Local Residents Up In Arms Over Adult Baby Fetish Store

It annoys me that the majority of Holla Forums seem to have this gross misunderstanding of the slippery slope fallacy and apply it where it doesn't belong.

Then you're not with us you lolberg slime. Let me guess, are you open borders or does your lolberginess prevent you from protecting your nation?

Whats your problem with this?
I mean id understand it fully if it were some place for orgys or open so children and people could see whats going on there.

But they hide it and just do busyness.
You dont have to be a libertarian in order to tolerate this begrudginly.

More specifically, I'm NatLib. Libertarianism doesn't work when you let low-IQ niggers and shitskins overrun your country.

So just as Hitler turned an objectively shit political system like Socialism into something great, so too do I believe Libertarianism would be best for America with a heavy emphasis on Nationalism and ethnocentrism.

Please point out how the fallacy is being misapplied here

I always thought the slippery slope fallacy went like

not this

But most people think of the latter while I think the fallacy is like the first scenario.

Sounds more like a swinger's club for those with a baby fetish than a retail shop for the required accoutrements.

Are you from reddit? Of course it's the second one. The first one never even crossed my mind. Is that what your libcuck professors told you?

Because it's a symptom of a diseased society. I don't have to be okay with it simply because 'muh freedums'. There is a just and unjust way to live, and surprisingly there is no end to the ways of living unjust lives. No, walking around with a bib and a diaper is not okay for society. Furries went from an underground fetish clique to getting their own AAA-budget movie (Zootopia). It's a race to the bottom with these types, except there is no bottom.

Gas yourself. How do you even square the circle of ethnocentrism with libertarianism? You special snowflake libtards need to GO. Shall I post dancing fat man at Lib convention . wav or shall I not?

/Thread

In order to prove a correlation between one event to another, you have to apply evidence showing how it would logically apply.
Slippery slope is "Event A leads to Event B which leads to Even C which leads to the end of the world".
Saying "If we allow immigrants to come into our country, there will be a strain on the economy because of taxes going to help them, and finally our nation will become weaker as a result". This is logically proven.
But saying "If we normalize homosexuality, then fags will spread aids, then everyone will die".
This is not logical.

So claiming degeneracy A will lead to degeneracy B is completely irrational unless you can point out exactly how both degeneracies are connected logically.

look at these fucking kikes

Second one is slippery slope, first one is straw man.

Yes. It's that simple. Glad you pointed it out.

Easy. Heavy laws against immigration. Libertarianism still accepts that some government is useful, namely for defense. If allowing violent shitskins into our white nation, then immigration could be seen as an act of aggresion, thus immigration would be heavily tightened by the governments.

What a fucking waste of space you are. You want to pin the entirety of Libertarianism on one faggot who took his shirt off on TV?
Should I post Nazi My Little Pony porn . png or shall I not?

Nigger the logic is fucking proven right in front of your eyes, from homosexuality to Transgenderism to furryism to Pedophillia.

Do you honestly think we are talking about a fucking natural phenomenon that can be proven in a fucking scientific manner?

It's fucking propaganda being pushed, like dominos, not a fucking philosophical fallacy.

Fucking hell how do people not get this?

But the second one is fact, not fallacy.

The trouble is, liberals are not rational actors. It's not fallacious to predict that they'll simply do the most destructive thing to civilization that they can get away with at the time and that they'll have no reasoning to back it up beyond "fuck whitey" and "muh freedom."

I'm glad we could clear up the fact that Libs are just retarded tax dodgers. Better put infrastructure into the hands of private companies, what could go wrong? :^^^^))))))))

So no legislation on food standards? No decency laws for the talmudvision? The problem with you people is that your allegiance is to the dogmatic application of your principles with no appreciation for the outcomes. Surprisingly the funniest part of the Libertarian convention wasn't that fat guy or Gary Johnson throwing away that pistol, it was when Gary Johnson got booed for saying that prostitutes shouldn't be sold heroin or that maybe driver's licenses are a good idea.

Your idea is a failed one, we have moved on.

Technically, you are correct since there is an obvious agenda to implement those things. Standing alone, however, the fallacy still stands.

Assuming B will happen because A happened is a fallacy.

Were you aware that there's a fallacy fallacy too? That's what you insufferable fags never understand.

Freedom bro.

gary "gun buyback" johnson needs your vote citizen!

That's not even true though. Just look at how gays bicker with each other because they don't have the right body type.

I voted for him last time. This time it's trump.

Calm down. Your example is not a fallacy because the consequence directly follows the action. A is related to B. Gay rights is not related to Pedo rights in any way; there is no logical reason to expect one to have an affect on the other.

hahahahahahahahaha

kill yourself

the fact that you can say that with a straight face. it's being pushed by the same groups, for the same reasons you dunce.

This is hilarious.
Although I don't see much of an issue over this, there's less of these people than fags and even fags make up 1% of the population, as long as they keep to themselves and keep their circlejerk closed then I don't give a fuck whatever fetish they engage in.

It was an example, good job missing the point.

you're right, you're a faggot

Except that homosexuals commit pedophilic acts at a meteoric rate because their sexuality is unchecked male virility applied to other men with the same sexual (non)standards. Remember that AIDS patient zero guy? He had 250 partners a year. 250 A YEAR.

I don't have it but do you remember that vid of that little huemonkey kid with booty shorts twerking to a crowd of fags? NOTHING TO SEE HERE GOYIM.

normalfags getting a taste of our reality. let them have it

It was used as an example to explain a fallacy. Forget it, I give up trying to argue with common core educated morons.

An explanation is in order, as this guy can't seem to communicate his ideas in a fashion that just werks.

He's saying that, as a standalone idea, the acceptance of homosexuals doesn't directly lead to pedophilia being the next logical step. Without any other external factors or information, that would be a fallacy.

That being said, there has been mountains of evidence that this is the modus operandi of progressive society, and when you consider their past actions, it follows that the following would not be a logical fallacy:

You've provided logical framework.

That's not a logical fallacy.

Now all you need are sources to back it all up, and you're set.

I think we can all tell who was Common Core educated here.

...

...

These people find used diapers in other peoples garbage, and put them on, mushing the days old baby shit in.

THEY ARE DISEASE VECTORS

Your waifu probably a shit anyway

No. You should care. You think these people will just fuck ass and eat shit in their own bedrooms? No, they will go out and seek sympathy and acceptence.

Fuck you nigger

can importing ebola niggers actually be used to our advantage?

They want to brainwash and mutilate your children, too. And if children have the mental capacity to decide they need sex changes, they have the capacity to engage in sexual activity just like adults. Why won't you let your son suck dick, bigot?

Why should I fuck myself when I already held hands with your waifu?

I'm pretty sure ebonigs aren't into diaper fetishism.

But outside the internet these people do not appear, unlike fags who actively indoctrinate people to their degeneracy.
When they do start doing that is when I'll start caring, so far they have kept to themselves.

If you'd study waifuology even a bit you would understand that holding hands with my waifu is impossible.
You are still a nigger and my dick is still 50 times bigger

They forego the diaper part and get straight into the shit flinging.

Holla Forums is a joke

Why not just import the ebola?

...

...

Do they have diapers and cribs with swastikas and memes? Great gift for a Trans Nazi.

Importing invaders is actually a really great idea, the more there are the faster people will realize how shit they are, it's accelerating the radicalization of the right and the anti-shitskin sentiment in whites

...

I have a ph.D. in waifuology actually. Nice Moonman reference.

Holy hell, lad. I don't even believe you're not baiting.

...

The first one is actually "fruit of a poison tree".

Yeah, sounds utterly retarded top kek ahahahahaha xDDDD Sweet image macro maymay bro, I saw one just like that on 4chan :333

Read my fucking lips:
The free-market cures all degeneracy.

you rang?

Heh, they know their target audience well.

[citation needed]

We've already proven there's a huge market for degeneracy, but does that mean it should exist? We swim against the currents here, not with them.

...

They act like it's a big fucking deal or a crime against nature.
People have a right to sell toddler sex-toys if they wish to do so.

Sure fire plan

Yet I still haven't heard of a diaper fetishist political movement or them spreading any agenda apart from engaging in their form of degeneracy in cons or private meetings. And as I mentioned before there is so little of them they are a non-issue.
Allowing them to have their little congregations is the price you must pay to have your own freedom.

Can I see your papers doc? Because you seem to be lacking in the basics.
>Nice Moonman reference
Only because I'm listening to this right now

Ever notice how degeneracy flourishes in the realm of harsh government restrictions on business practices and personal preferences?
Notice how you get fined for refusing to serve niggers?
Notice how you get shut down if you don't sell a wedding cake to fags?
Seems to me like the less overall free the market it, the more influence the government has in the market, the easier it is for degeneracy to run rampant.

...

...

...

That doesn't make sense. Nothing about my life would be negatively affected by a ban on diaper fetishists or the legalization of killing them or the repeal of all civil rights legislation post 1790.

Nice brony meme. We can see how well it worked out for them and everyone else who spouted this shit. You destroy yourselves and those around you with your fetish.

The reason people shame you is because you are acting shameful. The fact you are trying to deny it so much is because you are ashamed and you do no wish to be. So instead of changing your bad habits, which requires work, you demand other do the work so that you do not have to.

Again, you are selfish and immature. Stop spreading your disgusting filth around impressionable people or someone is going to stop you in way you do not like. History will repeat it self.

I was actually thinking of just leaving ebola infested diapers around degenerate sex clubs like the ones in the article.

America is not Germany. What's your point? That a certain political system worked for a nation that didn't have as deep a love for personal freedoms and rights like America does?

Precedent setting.

Same reason you would want to defend fudds with S&W.

When you set up a legal system based on precedent, you consequently make it easier to breach by going after disliked groups.
It applies equally, fag rights leads to pedo rights argument equally means stripping felon rights leads to no rights.

Consequently its a giant flipping table of trying to keep your rights, take others away and make sure it doesn't wack you.

Major reason you end up with "equality" as it is the easiest path.
If everything is allowed, then its only your fault.

I can't count the number of s&m shops, baby fetish stores, and stories for transfags I see in account of tourists to north korea.

*accounts

Tell me this: would you prefer NSDAP Germany or Modern America? Are you really bluepilled enough to think you have barely any personal freedoms? How stupid are you? Police can stop you at any point and take all the money from out of your wallet and you can't do shit about it. Do you really think you have freedom of expression anymore? Christ, we are being raped back to front in terms of personal liberties but you leap to the defense of diaper fetishists.

This is why your type will never win. Enjoy being relegated to the cuck shed since your ideology is being rightfully ignored as the spineless, self-serving ideology it always was.

GAS YOURSELF

I'm sure it wouldn't and I'm not really sure how to articulate this well but the point is that it is not moral to do so, just because you disagree with their opinions it does not give you the right to kill them or even limit them in any way, their right to express themselves is given by God and so is yours to limit it would at the very least be ungodly.
Also at one point someone could disagree with what you think or do and they would gas you along with them.

GO AWAY CHRISTCUCKS

YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE THE BASTION OF DEGENERACY AGAINST THIS SHIT

The hilarious irony is that the doompaul meme is directly about people like you.

t. Former Libertarian

Ehhhh

We're being raped because we don't have enough personal freedoms you nigger. How cucked can you be to look at modern America and think "You know what, I think I have too much freedom. I wish the government would restrict my freedoms!".
America is not Germany. We work best when we are more free.
And stop with the strawman. I'm not defending diaper fetishists. I'm simply saying they should be allowed to endulge in their degenerate ways as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of others.

I'm in it for the ideology, not the LARPing like a lot of you NatSoc faggots on here.
America was incredibly free early in it's lifespan. Are you saying early America was more degenerate than modern America because it was more free?

This is too easy, go in with a suppressed weapon, close the door, execute everyone in there, destroy any cameras, you've got time. then leave through the back.
They'd never catch you.
I don't condone this idea.

I stand with the constitution!

DON'T TREAD ON ME

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

that says it all really. you don't care about a healthy, function country or society. you just want the freedom to fuck ponies.

I would argue that fetish materials doesn't fall under the umbrella of "expression."

Further, I would support that by stating that sex is meant for procreation, and all else that tingles your bits without leading to that is fetish.

I'm not saying you have to be private about your sex, but if you're not trying to make a baby, you're not doing sex.

"Equality" is a left-wing meme for destroying civilization. I don't care if my "right" to fuck kids and wave my dick in public is replaced with a new "right" to hunt and kill people who do that or defend it. That would be an improvement. Apathy about the state of society is a welcome mat to those who have no stock in its continued existence - to maintain order, certain behaviors must be both unacceptable and punishable by law.

Except we had nationwide sodomy laws until 1970 you dumb fucker. We also had laws that prohibited divorce unless there was a proven cause, normally a very difficult thing to do.

I'm sorry, did I interrupt your wank to Ayn Rand?

Actually I do. That's why I'm pro-freedom. The more free a nation is, the less degenerate it is.

That's okay, I respect your right to free speech.

I'll start to care when it's an actual issue, the media makes it out to be much worse than it is, whites will remain the majority whatever way you look at it as the shitskins are highly concentrated in certain areas and there's only a few million of them compared to 600 million actual Europeans

sounds to me like that guy is a Nice Doctrine heretic, believing all that is natural is also good

The only way that someone becomes a diaper fetishist is to be a degenerate. Disfunction begets disfunction, and the reason people become like this is because all they think about is pleasure.
They stick dildos up their asses for pleasure, get bored, turn to diapers, then toilet slavery, scat, bestiality, ect.
Its a very short lasting feeling, and these people are addicts searching for anything that might give them that high they so desperately crave

Which they are free to try to do. There's no such thing as a "right". It all boils down to whether or not someone has the power to stop you from doing something.

So no, I don't have the right to kill or limit them, but they don't have the right to continue to do what they're doing either. They have the "right" to express their feelings through degeneracy, and I have the "right" to express my disapproval of that degeneracy by lynching them.

Sodomy infringes on the rights of the mentally ill, and divorce is a breach of contract.
I said I wanted to be as free as possible, not to have total anarchy.

I agree any form of procreation outside making children is hedonism and is animalistic. Yet all of us have our vices and things we enjoy and I'm sure there is no man who does not do anything immoral, although we should strive not to do so it is nice to have the freedom to not be punished for expressing your will to pleasure or whatever it is you would like to do.

Yes it is. My moral system is not governed by GRIDS acceptance.

No, but maybe it should. :^) I think the interest of civilization demands punishment of grossly degenerate activities.

I don't worship filthy Jews.

I have guns.

literal quote from you

Equality is a founding peace of Western civilization dating back well before christcucks got a hold of it.
By all means dispose of it, people are not equal, just don't flaunt yourself in a corpse skin.

And at the end that is the issue.
Who enforces the laws changes frequently.
You will not hold it forever, you will not even hold it long.
2 generations at most.

Thus you have to work out ideals that last longer, knowing they will be thrown out as natural.

Or you can just homogenize all of society, kill everyone that opposes you and rule a backwards god king society that gets killed off by everyone else in the world.

Parents who want their baby daughter to be trans so they can be on le right side of history stick them on their crotch

I need no book to tell me that that dude is a fucking disgusting faggot. Sad thing his type is very common.

The only mentall ill one here is you. You're the one who is unable to come up with a logically consistent, coherent ideology. Kill you'reself.

You got the wrong person my dude.

who cares lmao hahaha

Are you a caveman?

Yes it is. My moral system is not governed by GRIDS acceptance.
It's not about GRIDS acceptance, let me put it simply, mind your own fucking business about what others do until they are up in your face about it.
I disagree but I would fight to the death for your right to say such things.
Memes will not get you anywhere
Me too.

Except I have?
Just because you refuse to accept it as so does not make it true.

No it isn't. The Romans and Greeks had slaves and no womyn voting. Equality before the law is very different from the nebulous ideal of Equality that requires laws be written to protects the "rights" of subhumans.

Once again, I argue that fetish does not fall under the umbrella of "expression."

You may state otherwise, or reiterate the "niceness" of not being persecuted for effectively airing dirty laundry, but this isn't art.

And before that becomes the direction this starts to lurch towards, art must be tasteful to be art. We can all thank the Postmodern Movement for ruining what could have been a glorious caper through the pornographic in pursuit of "What is beauty," because that's exactly what they did.

artrenewal.org/articles/Philosophy/PullingBacktheCurtain/pullingbackthecurtain.php

...

If you wait to punish queers until they're having sex with your children and showing them how to lick buttholes in school at taxpayer expense, you've waited too long.

No, I just don't have the audacity to think that because I walk on two legs that I'm somehow magically separate from the inherent properties of nature.

Explain to me how all aspects of society are not, at their core, "I have the biggest stick = I win", or at the very least "If they THINK I have the biggest stick = I win". You can't.

That's all the proof we need that you're just havin a giggle here m80.

I know a lot of libertarians in meatspace that think like this. They're all voting Gary Johnson because they're just signalling faggots.

I literally never said no government, sodomy laws, or whatever strawman you believe I only ascribe to to be a special snowflake just for Holla Forums's sake.
The only thing you were right about it defense.
Fucking strawmans up all in this bitch. No wonder you're sperging out so hard, you can't logically defeat my argument, so you resort to putting words in my mouth.

Listen up nigger:
Some government is necessary. It's needed for 2 simple things; Defense (which would include border control in a NatLib society) and the enforcement of Justice.

Its not a club for sexing its a store for buying assecoires for people to carry home and then use for sex in privacy.
Are you dense nigger?

I didn't say the sodomy laws were good. What is it with you niggers and trying to speak for me? I simply said I could understand why they would be laws in the first place because sodomites infringe on the rights of the mentally ill. Do I think they should've been enforced in the first place? No. Do I delude myself into believing America has always been a perfect land of freedoms and liberties? No.

Now make a logical argument or fuck off.

It doesn't have to be, all it is is retards doing retarded things, it's not like I like what they're doing but I could simply care less, they are free to do it, they are not saying it is art they are not shoving down your throat and you are free to ignore it if you see it and in fact you are even free to criticize and discuss it with them or us if you like, my issue is simply with banning this and banning that.
And also in the end who are you to judge what others do?

You should separate from those as we are humans, not animals we follow our own rules as we are a step above simple minds which can do nothing but breed and kill.
Because the rights of the weaker ones are protected by laws and morals we have worked to establish throughout the centuries. Until you destroy all actual notion of human rights it will not be as such and even the weaker people will be free to express what they like.

Fucking materialists

Except it's not. They say in the article it's 'for people who don't have their own personal nursery'. Meaning they arrive, dress up like babies and do odin knows what else that entails. These types do online shopping for their baby stuff to try to hide their fetish.

No.

You aren't seeing anything, bitch.

What part of FREE MARKET don't you understand? Social conservatism should be called socialist conservatism.

Dumbass needs a scientific journal, because he can't see this is already happening right before his own eyes. It's like people who read dystopia novels, but still have to be spoonfed, otherwise they can't see the shit actually going on

Again, the slippery slope part.
As equality is going by the part of being human, its natural to hit this point.
The issue is humans are not equal, cannot be expected equal by most individual measures.

Thus, you have to choose the individual, which defeats the western school of thought.

As well, you will then have large disenfranchised hordes to deal with, so again, get your murder/killing on to deal with it.

Meanwhile other societies will be eyeing a chance to move on the US and take over when its so weak.

This too is natural.

Who are you to reject the Supreme Judge God and His standards?

I remember a similar thread in here, a few months ago that tackled this phenomena of Adult babies and that thread degrade when a huge turnout of them justifying and shilling their lifestyle as their choice .

The whole libertarian idea of "Do whatever you want as long as it doesn't effect anyone else" is a joke. Everything you do has an effect on society at some level.

Yeah, we objectively are, you fucking retard.

First off, those simple minds don't just "breed and kill". Killing is just one part of ensuring survival, protecting offspring, and securing resources. Second, that's IS all we do. We just have a hundred layers of fancy veneer on it. Show me an action that humans take that is not geared towards attracting a mate and securing resources (Food, shelter, allies, etc.)

Which were put in place by the guys with the biggest sticks, not the weaker ones. They strong just happened to care about the weaker ones. I'm not saying these social constructs don't exist. I'm saying anyone with the power to do so can completely ignore or destroy them if they wanted to. Meaning there's realistically no such thing as a "right". Anyone with enough power can do whatever the fuck they want unless someone with more power keeps them from doing so.

it wont end soon

See that's perfectly healthy behavior that we mustn't discourage in any way because 'muh freedums'.

Did you hear that crash? That was the sound of your "logical argument" imploding on itself.

wont someone think of the man children

ITT: Triggered Lolbergtarians

If you dont SEE the termites in your house, they aren't a problem. What part of free market don't you understand?

The only time I want to be treated somewhat like a baby is when I'm sucking on my waifu's boobs.

...

DELETE THIS

Explain to me how a primarily economic system gets rid of social and political degeneracy

Well if all costs are known and internalized, then all harm would have an economic malus attached to it.

Every time

What part of a deregulated market makes you think companies, from mom&pop to conglomerates, won't mask negative costs from consumers?

You can't prescribe "costs" to something. That's something economists try to do all the time but it doesn't work. If you want to define costs here you have to define harm, which is entirely relative ( furfags don't think there is any harm in furfaggotry ).

The interests of these business owners, with their sick perversions, do not intersect with those of the national interest. Unbridled liberalism contributes to moral decline and decadence of the people, the needs of which must come before the selfish desire profits. You will be going to prison for your indecency, contemplate your degeneracy.

t. National Socialist.

None, hence why I hate the idea and accept governments as needed.

It is however easy at this time in terms of pollution, so I can in such a system expect payments from energy generation stations, other people's vehicles, and more, while paying out for my own generation.

Mental harm is far more dicey and first requires the understanding of propagation.

that would be mean
some acid should suffice at first

Who are you to say what his standards are?
They will all be judged when they die, not by you.

Just a sec m9, gotta finish cooking my spaghetti.

This guy has been molested by every female and male member in the family above 10 years old up to the 5th knee

You're not a National Socialist, you're a commissar that's punishing some diaper wearing faggot for skipping out on his conscription.

So…

Nah bro, what he said was decidedly fascist in nature.

My soul and ability to self-awareness is what separates me from a mere dog or cow, if you want to act like one then go ahead.
Call it what you want but I usually call that tradition and culture, if you would notice most nations have different types of 'veneer' covering them throughout history and many different philosophies make up the basis of each one, the laws and rules we have now, compared to primitive times, are what our ancestors handed to us and developed, it is not merely veneer.
NEETs, there you go.
How about you show me actual evidence of your beliefs?
Because they understood that being barbarians and primitives only stunts actual intellectual progress.
No one man is capable of beeing stronger than all men together.
Honestly how do you even define power?

I did, it is not however ever going to happen.
Much like Communism.

Every time

Every time
:^)

...

That's a nagant revolver. It has a sealing mechanism when the gun is cocked that presses the cylinder against the barrel, forming a gas seal which lets it be silenced.

Absolutely speechless.
Hotline squads when?

still, I would NEVER go to a brick and mortar shop that specialises in this

Feels good not having a normie fetish. Normies ruin everything

I'd be fine if everyone on the planet was into all sorts of weird, kinky shit, as long as they kept it limited to the bedroom.

Funny how virtually naked trannies parading down busy streets wearing a suit of penises is progressive, but a fetish shop is disgusting and abhorrent.

Inb4 lolbergturdians defend the degenerates

Diaper fetishism is absolutely disgusting. That said, just because something is disgusting does not mean it should be illegal.

It hurts nobody.
It's just underwear.

You fucking autist.

Take your head out of your ass and look at the bigger picture; there is far more to a healthy society than economics. A healthy society begets a healthy economy, but a healthy economy does not make a healthy society.

Look at any third world country with completely free markets like China ca. 1990s or any Black controlled African state. You, as the good little Libertarian will scream that it is the corrupt government that creates such a terrible society, and yet countless European countries under varying forms of totalitarian governments across the thousands of years have had strong economies. This is not because of lax trade policies, or due to the government in and of itself, but due to the CULTURE of that society, and what did that culture promote? NOT RUBBING DICKS WITH FATASSES WEARING DIAPERS, but being family-oriented, being for more than just yourself. Jesus fucking Christ this is why nobody with any integrity likes or associates with libertarianism, it requires them to be autistic and selfish. To associate ones self with selfish autists, you instantly identify yourself as being a selfish autist.

This is the first one in years that truly got a visceral reaction out of me. That's fucking awful.

fuck fuck fuck

So it doesn't affect anything? What if this guy, a person who keeps his diaper fetish a secret, was the coach of your kid's baseball team? Do you start to see how this degeneracy isn't in a fucking walled garden like you lolbergs want to believe?

kek. Fuck libergtarianism.

Very easily, go read Hoppe.
Incidentally, Hoppe also doesn't have any problem with communities excluding shit like this, he just thinks it's better done through robust property rights than through government action.

What a time to be alive

"Refugees" Invading Europe
The EU is collapsing
Canada has gone full cuck mode
Nigger President ruins America
Woman who killed innocent people and released secret information to terrorists is running for Presidency
Beaners and Tacos want to kill all white people and make America into Mexico
Bestiality is Ok, and pedophilia is slowly becoming more accepted
Guy openly runs a store for diaper fetish

Something just isn't right here…..what is this world becoming?

Anything that irritates the normalslimes is great imo. Their false moral righteousness makes me hard.

We might not have the common sense to gas these degenerates but God sure does

Simple solution. Burn the fucker down. Problem solved.

If he's keeping it a secret how would that affect him/his behaviors as a coach?

You're the type that needs everything explained to him, I can tell.

Then please, explain. If you're implying he would spread his degeneracy to the children he's coaching, I don't see this happening unless he's also a pedophile.

Burn it down, you worthless cowards.

Oh I'm sure that the guy who gets his rocks off dressing like a fucking BABY doesn't sexualize minors at all. Nope. That would be crazy to consider.

You must not have kids of your own, so you're willing to risk the benefit of the doubt on other's children

Jesus wept

...

Which has no proof of existing

Animals are self aware. We as a species just suffer from a massive case of Dunning–Kruger.

Which come about because of unique circumstances of their environment. Tradition and culture are survival mechanisms in one way or another. Building community for security and cooperation, meeting and attracting mates, dressing appropriately for the environment, appeasing a god so that you have enough food for the winter, shaking hands to show that you don't have a weapon, having your shirt button from one side and not the other so that your weapon doesn't snag when you draw it, etc. Like I said, veneer. Strip the layers off and that's all it is.

Who are such because they've found that to them it's an acceptable way to secure resources and survival. Just because it's not super successful or glamorous doesn't mean that's not what it is.

Sure. That doesn't take away from what I'm saying at all.

Which is why he makes friends, hires employees, starts a family, builds a nation, etc. Like I said, literally everything we do.

In this context, the ability to exert one's will on one's environment.

I mean, if this guy was some sort of sissyboi exhibitionist who openly wears diapers/dresses like a baby I would steer clear of him. Otherwise, no issue.

I think there is somewhat of a misunderstanding of the nature of these two degeneracies. Yes both pedophilia and diaperfetishism involve elements which directly relate or allude to minors in a sexual way, though I would argue the two conditions are mutually exclusive.

Often a pedophile is driven by the apparent weakness of their child victim- they feel extremely empowered, and the taboo nature of it contributes to the excitement. The diaper fetishist, on the other hand, derives sensation from the tactile senses of the diaper and the psychological humiliation often involved in such practices.

I'm not saying it's impossible there is a correlation between these types of degeneracy, but I am not aware of any evidence which connects the two, and from what I understand of both conditions they appear to be mutually exclusive.

lolberg need to hang too

Kaide was only yan in the anime. In the game she was loving and pure.

whats the issue then?

Just like equality, amirite?

We need to stop this disgusting shit. The "it doesn't effect anyone" line doesn't work anymore because normal people live around you and they don't want to be around some sick fucking faggot who wears diapers

THE FREE MARKET FIXED IT

ABDL here. Those laws only apply to groups specifically listed as protected classes. Fetishfags, unfortunately, are exempt.

misspandapants.tumblr.com/post/137244745708/this-pertains-to-anyone-who-has-a-kink-or-fetish
This chick got raped, but couldn't get it prosecuted because of her diaperfaggotry.

During the times of the Crusades all the ancestors of Americans would have been in Europe so yeah it still stands.

Then how do you suppose humans even function, to have hardware is not enough, there must be software.
No we don't, we are in any way shape or form better than animals, in our achievements in our ability to think and in most cases even in physical ability.
I disagree, tradition and culture is the ultimate expression of a peoples spirit, their blood and their struggle throughout history, it can never be mere fancy veneer. And even if it was constructed as you say, for convenience, then it still doesn't matter, and it also fails to explain factors like language music art and why certain cultures managed to be superior to others.
Simply because we accepted that this veneer is better than a primitive way of life we abandoned abandoning would be regression, humans have only progressed and accepted what is more convenient than what was before.
I will agree that no beeing wants to die but NEETs are not only not geared to find mates but do not even wish to do so, it is also not a proper strategy of survival as you are at the will of someone else welfare.
Most of what you say doesn't either, you're just denying the central point. I also believe that comes from your denying of the existence of anything non-material.
Then such men are already at the top and if a stronger one comes by he will replace them, I do not then understand your issue, the Jews are smart they have connections allies and can impose their will on anybody, doesn't that just make them the strongest?
We also have a choice to do all those things as we are not forced to do anything, what would be the drive behind building a nation, starting a family, hiring employees. I suppose I simply fail to see how all of this can make sense.
As said above, Jews

I skipped ahead to see what this video was. I'm disgusted.

therefore it's an act of aggression and justifiable retaliation is warranted to protect liberty
therefore it is your moral prerogative to remove this threat
Check-mate lolbert
Then start ostracizing bitch. If you actually understood American Classical liberalism and not the modern (((Murray Rothbard))), (((Ayn Rand))) Cucked jew version of libertarianism you would not be defending this degeneracy. Just look at how Jefferson dealt with the Barbary Pirates.

just think, that thing has an electrical engineering degree.

did he die of cancer yet?