Being a commie

...

Other urls found in this thread:

alternet.org/news-amp-politics/honduras-sold-libertarian-paradise-i-went-and-discovered-capitalist-nightmare
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

...

...

...

...

...

There is no hope for you.

two years later, in 1929, Hitler backtracked, saying that socialism was “an unfortunate word altogether” and that “if people have something to eat, and their pleasures, then they have their socialism”.

...

...

I refer you to the image you didn't understand

...

...

Phony statistics. Communism hasn't killed a single person.

Unlike the Nazis, who murdered more than six million people.

...

I live in the UK.

-Tom Woods

...

Look at Honduras.

...

...

...

...

...

God is the ultimate statist.

alternet.org/news-amp-politics/honduras-sold-libertarian-paradise-i-went-and-discovered-capitalist-nightmare

You do not have a right to any of those things.

...

I've seen the article before, it's a joke. It's not a libertarian country, aside from the fact they have a government it's a very feudalistic system. The government was something like 20% of the country's entire economic expenditure last I checked, which doesn't sound very libertarian either

Watch the video.

lolbertarians

So Faggy McFaggot can afford a car but not the toll. Sounds like a nigger without a working husband shitting out 10 niglets and complaining about not enough gimmedats.

...

Ancoms, eh?

Libertarians confirmed for SJWs?

edgy
d
g
y

...

Define a state, then? You can't have a state without government.

...

...

Niggers. State of denial.

Libertarians confirmed for pinkos.

...

I have a few points for that:
a) would anyone find the cost of a SCUD missile worth wasting on a single lemonade dealer
b) you would probably want to solve the problem without such an escalation of violence
c) the threat of being SCUDded would dissuade most people from lemonade dealing on private property anyway


You can't have a libertarian state, that doesn't make sense.

Okay. So you have no state.

I control a state next door, and I decide since there's no-one officially claiming your land, I'll roll my army into it and take it for myself. What's stopping me, other than you, who will - being one person - inevitably have less weapons than I do, given that I control an entire state?

1. If you're rich enough, yes.
2. Because we can expect everyone to be non-violent.
3. Kids obviously have such a grasp of the world that they understand the ramifications of selling lemonade on muh bribate broberdy

That violates the NAP :((( You can't do that

You don't have an embassy or an ambassador that my country recognises, so I don't recognise your NAP.

he doesn't answer

The private military company rented out by my community provides adequate protection from invasion for our private properties.


1) I guess
2) We can expect to have insane nutjobs outside of most communities due to private agreements about local property
3) Killing a kid would probably be against local contractual agreement anyway. Shit happens I guess


I was watching pawn stars, sorry mate

...

DynCorp has 16,800 employees, the majority of whom are not combat-trained.

The active operational strength of the United States army alone is 475,000, with more than double that in reserve.

So, remind me, what's standing between my army and your property again?

Nigga that's called a law. That would literally be a state. Nigga.

I didn't even see that! Holy shit, I knew libertarians were fucking stupid, but I didn't think they'd be stupid enough to create a state BY ACCIDENT.

You're comparing a hypothetical situation without government to a real life with a government. Where do you think all those US Army soldiers would be without the government, school?


The difference here is that there is a contractual agreement based on consent, not based on the government's arbitrary power used to create a threat of violence, where there is no consent.

...

Fiction, then.

Spoiler: the stateless world libertarians dream of will never exist.

...

EcoIndustrialism > Capitalism
Open Source hardware and software becomes the norm: Moores law reborn.
Political, Scientific, Mathematical knowledge is the common norm. Everyone's well educated and 'equipped' early age, no job-wageslave human resource corpo supplies loophole and corruptedslut|wrinkledthirties women trapped by long education years. Age of consent reduced due to early maturity and requires examination to test mental maturity (inb4pedo)
Power of production made available to everyone. No obselete barbaric caste-like systems and no brickwall corporation "market uncompetition."
Merit-based. Innovations, rise of new inventions and discoveries in both science and technology that help and preserve ecosystem: mankind and the environment.
No excessive production or consumerism demand-supply-deplete-resources loophole. Recycling and environment friendliness.
Golden Waifu Age: Robotics and benevolent-AI + test tube catgirls

Capitalism Socialism Communism.. you name it! all're shit! NO WAIFU AGE WITH MASONIC AND DYSTOPIANIST SYSTEMS!

Wow dude you're so witty and smart

Snark all you want. It doesn't make me any less right.

Spoiler: The technophile's dream of a long-distance audio transferral method will never exist

Spoiler: The smallpox-free Europe science worshippers dream of will never exist

Spolier: The intelligence statists dream of having will never be within their grasp

Etc

Spoiler: The majority of educated humanity still thinks the state is a good idea.

And allowing states to fade away will mean allowing people of whatever race to live right next door to you, so I'm sorry, but even YOU don't really want an end to statism.

Check em

you either offer your services in return of a currency that you can in turn trade for food. or you get a big ass piece of land and grow your own food.

Same as previous point. Nothing in this world is free because nothing in this world is infinite. So in order to get something you need to give something of equal value back.

But if you could use the roads for free where would the currency to maintain these roads come from?

All these points are just you being a self-entitled asshole that wants free stuff without giving something in return. Go life in China or North-Korea u commie.

yeah

except they won't move there because businesses won't be forced to hire immigrants or serve immigrants

if they aren't wanted and don't offer anything, then they won't be accepted

...

...

...

Good argument, totally makes me think you know what you're talking about.

Boring ditty. Moneyism happened in china and the way it happened prior was love. See animals.

Things cared for other things.

i don't have the exact quote but it's something along the lines of "no matter what a man does to you, at least he recognizes you as a living being, women do not"

Retarded strawman image. Capitalism is a system of social arrangement - not a human trait. Selfishness is a human trait. The idea of capitalism is to make selfishness work for us instead of against us - as it has for most of human history.

...

fixed your pic

All of this individualism to absurdity becomes retarded when applied. Theories are nice but in reality it's bullshit. Beyond that, women hardly can be called the cause of any society problems. Men are the problem for not keeping their women in check. Step up.

kek, nice joke

...

U wut m8?

be?