Separation of Rightism and Christianity

Rightism needs to separate itself from Christianity. There is no reason the two should be intertwined, and this association between the two is one of the reasons sympathizers for Rightist causes are hard to come by. Especially because the Christian religion is false - like all other religions - is why Rightism must act at this moment and part with Christianity.

Let us post historical inaccuracies, literary oddities, anachronisms, mistranslations, and errors that very much show the Bible to be the work of humans, and without divine or even supernatural inspiration:

-The Binding of Isaac: A number of scholars believe that the original story ended with Abraham sacrificing Isaac, and that the ending where Isaac is spared and a ram delivered is a later addition. Old Testament scholar Terence Fretheim wrote that 'the text bears no specific mark of being a polemic against child sacrifice'. Even further, a genealogical snippet immediately after the binding of Isaac story hints at Isaac being sacrificed. First of all, the description of a rash of newborns placed right after the main story suggests the existence of some direct cause-effect connection between the two. From the perspective of a sacrificial economy, such a numerous progeny could not have been conceived without the preceding payment in an appropriate "currency". Even the names of these newborns seem to be a 'code', as they are not proper names: Re’umah (ראומה) – "see what"; Tevah (טבח) – "slaughtering" or "slaughtered"; Gaham (גחם) – "flame" or "burning"; Tahash (תחש) – "skin" often used to cover the tabernacle; Ma‘akah (מעכה) – "blown" or "crushed. In other words, "somebody had been blown, slaughtered, put on the tabernacle and burned."

-Existence of the Davidic Kingdom: There is no evidence of a United Monarchy, no evidence of a capital in Jerusalem or of any coherent, unified political force that dominated Palestine, let alone an empire of the size the legends describe. There is no evidence for the existence of kings named Saul, David or Solomon; nor do we have evidence for any temple at Jerusalem in this early period. Culturally, the Bronze Age collapse is otherwise a period of general cultural impoverishment of the whole Levantine region, None of the conquests of David nor Solomon are mentioned in contemporary histories. Solomon's empire is even said to have stretched from the Euphrates in the north to the Red Sea in the south; it would have required a large commitment of men and arms and a high level of organization to conquer, subdue, and govern this area. But there is little to no archaeological evidence of Jerusalem being a sufficiently large city in the 10th century BCE, and Judah seems to be sparsely settled in that time period.

-The Book of Samuel: The account features too many anachronisms to have been a contemporary source, such as: later armor (1 Samuel 17:4–7, 38–39; 25:13), use of camels (1 Samuel 30:17), and cavalry (as distinct from chariotry) (1 Samuel 13:5, 2 Samuel 1:6), iron picks and axes (as though they were common) (2 Samuel 12:31), sophisticated siege techniques (2 Samuel 20:15). There is a gargantuan troop (2 Samuel 17:1), a battle with 20,000 casualties (2 Samuel 18:7), and a reference to Kushite paramilitary and servants, clearly giving evidence of a date in which Kushites were common, after the 26th Dynasty of Egypt, the period of the last quarter of the 8th century BCE. Also regarded as myth due to its account of warring with the Canaanites, since the consensus today is that the Israelites emerged as an off-shoot of Canaanites in a relatively peaceful (uneventful) process.

Other urls found in this thread:

peterkreeft.com/topics-more/resurrection-evidence.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Historicity of the old testament is irrelevant to Christianity.

Well giving the OP the benefit of the doubt and assuming he is not a divide-and-conquer shill, let's just note that, intentionally or not, religion is the biggest divder of the right.

So I say: first we kick the left's ass, and then we can worry about religious squabbling within the right if it pleases you. But you have to pick your battles and the right needs more unity.

Until the left is crushed, the right should have a "gentleman's agreement" not to squabble about religion. Christian, pagan, atheist, whatever…KEEP IT TO YOURSELF until the left has had its skull ground to dust under our bootheels. Because 100% of the time it just devolves into:
vs
So if you are a serious Holla Forumslack, remember that "pol" is POLITICS, not religion.

-Census of Quirinius: The Gospel of Luke states that Jesus was born in Bethlehem in accordance with Jewish messianic prophecies because - according to Luke - the census stipulated that all people should return to their cities and towns of origin to register. However, this stipulation is complete nonsense, as it would have resulted in the massive displacement of the population and the separation of families; moreoever, there were significant amounts of Hellenes and Latins living in the cities of the Decapolis and Ceasarea Maritima and even Jerusalem, and such a stipulation would have forced them to undertake hazardous and long journeys. The idea that a census conducted for tax purposes would concern itself with the birth places of individuals is also ridiculous, since a tax census would actually focus on the amount of people residing in an area currently. Former Bishop E. W. Barnes remarks: "The Romans were a practical race, skilled in the art of public administration. It is incredible that they should have taken a census according to such a fantastic system. If any such census had been taken, the dislocation to which it would have led would have been world-wide. Roman historians would not have failed to record it." As such, the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem was most likely a later addition from Greek scribes who wished to appeal to Jewish messianic sensibilities (and failed, since ultimately, the majority of converts to Christianity were gentiles).

the fact that the Old Testament is horrifying legends of alien goatfuckers is relevant to Christianity, which holds it as divinely inspired scripture.

Don't forget, biology and nationalism are essential to our worldview, while spiritualism and universalism are essential to the Christian worldview.

wow yet another identical thread with the same title as the one earlier today

I wonder who would be behind pushing white people away from the faith of their ancestors, and from traditional moral values….

Pure coincidence.

On the other hand, completely relevant: for example, Jesus is stated to be of the Davidic line. Moreoever, how can Jesus be the 'New Covenant' if there was no 'Old/Mosaic Covenant'? Nonsense. Jesus even spoke of the events of the Old Testament as though they were fact.

These two are not in opposition.

Christcucks have surrendered to progs entirely. Christcuckery today consists of adopting embryonic niggers because all lives matter.

All lives do not matter.

We need to stop cucking for unborn bastards.

Rightism is a complete non-issue. The right and the left are just jewish analogies plagued by controlled opposition. This is not a war between the right and the left.

This is a war between nationalism and globalism, good versus evil. Right and left are kosher politics.

Only latter-day Evangelicals are Biblical literalists, dumbshit OP.

spiritualism is nonsense, and it is the reason Christcucks suppose that women have the same moral duty as men. In fact, women can not be trusted with any moral duty whatsoever, because that is not in their nature.

Souls do not exist, period.

Universalism absolutely conflicts with nationalism, and universalism = cuckoldism.

peterkreeft.com/topics-more/resurrection-evidence.htm

yep leftypol pagan Holla Forums and atheist Holla Forums and protestant Holla Forums are all on the same side

But pagans and atheists have resisted progressivism in any measurable degree?

...

-Census of Quirinius: The Gospel of Luke states that Jesus was born in Bethlehem in accordance with Jewish messianic prophecies because - according to Luke - the census stipulated that all people should return to their cities and towns of origin to register.

However, this stipulation is complete nonsense, as it would have resulted in the massive displacement of the population and the separation of families; moreoever, there were significant amounts of Hellenes and Latins living in the cities of the Decapolis and Ceasarea Maritima and even Jerusalem, and such a stipulation would have forced them to undertake hazardous and long journeys. The idea that a census conducted for tax purposes would concern itself with the birth places of individuals is also ridiculous, since a tax census would actually focus on the amount of people residing in an area currently. Former Bishop E. W. Barnes remarks: "The Romans were a practical race, skilled in the art of public administration. It is incredible that they should have taken a census according to such a fantastic system. If any such census had been taken, the dislocation to which it would have led would have been world-wide. Roman historians would not have failed to record it." As such, the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem was most likely a later addition from Greek scribes who wished to appeal to Jewish messianic sensibilities (and failed, since ultimately, the majority of converts to Christianity were gentiles).

Barabbas: Scholars believe the incident with Barabbas is a complete invention of a Greek scribe. The name Barabbas (bar-Abbas) is merely Hebrew for 'son of the father', and is an epiphet and not a proper name. It is possible this epiphet was one used by the historical Jesus: as such, when the crowd clamored for Barabbas, they clamored for Jesus. But as it was being transcribed from oral history to the written word, the Greek scribes mistook it for a proper name for a separate individual, and a story was invented concerning a tradition in which the Romans released a prisoner at Passover (this tradition never existed), which would later become the basis for anti-Jewish sentiment and as a convenient way to expiate the Romans (since the early Christians were frustrated that - while gentiles converted - the Jews never turned to Christianity in great numbers).

-Paul's Roadside Conversion: How is it that the Jewish Priesthood - which was limited to only having a small police force to monitor the Temple grounds by the occupying Romans - was able to command enough men and power to arrest private citizens outside of their jurisdiction? After all, Paul was sent to Damascus to arrest those who had faith in Jesus. Let us remember, that the Jewish Priesthood and Sanhedrin was only given certain limited powers from their Roman overlords, and even then only in the territory of Judea. However, Damascus itself would have been located in Syria, which was an Imperial Province of the Roman Empire. What's more, Judea was itself a vassal of the Imperial Province of Syria. Secondly, why would Paul - who claimed to be a very devout Pharisee - even work for the Priesthood, the majority of who were Sadduccees? After all, the two factions (Sadduccess and Pharisees) were extremely hostile to each other, indicating that Paul probably fabricated his Pharisee background (a number of researchers believe Paul was not very familiar with Judaism, explaining his odd introductions to early Christianity which resembled Attic mystery rites and neo-Platonism) and was merely a Greek who happened to have Jewish ancestry.

I am not a big fan of Christianity but Holla Forums is not a place to discuss it


This
Mods anchored an identical thread a couple hours ago and instead of dealing with it like a man, OP reposted it like a shill

MODS ARE FUCKING SHIT

WHY HAVENT YOU DELETED THIS SHIT THREAD

It's like you want to spend an eternity in the pit.

All but the most obtuse or heavily manipulated religious people today know, on some level, that Christianity is false. They just desire the structure and purpose that religion gives them, compared to the nihilistic void that modern society offers.

The traditionalist right and religious right are natural allies, both desiring the same thing but for different reasons: return of emphasis on the family, the culture, and the nation. No sense in poisoning the well now; the next generation is already less religious than their predecessors, and that trend will likely continue into the future.

dae evolutionary psychology?

Please die.

It's actually very pleasing to see Christcucks struggling with the cognitive dissonance between "it's real cuz muh book says so" and "fuck, all the evidence shows it's not real"

Christcucks are as normie as you can get, dumb frogposter.

Imagine the blood bath that would emerge in a white nationalist country when religious infighting commences.

You don't belong here, kike.

THIS.

Attacking Christianity is foolish as society is already becoming irreligious so the problem is taking care of itself.

Exactly right. The New Right will not be based on Christianity in any way, but we should welcome any Christians that support the New Right's vision of a traditionalist white ethnostate.

Focusing on Christianity is pointless and useless as our real enemy is the false oppositon known as "conservatism" and ultimately liberalism. As neocons have shown, the religious right can be easily manipulated to support the leading right's cause ( bombs for Israel), or again with the God-Emperor Trump himself who ran a nationalistic campaign and won among evangelicals over the "true consevative" evangelical cruz.

Christianity is not our enemy

Wrong, you have no idea what you are ranting about.

God created the world and everything that happens is by his permission - there is no such thing as separation of politics and God.

Any white nationalist who fails to get in line with the will of God and bow the knee to the Lordship of Jesus Christ will be destroyed. Sooner or later you will be forced to submit. You don't win - God wins and all glory goes to the creator Jesus Christ.

The entire Godhead dwells in the Lord Jesus Christ who trampled death and rose in glory and power and rules at the right hand of God Almighty over all creation. Every government, ruler, state, race, tribe, family, and individual lives or dies at his whim.

We white Christians will tolerate you right wing secular atheists as long as you match our agenda, including the destruction of communism, heathen races, and perversion. As for your slander of the Holy Scriptures and mocking, that's just symptomatic of your own perversity and therefore doom. Don't imagine that you will ever get the victory over us. The Christians will rule the universe under Christ forever and forever.