result of divorcecancer, not the cause.

I question wheather we're thinking of things the same/ talking about the same thing, but I will say that I believe I see your POV.

Fucking potatos, go back to reddit you fucking degenerates.

Is this hedonistic?
Yes, it is. But it's a stable kind of hedonism that shouldn't collapse society. It isn't wasteful, and excess seems like a Christian concept when it relates to sex–how can one have too much sex? Your sex drive will regulate that. What's wrong with chasing pleasure when it may increase overall happiness, rather than leaving a cavity in your soul?

Kindred marriage is the solution to divorce and makes the family group more cohesive.

Part of being a man is having self control. Living your life like some kind of free love degenerate hippie is childish.

You seek pleasure every time you watch YouTube videos or try to relax. You're doing it now on Holla Forums. Without some pleasure, there is unhappiness, and happiness is what you're really after. Some pleasures are better than others.

Going to the pub every weekend is hedonistic too, but some metrics. Asceticism and hedonism are by polar ends of the same axis, whose origin is arbitrarily defined.

It's within a group, sodomite, and you don't fuck anyone outside of the group.

Go join a commune hippie scum

I don't want to have sex with 3DPD, but I like Gravity Falls incest porn, so keep it up OP

The group in this case is some biologic brothers, and for every man there is one woman. That's hardly a commune.


Make a tulpa and prepare to meet her in the afterlife. Women won't be as bad once they just start getting the dick more often.

all 3DPD are hypergamous, and I find hypergamy unattractive. It is instinct that has been with them since before they were humans, and won't ever go away. No matter how much dick you give them.

Imagine a world where you can get tired of your wife, she can get tired of you, and you can take a break without getting a divorce or breaking up the family.

CUCKOLD
U
C
K
O
L
D

and she come back with some other asshole's kid
sounds like a pretty shit world tbh

Is it cuckoldry if you're fucking more than one woman, and the ones' fucking them are your brothers?

If your wife has another dick in her you're a cuckold. End of story tbqh fam.

You mean your nephew? Meanwhile, you've been fucking your other wives.

But, you're not a cuckold if you're fucking another man's woman–correct? You're just "alpha."
Do you see a problem with this logic?

I wouldn't take care of my own kids, I don't care who's kid it is. I am leaving if you try to make me take care of it

Then just get genetic testing so you can know which ones are yours when they pop out.

Anyway, this isn't supposed to be a solution for everyone.

the courts won't care if you're the real father, they'll make you take care of it anyway, cuz you're married to her

I speak from idealism; you from pragmatism. I pay no heed to current laws, for they are subject to change. Perhaps once we have a National Socialist state, the laws will be made just again.

Of course this isn't completely feasible, yet.