What can people tell me about Kaiser Wilhelm II? I recall that in Mein Kampf Hitler talked a lot about the political issues before WWI which led to the weakening and destruction of Germany. So was the Kaiser good and why?
What can people tell me about Kaiser Wilhelm II...
Aaron Parker
Dylan Sanders
I don't know about the Kaiser but perhaps it was similar to Russian where anarchists and revolutionaries destabilized the country and used the monarch as a scapegoat.
The Mad Monarchist has a good 3 part introduction to why Nicholas II fell.
Cooper Murphy
Here is some info on him:
madmonarchist.blogspot.com.au
Cameron Thompson
The Jews set up the World Wars. They used the Monarchs as scapegoats so that they could get rid of the old order and prepare the way for anarchy and marxism. Hitler was reacting against this revolution by Marxists and Anarchists. Look up the Bavarian revolution
Jason Cooper
He was the weak link in the chain, to say the least.
Was he good? Was he bad?
I don't know… Not every man fits such simplified description.
The Kaiser was who he was, when he was, and did what he thought was right for his people… And he made many mistakes.
Easton Sanchez
Do you mean the weak link out of all the monarchs? All heads of state make mistakes, even Hitler made several mistakes.
He was made to fail by Jewish manipulation and betrayel at home.
Noah Jenkins
Wilhelm II was a pretty good guy by all accounts.
Like all leaders he had his flaws (he did often change his mind on rather important matters), and made mistakes (focusing on colonial scraps rather then the situation in Europe).
But, I do think that he ruled as best as any leader in the situation that Imperial Germany was in at the turn of the 20th century could be reasonably expected to.
It is a shame that he (along with just about all of Imperial Germany and Prussia) have been so heavily demonised.
DNVP>>>>>>>>NSDAP
Wilhelm II>>>>>Hitler
Monarchism with elements of orthodox Fascism/Neo-Prussian conservatism>>>>>>>>>>>National-Socialism
Ryder Williams
Its strange that Holla Forums is so focused on WWII and Hitler when it is clear that at this point in history the forces and defenders of order and culture had already largely been destroyed by the radical revolutionary left.
Elijah Williams
The Kaiser was destroyed by the machinations of the same people who destroyed the Tsars. The radical revolutionary nihilists, anarchists and marxists.
They sought to destroy the link to the past culture and values so that they could impose their own subversive Jewish satanic values which Hitler realised were being pushed in the media.
Mandatory redpill: oodegr.co
Cooper Edwards
Kaiser Willhelm II was a useful idiot for Bismarck's statebuilding. He was a figurehead used to keep the Germanic state nominally unified.
The instant he clashed with Bismarck and drove him out of politics was the instant Germany was doomed to defeat.
You got that wrong. The Bolshevik Marxists were exported from Germany to Russia with the intention of destabilizing their Tsarist rivals.
Willhelm downfall was betraying Bismarck, one of the keenest political minds of the 19th century, and getting involved in those asinine secret treaties.
The "Media" didn't exist in late 19th/early 20th century and was largely confined to independent newspapers in America. The closest thing to a media outlet were broadsheets published by the state.