What are the different types of communism...

What are the different types of communism. It's a controversial question to ask here but I heard a proposal that Lenin and Trotsky would've turned Russia into a degenerate shithole but Stalin saved the day with that by introducing family values, patriotism, the killing of religious groups not all good like Jews and Muslims, etc.. Why is it that people praise Jugoslavia, it seems like another socialist shithole with the difference being telling Stalin to fuck off when he asked him to join the Eastern Bloc or something. Educate me on this or at least point to some books.

2 types

1. Good Communism: every communist is dead.
2. Bad Communism: one communist still lives.

I'm not saying there is good communism, I want to the types and their doctrines. This question belongs on /his/ but it's a gay and dead board and like fucking hell I'll ever go to Holla Forums.

As far as ex-natives go, they will often praise it because the countries that came out from it got out with a bloodbath, were ripped off in chaos, big property (companies) sold out, and then Croatia (after that Serbia) started adopting EU standards which is completely unnatural (and costly) for a very new country. Not only that but Croatia especially is importing foreign goods a lot which sucks for our manufacturing (which was heavily taxed or completely banned in yugoslavia).

As the effect you have high unemployment and high corruption while we're supposedly EU country or on-the-way in the case of Serbia. So it's not completely unfounded criticism of the current state coming from natives, although the debt in Yugoslavia was quite high as well.

As far as it's form goes, it wasn't exactly communism, rather heavily socialized country.

It's all the same. Slavery so a few can enjoy luxuries while pretending to care about "muh social classes".

Communism is famine packaged in an ideology.

During the first world war, Germany had to somehow get rid of Russia zerg rushing them. Because they were too busy fighting on the western front, the Austro-Hungarian multicultural empire had slavs revolting + had shit command and the Ottoman empire were shit, not surprising as they were turks, they had to devise a plan to fuck up the chain of command of Russia. They used bolshevik kikes backed by the ideology of Marx and sent them to infiltrate Russia with the aim of overthrowing the tzar.

It had two advantages: 1) Russia would have to focus on internal affairs (which it did by dropping out of the war at the time of the bolshevik revolution) and 2) They would be rid of those kikes (that failed, as we know with the Wiemar republic)

Kikes also had russians up their asses because Russian Tzars have been some of the most kike aware leaders of that time, they didn't fuck around at the mere suspicion of anything related to blood libel.

Once they manged their revolution they destroyed everything related to the economy, made people starve by stealing all their crops and appropriated all means of production, all that under the guise of public ownership. They then started to export that idea, trying to get more and more land and slaves, like Jews would do once given ultimate authority. It hasn't changed much since and there are still some useful idiots who were planted the seed of communism in their subverted brainwashing camps since the USSR started to export their bullshit.

Everywhere communism goes it ends up the same:
1) Internal revolution which leads to removal of any powerful dissidents
2) Appropriation of all industry and commerce by the state
3) Famine by the population because most food is only kept by the party,
4) Removal of starving dissidents
5) Using the remaining population, who had access to a bread line, as slaves to do whatever the party's bidding is.
6) Export communism elsewhere to try and gain more clay
7) Communist nation collapses under its own economic inadequacy
8) Communist subverted useful idiot somewhere else attempt a revolution.
9) Back to 1

Stalin>Lenin>>>>>>Trotsky

sfrj was different because tito was a benevolent dictator for the people. He gave out interest-free loans for home-building, every worker got 1 month holidays per year and life was mostly chill until the 80s, when the kikes crashed our economy. Yugoland took many IMF loans and used those sheckels to stimulate the economies and build factories. They became dependent on loans and the jews had them in their hands. Contrary to african republics the development money was spent on the citizens and development and did not go to titos private pocket. He did not steal and he did not leave wealth to his children. I respect him for this.

anyone who dared to meddle with titos politics got jailed for life. Also religious people were paid by the state. Today if you don't have 300€ for a preacher, he won't come to your funeral (no matter if muslim, pravoslav, don't know about katholics). Formerly they were on the payroll of tito and their mission was to shut up and not meddle in his politics and not to promote religious extremism.

He was a competent man and a good leader but he failed in finding a successor for his empire. Also, Enver Hoxha was right in the end

I don't know what to think about Stalin. He was a commie scumbag but he also killed lots of elite jews from his administration which he regarded as potentially dangerous to his reign. Didn't he also piss off the jews because he took over sovietland and jews did not control him anymore? I know that lenin and trotzky were kikes for sure

The topic of his death says that Jews killed him because, and I'm not very good on this, he betrayed the British bankers and sought to put the Jews in their own oblast out of distrust for them like how Hitler wanted to move the Jews to Madagascar.