SALON: TRUMP IS GOING TO WIN

Filtered.

Sounds like some streetshitter dopehead.

She's not even saying that. And free trade is fine on a small scale, the whole world should never be available for purchase though, there have to be higher ideals at some point.

what happens when a conqueror comes in? The murder of the high elites is quickly followed by them using the underling civil servant class against the new conquest.

They live longer this way. Don respects loyalty and usefulness. Hop on early and be very handy, he just might keep you from the hungry RWDS.

Off topic

Today I was looking at the stamp catalog. They have Chinese New Year stamps every year. What really piqued my interest is that this years' Monkey stamps' ceremony is being held in Jamaica, Queens, NY. Which is where Trump grew up.
Kek is gracious.

He said that the market doesn't give a fuck about Trump which is categorically false if Trump makes good on what he says. His entire point seems to be that the market is some ephemeral thing that is above politics, but I could be wrong. His writing is convoluted, self-fellating mess.

Doesn't that make her the street shitter?

I'm pretty sure run on sentences with 5 commas is not acceptable in a novel let alone an article of supposedly journalism. Many of her sentences lack central verbs, subjects or direct or indirect objects. It's like folks who say "an historic" to try to sound intelligent, not knowing that's been wrong for 250 years. This bitch thinks english is just a list of nouns and adjectives.

It's it a she?

Like, with a vagina and xx chromosomes.

This is what jewgle pulled up

Praise Kek.

also, this is absolutely full of jargon meant to seem so superior.

But it essentially boils down to this:

Its defeatism and smarmy superiority that would make a jew admire the chutzpah.

Totally sounds like Holla Forums wrote this, I thought all the classical materialist Marxists were purged from journalism long ago. That being said, I find this analysis much better and more truthful than the normal effeminate new left shrilling.

It's complete bullshit. He doesn't see how the economy and social mores interact with each other. They're completely disjointed in his mind.

Yah of course, he's fundamentally wrong buying into kike econo determinism. There's still some nuggets of truth there of some value and rarity, something that absolutely cannot be said about almost any other election article from the luggenpresse

I guess that's better than malice.

We have to take into account the fact that the recent resurgence of racism—in the form of overt police beatings..

I see Pajeet has no problems just making shit up out of thin air.

Let's try that again.

I see Pajeet has no problems just making shit up out of thin air.

then fuck the (global) free market

how about fuck you.

akinokure.blogspot.com/

IMO everyone should be reading that. Dude's up there with Scott Adams in terms of being on point and does a way better job at analyzing historical trends and precedence in regards to the 2016 election than ol' Nate Thirty Pieces. He's predicting a 400+ EV blow out for Trump.

This pajeet gets it. The war between right and left has boiled down to a war between identity and abstraction.

Its a shame that he only seems to see things in economic terms though. Economics is man-made and van be reigned in and made to serve man once more, with enough willing hands on the wheel.

Fuck off commie. Other nations can run their markets however they want.

But they happenned in his head, and you are reading what he wrote off the top of his head, and you're true, and his head is true;

SO IT MUST BE TRUE!!

I realize Salon isn't exactly a scholarly journal but for fuck's sake. He might as well ascribe the Democrat Party's election problems to a resurgence in UFO's and alien abductions.

Republicucks almost always fall in line behind whoever the leader is, it's in their nature as beta followers.

He's a communist, he thinks the market is something more than just the relationships and sum total of transactions between suppliers and demanders.

Somebody who looks like pic related, apparently.

Seriously, what trash writing. His analysis is only about 50% trash, but his writing is 100% trash.

How can Trump exist if politics doesn't exist?

Even this marxist trash is a better analyses than anything in the pundit group.

Most of us are NOT conservatives or Republicans in identity, and are not voting for Trump to do what Romney, McCain or Bush would have, or Bill Clinton, or even fucking Reagan.

In fact Trump is the anti-thesis of Reagan, he is not afraid to attack capitalists, he knows they are not all good, or the free hand just destroying to create. They are killing us, and he is at least recognising that without any fear, he's going to get fucking elected on that platform.

He is not a Repuplican and thank God for that.

Anis Shivani may be on the multi culti train but he does know what's wrong with modern fiction writing.

archive.is/FZ8Ub

Stupid commie fuck, the free market does work. What Trump's proposing is exactly what we need. Less government regulations, less taxes, more tariffs.

There will never be a free market in our lifetime.

Looks like that ad with Bill Clinton's victim having a nervous breakdown knocked some sense into at least part of the liberal media.

...

Look at the US during the late 19th century.

He looks like the sort of person that doesn't bother with toilets or toilet paper.

Which ad is that?

So the Free Market works when it isn't free.
Suuuuuuuuure.

That makes no sense whatsoever.

That's the same arguments a socialist would make.

archive.is/r6iuY

Brutal.

Because that collection of verbal diarrhea is published on Salon and has a headline, you're expecting it to be formal prose. This is an (understandable, given the context) mistake - that's not an article at all.

What you're reading is self-soothing behavior in text form.

The author needs to imagine she has a reason that will allow her conscious mind to accept what her subconscious mind has already decided, so she typed out a bunch of incomprehensible drivel of sufficient length to convince herself that she had accomplished this.

The market optimizes for efficiency, not for American interests.

Sometimes American interests align with global efficiency, but not always. Arguably not even often.

When Ford moves their plant to Mexico, we lose jobs. Do the cars become cheaper? No, not really. So what the hell do we get out of that deal? That's the market becoming more efficient, but not moving in a direction that benefits Americans.

We don't win anymore. Our country needs to win again.