Not who you were responding too, but that's very true. I think there should be separate laws for art and patent copyright, because comparing entertainment to scientific research is dumb, but my education was in music copyright so that's the frame of reference I understand.
Most artists end up signing their IP away to a firm or a label or something, and in the process they lose a degree of legal control over it. When you see copyright kikery in the news, it's almost never the artist responsible, it's their manager (sometimes at the behest of their (usually jewish) client, but usually not), because he controls the material as part of their contract.
Like any other industry, entertainment is under the thumb of the you-know-whos. They're the ones lobbying for the extension of copyright protection (last I checked it's 70 years after the creator's death, which we can all agree is completely unreasonable and very jewish), and the ones who get thingy about enforcing it, because it's free shekels. In the music industry, for example, all labels end up tracing back to one of 4 big names - Sony, EMI, Warner Bros, or Universal. They are the jews of that industry and they don't treat it as a cultural device, they never have, it's just shekels, and they wield their influence to maximise the shekels as they always do.
Personally I believe the original term of Copyright is decent - 10 to 15 years or so is enough time for an intelligent person to profiteer from a good idea, while still enabling culture to thrive. I believe artists should retain a degree of control over their labor as incentive to produce quality and to maintain an industry around it, but as it stands, the kikery is completely out of control. Stripping copyright terms back may help fight that, but good luck competing with the top of the pyramid with that shit.
Cameron Wood
Enlightening post, thanks. What are your views on the concept of copyrighting genetic material, as some GM crop producers are talking about? Seems like the ultimate low; getting shekels out of living DNA
William Rivera
I don't know too much about it. On a gut feeling, copyrighting genetics seems like a dangerous precedent.
Is the idea that the GM manufacturers hold copyright over a particular strain?
Easton Mitchell
yeah it wouldn't surprise me at all. it's like the word "hate" got seeded into the vernacular with it's newmeaning of: "disagreement with the narrative" I think (((they))) have huge teams of pr people working around the clock figuring out new ways to jew us with words.
Camden Brooks
Basically yes, so if they get copyright over say, the best version of a potato, then all potatoes in that strain belong to them. It effectively creates monopolies, as all other producers must therefore only produce inferior potatoes, or leave the market entirely. Any further improvement would require either payment, or starting from scratch. It makes it almost impossible to build on existing research
Noah Clark
So there definitely is a push then? Since you are here shilling that there isn't anything to worry about.
Cooper Scott
You can make money from everything you create. Just don't shit all over your fans. It is best to promote an environment where everyone feels like they should support those who create content they love.
I do not utilize DRM, I don't go after my fans, hell if someone has issues with an app store, I just give them the game for free. I've had people come to my forum saying they love my game, pirated it, and need help because they are stuck. I help them and just tell them to add a review to a site if they like the game. They pay me back by defending me on review sites and forums. You want people who will want to support you.
Charles Reyes
But if you create a thing, it's yours. This includes writing a book. The only people who argue otherwise are (((libertarians))) who subscribe to (((Rothbard)))'s definition of property. You're not a (((libertarian))), right?
Opposition to Intellectual Property largely stems from uncreative kikes who wish to steal the art the White Man makes and resell it for their own profit while the White writer/artist/composer goes penniless.
(((Libertarians))) will quibble over the definition of creation and try to argue that a work of art, a story, a song, etc, is just an idea and so nobody can own it. The answer to this of course is to do what Trump would do and prosecute such kikes to the maximum possible extent under the law.
James Adams
As other anons said, adapt or die.
If your novel is good, people will support it. If your comic is good, ditto. Same for vidya.
The market share of people that pirate without paying is a market share you were NEVER going to win. They'd just find something else.
Isaac Jones
Good try kike.
THIS thing. Not every other goddamn atom in the universe.
IP is just pushed by worthless men hoping to live off the work of everyone else.
