Natsoc/right-wing critiques of capitalism

Can anyone recommend me any good right-wing or natsoc critiques of capitalism?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.org/details/GottfriedFederTheGermanStateOnANationalAndSocialistFoundation
youtube.com/watch?v=UrJGlXEs8nI
counter-currents.com/2016/04/the-tarantulas-bite/
archive.org/details/HitlersRevolutionByRichardTedor_383
youtube.com/watch?v=3NqG2lAojNQ
pdfarchive.info/pdf/S/Se/Serrano_Miguel_-_Miguel_Serrano_on_Integral_Radical_Traditionalists_and_Julius_Evola.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

archive.org/details/GottfriedFederTheGermanStateOnANationalAndSocialistFoundation

youtube.com/watch?v=UrJGlXEs8nI

counter-currents.com/2016/04/the-tarantulas-bite/

It's simple, really. Capitalism does not recognize national interests and borders, as the only thing a capitalist is interested in is making profit.
Capitalism is also reckless and completely heedless of collateral damage - who cares about thousands starving when your stock value rises? It does not envision sustainability and long-term planning, it does not care about ensuring a good future for the nation.
And, of course, capitalism freely allows usury and monopoly - two words to which the yids flock like flies to shit.

Patrick Buchanan's The Great Betrayal and Ian Fletcher's "Why Free Trade doesn't work" are good books about why Libertarian Free Trade is bad. Patrick's is more America specific and about the Tariff, while Ian's book is refuting Free Trade arguments in general.

The problem with capitalism is that it doesn't exist. right-wing critiques of it will always miss the point because they fail to take this into account.

There is no capitalist manifesto, there isn't a capitalist theory of culture or history there isn't even a true "capitalist" theory of economics.

The term capitalism began as an epithet communists used to attack industrialists and that's all the substance the word actually has.The fact that free-market advocates have adopted it as their title is just evidence of the complete narrative control the left has achieved.

Take for example this post

None of the listed vices there can actually be said to be unique problems to "capitalism", they are all in fact also problems that communism has (except maybe usury).

What is really the heart of the matter is materialism and pragmatism which deny transcendent virtues and truths and posit man as an entirely physical, meaningless convolusion of molecules that has no purpose other than satisfying it's own material needs and furthermore denies that any transcendental moral law exists by which the powers of government are subject to and responsible for. At the risk of triggering Fedora's, the problem with western economics isn't capitalism or communism but atheism - a complete rejection of the spiritual nature and value of man.

If you can read german Feder has loads of books regarding economics.

What are the downsides of free trade, besides offshoring?

A society where the economic model is indepedant from the social model canno't work.
Because in that situation, the economic model's ultimate goal isn't the nation's preservation, happiness and cultural prosperity.