How long has it been since you've read in your Bible?

Mine gets dusty sometimes.

amytalksyourheadoff.blogspot.com/2016/10/about-reading-your-bible.html

[video]

Other urls found in this thread:

skepticsannotatedbible.com/jos/18.html
theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/12/who-pulls-the-strings-of-femen-and-pussy-riot/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_Librorum_Prohibitorum
defendingcontending.com/2009/10/09/the-papal-curse/
tajnearchiwumwatykanskie.wordpress.com/2014/11/06/klatwy-watykanu-na-polske-do-dzis-nieodwolane/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I support Christianity now, but I wasn't raised a Christian and resented religion at school when I was younger.

Now it would be totally fake and forced if I tried to read the Bible and believe it. I think I'm doomed to be an atheist forever; best to just make the best of it

I got rid of mine a couple of months ago

tried burning it, but it just wouldn't catch fire no matter how hard I tried, so I tossed it in the river instead

why would i ever?

...

First pic, if you had philosphy basics you will notice that is just a joke, a 12 years old, a legit retarded, or american propaganda.

Second, is self explained, dumping your 8/10 gf for a couple of 9/10 lesbians that do slaanesh cults in your penis is wrong.

Third, try reading the Bible, learning history and asking any person with 90+iq about the movie, the modern west masters want you to leave God, become a cuck and let muslims rape your country.

It will help you understand history, theology, the world the universe and everything

About a week ago.

I really wish I was back home tbh fam

...

Good book. Reminds me that I am a Hebrew Aryan sage wizard immortal destined to fuck little girls.

it wont and why would i want to "understand" "magic"?

I read it all the time. Makes it hard to believe ant of it is real though.

what of it is real?

About a decade.

You might want to understand what people believed and believe, if you had interest in other people and history / society

If you're a self-interested fedora redditor then you probably don't care about other people's bliefs

What is the Bible?

Is it a good dessert?

I believe only what I can see

...

Do you believe in photons and electrons kid?

photons r the only thinng u ever see

actual history books r better for that. I dont have interest in what idiots believe, im interested how they justify it and they justify it poorly
if u r so interested in that, u r birds of a feather. Just another idiot
What they believe is better explained and modeled in psychology, so another reason to skip this shit.

Hebrews existed, the lands and people described existed. Particular events, probably not. The more "miraculous" and supernatural the more reasonable it is to dismiss it. Any victory of the Jews at all should be dismissed or viewed critically unless another source backs it up. Sand existed, so did animals, and they did sacrifice them. Women existed, and they did treat them like shit. God might exist but the Bible is not a good place to look for God, you'd be stuck defending too much blatant human error and unabashed dogma. Better to take a rational approach to divinity and only "believe" what you could support with logical proofs and strong evidence.

That's just a few things.

I have never owned or read a bible.

yeah, its like spider-man comic - new yorck is real, americans r real, but is anything else?
my question was about

york*

You can't see individual photons, so how do you know they exist?

History books tell you who believed which religion, but they don't generally tell you much about what's contained in religions. And they're obviously useless for telling about what people believe NOW.

Well, I told you what I consider to be the real part of the Bible pretty clearly. The shit we can prove to have happened. The shit that's supernatural and can't be proven to have happened (eye witness are bs for supernatural stuff but ok for natural stuff for reasons that should be obvious) I would say, probably not.

So, there you go.

Deut. 28:49,64,65

every attempt to prove god exists boils down to saying if it doesn't exist, it isn't god. Every attempt to disprove god's existence boils down to denying this assertion.

though I suspect most of the family members I know of are religious god-fags, I myself have never even touched I bible
I strongly believe in ancient aliens

I can understand that, friend. Down at the car lot we don't care what you believe, honest. We just love our customers regardless and believe in the very american future of pumped cock, golf and russian bimbos. Contribute to our research budget and make Jim rich at last. It's the chance of a lifetime!

I never had one and never planned to have one.

Its easier to simply tackle the shady historical claims of any given religion than engage the vast metaphysical. Its actually much better because if you do the latter you give their otherwise empty arguments a level of legitimacy you probably shouldn't.

For example: if one hypothetically found the bones of Jesus, Christianity would cease to be, regardless of any "first mover" logical formula, they become irrelevant.

I already read it once. Its why I stopped being christian.

...

technically 1 and a half times. Got through the old testement and part of the new a second time before I realized I hated everything it stood for.

...

Why do you hate everything the Bible stands for?

Are you a trans-nigger-sodomite dyke crossdresser bitch?

this tbh fam

There's a few sections in the bible that I have bookmarked that I read and jack off to.


Comes in handy when I don't bring any porn on a long road trip and all I have is a Gideon bible in an anonymous hotel room.

isn't ezekiel the one about the niggers with dicks like stallions?

And one of the girls humping the wall that the nigger is drawn on? yes.

...

Didn't the Egyptians also keep slaves though?
Although yeah he could do anything, why didn't he only punish the most guilty.
Maybe he wanted to send the message of how terrible he was

i read the entire old testment.
it's fake and gay.

then don't forget that jesus actually let the devil posses judas before he committed his deed, and yet he's somehow still responsible for it, despite lesser demons canonically driving men mad


they both are

There's no archaeological evidence of Egyptians keeping Jewish slaves but, in the book of Exodus, God first offered Pharoah that he could keep the slaves so long as they could take a day off to worship him. He wasn't motivated to free the Israelites to be freed so they can pursue lives of freedom, he just wanted to be worshipped. If I were a Jew: I wouldn't find it to be that much of an honour to be one of his chosen if he valued the worship of himself over my emancipation from slavery.

So did he only have the bit about 'let my people go' because they wouldn't be allowed to worship him? Woah

Thats pretty much the theme of the entire book.

"You shall impregnate all those less than 12 summers old."

The Bible is so bad that 99% of christians have never even read it. That's pathetic.

Joshua 18 is the furthest I got. It's so fucking tedious.

skepticsannotatedbible.com/jos/18.html

The Holy Father in Rome bought red shoes worth $ 500. I believe, therefore, that he is a good person.

Sex was created by God for procreational purposes and as a demonstration of love between a husband and his same-race wife. Therefore, any sexual act is solely intended to occur in a healthy same-race marriage between husband and wife in purity and holiness. In stark contrast, masturbation is selfish self-stimulation without the presence of a same-race spouse or assigned sexual chaperone.

Masturbation involves sexual fantasies and/or pornographics and is certainly not pure and is sinful (the Greek word for “immorality” is porneia which means illicit sexual intercourse, i.e., fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, masturbation, bestiality, etc. The English word “pornographics” is derived from this Greek word). The Bible clearly teaches that our minds are as important to God as our bodies are and that we are to remain pure in both. Jesus said, “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery’; but I say to you, that everyone who looks on a woman to lust for her has committed adultery with her already in his heart.” (Matthew 5:27-28).

...

SEX

The first pic never actually happened to you, did it?

They were protesting the Pope tbh btw

Stop blaming atheists for feminist jews.

Source on them being Jewish?
People with no religion are like 10% of the country, 'other religions' 0.3%
It's extremely likely they are young women who are butthurt about authority and morality so they hate the Church, traditional morality, the family, etc

Numbers 23:21-23
Why do you sanctify yourselves, with the blood of goats? You know the only path of salvation cometh from the way of Truth, a path you hath lost. behold, thy seed is among you - eat of it and be renewed

They work for Soros.

theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/12/who-pulls-the-strings-of-femen-and-pussy-riot/

Do you know the difference between the Vatican and the Mafia?

There is no difference between the two organizations.

He was already a prisoner with both daughters and they were still virgins, fun fact, there is a probability that he was raped.


What is hell and heaven? the problem is that you are taking jew stance on this.


Pharaoh was a god for egyptians.


So what?


He call himself a god and didnt let jews to worship him, already answered, but wathever.

Mafia is racist.

And Stalin killed a gorillion of christian, like jews in Kitos war, if your point is correct then we have the right to kill all fedoras and just keep the virgin women as slaves, not sure if lesbians count.

It's not just Stalin either

wtf i hate catholicism now

one is better organised

not a counterargument
they dont exist. Invalid reasoning.
PUNISHES UNRELATED PEOPLE

What is wrong with atheists? seriously, every time they got the power shit is edgy as fuck.

Read more.

I've never read the Bible. Or Harry Potter.

Come to think of it, I guess I don't read a lot of fiction.
:^)

...

No, u read more.

The Middle Ages were okay
The Spanish Inquisition probably wasn't, but I haven't really looked into it

forbidden books
witchhunt
pray to cure THE BLACK PLAGUE
crusades
popes casting "curses"

Which ones?

Is that the fault of Catholicism?

Of course people will do that user

Do you want Europe conquered by Arab dogs?

Explain

Atheist and leftist aren't synonimous ya dunce.

Reconquista was fine, but the First and Second Crusade were retarded because it wasn't about repelling Muslims from Europe, just retaking "holy sites" which were important to the ridiculous jewish mysticism people bought into back then.

That shit show was NOT about "defending Europe". Look at Charles V for a person actually doing that and doing it WELL.


Mallus Malleficarum. A book that promoted this bullshit and sparked witch fears in Spain and elsewhere in Europe. The church tried to fight against it but they never just said "witches aren't real". You could argue promoting the mythology of God and witches makes Catholicism responsible for it. In the protestant world you have kings like Charles II actively promoting witch hunts, but that's not Catholicism fault obviously.

Nietzschian atheisism is nothing but an semi-intellectual fad used by individuals who believe themselves to be smarter than others yet repeat the same tired rhetoric in an intellectual attempt to massage their own balls

The unfortunate thing with modern atheism is that it's followers often use it's epistemology to justify Epicurean and Hedonistic systems of living

so is the bible true or not eh?

Teaching children creationism is child abuse

(but teaching children to be the wrong gender is probably okay)

The OT is nothing but Jewish Propaganda with some historical pieces thrown in. If we were to discount all history based on religious text, we would no longer have more than half of the ancient historical record. Some of the historical claims have been bolstered by archeological evidence (not only in Christianity, but in other religions as well). The NT is a philosophy and and various parables based around reformed Judaism.

Is the bible "true"? Some of it, yes. Other parts, no. Just as with all ancient texts.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_Librorum_Prohibitorum
yes
and die, cut they r busy having their hands clasped together, instead of doing science
its europe, who wanted jerusalem, not arabs wanting europe
defendingcontending.com/2009/10/09/the-papal-curse/
tajnearchiwumwatykanskie.wordpress.com/2014/11/06/klatwy-watykanu-na-polske-do-dzis-nieodwolane/

I did.

Check real numbers, it has less deads that any other intel agency, it wasnt catholic, it was spaniard and the catholic church gave orders to destroy it, then why is so bad? It killed jews, España did what Hitler didnt even try.


Like they are doing right now, war never changes.


Catholics deads are irrelevant compared with atheists/secular countries.


So what? tips fedora.


Are you stupid? common core or are you a yurop that will be jailed if he talk about facts?

"Dark ages" was the age of pagans and vikings in the north, muslims in the south, east and all mediterranean coast, fun fact, untill España become mad christians didnt have control over seas. Saying that the crusades are wrong is like saying that is wrong to kill a muslim rapping your daughter.


Mansplain please.

I know, please try to keep a level.

Are you talking about "bad" from a logistic point of view or a moral point of view? if you change meanings in the middle you will always win even if you are wrong in both Schopenhauer.

The other point, again, the catholic church rejected it, it was spaniard intel, they conquered the world, expelled muslims and had a war with the world thanks to jews buying everything and they won, so it was a really very good thing, btw, read a book again, every time a country did a "witch hunt" it becomes better, from Germany to America, removing tards that worship the devil/heretics is a good thing for civilization, even for "pagans", just check Rome and their killing sprees against Baco cults.

Fedoras are just buddhists with autism.

True like taking everything literal?


Thats talmud, but books are removed/added/changed every time, they lost their position as people of God almost 2000 years ago.

Anecdotes, while Mendel and his group created started genetic, another monk thinked about the big bang and they saved lots of books… its like saying that all whites must be killed because a legit democrat autistic atheist kill people every month.

Tbh Fedoras Are Literally Kikes

Oh well, this is why some anons use the word "menorah".

*tips menorah* then.

the difference is atheism doesnt have a doctrine and u can say atheism made ppl do bad things, while religion has a doctrine, tells u to stone gays, children, rape kids and own slaves. It has chosen ppl, breeds intolerance, has basis in factual errors, superstition and lack of education.
And they r not anecdotes, nor did mendel cross-polinate pea with god-magic. He used science.

Damn, I thought I was good Christian but I've never done any of those things

I never said that killing was bad, you started that, then i showed big numbers and i know that coincidences didnt mean correlation but when you have millions of anecdotes with the same outcome science is forced to show an answer to that, not saying that it didnt exists because it harms people in charge of money and/or power.

Try that then we can keep the other topic, seriously, stop showing yourself like a winner after doing little changes then changing the topic to celebrate your victory with more derailing.

so u r not obeying the word of god. Its as if u cherrypick all the parts that wouldnt send u to jail

how bout u stop attributing wrong things to wron ppl

...

Stay in school, kid.

...

Basically and based in facts:

If both christians and atheists didnt have to face consequences for their acts atheist always kill more people.


Are you "pure" enough to do that?

They made her stand before the group 4 and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” 6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. 10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”

With ids i think.

Freud please.

Mansplain please.

So according to you, the Bible tells you to be evil, but people cherry pick and wind up as moral citizens

Why is religion still bad?

Did that mean the people who wanted to stone her had also committed adultery?

...

According to people that will continue to live, yes, according to cucks that dont breed and fap to their women whoring, no.

cuz we invented new, better laws and religion was dragged screaming and kicking into XXI century as an artifact. How come if god tells u to not let women teach and to stone disobedient children, we let women teach and we dont stone disobedient children?

show data on atheists always killing more ppl than religious

am i "pure" enough to not follow such shit book? I can be the dirtiest and id still be better to judge things, as clearly u deny your hipocrisy as hard as u canFollow the teachings of your god, or dont. Theres no middle ground - u do as u r told ang go to heaven, or not. If all the rules dont matter, then u cant judge me by gods ruler, for i might be a better man to other humans without worshipping anything, than u enslaving mexicans, as deuteronomy tells u to.

No. U mansplain why your evil doesnt matter

You have a childish view on religion which says that we want to stone children and we hate science.
There's no point arguing with a retard.

I haven't in a long time. I have a KJV, and a newer version.


What? I thought only the Americas had that. Or is it a different plant of the same name.

Although I know they weren't like we are today concerning that topic, I didn't read that.


Some believe the flood was only local, and among those, they say only some groups are the descendants of Noah.
Around the Middle East in what is now Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Iraq.

Slavery is not bad, as long as you aren't abusive.

the "mature" view on religion is non-religious, which begs the question: why do u need it in the 1st place?
u cant defend your views and your views r wrong. U lost

how bout i enslave u and u tell me after a year if it was good?

Y-Yes, massa. Your wish is my command.

...

( ̄人 ̄)Hello. I am "Mr. Likes To Sage Threads". I do believe this thread is in need of Sage, so I would like to sage it. That is why my name is "Mr. Likes To Sage Threads".

See this please:

BTW, check id please, till now i am the only one using that shit in this thread, already answered.

See ice age (movie) if i am not wrong, the flood was a global event because the big ice age stopped.

be here for another hour

whats the argument here?

Yes, massa.


I remember reading someone talking about that. Something about a person having a name with a meaning referring to it too.
I don't like that movie though.

so how rwegonna arrange for u giving me everything u own?

I only have a few clothes for me to wear.

Fuck, just raped you.

I'd limp away slinging insults like a bitch too, damn.

Either Jesus is a God, THE God or Christianity is false. If the Bible doesn't do that, well…

Parables about morality anyone could come up with don't much prove that, and better men than you have tried to use mental gymnastics to make key miraculous events which are theological requirements into "allegories" only to come up with nothing but a castrated religion.

this lie demonstrates slavery isnt good

whats the argument here?

Fun fact, that movie is far more accurate than some books.

The Bible do it well and directly, there is a reason why greeks mocked pagans and become christians.


I am showing you that they chose something, the reason is the argument.

u lost, it wasnt meta

Sure Schopenhauer.

You have got to have a better argument than that….Its ok to say that you can only "prove" Christianity so far and you require faith, emotion, mysticism, to make it all work. Reputable people in the field would agree that Christianity can't be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, that parts of it simply *must* be believed without proof.

You are doing the same mistake always and shit is boring, basically you post a "flimsy" argument, then you talk about it like you won then you just keep talking, now i will ignore all euphoric celebrations and i will focuss on this:


Already answered and if you really believe that fairies are the same as the prime cause then you are trolling, you are retarded or you have a strong faith, maybe all of them, i am not sure.

Christ, you'd die on the streets without this same old trick.

I'l ignore all the stuff you said that has nothing to do with my post and all to do with your other conversations (or delusions). The five points don't prove the God of the Bible. The logical formulas don't prove the miracles of the bible or fill in the holes of historical inaccuracies, such as the Exodus myth, the various problems with the flood narrative, or the obvious one: Adam and Eve in the Garden.

Even Leibniz and others like him who improved upon Aquinas' arguments (taken from a "fairy believer" first and a Muslim second before he got to it, by the way) were deist, not Anderson-tier biblical Christians.

So, no, whipping out the "first mover" to someone who actually knows a thing about it doesn't prove the Bible is true, and it doesn't lend any more legitimacy to your first weird logic of "ancient greeks bought it, you should too!".

Fedora please, witness, you have few accounts of miracles, but you have a fuckton of people enduring tortures because they witnessed that and you have a lot of records of that, if we took them for false then even Caesar is a myth, and you have more records of christians dying that records of people knowing a shit about Obamas youth.

The exodus myth, the only thing proved here is that "modern archaeology" is just propaganda, first they said that nothing happened because The Bible say that it happened, but egyptians not, then a lot of monuments were found showing that something happened and it was big (see Akenathen).

Those so called scientists still called The Bible liar after that because egyptians built pyramids, but not even in a single place the Bible said that jews built the pyramids, you know how economy works, rite?

And, fun fact, a lot of people in masonic lodges train the guys writing fedora books. If you analize the "modern atheist" its basically an antichristian.

Another fun fact, most arguments used against christianity and showed as hard facts that most of the time nobody argues come from talmud, that is a book from the same age as qran, shit is propaganda and you are just a tool, the "debate me i am a fedora" work for that, it waste a lot of time and if you check yurop numbers you will notice that they dont breed, the nogf fedora meme is real.

Based on hard facts, now to arguably shit, see wikileaks please and before calling me a madman please notice that i wrote "arguably shit", some of them even worship moloch (literally) but they told people that they are atheists, fedoras and support anything that go against christianity.

Unreliable. Every tradition has martyrs. I heard of some friendly guys in Missouri during the 1800's who had their shit wrecked, their women raped and their main "prophet" slain in jail. That true too? Please.


Doesn't probe the exodus narrative. Way too many differences, its a massive reach, and nothing "supernatural" is proven.


Again, the problem is the only kind of evidence whatsoever of the Jewish tale comes from their priestly propaganda, hardly unbiased, and none of it can be validated outside of their priestly traditions. People tend to leave evidence behind of this kind of thing, not just made up stories.


Your credibility is dropping by the minute, the more you dip into conspiracy theories. But this is Holla Forums, so that's not a good reason to dismiss it, I suppose.


We really ought to step back because you're getting wild.

What's your wild tale for Adam and Eve, evolution being bullshit? That's the one I was most disappointed you left out.

Thats unreliable, skelletons, records no, btw, you have the same dudes as a "reliable" sources when they talk about a thing without proofs, but they are "unreliable" when they talk about another thing with accounts of witness and proofs.

What you are doing right now is cheap and disgusting.


Already answered, they said that egyptians records are real because egyptians said so, then they found proofs against those records in the same age. Again, what you are doing is not ok. "Supernatural" is just a word for something that we cant understand, quantum physics was "supernatural" to Einstein.


Agree, when you compare both talmud and NT the talmud is right and the NT no because they say so.


Its the same.


Kitos war never happened… i hate to said this, but Holla Forums was right again…


Your credibility is dropping, not mine and it doesnt matter, the biggest liar ever can say the truth and a honest person a lie and the lie will be still a lie and the truth, truth.

BTW, if you werent using cheap tricks like schopenhauer did you would be more honest, i said, literally:

You dont give a fuck about posting arguments or refuting them, you are just lying and changing things, i didnt said anything about Adam and Eve, i even talked about parables for a reason, now a real question, why you show such sharpness for some topics, but you show yourself as a legit tard for others? Please dont use the joker of "projection" or "ad hominem" i am being serious here.

And this entire post is full of equivocation. There is a reason why some events in recorded history are simply more credible. They happen over and over, we can see them happen and they belong to the category of "natural" precisely for this reason. The supernatural on the other hand remains obscure until we might understand it, or it is simply false if it can be reasonably dismissed. We know humans make things up.


Almost as if records of mundane every day activities we know for a fact can and do occur have more historical credibility than narratives about racial Gods granting magics to old men, which we have never actually seen happen and cannot duplicate. How about that shit.


You'd have to take that up with anyone who actually gives a fuck. Its all trash as far as I know it, I don't know why you keep equivocating like it has any relevance to the argument.


No, this is what you're doing. I'm asking simple questions about the legitimacy of the Bible, bringing up specific examples to be discussed and you keep going off on tangents about conspiracy theories, empty accusations, irrelevant opinions and insults. I'm a deist, which should be obvious, don't know why you keep calling me a fedora.


No, but I did, and that's exactly the problem. I placed it in the same sentence as Exodus and the flood, and you simply took the one you thought you had the best chance to answer and ignored the rest, hoping I might get distracted with all the insults, equivocation and bullshit. You have to defend Adam and Eve, its central to the foundation of Christianity and if its false, so is Christianity. If it happened, you best be able to prove it (good luck). If its allegory, you best be able to explain why Christ had to die for an allegorical man's sin due to the allegorical bitch who tricked him, or why the anonymous writers of the NT take it to have literally happened.

Che is a hero sometimes, others a killer, your point is wrong. Go to Germany, write something about the holocaust and post again if you can.


Like quantum physics… you had a ton of revords of things heavier than air flying, yet something heavier than air "floating" was just supernatural…


Like the cults that were proved false, the wicker man and the middle ages. How about that shit. Btw see this please:

You can change the word "supernatural" by magic if you like, btw, the "racial" part, again, OT is more credible than talmud, i already showed proofs of that, but you just keep repeating the same chant.


Butthurt.


No, you were the one puting words in my mouth that i never said and i even talked against it:

Records arent "I heard of some friendly guys…" you are a pathological liar to me.

The other thing is the same chant you are repeating over and over again, your "argument" is attacked and you dont protect/defend it, you just keep talking like it was always right, btw, i used the words "menorah", "fedora" and i pointed how you use talmud as it was the same as the OT, i even made some jokes about that.

No, but I did, and that's exactly the problem. I placed it in the same sentence as Exodus and the flood, and you simply took the one you thought you had the best chance to answer and ignored the rest, hoping I might get distracted with all the insults, equivocation and bullshit. You have to defend Adam and Eve, its central to the foundation of Christianity and if its false, so is Christianity. If it happened, you best be able to prove it (good luck). If its allegory, you best be able to explain why Christ had to die for an allegorical man's sin due to the allegorical bitch who tricked him, or why the anonymous writers of the NT take it to have literally happened.

ctrl+f parable, you have to take it in a lot of levels, its like a well made movie/book, it can be talking about the decay of something, romance, action and a lot of things at the same time.

I am not an expert of biology, but please see this:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve

BTW, i noticed a serious change in your prose after writing this:

This is why i asked you why you show a iq beyond 120 sometimes and a iq below 80 others, its like i touch something. Fedoras dont fall for this and you are still a human, do you want a free tip? Holla Forums was right again, but not the menorah troll, the paid frog shitposter, the fbi bait or the virgin ctr, but the old one that showed jews and supported christianity.

Bleesings.

Equivocation is your strong suit. An opinion, a human perspective is not comparable to the difference between the natural and the supernatural, between objective status, between reality and falsehood. The point stands.


Good luck then trying to prove the things which you claim to be comparable to these modern understandings. Creating a false dichotomy doesn't eliminate the reality of myth and magic, otherwise every single lie told by any man at any given time is simply "science" waiting to be proven. You have to have some ground to stand on other than "you can't disprove it" and you don't have that.


The talmud is irrelevant. I haven't brought it up, you're the one that keeps interjecting it in for no reason. I really don't care what the talmud might say, thought as I understand it its not a separate narrative but the musings of the rabbis on the mythology of the OT.


I'll dismiss all that without further argument.


You're confusing a convenient naming convention for a legitimization of the Biblical narrative. If an actual man was not actually made from actual dirt by God etc etc, you're in serious trouble. That's the magnitude of your argument, nothing less than full accuracy satisfies the claims set forth by Christianity.

Funny that even though this is very much the one point which is a fundamental axiom here, the one thing upon which your entire argument stands or falls, and instead you chose to waste time talking about talmuds, insulting and equivocating some more for good measure.

Adam and Eve: real human beings who really doomed humanity and brought sin into the world, fundamentally altering the supposed natural law which existed prior to their "fall"? Or merely a tale told by semitic shepards whose understanding of the world was simpler than a modern autist's? Time for you to stand.

That is called hypocrisy. You are bad even by your own religious standards.

It was a joke, but if I were a slave, I would respect my master, as long as he respects me and my fam.

There are a shit ton of accounts of "miracles". Just visit an insane asylum. None proven of course.


So what? That doesn't prove anything. Muslims torture each other all the time. It proves nothing.


Caesar raised armies, conquered cities and wrote books. That's why everybody believes he existed. Where is your Gospel of Jesus?

"In that legion there were two very brave men, centurions, who were now approaching the first ranks, T. Pullo, and L. Vorenus.”

Caesars Commentaries on the Gallic Wars: Book 5 Chapter 44.


Drinking Kool Aid proves nothing.


What kind of shitty argument is that? Are you saying that Dawkins is a secret "mason"? Prove it.


Prove it. Post the Talmud quotes that talk about drinking poisoned Kool Aid at Jonestown.


Name fucking names, asshole.

If your point is ok then why we have to validate a guy that believes and write about the supernatural?

Again, "supernatural", "magic" are just words for things that we cant understand, the flood was real, it was the violent end of the ice age, it wasnt real just some years ago, you point was refuted.


I call that hipocresy, you talk about talmud like it is the OT, then you critizice the OT.


No, a diagnosis isnt an insult or ad wathever, i am trying to explain why fail so miserably in some things, yet you looks like a genius in others, i call that a trained liar.


Thats an excellent point and the only thing that stands after so many lies and projecting, not even evolution is against the Bible, yet the man must be a separated creation, i will ignore the other things because is the same chant that i already denounced a lot of times, please stop repeating it, is molesting.

First, things work in a lot of levels like i said before, second, before the "applegate" (i know about dates, please dont be dense, yeah is a joke) man/men (i am not sure about this) wasnt accountable for his actions, example, you have a gf but you dont know anything about sex and nobody teached you anuthing ever, then you go ass to pussy, with time she dies from infections, are you accountable for what you did? The other point about creation is irrelevant sice you are a deist, but if you like it we can talk about it.

The best will be ignoring this, but i will try it anyways.


Millions of functional people (sometimes more than "sane people") with/without studies coming from different countries, social classes, races that didnt know each other saying the same isnt the same (sorry, my english isnt that good) to a few people that cant function properly that says different things between each other, the torture point was because they were tortured, yet they keep saying the same.

"In that legion there were two very brave men, centurions, who were now approaching the first ranks, T. Pullo, and L. Vorenus.”
Caesars Commentaries on the Gallic Wars: Book 5 Chapter 44.

Elites talking about elites in power, if your point is correct then we cant deny the holocaust in any level, btw, remember that i am not saying that Caesar wasnt real, i even admire him.

Prove it. Post the Talmud quotes that talk about drinking poisoned Kool Aid at Jonestown.

If you cant please leave the other guy do the talk, he is a liar, but at least he can understand and write.


It is shitty, i even said that (with other words). I am not saying that Dawkins is a secret mason, i am saying that media is showing him because is better for propaganda, ask Michio Kaku.


Hillary, but she has mental problems, this is why i critiziced my pown argument that time. Please read everything before quoting.

Here is Scriptutal evidence that eating semen is Biblically-sound practise.

Bump

If no one can come up with a jesus quote that counters this, then its cannon that Yehova wants jews to eat their own cum. I think its implied the cum of other races should not be ingested.

Just /pee on yourself

You theists ignore everything that challenges your ideology. That's no surprise. Stop making up excuses and get to the point.


Says who? You and your Bible? Those people were primitives. Barbarians running around the desert, chopping each others heads off.


No they don't. Even the Bible contradicts itself. Is it "thou shalt not kill" or "murder"? Pick one.


Wrong. Anyone can go to the so called "gas chambers" and see glass windows and wood doors. That's called evidence. Something that you have none of.


At least you admit that you are full of shit.


Who?


Hillary who? Clinton? She says she's christian. She has never, ever said she was an atheist.


You are not forgiven. The only thing worse than your english are your arguments.


No. If you can't take the heat, then you get out of the kitchen. Don't come back until you learn how to green text.


I did. I wasn't impressed. You are right. You are horrible at english and your arguments are shit. You are also extremely arrogant.

...

I do have a Bible, but I just keep it in the bathroom in case I run out of toilet paper.

bump with two wimmen

RLY makes you think

Big dicks are real, women are real, women like big dicks. Checkmate atheists, all of these things have ironclad proof behind them.