Atheism & Evolution BTFO

I could have sworn that I had it, but apparently I don’t. Anyone have a download?

Reported for intl. You lose.

These first three (and subsequently more) Russian language imprints were published and circulated in the Russian Empire during the 1903–6 period as a tool for scapegoating Jews, blamed by the monarchists for the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War and the Revolution of 1905. Common to all three texts is the idea that Jews aim for world domination. Since The Protocols are presented as merely a document, the front matter and back matter are needed to explain its alleged origin. The diverse imprints, however, are mutually inconsistent. The general claim is that the document was stolen from a secret Jewish organization. Since the alleged original stolen manuscript does not exist, one is forced to restore a purported original edition. This has been done by the Italian scholar, Cesare G. De Michelis in 1998, in a work which was translated into English and published in 2004, where he treats his subject as Apocrypha.[28][29]

As fiction in the genre of literature, the tract was further analyzed by Umberto Eco in his novel Foucault's Pendulum in 1988 (English translation in 1989), in 1994 in chapter 6, "Fictional Protocols", of his Six Walks in the Fictional Woods and in his 2010 novel The Prague Cemetery.

As the Russian Revolution unfolded, causing White movement-affiliated Russians to flee to the West, this text was carried along and assumed a new purpose. Until then, The Protocols had remained obscure;[29] it now became an instrument for blaming Jews for the Russian Revolution. It became a tool, a political weapon, used against the Bolsheviks who were depicted as overwhelmingly Jewish, allegedly executing the "plan" embodied in The Protocols. The purpose was to discredit the October Revolution, prevent the West from recognizing the Soviet Union, and bring about the downfall of Vladimir Lenin's regime.

I am not a Holla Forums kike, you literally worship
A FUCKING JEW ON A WOODEN CROSS
CHRIST WAS A KIKE

I realize that Jews use these theories to push their nihilism, but does that make the theories inherently untrue? The logic does not follow.

you copypasta'd that strait from kikepedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion#Publication_history

Yes, reported for intl. I already said that.

...

I did. Now you go to the article and read the references.

Also if you don't trust Wikipedia why would you trust some jackass on an imageboard saying it's true?

Kike = short for kikel, a yiddish word for 'circle' because jewish immigrants to Ellis Isle refused to sign their names with an 'X' because it resembles a cross. Kikes are terrified of crosses.

Kike became a slang term for Jews specifically because of their anti-Christianity you fucking mong.

Do you seriously think a single atheist or person who understands basic biology would be BTFO by a passage in a silly book?

You’re a fucking retard.

DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND YOU WORSHIP A JEW?
THEY ARE FUCKING SUBHUMAN

The very first verse of the New Testament clearly proclaims the Jewish ethnicity of Jesus. “The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham” (Matthew 1:1). It is evident from passages like Hebrews 7:14, “For it is clear that our Lord descended from Judah,” that Jesus descended from the tribe of Judah, from which we get the name “Jew.” And what about Mary, the mother of Jesus? In the genealogy in Luke chapter 3, we see clearly that Mary was a direct descendant of King David which gave Jesus the legal right to ascend the Jewish throne as well as establishing without any doubt that Jesus was a Jew ethnically.

JEW COCKSUCKERS BTFO

Nice comeback. You still didn't answer though. Why do you believe when people say it's true?.

If the Jews said that brushing your teeth was part of their plot to conquer the world would you let your teeth rot?

You’re not even trying.

Great sources. I totally trust them!!

Yes, reported for intl. I already said that.

Given that fluoride is exactly that, I don’t use fluoride anymore.

The Bible also says that Jews are a cursed people who murdered God, are contrary to all men, are the spiritual children of the devil, are like unto vipers, and the Synagogue of Satan, and are destined to hell for eternity.

Jews despise Christianity because Jesus destroys Judaic supremacism.

You don't believe in science, do you?

Great underlining skills, but that shows nothing. Is that supposed to prove a conspiracy?

Again, how do you know that protocol is not a fabricated propaganda piece?

JESUS WAS A JEW, AND YOU WORSHIP THAT JEW
DO YOU HAVE ANY LOGICAL REASON FOR PRAYING TO A KIKE SUBHUMAN?

Fluoride is pretty toxic tbh

The bible also says they are the 'chosen people', the whole Semitic trilogy contradicts it's self.

I worked in an herbarium. Evolution is real, I had to deal with the taxonomic side of botany: it's a nightmare trust me. It's precisely because you have hybridizations, tribes, subtribes and all sorts of other types of variations of speciation that would be expected if evolution were true.

The interesting part was that you got to see plants that haven't changed in hundreds of millions of years, and those that came about later. Lignin for example, the thing in wood that gives it its rigidity, was a game breaker in the evolutionary arms race of plants. Lignin evolved and then many plants that came along afterward adapted this trait.

It's real, no matter if the Jews push it as a vector for nihilism or not. That may be true, but that just means we have to retake evolution with a mind for race realism. Really, what other than a strong understanding of evolution would permit racial understanding? Human species' evolution didn't stop at the neck, no matter what liberals would have you believe.

We evolved for our environment. The current working theory for Euros is that we had to endure harsher climes so we evolved intelligence for craftiness and more tools that are conducive to a communal society. Africa is a veritable garden of Eden where all roots and weeds are edible so there was never the need to evolve advanced survival tools, thus their negrified intelligence.

Christianity offers no racial awareness passages and instead you get stuff like 'no jew nor greek' and 'we are all one in christ jesus'. We are all one? Even sub-80 IQ africoons? Nah, son.

They might be biased. They might have an agenda to push that conflicts with how truthful something might be.

eg. Jews say that "gender is a social construct". Everyone sane knows that this is false. Nevertheless, if you speak out against it you are met with resistance from people who point to Jewish sources that proclaim that gender really is indeed just a social construct, goy.

Yes, reported for intl. I already said that.

Just kill yourself.

YOU SAID THAT 4 TIMES

Micro-evolution (variations within a species) is true and doesn't contradict the Bible.

Macro-evolution (mammals and lizards and bugs and plants are all related) is false. It cannot be observed, tested, experimented on, or proven. It is purely theoretical like string theory and the multiverse, and always will be because it requires billions of years of time for it to be true. It requires faith to believe in.

Hahahah confirmed for not even understanding what you're mad about.

The Bible teaches that those who believe in Jesus are the chosen people. Jews are no longer the chosen people and that is exactly why they despise Jesus and despise Christianity you fucking mong.

Read Galatians ch 3.

Yes, reported for intl. I already said that.

Wouldn't scientists have found major differences between people of different races by now and publish that?

They might be biased but who can then verify the authenticity of the protocols? Certainly it can't be someone who depends on having a jewish boogeyman to further his own agenda.

not all scientists are jews. you are saying that the scientific consensus is fabricated by jews yet you give no proof of that (the protocols are not a credible source).

You're that retard from the other thread. Evolution has evidence backing it up. If you can prove it is wrong why don't you write about it and publish it so you win your Nobel prize?

No one said that.
1. Consensus is not fact.
2. The consensus is not that humans are the same species.
3. Humans are not the same species.
Okay, thanks for playing. You don’t give a fuck about science.

why are christians so retarded?

Are the protocols on /pdfs/?

It isn't but peer review is what helps science find truth.
You need to source that claim.
Also needs a source for that.

Reported for intl.

1. No, that’s not how anything works.
2. archive.is/C7ydZ
No, you’re the one claiming that it’s the consensus.
Already provided. Eat shit, you fucking leftist.

They're in the OP

There are tons of non-religious, non-Christian scientists who also say that evolution is bunk. It's not so easy going against the establishment. James Watson, the co-discoverer of DNA, famously stated that "there are biological differences between the races" and promptly had to apologize and ''return his fucking Nobel Prize" because he offended the PC kike establishment. Same thing happens with scientists who say that global warming is a hoax. Your life is ruined, the kike-run media and academia ignores you or makes you into a joke, you lose funding and your career and your friends, and nobody takes you seriously.

How dare you put the Klan logo on a Diabetic Mixed Person.

Yeah, but we want a PDF of them to have locally.

this is the single most retarded thing I have ever read on Holla Forums

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution#Votes.2C_resolutions_and_statements_of_scientists_before_1985

The vast majority of the scientific community and academia supports evolutionary theory as the only explanation that can fully account for observations in the fields of biology, paleontology, molecular biology, genetics, anthropology, and others.[19][20][21][22][23] One 1987 estimate found that "700 scientists … (out of a total of 480,000 U.S. earth and life scientists) … give credence to creation-science".[24] A 1991 Gallup poll found that about 5% of American scientists (including those with training outside biology) identified themselves as creationists.[25][26]

Additionally, the scientific community considers intelligent design, a neo-creationist offshoot, to be unscientific,[27] pseudoscience,[28][29] or junk science.[30][31] The U.S. National Academy of Sciences has stated that intelligent design "and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life" are not science because they cannot be tested by experiment, do not generate any predictions, and propose no new hypotheses of their own.[32] In September 2005, 38 Nobel laureates issued a statement saying "Intelligent design is fundamentally unscientific; it cannot be tested as scientific theory because its central conclusion is based on belief in the intervention of a supernatural agent."[33] In October 2005, a coalition representing more than 70,000 Australian scientists and science teachers issued a statement saying "intelligent design is not science" and calling on "all schools not to teach Intelligent Design (ID) as science, because it fails to qualify on every count as a scientific theory".[34]

In 1986, an amicus curiae brief, signed by 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, asked the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard, to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the teaching of creationism (which the brief described as embodying religious dogma).[3] This was the largest collection of Nobel Prize winners to sign anything up to that point, providing the "clearest statement by scientists in support of evolution yet produced."[23]

There are many scientific and scholarly organizations from around the world that have issued statements in support of the theory of evolution.[35][36][37][38] The American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's largest general scientific society with more than 130,000 members and over 262 affiliated societies and academies of science including over 10 million individuals, has made several statements and issued several press releases in support of evolution.[22] The prestigious United States National Academy of Sciences, which provides science advice to the nation, has published several books supporting evolution and criticising creationism and intelligent design.[39][40]

There is a notable difference between the opinion of scientists and that of the general public in the United States. A 2009 poll by Pew Research Center found that "Nearly all scientists (97%) say humans and other living things have evolved over time – 87% say evolution is due to natural processes, such as natural selection. The dominant position among scientists – that living things have evolved due to natural processes – is shared by only about a third (32%) of the public."[41]

The same thing goes with global warming. You lose funding because you basically prove that you're unscientific when you ignore the amount of evidence that proves it's happening.

Not an argument.

...

I think the problem isn't a belief in evolution. The problem is a non-belief in god or a soul, and evolution is used as (poor) evidence that God isn't real.

It seems that without a belief in god or a soul, it can be concluded that people are just evolutionarily-programmed automatons. If we have no souls, there is no objective standard which tells us that our lives are more valuable than a plant's or a rock's. Once we stop valuing ourselves, we can become passive or nihilistic, and be easily overtaken by those who still have strong beliefs (Jews, Muslims).

The wikipedia article for Homosexuality and Transvestism will say the same shit. That only an 'ebil right wing nadsee who hates science' would dare go against faggot orthodoxy.

Christianity as every semitic religion is a virus for the mind

is this the new favorite meme of idiotic shills nowadays? you're the one conflating a biological fact with theology and ideology, the burden of proof rests on you to explain yourself.

Yea I think humans evolving from bacteria over many many billions of years is probably BS. There is something the Jews are hiding with that theory of our history.

Lesson for the future OP you could have made this thread without mentioning the bible, whether or not it's right you added unnecessary tension to what could be an interesting thread. Retard

Reporting, as is every Holla Forumsack’s duty, serves to weed out intl.

Then again, it could be that Jews observed what Evolutionary Theory was doing to European minds, and so Jews decided to exploit and exacerbate something that was already taking place. The arrangement does not mean that Darwin and Nietzsche were operating under orders of the Elders.

Sageposters give me evidence how this thing evolved from a Chimp

...

But anthropology, all its Marxist infiltration aside, has uncovered so many primitive and Third World peoples who have a belief in separating man from the animals, like how man cooks meat whereas animals eat raw meat or that man can build and create unlike the beast. And the mentality does appear very important for us modern humans to maintain rather than carelessly cast aside, because we already see the negative consequences of throwing away this timeless mindset.

oh yes ken ham the guy who got blown out in that debate

Yes, I think they use and still use these theories to destroy people. There are at least two different songs I hear all the time on Pandora's "top hits" radio with the message "what doesn't kill you makes you stronger." That message is very damaging for most people, especially women since they are more sensitive and weak.

A messed up relationship will damage a woman for life, not to mention her pussy.

Evolution is also used as an excuse for degenerate atheism. And many Redditors use Atheism as an excuse for their hedonism, nihilism, and selfishness. During a conversation about Atheism, a Redditor coworker of mine randomly blurted out that she cheated on her boyfriend. What does morality have to do with religion? Actually a lot. Without religion there is no standard or basis for morality.

That's true. A degenerate will view his third chlamydia vaccination as a testament to "what doesn't kill you makes you stronger."

There is.
plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality-biology/

Except what you're saying isn't true at all. Genetics has long since proven the connection. You have latent (inactive) genes that would cause you to grow a furry tail if activated. These came about because we used to need tails for balance when acrobatically swinging through trees. Feel your tailbone right now, why do you think that's there? It's vestigial proof of our origins.

There is no clear line between what you define as 'macro' and 'micro' as many aeons of microevolutionary mutations lead to macroevolution. See Tiktaalik if you want pretty good evidence of a species caught in the transition phase.

I'm sad to see so many people pull out the 'but Watson was defunded and shamed for advocating genetic race realism'. Logic through this with me: why do you think that was? Do you not think that Watson was close to popularizing the very true realization that races are fundamentally different? He was branded a bigot then rushed out of science precisely because science can be used to discriminate successfully. The kikes didn't want him anywhere near that fundamental truth. There's a lot of science that deals with racial differences, but the SJW lynch mob is ever vigilant, especially with king nigger in charge, so anything approaching this topic is couched in heavy jargon like 'ancestry' and 'heritage' instead of race to talk about fundamental differences. They are just using Newspeak to get past the government censors. That isn't a condemnation of science as much as it is a condemnation of our government that doesn't want us to know the truth.

A good video that touches on this topic is from a speech from our very own George Lincoln Rockwell, who believed this very thing. Vid related. The relevant part of the vid is 0:00 - 1:45. Here's the transcript for those on their phones: youtube.com/watch?v=FaCHBmGWcBc

I'd like to see how a rigid understanding and application of evolution could lead us to anywhere other than the promised land of racial awareness once we have removed these kikes that are entrenched in academia. That is our goal. That is what we should be striving for. We shouldn't abandon the province of the European, science, to those who have hijacked it for SJW cultism.

how about no

There is no way to prove anything you just said.

Real science is something that you can test, observe, make predictions on, conduct experiments on, and see results. You cannot do any of this with macro-evolution because it requires millions of years of time to observe. It is not a real science. It is all theoretical and empty speculations couched in an anti-God bias.

Atheist-evolutions pretend that they are super logical and above biases, but they are not. An atheist-evolutionist sees shared DNA between different species and concludes that they must have had a common ancestor, that this proves evolution. A creationist sees shared DNA between different species and concludes that they must have had a common designer, that this proves the Bible.

Atheist-evolutionists also make weak ass arguments like "if God created us, then why do humans have x flaw? Why didn't he just make us perfect?" An atheist-evolutionist cannot seem to comprehend that God made us "flawed" on purpose for a higher reason. Alternatively, some of our "flaws" may not actually be flaws at all, they just appear to be because we have puny human brains with a primitive grasp of reality in comparison to God.

Critical pedagogy (cultural Marxism applied to education) is destroying education.

Nietzsche predicted all of this, and he's actually based as fuck. Read Nietzsche directly instead of revisionist interpretations like (((Walter Kaufmann))).

How about you give me evidence how Dindu's were not Satanic Organisms from the deep Pits of the Lake of Fire.

Noah's son Ham, the ancestor of all black people, had sex with his mother and produced Canaan. Their blood is cursed. They are cursed to be servants.

The human body has many flaws that no intelligent engineer would create if he put any thought into it. My favorite example is the retardation that we have to breathe and eat through the same tube. That's an oversight, and indicative that we arose from an unintelligent, random process. How many people would be saved if we had seperate tubes for each? I also dislike that we piss and fuck with the same organ. I'm sure many girls would suck dick more readily if they weren't wondering if there's piss spittle on the end of your organ.

Riddle me this, why do humans have 15% genetic overlap with the mustard plant if we aren't related?

Yes, science makes the prediction that an evolutionary basis for the world would conclude that we share DNA, but your explanation is just hamfisting this truth to fit your religion. You have no proof for this, only conjecture. I cannot disprove your claim, but you summarily cannot say that the fact that my theory fits with observable, testable traits found in the world is just a chance because it's uncomfortable for your paradigm. You are holding me to a standard you aren't holding for yourself. You have compromised your objectivity for dogma.

...

This is a place where we freely speculate, and in light of the lies of AGW, everything is up to question, including evolution, and the intelligentsia is not always right.

If evolution is false, then it opens up fascinating questions: Along with vindicating God, one is led to ask how God, the Ultimate Mathematician and Engineer created His Creation, seeing that there is much more complexity than something a mere Painter or Sculptor can compose

The Honorary Christian gave me evidence, why don't you.
Also tell me the wage you get for shitposting on Holla Forums.

I'm glad you'll always be a fringe minority but I'm also sad retards like you exist.

Pure arrogance. You think they are flaws; you don't know that they are flaws. They are flaws from your perspective, but there may be some higher purpose for them.

Alternatively, the "flaws" may be entirely intentional. We're not necessarily meant to have perfect bodies.

Because God designed both humans and mustard plants. That's why there's shared ingredients.

You misunderstand. I know that my belief has no smoking gun evidence. You will never be able to prove 100% for certain that God is real and that the Bible is His Word. Faith is required otherwise this entire exercise is pointless.

The difference is that I do not shy away from this. You people are the ones claiming that your evolutionist religion is factual and based on hard science, when in fact the truth is that it is also a religion that requires faith.

If you deny evolution, you deny genetics. If you deny genetics, you deny the white race.

Christiany has managed to embrace scientific findings, and even the Catholic church and Orthodox church promote research. OP is taking Jewish words like its a truth.

Darwinism is now a nonissue and infact motivates facist actions. Racial superiority was and is a centeral theme. Jews can only cast doubts by using themselves and weaker whites as tools to craft an illusion of slipping superiority.

The issue of atheism is irrelevant in this matter, as we have moved from Gods to Volk being of the key power centre.

Myth Disproven by Russian science

I think it is you whose the gullible one.

Disproven by scientific means. Findings prevent from reaching public.

Disproven unhealthy and a sign of psychological degradation through scientific means. Trust deliberately obscured

Proven by genetic research. Denied public acceptance.

What a well crafted piece of bait.

>lol god just made it look like evolution happened

This is why you people can't be reasoned with. My theory, in the scientific sense, has been proven many times over. You claim that the unprovability of your claims as something trivial. It's not. You believe in something that can't be proven. It's the eternal dragon in your garage that you will never question.

Evolution is real and is the explanation for what we see today. That you failed to grasp this because 'lol jesus amirite' makes me sad that you'll never fully appreciate what it means to be European. It's in the blood. You have disproven none of my claims that I have presented as proof of evolution, simply trying to coopt it as proof of your worldview.

You can't even provide any semblance of semi-evidence that would suggest what you say is true, while I can provide you the field of genetics and microbiology. Your ignorance is not a strength, it's just sad.

alright m8

Proven by the Bible of where the Devil releases a small amount of Burned Black people to Israel to invade the Happy Merchants residing there.
Believing the jew to begin with
Proven wrong by Holla Forums and Stormfront which happens to have populations of Unkike-minded Christians
Proven by >>>/g/ Christians to be a Sinful Curse by God to endamn Apple users.
Proven by the Bible which mentioned Hell is where Niggers have came from

I'm well aware that my beliefs will always be of a fringe minority.

Micro-evolution (variations with a species) is true and does not contradict the Bible. Nobody is denying races exist.

You completely missed the point. Of course those things are wrong; I agree. The point, however, is that the mainstream establishment props those beliefs up as if they were true, just like they prop up communism as being great and evolution as being true. Just like the Protocols say they would do.

Go join a university STEM course, study to be a scientist in some field, and then try making a claim like "homosexuality is unhealthy and I can prove it". See how fast it takes for your career to end and for your social life to disintegrate. Never mind that you can use facts to prove your case.

...

...

The Talmud was written down around 500 AD, fuckface.

Or are you still so completely ignorant about kikes that you think they just worship the Old Testament and nothing else?

Nope! Only micro-evolution has. You cannot prove macro-evolution. It is entirely speculative. It's like saying "String theory has been proven many times over", and although the math appears to add up, it's still nothing more than numbers on a chalkboard. You can't prove something that requires millions of years of time to prove.

I did no such thing. Faith is a critical component in what I believe.

So do you.

??? I fully acknowledge that faith is a critical and central component to my worldview. Faith is essential.

You have none. You have a speculative theory that attempts to explain the world from a strict atheistic bias. Should any evidence arise to suggest in a designer (ie. the enormous, mind-boggling complexity of DNA or of single-celled organisms, or the value of dark energy that holds the universe together) you simply co-opt it as proof of your worldview.

This is not an argument. All you do is appeal to authority and to common consensus. Authority and consensus are biased and their credibility is dubious as the Protocols of Zion illustrate.

atheists BTFO

Were.
God chose the Jews specifically because of how shit they are, it's a demonstration of His greatness that He can bring something good out of the worst sort of human garbage. That said, the Bible is very clear that even God Himself got so sick of their kike bullshit He personally came down to Earth to tell them to fuck off once and for all. "Israel" in the NT refers to the Church, not the kikes.

Remember to report all intl shills

that second pic? is thtat the protocols??

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religious_populations#Adherent_estimates

Evolution is observable in the fossil record and by comparative genomics. There's no "theory" of evolution, because evolution has been observed. The theory is that natural selection is the driving force behind evolution.

The most plausible scenario of the origin of the universe is that all matter was spontaneously formed from a dimensionless nothing, about 20 billion years ago, and that the physical laws have been operating normally ever since. Whether or not you want to argue that this Big Bang was a product of divine inspiration is moot, for there's not enough evidence to make a case for or against a sentient God.

It's strange to see reason around these parts.

>but muh holy __ book says ___

Also, this. Evolution and divinity are completely orthogonal concepts. It's perfectly rational to believe that some god set the universe in motion, 20 billion years ago, and that humanity arose out of this. It's also rational to believe that this god created a system in which atoms could arrange themselves to produce conscious thought, because that is evidently what has happened. If you can believe in tales in which women turn into piles of salt, then surely, you can believe in abiogenesis.

I think the most intellectually honest position right now is to be agnostic.

The fossil record does not occur in nature. Both complex and primitive organisms appear side by side in the various strata of soil. The fossil record exists only in text books, and has long been debunked since the nineteenth century.

Micro-evolution has been observed. Natural selection is the driving force behind micro-evolution.

You cannot observe macro-evolution. You can lie to yourself and say that one species led to another because they share one or two superficial characteristics, but there is no way to confirm or test this speculative observation. A lot of these "in-between" species that you claim to observe have also proven to be hoaxes. "Lucy" is just a mixture of bones from a monkey and a little girl. Piltdown Man and Peking Man are more examples of proven frauds. Why do so many of these hoaxes occur? Also, as a subspecies emerges, there is less DNA than in the parent species. How could more sophisticated creatures emerge from this degenerative process?

Yes

...

Gr8 b8 m8.

Agnosticism has that weird definition where it says the question is ultimately unknowable. I don't like that condition. If Jesus appeared and I made sure I wasn't just hallucinating, I would change my opinion. Until then, there is no evidence to prove any religion other than vague woo woo. I lean towards no deities though.

wew

I take it you don't know any girls.

This tbh fam.

Bill Nye: ISIS exists because of global warming

The ugly truth that public figures like Bill Nye never say: ISIS is controlled by Israeli Mossad, and is used to further the goals of Great Israel and of Zionism.

What else is Bill Nye lying about?

I never thought of it as unknowable as that assertion lacks evidence aswell. I guess that would be called soft agnosticism.

Yeah, he's a TV presenter who presents science that's correct according to the specialists, so what's the problem?

Piltdown Man was a fraud.
Peking Man was not proven to be a fraud.
Lucy is not a proven fraud. Where did you get that from?

It was more of a joke than anything. Many people have commented on the tragic nature of pissing and fucking with the same tool.

Maybe, I think atheist fits better but at this point it's semantics.

fug, can't sage

If God designed all living beings, why he would do such stupid things like the Laryngeal's nerve path?

Shhh, what you're suggesting is pure arrogance obviously. It's a perfect design and you just don't understand, mannnnn.

Jesus Christ.

Holla Forums the thread.

Perceived flaws do nothing to disprove creation. But keep wasting your time.

You keep assuming that we think "creation = everything must be flawless and perfect". Creation is open to micro-evolution. I guess giraffes evolved that way because it just worked for them.

Nice one OP.

Nigger if there wasn't overlap how the fuck do you think you'd be able to eat that tasty mustard?

Fossils are dug out of the ground and radio-dated. I don't know how much more natural you can get.

Well if we're going to go down that route, then there's also no way to confirm that the universe existed before I was around to observe it.

Anyway, what you don't realize is that I'm saying the same thing as you are. We're both picking a point at some point in the past, after which, the laws of physics and nature apply, but before which, "God made it happen." The difference is that I'm arguing that this point was 20 billion years ago when someone or thing made the Big Bang bang, whereas you're arguing that 7000 years ago, Sky-God made everything. (You're also arguing that Zombie Jesus rose out of the the ground, but I'm ignoring that for now).

The difference, of course, is that my argument has physical evidence to support it, whereas yours is here-say.

This is the main way in which Whites are socially retarded. They (mostly the Christians) have a "for-it-or-against-it" mentality. Jews are a lot more refined.

Not only will the Jewish goldsmith loan you certificates for gold he doesn't have, he'll also shave the coins that he does.

Not only will the Jew take over your media and brainwash your population to fight a war against Israel's enemies, he'll then sell your army $250 million dollars in defective Chinese ammunition, get caught, and then only spend 4 years in jail. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efraim_Diveroli)

Jews see things from all angles, while whites see it from one.

You're right there's no way you could have been conceived without you being there to observe the process

The fossil record was created before radio-dating existed and is used to determine the type of radio-dating to be used. It's all done based on the assumption that fossil record is correct. This is not in accordance with the scientific method.

Your yamuka is showing

1) Evolution is a fact, and we need eugenics to prevent dysgenics.

2) Communism is bad.

3) Atheism is a lack of belief in a god. I myself am an atheist, because I can face reality, and don't need to pretend that your Jewish god is real.

If you hate me because I believe in evolution, or because I don't believe in your god damn Jewish god, then you are my enemy. Anyone who hates me simply because I don't worship their god, is a fucking idiot. Pretty simple really.

...

You clearly don't understand how radiometric dating works if you think they use fossil strata as a tool. Radiometric dating works independent of any strata, it just matches the strata perfectly.

When someone uses Holla Forums to push Christianity/God, you can beat they're pretty stupid. I would recommend that they find a church instead.

I would add one thing to that: If you believe in Christianity, you're more likely to deny evolution. If you deny evolution, you deny genetics. If you deny genetics, you deny the white race.

Christians loathe everything Holla Forums stands for as it goes against their disgusting religion. That's why they attack it day after day with threads like this.

creation.com/recurrent-laryngeal-nerve-design
I didn't read this but it's an argument to what you just said.

We know user, we know.

not the entire protocols.

Here's a convenient image