SJWs are surprised that mass third-world immigration into the U.S. is making whites more tribalistic

A Dialogue With a 22-Year-Old Donald Trump Supporter

After having a conversation with a Trump supporter, the following is written in the article:


archive.is/Qt4E3

Who the fuck do the kikes and their shitskin hordes think they are fooling? As anyone who isn't a fucking idiot knows, their ultimate goal is the dispossession and extermination of the founding population of the U.S. We know this because the policies can have no other logical outcome. They only have one purpose.

Other urls found in this thread:

theamericanconservative.com/dreher/retribalizing-america/
voxday.blogspot.md/2016/05/the-rise-of-white-tribe.html
therationalmale.com/2016/05/15/tribes/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_Israel
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law
thefederalist.com/2016/05/23/how-anti-white-rhetoric-is-fueling-white-nationalism/
therightstuff.biz/2016/05/12/the-racial-tithe/
thundermark.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/might-is-right.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I have a sick fantasy in which the SJWs get everything they want.

Trust fund white kids will step out of their dorms and get attacked by violent third world immigrants, then the state will arrest the SJW white kids and subject them to a socialist style justice system (they are wealthy kids from wealthy families so they are automatically guilty and get sent to gulag).

How fucking fast will the wealthy trust fund SJW college kids be screaming to reverse socialist trends once they see what real socialism means for them?

Holy shit, Jack Donovan was right.

What do you mean?

Jack may be a faggot but he is pretty smart about this shit

Doesn't bother me none.

His book is about white people forming ethnic tribes, returning to tribalism.

From OP


It's exactly what Jack Donovan says will happen to defeat what he calls, :"The Empire of Nothing."

These are all natural system dynamics.

Push for globalization -> increased nationalism
Push for political correctness -> increased political incorrectness
Push for white genocide -> whites band together
Push for feminism -> MGTOW
Push for increasing minimum wage -> automation

Leftists don't seem to understand that an equation has two sides that balance, or that systems in nature tend to lowest entropy to reach equilibrium.

Leftists like to think they're smart, but their bullshit will fail for infinity because they're only focused on a single side of the equation.

Group interests and individualism are not incompatible

oh, I read at least 5 articles about TRIBALISM in the last few days


theamericanconservative.com/dreher/retribalizing-america/

>“I recently became engaged to my Asian fiancée who is making roughly 3 times what I make, and I am completely supportive of her and proud she is doing so well,” he wrote.

Into the trash it goes

voxday.blogspot.md/2016/05/the-rise-of-white-tribe.html

Becoming the New Barbarians

therationalmale.com/2016/05/15/tribes/

and this + others I can't remember.

Thanks for sharing, if you can, keep them coming.

why?

#whitegirlsfuckdogs

If you're white and you make non-white children you might as well kill yourself.

Yes, the guy that was interviewed is a race-mixing feminist cuck. The relevant part here is that even guys like him are becoming more tribalistic, and that SJWs are angry that whites are becoming aware of their genocide-inducing policies.


Back to Twitter.

Because as we all know that recessive trait on recessive trait is a good thing. Sure turned out great for royalty in europe right?

Can't remember now the other ones, will look for them.

pseudoscience babble

The guy interviewed knows gooks are next.

leftists and jews are quite short sighted, man. It's to be expected.

...

Genetics are pseudoscience babble. You heard it hear first Holla Forums

Up next: Flat earthers the future of Holla Forums or can feels melt steel beams.

#nonwhitegirlsAREdogs

Filter this derailing faggot.

Dominant alleles are not better than recessive alleles

Mode of inheritance has nothing to do with whether an allele benefits an individual or not. Take rock pocket mice, where fur color is controlled mainly by a single gene. The gene codes for a protein that makes dark pigment. Some rock pocket mice have dark fur, and some have light fur. The dark-fur allele is dominant, and the light-fur allele is recessive.

When mice live in a habitat filled with dark rocks, dark fur is “better” because it makes the mice less visible to predators. But when mice live in a habitat filled with light rocks and sand, light fur is “better.” It’s the environment that matters, not whether the allele is dominant or recessive.

So you're saying that if you don't racemix, it's practically incest?

Get fucked.

Shame the kikes got to her. Hillary was a qt.

Hurts your feels hard huh?


True, but then you need to look at carry over to genetic diseases. Ever wonder why there is a recessive problem with say heart disease here in the west?


I'm saying keep your fucking mind open, sometimes it's not the best solution but it is a solution at least until we can actually play god and fix recessive problems.

ITT: two IDs promoting racemixing with gooks.


In another thread: three IDs promoting racemixing with niggers.

Many genetic disorders involve “broken” genes that code for a protein that doesn’t work properly. Since one “normal” copy of the gene can often provide enough of the protein to mask the effects of the disease allele, these disorders often have a recessive inheritance pattern. But not all diseases alleles are recessive.

Keratin proteins link together to form strong fibers that strengthen hair, fingernails, skin, and other tissues throughout the body. There are several genetic disorders involving defects in keratin genes, and most of them have dominant inheritance patterns.

To see how defective keratin genes can lead to a genetic disorder, see Pachyonychia Congenita.

Same thing here in Europe lefties refuse to realize that the reason why so many people all of a sudden vote for right wing parties is because of the most insane immigration polices in history of Europe.

You seem rather butthurt. Maybe you should apply some ice to it.


And…you're right on the cusp on figuring out how you fix inheritance patterns. You just don't want to admit it.

C'mon lad, he said he would kill any mongrel she pops out before killing himself. Nothing wrong with fucking them as long as you don't make a half shitskin niglet

Like I said, you speak pseudoscience babble. Never stop posting, it makes you look like a retard every time.

Yes there is.

This. I used to date a half asian chick. Then i went Holla Forums and fuck eastern euro gals to keep muh dick in my tribe

Let me know how that works out for you. You can sure tell who the kids from the cities and the country, and have spent their life actually breeding animals.

If you're a woman it is

I am convinced you are a woman who is jealous of that nigger for some reason. Perhaps she is more toned than you, or has a bigger ass?

Whatever the case, your anger is really amusing. Keep it up.

Kill yourself, nigger-lover.

Who told the niggers on twitter about this place?

Hi

Post tits or get the fuck out.

What's mine is mine, and what's yours is mine.

-t. Jew

...

Imagine that; a leftist is trying to argue that liberal leftism is now an individualist ethic while conservative traditionalism is a monolithic conformist ideology.

And tribalists are still a disgustingly small minority. Funny how his logic works.

Are you proud of being an animal breeder?

it's happened before, they are useful idiots and useful idiots always get a rude awakening once their benefactors have won

Wouldn't you be? Where else you gonna get those tasty steaks and hamburgers from.

What the fuck happened here?

So, what's the solution then, oh wise farmer? Sterilize all the brothers and sisters of anyone who inherits a genetic disease, just in case they might happen to have invisibly inherited a recessive gene for the disease?

That's certainly some "solution", when white breeding rates are well below replacement as they are. We need more white babies, not less of them.

mgtow is feminism.

Is this not surprising ? They insult whites all they day in media , education , life , etc ( if whites had power and privilege , how would this be possible to begin with ? ) and see non-whites viciously defending their own race and other every race hating their race traitors and such, even having special words for them . It is only natural for whites to wake up and learn from the non-whites that leftists/SJWs wished for and protect their own race and interests no different than non-whites .

The author seems like a useful idiot rather than someone that knows the gameplan. For instance he didn't name and shame the guy in the article and portrayed him in a reasonable light. Author just bought into the diversity is strength meme like an idiot.

Assuming that is true, the point is people are going to stop thinking about the merits of the others argument in the vaccum but also take into account their group interest and may even put them first before making some concession to the other.

...

if only we could isolate multiculturalism in liberal areas

Just build walls around the cities and throw the trash in there or alternatively do that but with most of Eastern Canada.

Get some CCTV's everywhere and we can watch pet minorities turn on their overlords when the gibmedats runs out for very obvious reasons.

Fine television I say.

what a QT

what happened?

nothing wrong with fucking dogs

much better than fucking niggers

No, it is in the group's best interests for everyone individual rights to be protected.

White groups tend to protect such rights, which is why white culture has dominated the world for centuries. Take pride in your culture rather than acting like a fucking communist nigger or spic.

pedowood?

Doesn't really contradict what I said. The same people that fall for the diversity is strength shit obviously dislike "racism", "anti-semitism", "white supremacy". The fact that he protected the guy in the article and didn't seek to strawman him makes him seem more bluepilled/ignorant than malicious to me. Obviously he's an enemy, I just disagree on his knowledge of the plan he's working to further.

They made documentaries about this.

Power corrupts.

Although it's more likely that Hillary has had a black hole where her heart was supposed to be since she was born.

But at that point, the remaining areas and whites would have been killed, not born, or migrated away. If only there were a way to concentrate the brown hordes in the areas that limousine liberals live

A bit of research into AIPAC after seeing them in US elections , I find this

Greatest Ally summed

May 14, 1948– Official Recognition- The United States of America becomes the first country to officially recognize Israel as an independent nation.

1949-1973- US-Israel Aid Commences– The United States gives Israel an average of $122 million per year in foreign aid payments.

Summer 1954– Lavon Affair– Israel recruits Egyptian Jews to blow up American and British targets in Egypt. Israel planned on blaming the murderous false-flag attacks on the Muslim Brotherhood in an effort to garner support from the US and Britain. After officially denying any involvement, the Israeli government finally admitted their role in the incident in 2005 by honoring the surviving agents with a certificate of appreciation.

1955-1970- Israel Steals American Uranium to Build Its First Nuclear Weapons– In 2011, the Institute for Research on Middle Eastern Policy examined hundreds of newly de-classified documents from the FBI and CIA and discovered that Israeli spies in collaboration with American Jews stole hundreds of kilograms of weapons grade uranium from US stockpiles and shipped it to Israel. Although Israel does not officially acknowledge the possession of nuclear weapons, their nuclear arsenal is estimated at between 200-300 nuclear weapons.

1963– AIPAC Formed– The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Americas Pro-Israel is formed, but refuses to comply with US law and register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. AIPAC has been in violation of federal law for nearly 50 years, but through political contributions and connections, AIPAC officials have remained above prosecution for their many violations of Federal law, including espionage (as addressed later).

June 8, 1967– USS Liberty– Israeli jets and torpedo boats attack the American naval ship USS Liberty with the intention of murdering every sailor on board and then blaming the attack on Egypt. Israels goal was to draw America into the Israeli-Arab War. Israel has officially claimed the attack was an accident, but every survivor of the USS Liberty claimed that it could not possibly have been an accident given that Israeli jets flew directly over the ship hours earlier on several occasions and one pilot flew so close that he waved to the US sailors, and the sailors waved back. Given the proximity of the jets and the surrounding facts of the incident, there is no question that Israel knew whose ship it was. Lt. General Marshall Carter, the director of the NSA, told congress the attack, couldnt be anything else but deliberate. A later coverup ensued, and in 2002, Captain Ward JAGC senior counsel for the court of inquiry claimed that the court of inquirys findings were intended to coverup what was a deliberate attack by Israel on a ship it knew to be American.

1975– Oil Guarantee- The Jewish US Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, secretly brokered a deal in which the United States of America guaranteed Israels oil supply in the event of a crisis. The 1975 Israel-United States Memorandum of Understanding (see the full text here) required the United States to maintain an oil reserve for Israel and guarantee the shipping of that oil to Israel in times of emergency. This deal has cost the United States more than a hundred billion dollars since it was first enacted. The most troubling aspect of this deal was not the cost however, but the stipulation that in case of an oil emergency in which both the US and Israel needed oil, the US would give its oil to Israel. Section 3 (b):

If the oil Israel needs to meet all of its normal requirements for domestic consumption is unavailable for purchase in circumstances where quantitative restrictions through embargo or otherwise also prevent the United States from procuring oil to meet its normal requirements, the United States Government will promptly make oil available for purchase by Israel in accordance with the International Energy Agency conservation and allocation formula as applied by the United States Government, in order to meet Israels essential requirements. If Israel is unable to secure the necessary means to transport such oil to Israel, the United States Government will make every effort to help Israel secure the necessary means of transport.

This is oil that would have been used to heat homes during the winter, power ambulances, and provide the fuel for tractors to farm Americas agricultural lands. To put this into perspective, in the event of an oil crisis, the fuel that Americans would need to heat their homes, get them to work, and produce food would go to Israel. This agreement very well could have starved tens of thousands of Americans in order to save Israelis if an oil crisis would have taken place.

Greatest ally II

1978– US Starts Paying Egypt $1.3 Billion Annually In Exchange For Maintaining Good Relations With Israel- John McCain admitted in a CNN interview that US-Egyptian aid was essentially a bribe to maintain good relations with Israel. The aid was pledged during a US-brokered peace negotiation between Egypt and Israel, and began to be distributed just after the signing of the Egypt-Israel peace accord.

1980-1981- Israel Teams Up With Republicans to Defeat Jimmy Carter- During the Iran hostage crisis of 1979-1981, Israel, upset at President Jimmy Carters attempt to create a peaceful two-state solution in Palestine, used its clandestine operations in Iran to prevent American hostages from being released before Carters re-election bid. Carter wrote in his White House Diaries that Israel was purposefully thwarting the peace process with Palestine so it could continue to settle on Palestinian land. History has certainly proven Carter right, and Peter Beinart, the author of The Crisis of Zionism confirms this fact by investigating every major Israeli-Palestinain peace negotiation, and pointing out Israels efforts to subvert them. According to Consortium News, Israel used its operatives in Iran to ensure that US hostages were not released before the election, which doomed Carters chances for re-election. The hostages were released immediately after Reagans inauguration, and Israel was subsequently caught shipping US weapons to Iran after an Israeli chartered plane crashed in the Soviet Union. Israel claimed to have the Reagan administrations approval for the transfer. As the Consortium article points out, recent discoveries make the cooperation between the Israelis and Republicans to remove a US President by using American hostages as political pawns, impossible to ignore.

1980-1990- Israel Steals American Technology and Equipment at Unprecedented Levels- According to the Israeli newspaper Hareetz, It is worth mentioning that in the 1980s, regardless of Jonathan Pollards espionage activities for Israel, Israeli companies and individuals were involved many cases of technological espionage, steeling U.S. secrets, technology and equipment. The most outstanding case involved Milco, a U.S. based company owned by Israeli tycoon Arnon Milchan, which bought and shipped equipment with which could have also been used as triggers for nuclear weapons. Recently released FBI documents revealed that current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was integrally involved in the Milco incident.

1982- Sabra and Shatila Massacres– The Israeli military purposefully allowed a right-wing Lebanese militia to enter two Palestinian refugee camps, which were under Israels control, and rape, murder, and dismember 800 civilians. Nearly all of the dead were women, children, and elderly men. In 1983, an Israeli investigation concluded that then Defense Minister Ariel Sharon bore personal responsibility for failing to prevent the massacre. The New York Times recently uncovered de-classified transcripts of conversations between US officials and Israeli officials, in which Israeli officials misled the Americans about the events in Beirut, and bullied them into accepting outrageous accusations that the Palestinian women and children were terrorists, and therefore deserved to be massacred. According to the New York Times, The Sabra and Shatila massacres severely undercut Americas influence in the Middle East, and its moral authority plummeted. Only a year later, in 1983, the US marine barracks were bombed in Lebanon, in which 241 marines were killed.

1985– Jonathan Pollard Incident– A Jewish American named Jonathan Pollard was caught stealing American secrets and selling them to Israel. At first, Israel denied any involvement in the incident, but later admitted complicity in in 1998. The wife of Pollards handler, Avi Sella, worked for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and Pollard later admitted that a prominent ADL member was deeply involved in the spying. Like AIPAC, the ADL does not register under the Foreign Agent Registration Act as per the law, even though it works closely with the Mossad, and has been caught spying on Americans for Israel. Amazingly, the ADL even had the gumption to shamelessly appeal to President Clinton in 1993 to commute their spys sentence. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also campaigned for Pollards release.

Greatest Ally III

1987– Israel Starts Receiving Regular Payments of More Than $3 Billion Per Year. The real US-Israel aid is estimated to be $15-$20 billion per year when valuable military equipment deemed scrapped, loan guarantees, under the table aid, and preferential contracts are factored in.

1990– First Gulf War. Saddam agreed to withdraw from Kuwait if Israel complied with international law and withdrew from Palestine. Instead of encouraging Israel to abide by international law, the US launched an attack on Iraq, even though Iraq did not threaten Americas oil supply nor pose any danger to US interests. Israel did not send any troops or material support for the invasion.

1993- ADL Spying Scandal– San Francisco newspapers broke the story that the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, which has close ties to Israel, had been paying American police officers for confidential information, illegally wire-tapping phones, and even dumpster diving to acquire private information on American citizens. The Anti-Defamation League later sold the information to the Israeli and South African governments. Among the individuals the ADL spied on were civil rights activists deemed anti-Israel, Congressmen such as Nanci Pelosi, reporters, labor unions, the NAACP, African National Congress, and the Rainbow Coalition. Presumably the ADL was going to use any damning material acquired during their spying efforts to blackmail these politicians and influential people into changing their negative stances on Israel. Just one of their spies, Roy Bullock, had compiled files on more than 9,800 Americans and 950 organizations spanning three decades. After the search of the ADL offices, the San Francisco District Attorney said the ADL was conducting a national spy network.

1993– AIPAC President David Steiner Caught on Tape Bragging About his Organizations Incredible Power in America. Steiner first admitted to manipulating the US Secretary of State into giving Israel more foreign aid. Steiner said he, met with [Secretary of State] Jim Baker and I cut a deal with him. I got, besides the $3 billion, you know theyre looking for the Jewish votes, and Ill tell him whatever he wants to hear Besides the $10 billion in loan guarantees which was a fabulous thing, $3 billion in foreign, in military aid, and I got almost a billion dollars in other goodies that people dont even know about.

In the same conversation, Steiner said he would support any politician who has been good to Israel over his own brother. He also discussed his efforts to get Jewish, and pro-Israel candidates re-elected, even by paying for a rigged poll. Steiner was attempting to raise money for dozens of pro-Israel candidates through his position at AIPAC, even though the organization claims that it doesnt engage in such behavior. In the conversation, Steiner asked a potential Jewish donor to get his children to write checks in order to subvert political donation laws.

Steiner also said, We gave two employees from AIPAC leave of absences to work on the [Clinton] campaign. I mean, we have a dozen people in that campaign, in the headquarters.and theyre all going to get big jobs. We have friends. I also work with a think tank, the Washington Institute. I have Michael Mandelbaum and Martin Indyk being foreign policy advisers. Steve Speigelweve got friendsthis is my business.
I talked to Bill Clinton [and he made a commitment that] hes going to be very good to us. One of my officers, Monte Friedkin, is one of the biggest fund-raisers for them [Clintons]. I mean, I have people like that all over the country.

When asked if he knows who Bill Clinton would put on the Supreme Court if elected, Steiner replied, Were talking now. We dont have no commitments yet. Were just negotiating. Were more interested right now, in the Secretary of State and the Secretary of National Security Agency. Thats more important to us. He also said, we are negotiating who will be Secretary of State.

1993- Israel Caught Selling US Military Secrets to China– Israel sold $2-3 billion worth of sensitive US military technology to China. This was technology that the US had specifically forbidden to be delivered to China in anyway shape or form, as it would undermine Americas national security.

Greatest Ally IV

1996 GAO Spy Report– The Government Accountability Office reported that Israel spies on the US more than any other ally.

2000-2003 Iraq Sanctions- In 2000, AIPAC distributed a letter asking AIPAC members to put pressure on the US Congress and the President to ramp up sanctions on Iraq and block the oil for food program, which was providing Iraqi civilians with much needed food and medicine. In 2003, AIPAC attempted to block a bill that would have allowed US companies to export food and medicine to Iraqi civilians. AIPAC took the position that the food and medicine would not help the Iraqi people, which is obviously untrue, and that the bill would hasten Saddams effort to procure weapons of mass destruction. Saddam was of course not building weapons of mass destruction, and the AIPAC efforts ended up murdering thousands of Iraqi civilians.

September 11, 2001– Five Dancing Israelis– The terrorists who perpetrated the worst attack on America in its history stated on record that their motivation was Americas unabashed support for the apartheid regime of Israel. Five dancing Israelis were actually caught filming the world trade center attacks and dancing in celebration afterwards. When the Israelis were caught in a van that had contained explosives, they said we are all on the same side now against the Palestinians. The dancing Israelis later admitted on an Israeli talk show that they were there to document the event. Before the US government classified all information on Israels involvement in 9-11, the FBI officially concluded that Israel had to have known of the attack before 9-11-2001 and didnt warn the US. After the attacks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, We are benefitting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq. He also said, these events have swung American public opinion in our favor.At best, Israel knew of the attacks before hand and did not warn America because of the strategic support against the Palestinians that it would bring. At worst, Israel had a hand in planning the attacks.
2001- Israeli Spies Deported– More than 60 Israeli spies were arrested and detained. Most of them failed lie-detector tests about their spying activities on the US and their connection to the September 11, 2001 attacks.

2002- Harvard Economist Estimates Total US-Israel Aid At $3 trillion. Dr. Thomas R. Stauffer, a world renowned economist who taught economics and Middle East studies at Harvard, as well as serving twice in the Executive Office of the President on a task force for oil imports and controls, estimated that as of 2002 (in 2002 dollars) Israel has cost the US $3 trillion. His estimate took into account direct military aid, political support, oil price increases as a result of conflicts, and peripheral/hidden foreign aid.

In Stauffers estimation, US aid to Israel costs 275,000 American jobs per year due to unfair trade imbalances and sanctions on Israels enemies. In one example of under the table aid, Stauffer pointed out that the US actually gave Russia and Romania billions of dollars in undeclared aid to facilitate Jews moving to Israel. The US has also spent hundreds of billions in the region to secure friendly relationships with Israel. John McCain admitted in an interview that US aid to Egypt is really just a bribe so the Egyptians will maintain friendly relations with Israel. The US has also given Turkey and Greece billions for the same purpose.


2003– Iraq War– In January 2003, AIPAC executive director Howard Kohr stated, quietly lobbying Congress to approve the use of force in Iraq was one of AIPACs successes over the past year. Jeffrey Goldberg reported during a profile piece of AIPACs policy director Steven J. Rosen that, AIPAC lobbied Congress in favor of the Iraq war.

In addition, the US media, which by this point was almost completely controlled by Jewish American supporters of Israel (see this link for proof), refused to investigate the validity of the governments accusation of Iraqs possession of weapons of mass destruction. The mainstream media then went a step further by criticizing anti-war activists and even called them traitors who were against the troops. Many Americans leaders and reporters came out after the war and criticized the media for its pro-war propaganda, but very few spoke of the Israeli connection for fear of being labeled anti-Semitic.

Even though Israel aggressively lobbied America to attack Iraq, they committed no troops or resources to the struggle.

This is why they act like "America First" is anuddah shoah

I completely forgot about those movies. What a future we're gonna be living in.

it's afraid

Greatest Ally V

2005– AIPAC Spying Scandal– A pentagon analyst pleads guilty to passing military secrets to two AIPAC employees en route to Israel. After some political wrangling, all charges were dropped against the two Jewish AIPAC employees in 2009, even though the analyst agreed to testify against the AIPAC employees, and the government had overwhelming evidence to prosecute. It was later reported by Time magazine that Jane Harman, a Jewish congresswoman, was bribed by AIPAC to lobby the Department of Justice to drop the spying charges against the AIPAC employees. In 2009, CQ politics reported that Harman was caught on a NSA wiretap telling an Israeli agent that she would lobby the Department of Justice to drop the case.

2008-2009- Israel Fires White Phosphorous Shells Into Civilian Locations, Including a Crowded Refugee Camp. At first, the Israeli army categorically denied the use of white phosphorous gas on civilians (a war crime), but then later admitted it when video footage made it impossible to deny. These weapons were made in the USA. The entire planet criticized the barbaric and internationally illegal war crimes, but President Bush and the United States supported the Israeli atrocities, which hurt Americas standing in the world.

2010- Israel is Caught Stealing Americas Nuclear Triggers– The United States Bureau of Industry and Security released a report concluding that nuclear triggers were illegally exported to Israel.

2010– Israel Bribes US News Outlets for Biased Stories– Newly declassified files prove that Israel has actually been covertly paying American media outlets tens of millions of dollars to publish pro-Israel stories. Among other things, the documents revealed that Israel paid the Atlantic magazine $50,000 to disrupt a US peace proposal that would have allowed Palestinian refugees to return to their homes in Israel. These documents came from a Senate hearing, which ended up being censored by American politicians who received significant campaign financing from non-gentile sources. The bribed senators even went as far as sealing the most damning documents from the investigation.

January 13, 2012- Atlanta Jewish Times Owner Claims the Mossad is Considering Assassinating President Obama- Andrew Adler, the owner of the Atlanta Jewish Times, writes an article stating that Israel has three options in order to defend itself. 1. Attack Hezbollah and Hamas 2. Defy the US and attack Iran 3. give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies. He went on to say, Yes you read three correctly. Order a hit on a US President in order to preserve Israels existence. He claimed to know for sure that this option was already being discussed in Israels most inner circles, and given his high powered Israeli friends, you can bet that he is correct.

April 18, 2012- Total Cost of Americas Relationship with Israel, Adjusted for Inflation and Including the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, to be in Excess of $5 trillion, or $16k per American.

July 28, 2012– CIA Reports that Israel is the Largest Spy Threat in the Middle East. The report details numerous incidents of Israeli spies breaking into American diplomats homes and offices to steal sensitive material (link already posted, see my first post ITT)

There is obviously so much more but it is is pathetic and what a worthless "ally" and traitor to US israel is . They are so cowardly their populace protested about having to fight their own wars but the very same populace basically said they literally had no problem if dumb goyim Americans die for them . I suppose that makes General George S. Patton when he refer to jews as "yellow bellied" .

naw, she was insane before she was powerful

This is nonsense.
Inbreeding increases the chances of expression for deleterious recessive traits that might be inherited from parents.
But recessive traits are not inherently deleterious much like dominant traits are not inherently advantageous. Many diseases are caused by dominant alleles.
The reason why diseases caused by recessive alleles are harder to eliminate through natural selection is because a heterozygous individual can be a carrier but not be affected, whereas it only takes one copy of the dominant allele for it to manifest, severely reducing that individual's overall fitness and making it harder for that dominant allele that causes the disease to pass itself on.

Satanic parents happened. Bill also. That's why he's a pedo.

That won't happen, these people will enjoy security from tax payer money.

Don't, for even one second, think that a Leftist will ever endure his own nightmare.

Ban this obvious shill faggot.

Well, basically it IS feminism but for men.

Like sickle cell anemia for niggers.

Well that's not feminism then now is it?

And no, even if we look at it as a male counterpart it's not even remotely close to that 'civil rights' activist movement that has invaded every aspect of our society and codified their demands into law.

So no, it's not even 'basically' feminism, you fucking cancerous malignant tumor of a shill.

Bill Clinton.

Hillary was once a barry goldwater supporter.

You know why they're afraid? Because everyone knows, except white people, that we're the ONLY ONES WHO BOUGHT INTO DIVERSITY AND MULTICULTURALISM. White people, selflessly, sacrificed personally and as a group to try and make this work. Meanwhile, nobody else bothered with making anything but a half-assed attempt other than parroting the idiotic rhetoric white people were using to convince themselves that it was a smart thing to do. They're afraid that if white people wake up, and rightfully so, that we'll fight back and win and the consequences of the past 60 years will be seen in full. More then anything they fear the free lunch is over.

Diversity was a failure.
Multiculturalism was a failure.
Liberalism was a failure.
White individualism has been a failure.

Get people to recognize and accept those 4 things and you are screwed.

akjewally the smart ones know this and that's why they are doing what they are doing.


I really liked this speech. Donovan is a sick fucking degenerate, though, and should have a pike shoved up his ass or maybe not he might like that


i would like you to consider the option of not underestimating your enemy

Leftists also know that when the wrath of whites does get unleashed, it will be unleashed upon them. As it should.

Only a few of them will be granted this kind of mercy, the vast majority of the others are just useful idiots.

Yes, be a man and beat some sense into them.

This author:

Holy shit, even if lite Fascism is only temporary in America, anything is better than the half century of left-wing dictatorship we've had since Kennedy got assassinated.

okay, whatever you say smart guy. Let's talk again once you've read some books.

And then the government throws you in jail after fining your ass.

When you fight women you fight the government. How fucking difficult could this possibly be to understand?

Well, admittedly Jews WILL be spared, but not all of the wealthy are Jews, the wealthy goyim will have their wealth confiscated for "workers' solidarity" at best and they will all be sent to gulags at worst. The former happened to my own family.

It's the same strain of cancerous equality that only serves to create a divide between men and women, rather than the harmonious relationships we've had for decades.

This is nice rhetoric, but completely historically false. White people's tendency toward Universalism and (some form of) individualism aside, its not like modern white countries are the first countries in history to accept race mixing or other cultures within our borders. This is what empires always do to their native populations. The elites lose their ties with the average citizens and come to see themselves as a different, and cosmopolitan, class of their own, while everyone else is forced to accept their whims and is tied to the soil on which they were born. This is nothing new, tbh fam.


Oh yeah, sure. I agree. I'm just saying the SJWs – those loyal to "the cause" esp the jewish ones – will be given jobs and nice estates. Only the white european "reactionaries" will be sent to gulags.

Most of the SJWs will be shot when they realize that their "social justice paradise" is nothing like they thought it will be and the "people's social democratic Jew" takes off all of his masks and stops hiding his true form of the bloodsheding Jew. The same happened in the Soviet Union, that's why they are called useful idiots. Only the goyim who are actual true believers and their kosher ringleaders of socialist revolutions will have cushy bureaucrat jobs and will get estates for "solidarity".

i looked this up because i remembered hearing the soviet union was the first to recognize israel but they were actually the first to recognize israel de jure while the US was the first to recognize officially, as you have posted. not that it makes a difference.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_Israel

ShockedYid.jaypeg

MGTOW isn't about equality, it's a symptom of feminism. It is men opting out and it was something to be expected the moment women did away with their feminine qualities.

You can stop spouting bullshit and crying about MGTOW now.

i will always look out for my white brothers and sisters.

i will have 6+ children someday.

all foreigners will be removed, all kikes will be removed, all traitors shall hang.

no kikes will dispossess us on my watch.

Those whites, aka traitors, will get the worst treatment over anyone else. They know this, and they fear the reaping as rightfully they should. Why we don't execute cowards and traitors IRL anymore is beyond my understanding.


I'm not familiar with many non-white empires that failed by these means compared to the historic plethora of white ones that have. It isn't anything new that's for sure, but we continue to make the same stupid mistake time and time again even when we were far more brutal as a people. Some blame Christianity, others blame economics, but over all something is deeply wrong with our psyche that needs to be biologically forced at this point to act differently for centuries or a millennia to get this idea out of our heads. This is probably the worst instance in history because there is nowhere to retreat to anywhere in the world. Previous times we had went out conquering lands from isolated homogeneous areas and basically "colonies" were the ones that failed.

There is a little bit of uniqueness about what's going on today regardless of who was involved in instigating it. WW2 really was a complete psychological turning point for us.

THE BLACKEST SUN CONQUERS THE SKIES,
HATRED GROWS AS WEAKNESS DIES,
WE CRAVE REBIRTH AND THE SEMITES' DEMISE,
BY OUR WRATHFUL HANDS, THE FIRE SHALL RISE!

The poem of the blackest sun is just a poem, it's a promise.
Each verse in the poem has a meaning.

It's the growth of white consciousness, many of our race will awaken.

This is about righteous hatred, the hatred for those destroying everything we love.
A hatred for injustice and all things anti-white will grow.
The weakness is the weakness of our race, pathological altruism.
The weakness that created the self hating white cucks will die as the hatred for those who want to destroy us grows.

We will have a desire to restore our civilization and our race will be reborn stronger, we will also be collectively against the Jews with desire to wipe them out.

This is self explanatory.

Can't be. Men brain is differently wired. There is no possible equivalent because of biological differences.

If you believe in such "equality", then you still have a lot of bluepill pozz loads inside your head.

You left out

1963 - President Kennedy is assassinated by Mossad with help from the CIA and the Meyer Lansky international Jewish crime syndicate for opposing Israel nuclear weapon development.

That sounds like some dethklok

Smashing Killing Devouring All
No One Is Saved The Chosen Fall
Run With The Hordes Trample The Weak
Crush The Skulls Of Those that Can't Speak
Sweating Bleeding Your Eyes Go Wide
The Earth Is Ending It's About to Collide
The Clouds Part The World Goes Black
The Comet Speeds Forth For It's Final Attack

You have no idea how glad i am there's still people like you around.

not really

No one ever used that term. That's a myth. listening to someone (yuri) who predicted the US would fall around 1990 – seriously, how stupid are you?

Yeah, okay sure. I mean, if the SJWs freak out and suddenly become "reactionaries" then I agree, but most won't. Most won't know about the killings, and if they do they'll definitely be told by the inner party that it was actually a "riot" or a "military battle" or something of this nature.

You should read more of the Communist literature. Their whole MO is to infiltrate every profession – set up a government "beside" the government – and then off the "naive liberals" when they time is right and take those posts for themselves. It's kinda like our DOTR, but instead of offing niggers they're offing government officials (and psychologists, etc anything seen as holding 'power') who were against the conspiracy or were too stupid to realize what was going on.

people need to cut it out with this "against equality" bullshit. its pleb intellectualism at its worst; you're being led astray. The Right is about thymos, not hierarchy, per se


You should have just stopped there. We aren't taught about it bc it isn't European (Whig) history. The Persian Empire was well-known for being mutliethnic, and its well-known that's why their military was shit. The Babylonians were overthrown when their mutli-ethnic capital was successfully sacked because (((one of the ethnic groups))) who lived there opened the doors to the city.

what is lolbergtardianism

I like this idea.

cancerous equality part was for

The right should focus on thymos, not hierarchy. That's just sticking your fingers in your ears starting in like 1650 and saying "lalalala all of Enlightenment Thought never happened lalalalalala"

It is probably the oldest top-down problem on earth.

The powerful get drunk on said power and do everything they can to entrench themselves behind a bureaucracy.

How do senators with 8% approval ratings get elected again and again until they die? How many supreme courts did we make it though before they declared themselves appointed for life again? Four?

They convince themselves that the common man cannot be trusted to govern himself at the same time they poison the well of whatever society they infest.

They inevitably become a separate class from the people they supposedly govern and eventually disconnect from reality itself (pics related).

This leads to the end of the government every time; often by force.

After that…welp. Maybe we will get lucky this time. Emperor Trump seems like a nice guy who raised nice kids.

It is kind of funny to think that the social experiments, corporate raiding, and political cronyism of boomers could be what kills the union.

If you know what I mean.

Not only do you respond to bait, you respond with

Dude. You know you're fucking better than this.

mgtow plz leave

Jews aside, I really can't understand how this self-destructive philosophy has taken hold over so many young whites.

No, there is no equality. To believe so and act accordingly is to go against nature itself.

Fuck off SJW faggot.

Incessant and relentless indoctrination that targets and exploits the pahtological altruism of whites.

So you don't believe in the Rule of Law?

This is what I tell folk all the time when anyone says anything nice about communism. I tell them that all their heroes of the revolution are subjected to Show Trials in which they are "proven" guilty and then executed by firing squad.

I then tell them that this is insurance against counter-revolution by removing possible ringleaders with combat experience from the population, and weeding out any party leaders with actual morals that might oppose their plans.


Exactly.

and you as well, we need to look out for each other and build our tribes.

Rule of Law will not fix biological inequality, to manipulate it to suit your impossible ideology is indeed to go against nature. Where fairness is concerned it's also not even fair.

I was in San Fran last year and I must have seen 100+ WMAF couples

Is that the local norm?
Or is it that Asian women are the only ones that work in tech?

The worst part about being half Asian is knowing your dad was a beta

WE are their nightmares and pretty soon they will have to endure our retribution.

Rule of Law is a form of equality, you fucknut

Now, this is a strawman, and this is exactly what I'm talking about. All I'm saying is that screaming "muh hierarchy fuck equality" is fucking ignorant as fuck. I'm not taking a position, I'm critiquing your position.

Fairness is also a form of equality, retard.

Maybe you could explain what you mean a little better? See below.

Let me expand on that

To anyone with a triple-digit IQ, this leads to the following general assumptions about your viewpoint


So you don't believe in:
**The Rule of Law
**Autonomy/Self-direction/Self-actualization
**Equal Opportunity (eg. children should have the best education possible, or for their talent level)
**The State should treat everyone as abstract citizens
**Meritocracy
**Free Inquiry
**Freedom of Speech/Opinion
**Freedom of Religion
**Freedom of Association
**Negative Rights/Liberties (freedom to be left alone)

You do believe in:
**hierarchy for hierarchy's sake
**a caste system (hierarchy by birth)
**that a select group should wield all knowledge above everyone else for their own benefit (Papism, etc)
**Thrasymachian Ethics (Might Makes Right)
**Arbitrary Rule by powerful elites (Thrasymachian Government)
**Power (/might/violence) trumps Reason and should be the basis for all decision-making
**No limits to government other than the will of those in power

??????

I don't see how this belief system is tenable. And, don't start screaming strawman at me. If you're throwing away the Enlightenment in order to return to a previous state, then you are basically promoting the above. You're probably just too stupid to realize it, which is my whole point

Also Meritocracy cannot exist in your Leftist egalitarian utopia.

It seems more you're at conflict with yourself than with me.

I cannot believe white people are actually concerned about issues about white people again much like how all other races care about issues concerning their own race. Truly disgusting. Fucking white people always being white and shit.

I cannot believe white people are actually concerned about issues concerning and about white people again much like how all other races care about issues concerning their own race. Truly disgusting fucking white people always being white and shit. Remember after white men that white women are next until the world will finally be a progressive utopia free of white people.

kill whitey

The Soviet Union was also the first country to criminalise anti-Semitism.


I hope the current period that we are living in will be informally referred to as the second Weimar Republic in the future.

Also i don't like that you put up the false dichotomy that Rule of Law cannot exist without 'equality'.

Look at Sharia, it is Rule of Law, it is even socialist, but it does not force ridiculous 'gender equality'.

Equality is not a requirement for law nor does it even guarantee fairness. One only needs to look at failed Communist states to see that it leads only to more unfairness.

What a coinkydink it is then that the Soviets were also the ones to discover 'ze gas chambers'.

Oops, wrong image.

Spic here that has been here since my family helped texas defend the alamo, the brown people that are already here and adopt a 50s American mentality can't stand the wetbacks and cholos that are shitting it up for the rest of us.

Should a RWDS ever happen, I will happily cover my body from head to toe and assist them.

Then take a position, faggot

NOT. AN. ARGUMENT.
molyfag.jpg

I'm not a Leftist, and you're making a good show of being a case-in-point of what I'm talking about. All you know how to do is scream "LEFTIST – EQUALITY IS STUPID" but don't understand how to actually formulate an opinion and deal with the last 300 years of Western thought. This is not dissimilar to the SJWs you hate who simply scream "racist/sexist/etc" and are unable to think independently either.

Now, please take a position and stop fighting strawmen. I did not say "this is what you believe" (and therefore did not create a strawman) – what i said is simply saying muh equality is stupid is not a position, and leads anyone who has any intelligence at all to make those assumptions.

If those assumptions are wrong, then you need to explain your position. Again, all you've done so far is say that equality is stupid (while not understanding what that word really means) and call me a Leftist.

I'm waiting….

I read activists as "arguists" maybe we should call the lefties that since all they do is argue

You sound like a butthurt Korean.

You refuted nothing.

As for the rest of your post, see:

You didn't even address the idiocy of thinking a Meritocracy can exist in an egalitarian utopia. Come on man.

Equality does not exist. Rather than wanting to level everyone how about governing them with fairness instead?

That's not what I said. I said Rule of Law is a form of equality – equality before the Law

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law

The rest of this post is absolutely stupid shit based upon the false premises above, so I won't get into it.


This could be a real learning experience for you if you'd just calm down and actually listen, as well as argue

see

Stop obfuscating. And quit saying that I'm advocating an "egalitarian utopia" – not only is this completely wrong, but it is abstract rhetorical faggotry at its worst. Take a position and quit trying to claim I'm an SJW and argue against that with rhetorical garbage

She got molested and turned into a lesbian

I've heard this "pathological altruism" argument numerous times before, and I don't buy it. If any other race, including Jews, were targeted from birth with propaganda telling them they're oppressors and carry the original sin of privilege, they'd probably turn out the same way.

This type of mass-media propaganda that began with television is historically unprecedented, and whites are the unfortunate targets.

Still waiting on answers, including the one why you put up a false dichotomy. I get nothing but spiteful remarks. This is going nowhere fast.

...

Read/listen to professor KevMac then.

Ahaha, Baneposting evolves.

Because this article wasn't written for you or me or anyone who understands the current immigration issues

Note leftist news outlets didn't decry the tribalism exemplified by Mexicans protesting Trump. They were literally waiving the Mexican flag saying this is our country now.

This article was written to anger leftists and left leaning moderates who have been largely inactive this election cycle. SO that they will get out and vote in the election for Hillary instead of staying at home and letting trump win

Technically every religion race was targeted. Whites get browbeaten for their "crimes", blacks get called kings since birth thanks to kike propaganda until it blows up into #noglivesmatter, nonreligious browns get a healthy dose of DIVERSITY while the religious side gets riled up due to how corrupt the west is, and you have a perfect storm of subversion to the point everyone is at each other's throat while the yids hide behind their wall in israel. Whites have gotten the shit end of the deal from this entire thing, but every race is being played like a damn fiddle. Why do you think the internet has been such a wild hair in israel's ass?

You link me to a Wikipedia article that confirms exactly what i said, it does not disprove that Sharia is also Rule of Law.

Fuck it, i'm done. Can't say i didn't try.

One final word though; i study labor law and even in my studies i see the absurdities of 'equality' codified into law.

Like i said earlier; you're more in conflict with yourself than you are with me.

He's correct. They aren't zero sum, they're all negatives.

(checked)

Oh gee, how could this be possible? Don't these shitlords want to be flooded with different and incompatible cultures that all segregate into their own small communities?

B-but they bring their food!

Underratted post.

Look at all the other races… they are tribal and "Racist" as fuck. They also receive a social pass to be this way while whites do not.

If whites turn around and match their tribalism then it is game over. Consider that…

Regardless of (((who))) is at the top. Whites make up a large enough portion of power to honestly change things around culturally.

The sad truth is WHITES are the only ones who subsribed to multiculturalism. We police ourselves and let those outside of the race run a muck.

How do you study law and misunderstand what the rule of law is as badly as you do? If you're against equality in the abstract form you object to, you're against equality before the law. The other user is pointing out that there are various forms of equality, and that equality just comes down to acknowledging that two things are the same in some respect. All humans are equal in being human, for example, even if there is a lot of biodiversity among humans. All citizens are equal before the law in a state where the rule of law is properly implemented, even if they are biologically different–the point is to create a level playing field for unequal people to compete on.

Rule of Law is anti-monarchist and puts governors under the same law as the governed. that's a form of equality retard. Sharia Law is monarchist. Rule of Law =! Having Laws

Now, let's get back to the point at hand. Do you or do you not understand that there are many different forms of "equality" and that simply screaming "fuck equality" is not very fruitful unless you are arguing against SJWs?

You keep throwing around that word, but you don't seem to understand what it means.

Please explain what you mean by "equality" – perhaps you don't understand, due to my verbosity, and the fact that you clearly lack a proper education and/or critical thinking skills that this is the point I've been poking at this whole time.

Equality is a good thing, however, equality is a privilege, not a right. Jews should not be equal to us. Cannon fodder idiots should not be equal to the smart individual, if an autist, a downer, any mentally disabled person is born into nature how it was intended, he would never survive, why? Because he's inferior. Keeping them alive and giving them equal chances is bullshit against the law of nature. Hierarchy should not be according to money, but according to responsibility. The man with the most responsibility (the Fuhrer) is the highest class possible, and receives priority over everyone else. When you break said responsibility, depending on severity, you are either demoted or executed. Children of those people who do not receive the benefit of citizenship shouldn't have education paid for by the state, paying to educate your enemy is bullshit. As Stalin once said:

"Ideas are more powerful than guns, we would not let our enemies have guns, then why let them have ideas?"

We have a unified enemy, and not using every chance to put him at a disadvantage is just being cucked tbhfam.

Fellow anons, is this user a commie?

just arrived in thread

Did you write this?

rhetoric. disgarded

So then you're saying that Might Makes Right? (Thrasymachian Ethics and/or Government)

But if they're retarded, then they won't succeed. Why shouldn't they be given the chance to have an education, and make flunking out proof that they're inferior?

Begging the question. This is a tautological assertion: Who should be in positions of power? Those with the most responsibility. Who has the most responsibility? Those who are in power.

Now, clearly, you have some points, and are pushing toward a logical goal no doubt, but I don't think you've fully and efficaciously articulated your opinion.

This.

Equality in a republic is a good thing. We have to hold everyone accountable for their actions EQUALLY.

This comes into play with economic class. A poor man and a rich man should both be held equally accountable for the same crimes.

Since all the rules are laid out this system also allows the best citizens to pool to the top.

Now I am talking about equality in terms of law. The equality the left subscribes to is "social equality" which actually dismantles equality of law by giving 1 group of people special privilege over another. This is bullshit and needs to stop.


You are talking about social equality, which is different from equality in law.

If the autist commits murder he should be punished the same as any other citizen.

If the autist applies for a job, social equality tells he we should give him a job JUST because he has a harder time getting one. Or whatever the SJW argument is.

Equality under the law and social equality are not the same thing. One makes sense and the other allows jews to fuck us.

Reality?

It's cool to vote for that shit until Muhammad and his sleeper cell buddies move into your neighborhood, or the "teen" community center opens up next door to your business.

No. And, I haven't yet taken a position on anything except to say that this other asshole keeps throwing around the word "equality" without understanding its historical development as a term and/or the multiplicity of its meanings.

The only position I've taken, I suppose, is tacitly accepting some Enlightenment principles (but only for the sake of argument). If that makes me a commie, then I'm guilty and you're stupid.

checked.

Notice that almost every post that user made was basically a shitpost and displayed a remarkable ignorance of both history and philosophy, not to mention critical thinking skills and mental agility.

they already had the chance, we shouldn't linger on "might"

Those who should be in positions of power will make their way to power, just like Hitler made it to becoming the Fuhrer. The competent will always find a way.


The autist should not be allowed to live in the first place.

But agreed, in a cleansed society, all citizens of the state should be treated equally by law

when? I don't understand what you mean.

This is either tautological or horribly naive. Lenin also made it into power, as well as Pol Pot and Kim Jong Il. Likewise, Caligula.

Basically, you're saying might makes right. Just admit it and quit pussyfooting around.

Anyone got any digits they could spare?

You could see it if you US balkanises. Think about if the south were able to secede then immediately after abolish welfare. There would be a flood of non whites to New England.

You could also just deport the SJWs to Africa. In fact take party registrations and just round every registered Democrat up and deport them to Africa.

B-b-but muh homosex!!!!

dr. pierce gave a great talk about the danger of individualism, i think it was his show called 'poisonous doctrines' look it up

Autists today are allowed to live. The results aren't positive.

This is why there are core values that a movement should have, communists, for example, would be declared terrorists and enemies of the state. So would be liberals, etc.

Basically, all political parties would be just variations on NatSoc.

Notice how you refuted nothing and still believe in equality and Meritocracy. Now you're appealing to your Lefty friends in an attempt to…what exactly? Look more credible? Oh wait i forgot, that's how you Leftists argue. You only want to score points with the audience, forget the fucking topic.


Here's how i can tell you're a teenage 'philosopher', because if you actually went over Western law (or what's left of it) you wouldn't be defending it so badly as you do. Especially labor law has been mangled to death in the name of this 'equality'.


And you think equality before the law is a good thing then? You honestly think every and all chucklefuck that walks in deserves the same laws as the people that made them for themselves? Do you think women and men should be equal before the law? Do you think smart people and fucktards should be equal before the law? Do you think hard workers and lazy shits should be equal before the law? Are you honestly going as far as to defend the devaluation of the valuable for the sake of the unvaluable?

Just say it Leftyfag, you're an egalitarian.

And this is where your Leftism and naivety is showing; no, not all humans are equal in being human. At all.

...

"I fuck men like women"
degenerate less of a gas chamber worthy faggot than per say milo, but still gas chamber worthy

Thanks for the read

reported

by definition, every objectively measurable thing in life is a zero-sum game.

?

"I smoke cocks" Jack Donovan

Get the fuck out you literal faggot

reported

???? ?? ???????? ??
??? ??? ???? ???? ?

????????????

reported

reported

OH NO
DUBS ON MY REPORT
I'M DOOMED!

reported for those amazing digits sir

is that photo real?

It's as real as this report I'm about to send.

obviously fake honestly

that's not what I'm saying. what I'm saying is, why not make them fail upon their own merits?
also

okay, but you haven't defined those values despite my prodding, and variations of NatSoc is a step forward, but not really compelling


stawman; ad hominem

Notice how you have yet to make an argument, you retarded faggot!

case-in-point. All you do is insult the other user without taking into account the arguments. You are literally a piece of shit. This is 8/pol/ – you're supposed to be using logos not pathos (or, in Vox's terminology, dialectic not rhetoric)

Until you do that – actually have a logical argument rather than rhetorical one – I have nothing to say to you. And, you've lost in the eyes of any sane person ITT.

You've never dealt with anyone with autism, have you? You certainly seem very ignorant about the matter.


steps to find values:
1- read Mein Kampf
2- turn Mein Kampf into main ideas
3- ?!?!?!?
4- Profit.

Any NatSoc knows the values, I won't bother listing them here.

This.

(checked)
Kill all leftists.

This is significant because it means that even good goys are seeing the practical results of a Trump presidency and are choosing to vote in their ethnic interests.

The Democrats that voted for Reagan did so for a variety of cultural issues.

Trump is confirmed to be bringing over Democrats due to economic issues. Pundits are even qualifying Trump's position as "economic nationalism" because he's not really pushing the racial angle. But this means that white guys (yes even those that live in San Francisco and have the yellow fever) are concerned about ethnic tensions and the future of the US and they see Trump as the best chance to fight back.

C'mon. I'm sure you can see the difference. Anyway, I don't think anyone in modern society argues that, at the extremes, certain measures must be taken. Even today, total retards are not allowed to handle their own money etc etc. Its the reasons or justifications that matter. If you're going to advocate for something, something very different than what we have today, then you need to make arguments - you need to have justifications. All you've said so far is "hurr durr gas the retards NatSoc war now" that's not very compelling tbh fam

I don't actually really disagree with anything you're saying. I'm objecting to the fact that you're being an illiterate faggot and making bad arguments. Also, you've shifted the goalposts away from whether "muh equality is stupid" is a good or bad argument… which is fine, but that's all I was arguing from the very beginning.

MGTOW is anti-white.

Literally "don't breed goyim"

The core of this simpleton's confusion.

This IS a zero-sum scenario, ''because SJWs and others make it so, were it not inherently so (itself a dubious prospect).

Until these mongrels realize that, they will remain perplexed.

Yeah, we can't have them realizing and resisting their destruction. I mean, it's 2016 for fucks sake.

Spot the autist.

...

Holla Forums will agree with almost every facet of MGTOW, if you mention the ideas, but not the name.

Not fast enough to stop it. This is exactly what happened in the Soviet Union, as well as every other place that impliments Communism.

It gets pushed by wealthy urbanites who are highly educated idiots, they start the revolution, and they are inevitably it's first victims. Only Jews escape this, due to in-group preference sparing one another. They take vindictive pleasure in jointly executing everyone else, however. Just ask the sixty million dead Russian Christians.

Wherever they are, kikes gonna kike.

That's because MGTOW's conclusion is wrong. Most of what they claim is true is correct.

That's a reason to take away women's rights to vote, work, and hold authority over men, and rework the laws so they are put back in their place as homemakers and educators of their own children. Not to abandon women entirely.

True gynoids won't be viable for at another hundred years. Unless we have massive gains in the fields of life extending medicines, it will be beyond all of us to see one even in our oldest age. It will certainly be beyond us to raise a family with one.

Women may very well end up being ultimately replaced, but it won't happen in your lifetime, so you need to man up and play with the hand you've been dealt. MGTOW are manchildren who can't deal with that, who revel in simply being debauched bachleors, and refuse to help their nation, their culture, or their people. PUAs are traitors who diddle while Rome burns.

Hee hee.

The first supreme court decided that, the 4th justice specifically.

They agree with the MGTOW diagnosis of society's symptoms - just not the root causes, or the cure.

How could they not seeing this coming? Really now… of course races will vote in their interest and whites are different? Bollocks.

You have to wonder. Are these people serious when they say they don't understand why this is happening? Or they DO know why and understand it but are lying to themselves and us as a way to not incur a blame on themselves for not even warning everyone that something like this was going to happen?

the commies always kill off those who brought them to power

because those people are the last threat to them for total domination

It is zero sum, and I proactively spread White ethnic identity and promote shunting all things non White, especially jew. Blend in like everyone else making regular money at whatever level but do everything possible to live as independently as you can, cut taxes, grow own food, buy used, vet owners of companies to find the few that are White, aren't jew, make own shit, build up White businesses that directly compete with jews, etc., reduce wealth in jew currency holdings, transact outside of jew currencies, get fit to avoid jew health racket, do medical tourism, have as many White children as possible.

jew lie.

Are you retarded? Or do you just have no idea how genetics work?

No, no, those are ALL zero sum in nature.

Hell is forever!

Neat. Rape and pillage when? Someone fetch me a Carolingian sword and a nasal helmet.

But at least we are learning from the migrants, am I right? This is truly the multiculti utopia free of hate the left has so dreamed.

That pic is worth many sensible chuckles!

This. Tribalism alone is perhaps suited for niggers in the African savannah that only wish to continue existing, but not for white people living within civilization, who have recognized the importance of individual rights in expanding, innovating and gaining power. And that embrace of the individual is what has separated white civilizations from everyone else.

This applies to many aspects of life, such as art. Nonwhite communities typically see art as a mere device to keep the tribe together, but white societies have also valued art for art's sake and made a science out of art, the most specific and detailed example of which being functional harmony.

If you're concerned only with genetic and phenotypic similarity, you wouldn't be any different from any old nigger rolling in the mud with his fellow niggers, you have to value the unique virtues that have made whites superior as well.

...

thefederalist.com/2016/05/23/how-anti-white-rhetoric-is-fueling-white-nationalism/

Equality before the Law doesn't require your radical egalitarianism at all. Treating Unequal things Equally is in fact unjust and not an example of Equality before the Law at all and is nothing but an example of radical egalitarianism having corrupted the legal and political culture of our society. The logical endpoint of your beliefs is that courts cannot come to any conclusion regarding guilt or innocence as naturally making these kinds of adjudications is separating citizens into different categories to be treated formally by the state as unequal entities.

This concept of Equality under the Law is called Isonomia in ancient Greece and it is what the Athenians called their own system of government (called Democracy as an insult by Plato). The Athenian citizens were a tiny fraction of the total population of Athens automatically creating a multi-tiered system of citizens, free residents, foreigners and slaves. The actual specific political rights of equality were individual and not holistic or universal. Isegoria was the equal right to address political assemblies by citizens for example. A common penalty for citizens judged by court was Atmia. A rescinding of specific rights of citizenship so that one may perhaps be allowed to have his vote, but no longer have the right to address the assembly. This entire system, the original formulation of the concept, is obviously an expression of "inequality" that is opposed to what we consider to be the epitome of the same exact term.

So the concept of Equality under the Law in western civilization starting in Classical Antiquity is a far cry from what you and 'we' call Equality under the Law today. The very philosophical basis for it does not come from any civilizational impulse which is entirely about assorting, and specialization, and maximizing the potential of even the most marginal members of society by giving them a specific niche to operate in that would be precluded in more primitive, communitarian tribes.

Furthermore, we Anglophones had up until the 16th century a perfectly functional Common Law. "Equity Law" was put in place patchwork style by early converts to Liberalism and they justified it based on Enlightenment era fascination with Classical Antiquity. Except that the ancient Hellenes were not Liberals and did not believe in egalitarianism and their impulse was always one for civilization. "Equity Law" and Liberalism itself is the opposite impulse for communitarian tribalism but one which isn't even for a tribe but can instead be imposed upon all people as they are blank slates.


Right on.

The goal of a traditionalist society would be to remove politics altogether, so no political parties. Most people aren't interested in politics, which are foisted upon them. They desire an Epicurean existence wherein they can live with family and seek their own enterprise without concern for politicking. They want freedom in the real sense, not in a political abstract wherein freedom is defined as the ability to politic itself.

Freedom and Political Rights are diametrically opposed concepts, as the notion of Citizenship requires one to be a part of the government against their will and desire. The Liberal notion is that engagement in the political process not only makes them "frree" but also uplifts them so that each individual becomes a highly educated statesmen over time, who is necessarily virtuous as all people will want to refine themselves to better make use of their political power having been "freed" from the "oppression" of an idyllic apolitical life. The concept given hindsight is transparently fallacious.

The desirable end point of National Socialist government is ending of these liberal notions and return to a traditional (and Hellenic) concept of life. What Heidegger called 'the tragic view' which he said was unique to NS in his contemporary time and why he was attracted to them. Life is really about living it and not about political squabbling which only takes away from life and is a downward spiral for society.

How can they, with straight face, say white people are racist for decades and then act surprised when white people become racist?

If you don't become like a nigger by racemixing, you are no better then a nigger.

huhm, there is something wrong with this logic.

therightstuff.biz/2016/05/12/the-racial-tithe/

Non-whites are an aggregate fiscal and economic loss to the USA.

One could say Whites were victims of… stereotype threat, even.

:^)

how close is the half-asian to a slav?
I mean, you might be attracted to the half-mongoloid features…

So, collectivism/tribalism or individualism?

A blend of both?

(tribed)

Kek. I love it. They are starting to see the gravity of the situation. But they still don't see it all. Whites are starting to realize that the only sane choice is to stick to and support their ingroup. Yes.. He has that right. What he doesn't address is that there is absolutely no other race as good as whites at forming extreme strong tribes/clans/war parties. We are witnessing a polar shift in white society. We are really, really good at being apathetic to the point of seeming suicide… But we are also the best at defending what is ours. Once the white man feels the cold stone of the corner touch his back not only do all of his enemies fall but the world enters a new historical age.

Apathy is derived from our sense of superiority we've crushed everyone for 3000 years. The turks lost 80,000 of their 150,000 men when taking a degraded Constantinople with only 8,000 defenders. Most seiges in history resulted in few loses for the attacker who could chose to slowly weaken the fortress and preserve his strength for a total victory. The Turks threw men at the walls as if their bodies would shatter the stone. When they besieged Vienna nobody was paying attention then suddenly armies of mercenaries arrived and crushed the Turks with hardly any loses. Spainards would kill thousands of Moors with their pike formations and not lose a single man. In the first crusade a charge of 400 knights slaughtered 4,000 men and scattered an army of 10,000.

Non-whites are so inferior that even as they storm the gates whites refuse to see them as a credible threat. For all their "anti-racism" the libtards are the same they think their pathetic political ideology can defeat the shitskins.

Didn't this happened to white Papuans when Papua New Guinea become independent from Australia?

Astute. That is what it boils down to and it is readily apparent now that people are starting to recognize a danger… What are they doing? They are turning traditional, fashy and warlike.

God I hope this happens, you guys are the ones with all the niggers and spics

Holy fuck, this fucking author.


>Friedersdorf: I believe that the best solution is to aggressively deport people who've perpetrated serious crimes and to grant legal residency to everyone else, so long as the folks who snuck across the border or overstayed visas as adults pay a small fine into a fund used to expedite the processing of folks waiting in line to come here legally.

Not only does he want to grant amnesty to pretty much everyone here illegally, he wants them to pay a fine to make it easier/faster for more shitskins to come into the country.

Liberals are so dumb that they can't see that their "no rights for whites; subsidies for minorities" programs have caused white people to feel abandoned and betrayed as they watch the other white countries an ocean away fall and see great cultures destroyed. It's the hight of liberal arrogance.

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were educated, do-nothing bourgeois who thought that they would continue to keep their roles and use their superior educations to lead the proles in establishing a communist utopia with them at the head of course because they're educated and someone has to run things while the people work.

Communism always was, much like it is today, the labor version of James Fenimoore Cooper's noble savage bullshit.

Really too bad about burr. In a way I still think he's red-pilled. But he was blue-pilled and lied to for so long that I honest think he just refuses to believe it all.

This could also be why he seems to counter signal in the complete opposite direction so much now. He stared into the abyss too much and now refuses to believe what he saw.

Don't fall for the counterfeit Jew, when the original is available here:

thundermark.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/might-is-right.pdf

The age of floating cities is upon us. We must look to colonize the Oceans, both the surface and below.

but this is "The White Tribe" not individualistic tribes like the Irish, Polish, Italians and Germans etc. He's only partially correct

That's not how genetics works you flaming faggot shitskin. White people are not even inbred. Even the UK has enough genetic diversity to marry within not only race (species) but ethnicity (subspecies) too and stay completely beneficial.

This.

MGTOW root cause: women
Holla Forums root cause: Jews

MGTOW cure: stop breeding with women
Holla Forums cure: gas the kikes and encourage white exceptionalism again

Just how the fuck does this idiot think non-whites operate? Does he actually believe they vote against their own ethnic interests, or even think about how they can improve things for everyone else, including whites?

I fucking hate these people so much.

Tribalists are moving in and tribalist Jews wonder why other tribes respond in a tribalistic manner?

Unless these oceans are formed of leftist blood I see a problem with your solution

Leftist can't conceive the idea that non-whites have ethnic interests. They can barely acknowledge that ethnic identities exist in any sense other than them being not-white which is why the fact that so many of their pets hate each other is so shocking to our pozzed cousins.

Before the US the concept of individual freedom was not that important to the west. In fact it didn't really exist before then.

actually, jews are the absolute best in the world and in history at forming extremely strong tribes.
they've survived for thousands of years after being exiled from every country several times and today they are ruling the world.
they always have each other's back.
whites eat each other because we disagree on petty stuff, "he's an atheist! he's a marxist! he's a nazi! he's immoral!" etc., while for jews none of those differences matter at all as long as they are jewish and there are other races that they must survive against