Can someone explain to me, as someone with little knowledge of these ideologies...

That's even shittier than the Molyneux Dresden thread being locked.

The reason you have that complaint is because you don't like the idea of uncontrollable or unchecked people doing things for themselves alone and just using everyone else to make that happen, stepping on anyone that's in the way.

Like the kikes do.

The reason this is different is the leadership is people who are actually like you, and the only thing they care about is the people. Because of this, you have your freedom as a part of the people. Things are done on your behalf, not to you.

You best be joking:
google.com/search?q=kindle 1984 incident

Never mind the privacy issues.

Hitler had great respect for Mussolini. But when it came to military business he said he was, to put it mildly, unprepared.

Ok i read most of part 7 of 4 pic and i gotta give it to him he makes it clear what fascism is and thats the sad part since genuine fascism is just crypto-communism or something like syndicalist Strasserism.
So i went to part 8 (the natsoc part) and not to suprising he has no idea what NatSoc is. The sources he use is from american natsoc movements. The only source that is from germany is Nazi-Sozi. Literlly a 35 pages pamphlet for the very basic basic man.
The part where he talks about NSDAPs programme made me so angry that i had to stop reading for a while. He has no idea what any of the points really mean and cuz of that no idea if they were implemented or not.

I cant be bother to spell check their will be lost of spelling and grammatical errors.

Also why the fuck did this thread get bumplocked?

You mean the Austrians (i.e. Germans) destroyed their nation (i.e. Germany) by joining with… Germany?