Why are you still supporting the governments that think they rule and own you?

...

hay guys vsause here

...

heh

because the alternative is a hundred times worse in every way but one

why are you still supporting the board owners that think they rule and own you?

...

Nice b8

slave attitude

Because the evil "big government" gave me the right to marry the person I love, after centuries of being persecuted by the exact sort of person who now supports "small government."

...

wow really makes you think

Not even ancaps would be this retarded

wow, they gave you a piece of paper and official state recognition of your relationship, i'm sure that matters because reasons. the government didn't create marriage, marriage existed before government and the government giving you and your butt buddy their stamp of approval is utterly meaningless.

Without love there is marriage is meaningless.

marriage is nothing more than an expression of love and started as a religious tradition.

this is what you are saying…

i want you to get off your keyboard walk over to a mirror and say that out loud 5 times and tell me if it still make sense.

See, you're arguing upon the validity of marriage as a government institution.

What I'm arguing is that the government has extended the franchise of that institution to me, whereas most people I see screaming about libertarianism and anti-statism are also homophobic as fuck.

It's not within my self-interest as a homosexual to side with people who hate me, even if the idea of marriage as a government institution is flawed.

the government that taxes you? now lets you get taxed in a special way?

except that no one is asking you to side with anyone
nor are religious people more likely to be anti government than the not pious
most of all there were for a long time many civil unions and governmnt recognized marriages you could have
the government distracted you, and all who get offended on your behalf, with a non issue
all while expanding the foundations for TTIP
removing the rights of the constitution that give you the right to speak about anything without being imprisoned, and taking away your gun rights
good luck with that when the next criminal decides he really doesnt like homos (due to being buttraped by a superior gangster) and wants to turn a mugging into a murder

okay I don't see all this homophobia among libertarians that you do. the whole ethos of libertarianism is live and let live. there are both hardcore christians and atheist randroids among libertarians. even ron paul who is an old socially conservative pro-life christian, when he was asked if he saw homosexuality as a sin said that as a doctor he didn't see it that way. as far as marriage goes they either want to get government out of the marriage business or allow gay marriage. but they don't want christian bakers to be forced at gunpoint to bake gay cakes, which i guess to the SJWs of LGBT is "homophobic".

so government makes the love better? i don't get it? what are you saying?

sounds like you're projecting some broad generalizations. The libertarian platform unanimously is in favor of equal rights. since government is what makes people unequal.

The funny thing is you turn a blind eye to socialists like Che Guevara who burned gays at the stake but some hillbilly in the RNC called you a faggot so you come to the conclusion that we need government in marriage.

you kinda sound like a homophobe right now.

friendly reminder anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron

That pic reminds just how gay libertarians really are.

I'm glad I stopped being one.

...

Cause why not. What else am I gonna do with freedom? Shitpost on Holla Forums like OP or play vidya some more? Thread's retarded and OP's opinion is trash.

It's not in your selfinterest not to pass on your genetic material you mentally ill dick suck.

Marriage is about property rights. It's a contract between two people and the government.

A system without a government being socialist is the real oxymoron.

Socialism fails to be administrated in any effective way in the most authoritarian of states. A system that requires redistribution on a national scale cannot exist without hefty administration, and even then they can't function.

If your argument is that administration doesn't require national leaders you can shut the fuck up right there, because that's retarded, and I wouldn't enjoy seeing you humiliate yourself like that.

Even discarding the most fundamental elements of human nature it couldn't work, because leaders are fundamental to keeping any bureaucratic machine turning at all, and buracreaucy is the cornerstone of administration.

5000 hrs in MS paint

Fuck off and die, cunt.

you first faggot

love it

there you go corrected it for you

...

...

why not??

...

...

whyyy

...