washingtontimes.com
Gotta love the libtard lefties.
Oh!
Also
Post ex facto law. Lovely unconstitutionality
Pic unrelated kinda
Climate change denial laws
Jose Kelly
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
populartechnology.net
friendsofscience.org
notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com
edsanders.com
telegraph.co.uk
americantraditions.org
aip.org
archive.is
rt.com
washingtonpost.com
google.com
twitter.com
Dylan Jackson
1st for cringe picture of incest couple.
Jack Ramirez
Because it's not good enough to end free speech. It must be ended retroactively as well.
Henry Kelly
This seems to obviously violate the first amendment. This should be struck down in court if it passes, right?
Joseph Kelly
Its ex post facto, OP
Is this civil or criminal?
Andrew Fisher
Pardon, not familiar with burger law. I was informed this was highly unconstitutional.
Also civil supposedly.
Landon Richardson
1984 was required reading when I was in high school. Does the notion of wrongspeak mystify people?
Samuel Brooks
Hey guys I am pretty well versed in Economics and would like to weigh in on climate change. There is currently a globalist movement to apply a world tax to carbon use. The Kyoto Protocols of the last decade attempted to tax the entire planet, but the USA backed out when they realized what was actually going on.
Global warming is as much a real phenomenon as it is a means to an end for globalists who want to control the entire planet. It is pure fear mongering, telling the entire world "If you don't pay us, the world will end." It is the PERFECT excuse to tax everyone and is essentially a tribute payment for being allowed to continue to generate electricity for your populace.
I took an intensive college course on Environmental Economics to learn how this would work. It's called Cap and Trade, and it seems to me to be a scam. That class really opened my eyes to the possibility that our elite are using the increasing global temperatures to their advantage and our detriment. I do not deny that each summer where I live has started earlier, been hotter, and lasted longer, but I do not think this is necessarily our fault. And I CERTAINLY do not think that the solution is to create some UN-tier ponzi scheme institution called the World Cleanliness Organization or some bullshit and force everyone on the planet to give them shekels if they want to keep the power on. What will these people spend the shekels on? You already know - further globalizing our planet under their control. Global warming is the first step because it is the only means to convince common people to accept global control by telling us that if we don't throw money at them, the world will end. It's pretty convincing, right? That's why I am so skeptical.
Gavin Lopez
And yet no one bothers to question the credibility of these scientists or where they are getting their funding from.
Only what they put out is looked at.
Yeah, as if shit like a scientist putting out crock hasn't happened before.
Straight from the pages of their own liberal network. scientist trying to push Lead Poisoning as a good thing.
Eli Foster
The world is not warming. The ice caps are not melting. Glaciers are not melting. Sea levels have not changed their rates in 1000 years. Weather is not getting more extreme in any sense. The oceans are not becoming more acidic. Species are not dying out at a faster rate.
Every single thing they claim is a lie.