It's quite evident that it's Midday in Freedoms-land and night in No-funs-land. So maybe you Murricans need some info about the Scandinavian model, and what the OP will mean for the Swedes.
Scandinavian schools rarely have fights, since children are socialized by caregivers from a very early age. Not at all a bad thing, since it frees up their parents for work, and gives the municipality workers a chance to instil some of the values that society at large would want in children.
I've worked in a nursery and kindergarten, though not in Sweden, our models in Scandinavia are very closely related. It's not indoctrination, but a way to help families, since the man can't be the sole breadwinner, since (((they))) control the economic system and opened up the labour market for women.
So Swedish kids, even from working-class homes, have very safe and nourishing environments growing up, which shelters them from violent behaviour, which obviously is strongly discouraged by the caregivers.
When you import shitskins, you get children with the shitskin mentality. Which means a deeply tribal and violent approach to socializing.
Shitskins of all ages will come to help slap the shit of the Swedish children. Shitskin children are given a direct hierarchy under their brothers to follow, which in turn means the older brothers also have an obligation to "protect" their younger siblings. A good trait, if you live in a hostile environment where different families belong to different clans, and you need to not seem weak. But in Sweden, older kids usually don't mingle a lot with the younger children, since it's not their responsibility. So if a shitskin child and a Swedish child have a quarrel about who gets to use the swing, the shitskin will lose alone, since Swedish children can stand up for themselves one-on-one, as nursery and kindergarten socialization has taught them. The shitskin will then go crying, not to an adult like any Swedish child would, but to their older siblings or family members, who are then obligated to "defend" their sibling, or get the shit beat out of them at home. Which means the Swedish child has a potential fight with either a child that is older and far bigger, or a larger group of shitskin children, or even a group of far older and bigger shitskins. Shitskins, as we all know from various case studies of niggers and sand-niggers, have no concept or honour, nor any regards for when enough is ENOUGH, in a fight.
The joyous thing about the OP, is that the Shitskins have done the absolutely worst thing possible. They've disrupted the family structure where parents can leave their children in Schools, kindergartens, and open institutions during the workday, so they can focus on generating income and taxes for the system to function.
This means the local government has two options:
Let the shitskins terrorize Swedish kids and scare them to stay home, thereby disrupting their parents' workdays and disrupting productivity. Thus essentially allowing the shitskins to start depraving the local government of tax money.
Or they involve social workers and police, in order to curtail the problem and hopefully wring more money out of the national politicians, who at this point probably don't have very much money for anything except 'refugee' costs.
Either way it will reflect EXTREMELY poorly on the social services and the shitskins. Since having police in schools to protect the children is usually only needed at the chosen people's private schools and daycares. So Swedish parents will either find their child neglected by the system, or put in a deeply fear-filled environment where police officers have to be present in schools to keep everyone safe (since teachers no longer are allowed to slap kids, sadly).
It's a beautiful zero sum game for the Swedish establishment, and an eye opener for Swedish families, children and adults alike.
