en.wikipedia.org
What's your f-factor guys?
How much do you know about Jew supremacism and crime throughout the centuries and how badly, much do you want to change things, help?
Remember these things were concocted by the "commie" Frankfurter Schule. They literally have "intellectual", "scientific" theory and methods of keeping the "bad goyism", f-factor of the slaves to an absolute minimum which ends up as what you see in the news, media as a child and adult. We have sort of a naturally recognised T(reason)-factor for Jews and traitors too, of course.
Jew supremacists can be this blatant about how you are categorized and oppressed, used in so called "democracies".
The fixed election of Norbert Hofer in Austria and EU President Juncker's statements of not even talking to an elected president of a main, founding EU member because he classifies him and his party in the arbitrary "far-right" shows how "democratic our post-WW2 "utopia" really is. Could it be that they have these kinds of scales and heavy anti-democratic reactions against nationalists, institutionalized brainwash because it are things which can free us from our Jew-mason slavers? Are we to strive for the highest f-factor possible in society to reach a society where we can finally create a revolution, oust the Jews?
There are official scales for 'bad goyness'
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
liveleak.com
twitter.com
anesi.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
If they're going to do the science of oppression we might endulge in their extensive work on the subject (they are an authority after all) to promote what they believe to be the most dangerous characteristics, the baddest of goys. Link related. youtube.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see F scale.
The California F-scale is a 1947 personality test, designed by Theodor W. Adorno and others to measure the authoritarian personality.[1] The "F" stands for "fascist". The F-scale measures responses on several different components of authoritarianism, such as conventionalism, authoritarian aggression, anti-intraception, superstition and stereotypy, power and "toughness," destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and sex.[2] Scores acquired from the F-scale could be directly associated with background components, educational level, and intellectual capacity.[3] It is an indirect type of test that ensures the result would not be due to the individual's fake responses; this is possible because the purpose of the measurement and which attitude is being measured are initially concealed from the participants.[4] The existence of this correlation could possibly affect the way in which the F-scale accurately measures the authoritarian personality syndrome.[3] The F-Test has two principal purposes: it aims to measure prejudice and anti-democratic tendencies at the personality level.[4]
The purpose of the F-scale is to measure an antidemocratic personality structure, usually defined by authoritarianism. A score of above 80 on the F-scale test indicates that the subject may be suffering from severe psychopathology. Patients who suffer from repeated episodes of disorders usually get a higher F-scale score than those who have acute disorders. Besides, people who have a high F-scale score mostly likely have a lower educational level.[5] The scale specifically examines the following personality dimensions:
Conventionalism: conformity to the traditional societal norms and values of the middle class;
Authoritarian submission: a passive notion towards adhering to conventional norms and values;
Authoritarian aggression: punishing and condemning individuals who don’t adhere to conventional values;
Superstition;
Power and "toughness";
Stereotyping;
Destructiveness and cynicism;
Anti-intraception, i.e. "rejection of all inwardness, of the subjective, the imaginative, the tender-minded, and of self-criticism"; and
Sexuality.[6]
F-scale tests measure not only the subject's overall level of stress but also his or her willingness to cooperate in the testing process.[7]
Well this is the sort of drivel they'd sell to college kids everywhere the stereotype anyone with "bad goy", anti-Jew supremacy ideas so making all of them our goal wouldn't be the way to go. The Frankfurter school was all about undermining the fabric of society, self-protection, "pesky" attributes of Goy culture and society by imposing all kinds of false dilemmas and "guilt", negative attributes to "bad goy" ideas like authoritarianism, fascism, etc. as "educated", "intellectual" alalysations of "what is wrong in society" and "how to fix it". (yes I do like quotation marks for words, sentences I can't type without cringing, want to mark as sarcasm or where I disagree with a commonly used term).
...
These are the people who decide whether your kid can function in society and have a future or not. If you think or write down "bad goyism" they will destroy you. The Frankfurter Schule moved to Geneva and then to New York when the second world war started. Guess where current anti-white Jew ivy league professors get their mustard to inject the future elite of White, American and European culture with? For example: Noel Ignatiev, a Jew Harvard professor who wants to literally end the entire notion of White ethnocentrism, ethnicity, heritage as it would be "supremacist". liveleak.com
Another, lesser known Jew NY Ualbany professor twittered "I hope we can see this incident as a problem with whiteness" and "white identity only serves to protect a privilege" to the incident of an alleged racial attack on Blacks on a bus that turned out a massive hoax (even officially) where Blacks had actually attacked Whites instead. Regardless these reactions and a massive rally, propaganda campaign which even saw Hillary Clinton reacting not a single apology was given after the story turned out as White people being victim of a hate crime and slander. twitter.com
Just some cases to prove how their stigmas serve an anti-White agenda whether peple are White nationalist or just some kid on a bus.
Not quite.
Free bump, OP
I'm not a pro 8channer if you want to pay me for a structured book that's fine by me. I'm not paid for shilling for my race like these Jew professors. This is pro deo activism. I'm making this shit up as I go along. I didn't print a draft, reread 5 timesand send it to a dozen publishers before I clicked on "new reply".
Sage & report.
fuck forgot to sage
I'll toss a bump.
Thats some lame ass fiction gore there bud, step it up please.
Is this better?
Thanx for derailing my thread.
Are you scaring the goyim away from my thread?
I thought we'd engage in a meaningful dialogue here… Is this a form of threat, intimidation?
Saw something like this a few years ago, they called it a measure of "right wing authoritarianism" and associated it with everything bad but then threw in some retarded made up disclaimer, "there can be left wing authoritarians too but we called it right wing because it sounds like writ as in written law". Totally not meant to slander the right goys.
thanks for reminding me how badass that song is.
vid related
bump because it's an intersting topic
What does that mean, exactly?
Anyway, seems like the test is designed so that a reasonable person who believes in order, tradition and leading a productive life will score medium, and fascist who happens to be retarded will score very high.
In other words the score is correlated with "fascism" (actually more like "respect for discipline") but also anticorrelated with intelligence and sanity. This is creates a clever bait and switch: The author, being a communist anarchist, believes that fascism is inherently stupid and wants to prove it. In this test, people will see that the people scoring high also happen to be retarded and insane, so they will look at people who score medium and say "look, you are being retarded just like them!". Because of how the questions are written, I seriously doubt this is not intentional.
It's just a bad test. More than that, it's a rigged test. The questions actually measure two things (discipline and irrationality) but are then collapsed into a single number instead of 2. It's the same problem as judging fitness by weight alone: A 250 lbs dude can be a fucking jacked hulk of muscle, or he can be a fatass who can barely climb up a flight of stairs (cue couch potatoes saying "that one famous bodybuilder is 250 lbs too, 250 lbs is a perfectly healthy weight!"). You need to at least know fat percentage as well.
For instance, question 5:
What does this have to do with fascism? The answer is trivial and matter of fact: Obviously many things can be understood by human minds, especially if appropriately using the scientific method. Some things cannot be understood because the human mind is limited, but this is irrelevant because the limit is clearly very high (at least for our top minds).
Agreeing with this doesn't mean you are fascist (in fact a lot of hippy vegan wiccan crystalfags would agree as well). It just means you are a retard who believes in le spooky spirit science.
Or, take question 6:
How the fuck does religion relate to fascism? As if historically the major fascist movements weren't very secular, or as if religion does not play a huge role in uniting Jews who were targeted by the most notorious fascists. This question is just "are you a bible thumper", it clearly just plays to the American stereotype of the "fascist":
Of course nowadays the added hilarity is that most people labeled "fascist" by the left consider Islam unacceptable, despite it fitting this question to a tee.
Or the most hilarious 21:
So believing a retarded meme for stupid women is a defining part of fascism?
Just to be extra clear, if you did PCA on a large, varied sample of responses, I bet you would get two components, with PC1 strongly predicting favorable view of Trump and PC2 strongly predicting low IQ. Once again proving that the author is retarded for collapsing it to 1 variable.
Have any of you faggots found an online version of the test? I want to know how bad of a goy I really am.
I used this: anesi.com
In Culture of Critique, MacDonald has an interesting discussion of how, yes, the F-scale test was designed to correlate to essentially right-wing ideals and antisemitism.
I don't even know what the fuck am I answering here. Besides WW2 and Hitler, I don't know the details of 1940s German politics.
From your screencap it's obvious that this user is right>>6117903
Well guys, to >>>/oven/ for me it is.
Got a 4.7
4.9. Disappointing. I think they designed the test to identify caricatures of fascism, like pic related.
This is kind of a shitty scale.
Don't go crying no one posts in the second version of this thread you make due to lack of interest with that kind of autism.
I think it's trying to imply "Should we just not try some of these guys at Nuremburg and give them civil leadership positions?".
4.6
I may have jumped the gun saying we'd need to promote what the test claims people with " high "f-factor" to be. I was naive in thinking they were openly assessing the intelligence and "danger" of people. It's indeed a test designed to frame anyone disillusioned with their "democracies" as retarded, religious and a handful of similar things most people here obviously are not. But we can take away from this that in trying to associate stupidity with fascism and a handful of positive attributes, perhaps that actually is what we should be going for. Because a lot of dissident people here aren't agreeing in how we should free ourselves. Perhaps they are positive the only thing that will work is a form of "fascism" (which is inherent to any "coup" from "foreign" oppression) now obviously associated with all kinds of "spookyness" and "backwardness" but which can be done in an atheist, (obviously ethnic based), progressive (like how Hitler's NSDAP was socialist), "scientific" ideology rather than what is obviously being put down as "far-right", "alternative left" and "fascist". And that's actually what we have to do if we are to ever have a chance of realizing our freedom in an independent nation.
Are you sure I'm not a fascist instead of an autist?
I'm sorry user. I realize this site is owned by the cripple and his Jew buddies. So technically it's their thread I made on their site. Thank you for correcting me.
Not so fast, user. The wiki article on the test said that scoring higher than an 80 (I'm guessing out of 100) indicated that you were a psychopath, and 4.9 out of 6.0 breaks that threshold.
So suffice to say, you're a very very bad goy.
I only got a 4.3/71%. Probably because I didn't put "strongly agree for anything.
The merchant assures me that I think like a "real american". FML.
The entire concept of this "F-scale" is sort of the same "medicallisation" of dissidence as a "mental illness" which was used against niggers back in the day by a certain Samuel Adolphus Cartwright. They say "a score of above 80 on the F-scale test indicates that the subject may be suffering from severe psychopathology."
In the same sense this American physician invented "drapetomania". It supposedly states that a slave who disobeys and wants to run away is mad. It's part of what they call "scientific racism" but in no way different from how this Jew fabrication tries to frame every White separatist, national disillusioned with fake, subjugated, failed "democracies" as "suffering from severe psychopathology". It is scientific racism by a globalist "diaspora" supremacy of Jews in shadow government as secretive slave owners against the Goyim citizens. en.wikipedia.org
Socialism back then isn't the same as modern day socialism.
To clear the obviously revolting, similar methods of this supposedly White physician from any potential justification of the scientific Jew racism here I will extend on, discussA the Jewish role in American and other slavery which is pinned exclusively on "White supremacism" in history classes.
The question is of course to what extent Southern slavery itself was a Jewish thing ("some" Jew owned textile industrials sure made a "pretty penny"). Or to what extent this "Samuel" character who studied under Yankee abolitionist "Benjamin Rush" was actually pro-White, White himself. Perhaps the civil war was to take certain profits from the slave industry from Goyim as they were gaining too much power, independence through it despite the profits Jews made in the textile industry and therefore had to be subjugated once again… not by the Brits but by Yankees led by "Abraham" Lincoln.
The end of slavery didn't stop the industry either. Former slaves would often even continue their work but then for a small pay instead. This ensures less profits for a White farmer but ultimately makes little difference for the textile industry which just buys from the cheapest supplier. Bottom line being that the American civil war was one against "Goy independence" in the south. Abraham Lincoln imposed the first "Income tax" in the States at the start of the civil war. The intent there probably being too to be able to extend this over the entire U.S. We see today how unfair this tax is when you compare how ordinary workers are taxed against big business and Wall Street. I am not against tax as it is (it's an obvious necessity) but anyone with a brain knows you have to tax progressively along with wealth and capital gains and not just according to "income". Not just ignoring those in the name of "stimulating the economy and job creation".
We know Jews were far more involved with the trading of the goods produced by slavery as they were in trading the slaves themselves and transporting them than running the actual plantations. According to Wikipedia Jews made out about 1.25% of southern slave owners (en.wikipedia.org
A Yankee general Ulysses S. Grant banned Jews from a certain area in the South because they ran the (now) illegal black market trade of Cotton. en.wikipedia.org
This is a long discussion on Jews regarding slavery, the civil war in the states but I thought it was necessary given how the revolting agenda of "medicalizing" the dissidence of an oppressed peoples would suddenly be associated with "White" slavery. Potentially justifying the "f-factor" to certain of the Kosher elements undoubtedly surveilling this website.
I realize "social democracy" differs from Hitler's socialism. That doesn't change that a lot of the basics would apply. The main differences would probably obviously be the (pragmatically) undemocratic nature of Hitler's rule which are probably necessary again to fix our countries to oust, deal with all of the subversion. And the fact it was ethnic based socialism which is exactly what we need whether we kick out all migrants and Jews or not. Now we are reduced to useful slaves treated equal to, even inferior to whoever they want to herd into the coountry to divide us and make us dependent, destroy our nationalism, homogenity, unity and ultimately, identity, people. Our interests criminalized as "racist" regardless of blood spilled fighting Germans for Jew interests in the hugely ironically vile lie of "protecting our people and nation" (which are now deemed dead and illegal for replacement by the homeless, identityless "Eurasian negroid".
Don't SJW technically fit the criteria for all of these except the first and the power/toughness ones?
F-scale was invented in 1947 by Theodor Adorno
Mother was devout Catholic, father was "assimilated Jew" who owned a successful wine export business (holy shit, a jew who was a merchant, no fucking way)
Adorno was associated with the Frankfurt School and concepts of Critical Theory
This faggot was 110% kosher
I detest the term "Social Justice warrior" in it being a massive misnomen. You give them terms and titles which are the exact opposite of what they mean and slander the words themselves. Yes a lot of the people you'd refer to as SJWs are basically "fascist" drones indoctrinated in an anti-national, anti-white ideology. They lack the power/toughness part as weakness and apathy, self-loathing is part of their ideology, the socially engineered "ideal", "standard" of their "ideology". The only people they'd be allowed to be strict and "tough" against are their own people and interests. Ironicaly such radical anti-ethnic and other nationalism makes nations bigger prey for and more easily controlled by "capitalist", foreign, Jew interests which then allows them to be used for these alien, foreign, Jew imperialist agendas like the "war on terror" and destroying the rights, homelands and identity of natives in the genocide of the European (and other) peoples (all but Jews really). Causing a lot more suffering, damage than homogeneous, united, ethnocentric states would. It's basically using certain "fascist", autoritarian doctrine, applying supposedly anti-subversive measures to suppress a population's own interests for globalist Jew dictatorship, thus for subversion itself.
Also, let's analyse these questions:
Loaded question.
What if your job is to talk?
I'm guessing the professor also includes actual scientists, so loaded question.
Even scientists probably admit this, not because there's any superstition to it but there are probably things out their our minds are not capable of understanding, but that is not a persistent problem as evolution may play a role in that and things will change.
The religions best known for this kind of thinking are sand religions so this is rich coming from a Jew.
They don't just ought to, it's a confirmed trend. Those outliers who don't go on to live very unhappy and unsatisfied lives, case and point: SJW's.
However it's important to note there's a difference between a phase and a reaction. Even the calmest of men will take up arms when they feel their way of life is at risk.
This just signals and confirms their whole philosophy is just a self fulfilling prophecy.
The government can't be trusted because politicians can't be trusted because we don't trust politicians as a rule rather than as a measured reaction.
I'm not even sure what this has to do with the rest of the test. Looks like this belongs more on a psych test.
So is he saying hardship is not a good teacher or is he saying that hardship is the only good teacher.
Loaded as fuck question.
If they don't need that then what DO they need, Chaim?
This is one of the only decent questions so far.
[13] Sex crimes, such as rape and attacks on children, deserve more than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly whipped, or worse.
We used to do this far before Fascism even existed. There isn't even a correlation here, the question simply makes no sense within the context it is delivered.
Now that I look at it there's a few questions here and I can't be arsed to go through them all but these first few set a precedent.