What is the deal with Holla Forums and Max Stirner?

how to spot the Americans
anarchists and communists might be on the left but the disagree about a lot, just as natsocs and neocons do.

Neocons are pretty much jews, I think you meant paleocons.

I've never mentioned unification of both sides. Did you misspost here or what?

All of the left is unified in certain assumptions. Anarchism, communism, and liberalism all come from the sam e motivations.

Are you a cummie :^)?

Nope Communism is Jewish, Socialism and Anarchism are White.

Neoconservatism and Libertarianism are Jewish, Classical Liberalism and Paleoconservatism are White.

That is sort of fair classification.

I noticed a thing
Quite ironic now is it?

Their obsession with Stirner is proof that they just pretend something doesn't exist when they can't argue against it. They probably use it because "social construct" is rather unpopular now, considering the people that use that term. It is the same with any leftist: feminists that saw the word as starting to mean something negative changed to "egalitarian", Marxists became "liberals", SJWs became "left-libertarians". Compare that to the right, where people willingly label themselves as literal Nazis, which gets them shat on by the media. Leftists are incredibly obsessed with changing definitions to argue their point, just as it was when Noam Chomsky was willing to argue that the Second Amendment does not let people own guns on the grounds that because gun ownership is to fight against tyranny and on the grounds of him defining democracy as non-tyrannical by default, there is no tyranny to fight and so there is no permission to own guns.

You just need to tell Chomski that democracy is fragile and that the gun ownership thing is backup or "plan B". The Constitution bases itself in that power can corrupt man. I kind off destroyed an "intelectual" in a Mongolian Traditional Knitting Wood Board. He should feel bad about himself.