#LastWhitesOfTheEastEnd

Sage for porn.

I just noticed the hashtag, how long has it been going on for?

It's not porn boy, it's fan fiction.

Britbongs would still have a Empire if they didn't reject uncle Hitler.

There ain't no way to stop this shit short of civil war, a real one.

They don't have the fucking spine for that. You chose this fate.

~Hail Hitler

It's on you at this point.

Yup the first time his shit and it's a poor image choice, but grow up and get over it.

Sage for porn.

Rofl.

Also;

Nah, not going to stop fighting degeneracy.

wew lad

Anyway, since it’s London talking about white genocide and Internet hate speech is illegal on Airstrip One, won’t these people just be arrested?

See;

...

It was the most relevant pic in my collection, I was going to use a pic of Bill Clinton with another man with captions making it look like he's propositioning the man for sex, but that file already existed.

So the fact that you’d be butthurt about someone sharing your beliefs is really confusing.

Anyway, there’s this: archive.is/x8BK7
We’ll see what happens.

You’re not even trying.

Open an image editing program. Save it. It now has a new MD5 and won't flag the same image shit.

surly no one, no one on Holla Forums has ever,ever seen porn,I certainly haven't.

I am shocked and appalled as you are good sir, I will inform the authorities post haste.

You're not even trying.

He's just upset that he has a Mary Poppins fetish now and there's not any relevant porn to satisfy it.

What the fuck are you even trying to say, you stupid sack of shit?

One that's going to get bumped you active retard.

Yeah so anyway how big an impact does a hashtag like this have do you think? I mean lots of people think like this, I suppose the hashtag serves as a way to declare the Emperor has no clothes.

You retard's don't seem to understand it's not the done thing on pol and never has been. This thread would of been fine if he picked a better image. Stop making shit up to justify it

I want reddit to leave

How can non Brits help ?

Very true but like hitler said if 16 million people decide to die they will.

Holy fuck, I hate when people try this bullshit.

My god, I hope that this woman, and people who actually use that argument gets struck by a bolt of lightning.

"Yeah getting called a "Paki" by some drunk white guy is like, literally as bad as having Sharia instituted and your daughter threatened if she shows her uncovered face in public!"

Well, aren’t you an optimistic faggot. My sage shouldn’t even matter, then, should it?

So leave.

Use your fake Twitter account and grow the hashtag.

You can't londons lost and they only thing now is full acceleration to get the rest of the whites out so we can form something better. Maybe make Newcastle the capital.

London needs the 28 Days Later treatment.

I'm not making up shit to justify it, it's not even porn since you can't see the head of the penis.

bump

Fucking Newcastle!? Yeah alright scouser.

Already did it, you intractable faggot.

Lad I won't swear but I think you need have a lil think about what you just said

I can't wait until Euros just start going door to door slicing the throats of everything not white enough.

inb4 "deafeatist kike hurr durr reported, I am reporting uuuu!" but it won't do a bunch. It'll get cucks and anti-whites to jerk off over the demise, and if it gets mainstream (((media))) attention (which it likely won't for fear of waking white people up in other nations), it'll all be under the narrative of, "Neo-Nazis learn how to use internet; demand the murder of all brown children in UK; ethnic British politician, Sadiq Khan to address this tomorrow at 12 and a half bongs on BBC 4".

I'm south east and scousers are from Liverpool. Thou Liverpool is very white

...

Is that not the rule? Like how it's not porn if you only show the muff from far away?

Nevermind

Is that like how it's not gay if balls aren't touching?

Not after Hitler found out that the British Empire was fully Jewish.

kill yourself you fucking normie-tier faggot

If they think being a minority is so bad they are always free to fuck off back where they came from. None seem very eager to take that option for some reason.

You can fap.

Why the fuck did she cut her hairs ?

Nuns have short hair. It represents their putting aside earthly vanities.

I just looked on Wikipedia and apparently she is a product of cuckolding. Her slut mom cucked her dad and she doesn't even know her real father. Could be a kike for all we know.

Older women do that because they're tired of messing with their hair and don't need to attract men anymore.

Of course they fucking won't. They'll just bitch and moan for gibs until evil whitey is gone; then when they're gone, they'll blame their shit-tier existence on, "Well we wuz kangz but these pale muhfuggas wuz evil n sheeit n now we all got PTSD tho."

It's Mary Poppins.

...

Exactly, don't know what he's going on about porn for, hasn't he seen Mary Poppins?

Do you think saying that changes anything?

Do you think saging thread changes anything?

Yeah, there's a difference between porn and a scene from a film. One is artistic expression whereas the other is fap material.

you lost whitey

deal with it

Do trends like this start often? I can imagine this stirring up a shitstorm with the British media.

Constantly. This one somehow slipped through though. They untrend them by force though. This one was forced to not be trending like 10 minutes after this thread was created.

It's still trending tho.

Is it? Maybe I missed it. My contacts were out so I was basically a corpse.

Though that would make sense because it appears cucks are using it as an insult too.

The United Caliphate isn't my problem.

"So what if my neighbour's lawn is burning? It's not like it could possibly spread to my lawn or even my house!"

Documentary in question is up on jewtube, for now anyway. Shitty 360p version for non-bongs

its some tv show faggot

im not a britbong and i dont live under the Emir of London so i dont care

SAGE

This is what libertarian actually believe.

Now that I think about it, I don't remember this specific scene…

k

That's why we build fireproof walls to keep the neighbors and their problems out.

...

Trump will build a wall and you're not going to remove it, faggot.

He's not going to build a wall across the Atlantic.

At least you know that you had a retarded stance since that's all you can come up with, faggot.

youtube.com/watch?v=aM4je2ZkrBU

Fucking Morning Joe, what the fuck happened, they loved Trump and now they just seem so clueless.

Trump destroyed the Bushes, Trump destroyed the GOP. Trump will destroy the Clintons.

Fucking Morning Jew.

A body of water like the atlantic is as good as a wall. Try to boat your third worlders over here and our navy will shoot your fucking boats down. Stay the fuck away from my country if you know what's good for you.

WHOOOOPS wrong thread.

The monkeys have European passports; they'd have to be filtered out at the airports - and our airports are staffed with third worlders.

I dont believe there wont be blood. In the USA we will avoid it if Trump gets in, but in EU the totalitarian left will directly create the fascism they fear. Most people dont realize it yet, but blood is much thicker than water. Utopian, nature ignorant ideologies cant afford the bliss much longer.

it's a white dick so shut up, anime nerd.

Try it and we'll bomb the shit out of you. And those who survive will get worse than waterboarding.

I agree that would be a great thing to do. Of course, right now we have a way bigger shitskin problem within our own borders.

Mass deportation starting January 20. They all have to go.

White genocide cucks are the worst.

You guys were funny at first when it was just about the memes, but some of you have become so warped into the meme that you are taking it serious.

why

You don't say.

Fucking hell are they this retarded? No one ever wanted minorities in the first place, it's all one big indoctrinated lie to pacify white people.

Sage and report. Take your degeneracy back to Holla Forums.

Fuck off Shmuel.

I don't know what that is

hi jew

At least sage, retards.

Steve's jew friend on american dad, a jewish name. Even the most bluepill of bluepills would recognize that.
Hi jew.

I'm not Jewish though.

my bad

I haven't fucking watched American Dad in years. I also don't know many Jewish people, as i live in the middle of nowhere; literally.

Israel is kind of the middle of nowhere.

anything with a shc sound I assume to be jewish

That one is needed.

Education to the poor is ALWAYS necessary because it stops the educated from ruling over uneducated peasants.

Only kings hate public education.

Jews made public education private by increasing the costs dramatically. It should be free but now it can never be because of the large debt.

I live in a green forest, with the nearest neighbors being quite far. I don't know too much about Israel, but don't they just have crappy buildings and run down deserty terrain?

I don't really get why that's jewish.

That one makes sense

Don't really know what that is either

Why is a shrink associated with jews? Isn't a shrink just a therapist?

Also, lots of German words have a shc sound;

weren't they kind of famous for being anti-jewish. Not sure i understand the whole shc jew association

I can agree with you on that; but does this not make us socialist scum?

providing basic services to your people like education doesn't make us "socialist scum", mate. You're falling for a false left-right dichotomy

Private education would be way less expensive if there was not a monopoly on the industry called public education.

Stop using that meme.

It's purpose is pragmatic and for a specific reason.

We gotta stop using spectrum memes. We need the best ideas, not the ones on a specific part of the ideological spectrum.

That's the way that worked in the past, not now.

We just need to avoid the traps.

people get ugly when they get old

...

…and it's already gone.

yeah, and also stratified so only the wealthiest can have the best education, and the rest are left in the dirt with shittest-tier education they can afford. Also, what about the people that simply cannot afford any education? What do you do with these people?

You do realise private schools exist already, right? Public education, although currently shit tier, provides a baseline for all citizens. I don't think any member of my society should be deprived an education simply because they can't afford it.

higher education is a different story, though.

I get a little confused, as admittedly, i am not too savvy when it comes to politics

I used to think that it was fallacious to think of it in a black and white way, but i spoke with a lot of people who were debating the matter, and they kept saying: If you have socialist policies, you will head further in that direction and eventually end up being socialist, which then leads to communism.

They also talked a lot about cultural marxism and debated that for hours–but i didn't really understand.

Not sure if you are agreeing with the other guy that it's a false dilemma, or if you're disagreeing with the idea of free public school in general.

False dilemma.

We need schools. Infact, part of the reason that we've got a fucked up world is the inequality in education.

I believe in equality of opportunity - not of outcome. We're a pack of wolves that must give the pups the chance to become the leader.

Sometimes though - humanity splits into different packs, that's the question we're asking now - what are the boundaries?

I agree with you on equal opportunity for all as long as it's only whites you're referring to. All other races have to go back to their racial homelands and fix their people's problems back home.

That's a pretty narrow viewpoint imo.

Since the times of the first humans we have been a species that explores, settles, explores, settles, etc. When we settle, after many generations with the the groups of people we have settled with, we develop culture, and over long periods of time, the culture grows stronger; however, culture does change–people of different skin colors and of different religion travel too; whether that be by refugee, immigration, general exploration, and special circumstances, e.g. slavery.

Those who are not originally from our culture; but over many generations integrate into it, or those who genuinely accept it as their own–I do not see reasons for them to leave.

In contrast, there are some groups of people taking advantage of the refugee crisis right now–these people come into our society and do not accept our culture, and have some diametrically opposed positions on important matters–these people do not deserve to stay. Those that are attacking our culture are a threat to it; and are grossly taking advantage of a crisis. These people have such different views, that it would be near impossible for them to integrate into our society with the current circumstances, and they end up damaging it.

So, I see no problem at all with an educated black person who identifies with the culture and is a part of it; perusing education, business, and contributes to society, etc.

Though i do see a problem with those who come; not to embrace the culture, but to try and enforce their religion as law in it, leech of off of society, and contribute nothing. This is an attack on our culture, and people with these mindsets should not be welcome.

Then it appear you've been ignoring all of recorded history haven't you?
That has been Jew tactic number one. Pretend to integrate and stand with the locals only so long as they benefit you, and as soon as trouble comes knocking you willingly pick up and abandon ship.
They have to leave because no amount of generations can make a man out of a monkey.

There is no such thing, you need to learn this. Culture comes from the people, and black man can never be your people. If he and his kin are allowed to become the future arbiters of culture, it will be perverted into a mockery of what it once was. You're pulling the classic civic nationalist mindset, which has ALWAYS failed and continues to fail to this day.

This is genuine racial-cuckold tier thinking. Culture and civilisation are racial constructs. Races and civilisations are not cultural constructs. If your race dies out, so does your civilisation and every bit of living history and identity it once had. Humans are not interchangeable blank slates that can be painted different colours depending on what society they live in. An African will always be an African and an Asian will always be an Asian no matter whether his/her family has lived in a white society for three generations or more. Nations are the product of the race that created and defined them, not the other way around. In order to preserve the historic and ethnic identity of your nation, you have to preserve your race. There is no other way around it.

What reason does any non-white have to preserve our culture and civilisation if they don’t have any connection to the history and race of the people that created it? Absolutely none. A nation, whose identity is so thoroughly defined by the ethnicity that produced it (something that should be the case for any healthy society), cannot possibly incorporate foreign racial groups into itself without diminishing, diluting, and ultimately destroying its innate racial identity. A nation made for multiple ethnicities is made for none at all, so how do you propose you'll foster a sense of fraternity and identity between vastly different racial groups that share no bond through history or blood? It's simply impossible and unnatural, and will only result in ruin.

Take Canada for example (my home country). Everything about Canada - the real Canada - is European to the core. The institutions, history, identity, ethnicity - everything white European. Canada's first immigration policy was even designed to only allow whites to immigrate. Being "Canadian" was synonymous with being "European” since the two were inseparable pieces of a greater whole. In an attempt to incorporate foreign races and cultures into the definition of "Canadian", the innate European identity of our nation has been destroyed and replaced with this modern, soulless cosmopolitanism. Each and every non-white that immigrates or is born here and supposedly "integrates" only does so on the most superficial level, and shares absolutely no deeper connection to the European race and culture that has defined our nation since the beginning, and thus will forever remain an outsider and foreigner living in another people's land. This simple fact will always remain true no matter how much supposed “integration” these non-whites undergo. The only way any non-European can ever truly "become" part of the nation - not superficially but innately - is to redefine the very European nature of our society at its core, as to destroy what it originally stood for and represented. It’s simply impossible to maintain a European civilisation based around European values and maintain a European identity, if the European race is replaced with some other foreign race. If Somalis or Chinese replaced the British people, Britain would be dead, since the nation itself is so deeply defined by the British ethnicity and race. Our nations are not propositional. They aren’t just a set of loose ideas that can change on a whim. Without Europeans, America would no longer be America, just as Canada would no longer be Canada, and Germany would no longer be Germany. This idea that we can just import foreigners and "integrate” them is a dangerous miss-assessment and is leading to our race's and civilisation’s collective demise.

Even the Africans who have existed in America since the beginning are still a completely distinct ethnic and cultural group that never has and never will share a racial bond or identity with the white Europeans who built America. What interest, or even capacity, does a Pakistani, an African, or a Chinese have in maintaining the European identity of our nation? Absolutely none. Since they are a product of non-white immigration, they have a vested interest in continuing this system. Why would any Hispanic Immigrant be opposed to further Hispanic immigration? That would be hypocritical of them since they themselves are a product of this system to begin with, and owe their very existence to it. Like I've already mentioned, even a "successful” integration would only ever be superficial. These races will always remain foreigners living in another people's nation unless the very core identity of the nation is usurped and destroyed in order to incorporate them.

This is genuine cuckservative-tier thinking. Culture and civilisation are racial constructs. Races and civilisations are not cultural constructs. If your race dies out, so does your civilisation and every bit of living history and identity it once had. Humans are not interchangeable blank slates that can be painted different colours depending on what society they live in. An African will always be an African and an Asian will always be an Asian no matter whether his/her family has lived in a white society for three generations or more. Nations are the product of the race that created and defined them, not the other way around. In order to preserve the historic and ethnic identity of your nation, you have to preserve your race. There is no other way around it.

What reason does any non-white have to preserve our culture and civilisation if they don’t have any connection to the history and race of the people that created it? Absolutely none. A nation, whose identity is so thoroughly defined by the ethnicity that produced it (something that should be the case for any healthy society), cannot possibly incorporate foreign racial groups into itself without diminishing, diluting, and ultimately destroying its innate racial identity. A nation made for multiple ethnicities is made for none at all, so how do you propose you'll foster a sense of fraternity and identity between vastly different racial groups that share no bond through history or blood? It's simply impossible and unnatural, and will only result in ruin.

Take Canada for example (my home country). Everything about Canada - the real Canada - is European to the core. The institutions, history, identity, ethnicity - everything white European. Canada's first immigration policy was even designed to only allow whites to immigrate. Being "Canadian" was synonymous with being "European” since the two were inseparable pieces of a greater whole. In an attempt to incorporate foreign races and cultures into the definition of "Canadian", the innate European identity of our nation has been destroyed and replaced with this modern, soulless cosmopolitanism. Each and every non-white that immigrates or is born here and supposedly "integrates" only does so on the most superficial level, and shares absolutely no deeper connection to the European race and culture that has defined our nation since the beginning, and thus will forever remain an outsider and foreigner living in another people's land. This simple fact will always remain true no matter how much supposed “integration” these non-whites undergo. The only way any non-European can ever truly "become" part of the nation - not superficially but innately - is to redefine the very European nature of our society at its core, as to destroy what it originally stood for and represented. It’s simply impossible to maintain a European civilisation based around European values and maintain a European identity, if the European race is replaced with some other foreign race. If Somalis or Chinese replaced the British people, Britain would be dead, since the nation itself is so deeply defined by the British ethnicity and race. Our nations are not propositional. They aren’t just a set of loose ideas that can change on a whim. Without Europeans, America would no longer be America, just as Canada would no longer be Canada, and Germany would no longer be Germany. This idea that we can just import foreigners and "integrate” them is a dangerous miss-assessment and is leading to our race's and civilisation’s collective demise.

Even the Africans who have existed in America since the beginning are still a completely distinct ethnic and cultural group that never has and never will share a racial bond or identity with the white Europeans who built America. What interest, or even capacity, does a Pakistani, an African, or a Chinese have in maintaining the European identity of our nation? Absolutely none. Since they are a product of non-white immigration, they have a vested interest in continuing this system. Why would any Hispanic Immigrant be opposed to further Hispanic immigration? That would be hypocritical of them since they themselves are a product of this system to begin with, and owe their very existence to it. Like I've already mentioned, even a "successful” integration would only ever be superficial. These races will always remain foreigners living in another people's nation unless the very core identity of the nation is usurped and destroyed in order to incorporate them.

We already know for a fact that races are tribal, so importing any amount of a foreign race will naturally result in ethnocentric preferences and behaviour within these groups, a breakdown of trust, and a dilution of national identity. These in-group preferences happen naturally and oftentimes subconsciously regardless of how much conditioning you try to force upon these non-whites. The reality of Human racial tribalism and in-group preference is not debatable. It is a fact that has been proven by multiple studies observing diversity in communities and observations of historical trends. Ethnocentrism is naturally how human communities have formed and how nations have always defined themselves. Only in recent decades have the disastrous and destructive policies of multiracialism/multiculturalism been implemented and institutionalised, and the devastating effects on national identity and cohesion it’s had are plainly obvious.

It is simply ludicrous to believe that one can preserve ones European national Identity and the integrity of the white race and civilization, while at the same time importing foreigners who naturally, both consciously and subconsciously, work against this in the many ways I've already mentioned. Multiracialism and multiculturalism are destructive fallacies that are resulting in the mass-replacement of white Europeans in our own nations, the destruction of our national identities, and the endangerment of our civilisation’s long-term survival.

From what I remember it was up for a day or two before this. I link it here and suddenly it gets taken down. Fucking shills pls go

They cannot.

They are too trapped in an inescapable machine.

We must consider genetic modification. It's their only hope - though I fear the consequences of that too, personality is not examined quite enough yet.

And I have no doubt it will cause more problems- change in society always causes more problems. We must continue to beat the problems.

Civic nationalist are faggots and you are a nigger how is that for narrow worldview

...

Jews want to bring white people down to black people's level.

White people want to bring them up to our level.

Kill yourself. Culture is unimportant. In fact, Western culture today is entirely cancerous and there is nothing worth preserving in it. Only blood matters.

FUCK YES BOYS PLEASE TELL ME THIS IS THE START OF SOMETHING BIG

Kikes do both.
Both you and the kikes want to sell the futures of your children all the same, you just disagree on method.

Bollocks, because I want to restrict global trade, increase national trade.
That means first re-establishing companies within the country, then getting the governments of first world countries to send educators and entrepreneurs to poorer countries to START (not outsource) businesses.

I was hoping to get some serious replies from those who have left their mothers basements and have actually experienced and traveled around the world.

Instead you talk about Jews and infer that black men are monkeys.

Yes there is. I have experienced it myself and have interacted with many people across the world of different cultures, and those of my land too–it does exist–it is completely ludicrous to think otherwise.

Please elaborate.

Your argument was slightly interesting until you mentioned race-preserving. Like it or not; that is simply not possible. Society will continue to mix races–you know that deep down. Cultures come and go and change. In our lifetime, we will have our culture in the far future–culture will be completely different. Things change, that's a fact of life. You're swimming against the rapids as you are so desperately trying to cling to the concept of identity. You have been so far indoctrinated into this way of thinking, i honestly feel bad for you. Think of the big picture. Your belief about race is so minuscule, insignificant, and irrelevant to us as humans. You take it far too seriously and miss the entire point of what we actually are.

At risk of sounding corny, our emotional sense of wonder, beauty, and lust for knowledge. If i developed a society where the Machu Picchu is; i would preserve it, for the emotion-based reasons aforementioned. I wouldn't tear it down and try and build something new, though that is just me. Just because your ancestors did not make something does not mean you cannot have appreciation for it. Have you ever left your country and seen the world? You ought to, it would do you some good.

These things ultimately do not matter in the grand scheme of things. You may be emotionally attached and tethered to these sets of ideas, but you're going to die, I'm going to die. Our great great great grandchildren will be living in a completely different culture and society than the one we live in now.

A lot of people here seem very emotionally attached to the idea of identity; there is nothing wrong with that, but it is only a slightly important factor in our brief lifespans. They ultimately do not matter.

I've lived there, and I've lived in a variety of places in the Europe. Canada is not European to the core, lmao. You've got Montreal due to french colonization, but that's it.

That is very much a false dichotomy; you imply that for an outsider to integrate, it destroys the culture. I cannot take an argument like this serious. Do you not think that the french had immigrants in the past? Do you not think Canada has had immigrants? People fuck, races mix. Your bloodline is most likely not as "pure" as you would like to think.

Your further argument about the British, the Chinese, and the Somalis have some merit, but again, like it or not, culture is not static. It changes slowly overtime; implying the Chinese conquered Britain, of course it would completely change, it wouldn't be Britain, i can agree with that. The Chinese would most likely have a culture no where near that of what the British were. The likelihoods of a sudden population replacement like that is close to nothing–and if it did happen, it would be a shame to us who are emotionally attached to that culture; after we're dead, it wouldn't matter. Society changes; in the far future maybe they would call the time before Britain was hypothetically conquered Ancient Britain, and kids would learn about it in schools.
Culture is never static, it is always slowly changing–a huge change like that happens rarely in history, for the most part, society will just slowly change as time goes by.

I don't identify as a civic nationalist.

Well done, you can speak in abstract terms but not come to a coherent solution to the problems we face.

Stop trying to sound intellectual, I've personally been travelling with my father (businessman) since I was old enough to walk - you know as well as I do that traits are prevalent in certain races and that cultures differ accordingly.

As all civic nationalists do. But your goals always end up coming backseat to making sure your culture dies on YOUR terms.

WHY?
Why do that? How does that help you or your people? Why bother doing something for an alien peoples that doesn't benefit you, and is actively hindering you by sending away your best and brightest to foreign lands to train the locals on how to take you down? It sure worked great for the legacy of Colonialism didn't it, just ask Britbongistan or Rhodesia didn't it?
You don't learn from history, so I will feel no sympathy when you watch your kids die by the very savages you tried to civilize.

Oh you've traveled have you?
I assume then that you've spent time in the Indian slums. Or that you've been to Zimbabwe and relished how much better it is now that it's under black control. I assume you've been to South Africa, and I assume you rationalize every minute of your travels as the fault of everybody BUT the people who make up those countries.
I don't infer it. I'm stating it.
Then you have bought into a mirage hook, line and sinker. You're putting your faith in fantasies because they look pretty.
Then you have already forsaken your own culture, and you are a traitor to your people. I'm glad we are able to establish these things upfront.

Never before have different races managed to live in the same society and adopt the same interests, the same mindsets and the same mannerisms.
Britain thought itself above this, and it's irreversibly changed from the country it was 20 years ago with its natives becoming second class citizens.
Australia is being bought by the Chinese and nobody says a word because to insinuate that Chinese and Australian peoples are different is grounds for legal ramification.
The European Union project is failing as every member state within it has a different interest by virtue of being different people.

Your ideals have NEVER succeeded, yet you continue to cling to them. You are no better than a communist, claiming that you must keep trying no matter how much innocent blood of your own you spill, in order to create the utopia you dream of or destroy your own people through trying.

It's too early (UK) to bother with a drawn out response but I need you to know that you're wrong, you even claim that cultural impact is a temporary thing and not a woven fibre into the tapestry of a nation. Any non-white who 'integrates' in a white society is merely a soulless, detached parody of that society. No different from black-face.

fucking sandnigger cunt makes me rage.

just keep it up niggers. your day will come.

Bump for a video link.
Also watch this video, highly relevant.

youtube.com/watch?v=vaVHTp2NKXw

feminist suffragette pls

...

Yeah. Kinda unpleasant somehow. Maybe it's just that I always had a thing for Mary Poppins when I was a kid. She can whap me with her umbrella any day.

haha. English nomenclature strikes again.

Only women.

Create a load of fake SJW and fake Mohammed accounts and then attack the whites, telling them London is muslim clay now it has a muslim mayor, and now that Newham and Tower Hamlets are >10% white british.

nigh

if we go out, we go out with a bang ;^)

full documentary

Submissive sexual fantasies/fetishes aren't healthy, lad.

But if it's Mary Poppins doing the whaping…

Whap her, nigga.

Call me degenerate but this picture is much hotter than it should be…

Indeed.

The concept was never intended as comedy. I think you underappreciate the gravity of the situation; what would a legitimate popular movement to secure a future for white people look like?

Suppose the contrast contributed to it.

fucking spics and their degenerate spam ads

>>>/auschwitz/

oh we'll deal with it just you wait you fucking heeb shit

huehues got an appreciation for gallows humor, I like it

huh

There's literally nothing wrong with letting your woman take charge every once in a blue moon. Its just a bit of fun lad.

How many women did you impregnate today? Stop being part of the problem and get out there

Fuckin Brazilians man

none, fuck off normie scum

You britshits are truly cancer

How did the leftist propaganda network let this one slip under the radar? I guess they're so far gone, they thought it would come accross as a positive message about diversity.

Can someone give me a tl;dw of the documentary?
What was the grade of anti-white propaganda?

Also, am I reading this correct on twitter? Are there actually mostly non-white "Britons" moaning whites dying out in the EastEnd, while the whites call it a racist propaganda piece?

What the fuck, Britain?

Non-whites all know on some level that they need Whitey around to keep things running.

Nope. You're projecting White sentience onto non-Whites. YOU know that non-Whites suffer without Whites. They don't because they categorically cannot see into the future.