New Jungle Book movie has us as the bad guy

Have you guys seen the new Jungle Book movie? It had some stuff I think Holla Forums would be interested in.

For those who haven't seen the original, I'll recap. It's based on stories by based Rudyard Kipling. The movie is about a boy named Mowgli, a little kid raised in the jungle. Throughout the movie, he is being escorted by a panda to return back to the society of humans because he doesn't belong in the jungle. They do this while trying to avoid Shere Khan, a tiger, who viewed Mowgli to be an intruder who didn't belong and a threat to the animals in the jungle. The film ends with Mowgli returning back to a village of humans, thereby returning to his rightful home and where he belongs.

This new one is different. I am convinced the changes they made were in response to the growing right-wing sentiment on the internet and it's culture. It also had the inevitable liberal bullshit all new movies made by (((The Disney Corporation))) spits out. For example, Mowgli in both movies found himself in the jungle because he was being accompanied by his father in the jungle when his father died, leaving Mowgli stranded. In the original, all you see is a crashed boat with the baby inside. There are clear implications that his parents are dead, but you never actually see them (before or after they died). In this new one, there is a flash back where you do get to see Mowgli's father. His father is dressed in a turban and robes that is unquestionably Islamic. This is an important change, as you'll see later.

Another change is the ending. The new one has Mowgli kill Shere Khan after uniting the animals of the jungle against him. There is than narration by another character saying something along the lines of "I don't think I ever saw anything like it. This was a kid with no homeland and no background do the impossible by uniting all animals no matter who they were" (that's not exactly it, but I can't find any clips online so this is going by memory). The original had a message that all should stick with their own kinds, this new one has a message that any one can integrate into any environment, and that people who protest this are evil and deserving of death. For those wondering, no, Mowgli never does return back to the man-village in the new one. He stays in the jungle (presumably) forever.

Now, I know what you're thinking.
Here's why:
There's a scene in this new movie that really stood out. It's a scene that's not in the original movie or in the book. Shere Khan has taken control of the wolves den and is telling the baby wolves a story. He says, "The one you really have to watch out for is the cuckoo bird. The cuckoo puts his eggs into the nests of other birds. Then, the other mother hatches the cuckoo, and treats it as her own bird. However, the other chicks do not have enough food because their mother is taking care of the cuckoo chick. Her own chicks starve and die all because a mother loved a chick who was not her own.” As he says that last part, he turns and looks at the mother wolf who took care of Mowgli in the beginning of the movie
Disney changed a movie about staying with your own kind and not straying beyond where you should be into a movie where a young Muslim comes into a foreign environment, the people who support him are called "cucks" by the bad guy, and it ends with the foreign Muslim killing the person against him and becoming king of the jungle. I really recommend Holla Forumsacks watch the original and the new one, it's an interesting change.

Other urls found in this thread:

therightstuff.biz/2016/05/13/the-jungle-book-shere-khan-did-nothing-wrong/
imdb.com/title/tt0110213/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hua_Mulan
streamin.to/gf9grqkpgb0k
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Fucking hell. I meant panther. Disregard, I suck cocks.

This ought to be done into an article somewhere

I'm not a very good writer, but yeah this could make a petty good article on TRS or TDS or something.

top kek this is why I thought your post was off.
otherwise good work, that little detail you noticed is key.
fucking hollywood kikes warping everything to suit them.

There's another scene that bugged me. There's a song in both the original and this movie called "I wanna be like you." In it, the king of the monkeys wants to become a human, and kidnaps Mowgli so Mowgli can teach him the secret of fire. The king believes this will make him human. The new movie changed this a bit. They made this king a giant monkey with an enormous wealth of gold and fruits. They also added a verse emphasizing his "desire" for this power. Essentially, in the original this scene reinforced the theme that you can't change who you are. The new one has a broader message of "greed." The king isn't bad because he's violating the idea that a monkey can't be a human, he's just bad because he's selfish. Pic related is also important to keep in mind.

...

Oh, looks like they did one already.
therightstuff.biz/2016/05/13/the-jungle-book-shere-khan-did-nothing-wrong/

But it's absolutely terrible. Your writing is actually far better, even if unpolished, because you know how to structure information clearly.

This is a real slap in the nuts because Kipling's original character was Indian (modem, not totem).

Thanks, man. Reading through their article, I really feel like they should have compared it to the1967 version. If you don't have the context of what could have been you won't know how unbelievably pozzed this new movie really is

That must have been uncomfortable for Mowgli. There aren't any streets in the jungle. Was he just holding it in the whole time?

I saw it and enjoyed it for what it was. Yes it's subversive, but still enjoyable if you put the focus on Shere Khan as the tragic hero whose only crime was jungle conservatism and not enough respect for how fickle his jungle brethren are.

I think it's good to spread awareness of this kind of subversive stuff. Remember, most people won't think of Shere Khan as a tragic hero

Millions of Indians are Muslim. They even made their own country (Pakistan).

These people weren't Muslim in the original. They were Hindus.

I'm aware. I'm being pedantic.

Fucking pirate it if they're going to be cunts.

Of course. Don't give money to (((Disney)))

That's actually pretty interesting tbh.

The jews and their meme magic will fail.


But in the mean time its doing quite a bit of damage.

Luckily all it takes is a wake up message and people will snap out of it.

I actually saw this garbage and then completely forgot about it but what you said stuck with me. especially the change at the end with Mowgli never returning to the man village.

That was the entire point of the original story, it was an allegory for growing up. The kid needed to stop fucking around in the jungle and become a man. That's why Sher Khan wanted to kill him so bad, men can be dangerous and he didn't want another man around.
The cartoon reinforced this idea with the girl singing by the water, part of growing up is being attracted to girls. But no, in this version Mowgli stays a man-child in arrested development. Exactly how the (((They))) want us, not men, eternal children.

I saw the original with my little cousin. Everything about it is fucking great, the animation, voice acting, every frame is perfect, all the dialog serves to move the story and reinforces the characters. It's brilliant. The good news is we'll always have the original

Bumping this thread with no survivors

THE DISGUSTING SWINE THAT HAS DONE THIS NEEDS TO BE BOILED UNTIL HIS ENTIRE BODY DISINTEGRATES INTO A THICK FLUID

I AM BEYOND MAD

GASSING WON'T EVEN DO IT

THESE PEOPLE NEED TO IRRADIATED THEN LEFT TO DIE IN A HOSPITAL WHERE THEY KEEP THEM ALIVE AND SUFFERING FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE LIKE THAT FUCKING JAPANESE GUY WHO LOST ALL HIS SKIN AND WAS STILL ALIVE

THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST ANGERING THINGS I HAVE SEEN, THEY HAVE RUINED MY CHILDHOOD CLASSICS WITH THEIR POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

THIS IS WORTHY OF ARTILLERY ATTACKS WITH NUCLEAR SHELLS

THEY NEED TO DIE AND SLOWLY


REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

100% agreed. The original was gold, this is degeneracy that needs to be stopped

There's a flaw in the enemy's memetics that should be exploited.

Pakistanis and Indians fucking hate each other.
The fact that they arbitrarily changed Mowgli from Hindu to Muslim should be a slap in the face to any Indian person, and while I don't know, I would imagine there might be MANY Indian people who identify with the old movie, and would care that this change has been made if they knew.

So by all means, let (((Disney))) think they're clever for shifting around the character's ethnicity and religion to make it more "topical" and push their political message more ham-handedly.
This exact action opens the door for us to use the racial tensions which they INSIST are irrelevant to tear their marketing efforts apart, turn their own liberal drones against them, and set them on the cannibalistic path of attempting to apologize to SJWs.

The problem is that there is a pseudo-hierarchy in liberal minds. Sure some Hindus might get upset, but liberals (who like Muslims more than Hindus) would just complain about bigoted, conservative, Hindus who hate their poor Muslims neighbors. Liberals might even try to Zimmerman them and declare Hindus white. That might sound funny to you, but I've seen liberals claim that Jews and Eastern Asians are white and that the Rwandan genocide was caused by white people.

you are all niggers

I am a caucasian male, good sir

LOW ENERGY SCHLOMO
O
W

E
N
E
R
G
Y

S
C
H
L
O
M
O

I saw this one with my wife and mom, and the changes to the end and who the humans were really threw me off. The decision to have him stay actually bothered me a bit, it kinda ruins the movie TBH.

Straying from your own kind also causes problems and damage repair.


In essence, Mowgli is just a fucking environmentalist who actually fucked up an ecosystem with all his bullshit. Sure, at the end of the movie he lives with all the animals and shit, but there is still explicit mention of "hunting" when all the animals are gathered at the watering hole, so it's not like he settled all the scores of the jungle forever. They gotta eat.

The whole point is to get hindus and muslims at each other's throats in our lands, which shouldn't be hard but so far hasn't happened much.

It's doesn't just kinda ruin the movie. It betrays the entire central point of the movie.

Had to check this work of "art"

So, you are saying it is liberal fantasy porn where their pet shitskin helps them unite all the factions to overthrow the natural order for their marxist reasons. It's like Sarte was the screenwriter.

...

...

sage, report and move on

nice

Shit, but I'm not surprised at all. Good work OP.

Hey Holla Forums, what's the maximum jew percent we can tolerate before a movie is complete trash?

By "us" I just mean the broader movement of right wingers online, such as Holla Forums, the alt-right, and others. Ordinarily I would have said this was typical pozzed Hollywood being itself, but the fact that they created a brand new scene where the villain calls the good guys cucks means they're acknowledging us

Holla Forums was right again.

Meme Based Shere Khan

Kaa as an older woman preying on the young boy is just setting people up for straight shota to be legal.

Bump and reported for kike shill.

TRIPS CONFIRM SHERE KHAN IS BASED

Disney pulls this kind of Jew-shit all the time, just don't do business with them.
Disney has never made a "Jungle Book" movie even close to the actual book, ever.

Just read your kids the real story & throw the damn Jew-TV out the window.

Dumbass.

I saw the movie, Mowgli's parents are likely Sihks because they wear turbans and carry curved daggers.

You want to really get mad as hell?
Pirate (don't rent, don't give the filthy Jews at Disney one red cent) the 1994 version that Disney butchered.

imdb.com/title/tt0110213/
This one actually had white Englishmen in it as the example of how people SHOULDN'T act, forcing poor Mowgli to take them to lost treasure at gun point.

"An adaptation of Rudyard Kipling's classic tale of Mowgli the jungle boy who is raised by wolves after being lost when a tiger attacked an encampment and killed his father. Years later he finds himself re-united with his childhood love Kitty and back in the "civilization" of Colonial India which he finds far less civilized then his jungle haunts. The search for a lost treasure shows who the truly civilized members of society are."

Of course, there aren't even any whites in the book AT ALL, so they had to write some in in order to trash them and push white "guilt."

In the original book, there were three Hindi that got their hands on a jewel-encrusted knife that Mowgli had taken from a snake guardian of a treasure, who warned him that the trasure was cursed, and the three ended up killing each other for it, so Mowgli took it back to the hoard. Other than this, the movie in 1994 had no resemblance to Kipling's story at all whatsoever, and Disney even had people writing them to rage about it.

I agree with this.
Holla Forums should list a number of highly traveled Indian social media websites and then we all could spread the word that Disney has presented Mowgli as being a Muslim instead of Hindu.
Maybe we can light a fire under those bastards asses.

However, are you sure they're not presenting Mowgli as a Sikh?

Made a post about this with pretty much the exact same contents a while back, with one more point.

The mother wolf is completely white, compared to the gray of the other wolves. Then, at the end of the movie, they make her (cucked white female) the alpha of the wolf pack, completely disregardful of nature.

MAKE NIGGERS MONKEYS AGAIN

Daily reminder that Jungle Book was the last film Walt Disney was alive to make (he died during its production)

And his death opened the door for the inevitable kike takeover

go shill your shit somewehere else, kike
reported

I was looking for that image, thanks based user

That tiger was voiced by an ape

how much does hollywood pay per post?

Given that I advocated pirating the movie and outright stated not to give money to the company making it, clearly not enough

MY COINCIDENCE DETECTOR IS OVERHEATING

Bretty good post fam.

I was on the fence about taking nephews to see this, I will now try to get my local cinema to have some showings of the original.

You could also take them to go see the new Angry Birds movie

London is Falling was a decent (not cucked) recent film, it flopped completely. Nu-males (cucks) run the review busines and decide what is going to be a succes and what not. Anti-whte movies are praisedm films that are not anti-white are demonized. We need a march through the institutions to fix this shit.

We should stream it some time and get comfy. How is something that based even allowed to exist in this day and age?

I'm glad AVGN is coming to uncuck the review business

Wow, way to cuck up one of my favorite cycle of stories, Jewsney.

Turban and robes is Sikh, maybe Hindu, not Muslim.

Harry Potter was like this: in most traditional coming of age fantasy stories in this vein, to defeat the villain, Harry would have had to have sacrificed his magic, thus no longer being part of the Wizarding World representing his passage into manhood. I mean, the set up for that was there, but Rowlings is a god awful writer and did the shitty cop-out fanwank ending.

Hilariously enough, the Muslims were the most atrocious rulers of the Indian sub continent. Literally entire villages were razed on the fact that a king was restless. Men and old women were beheaded while the pubescent children and women were made into slaves or sex slaves.

If what you're saying is absolutely true about the Muslim fellow, then I'm at a loss for words. I can't believe how corrupt Disney has become over the decades.

...

There was that ruined town with streets and all.

How's your first day? :^)

Been prety good, woke up, masturbated then fell back asleep.

That original song too is kind of funny when viewed through a racial lens.

A monkey wanting to be human, just like a nigger wanting to be human. I was most curious about how they changed up that song in this film, thanks for filling me in.

How?

Oh look, it's the Norse god Heimdall, Roland Deschain and the next James Bond.

Where do Indians fit exactly?
Just down from Whites like East Asians or somewhere else?

bestiality porn when? what a bullshit reboot to be honest.

I've always thought the same thing, in fact singing this to a nigger in HS was a highlight of my education.

Slightly below east asians but through sheer force of numbers there are plenty of decent ones.

I hate that nig, people fucking jizz themselves over him all the time , like he's some kind of amazing actor. I used to think he was decent, but I can't fucking stand his ugly ass because of how many people virtue signal about how great he is.

He didn't want to review the new ghostbusters and lefties freaked out. That's all.

...

Michael Bay's movies are universally trashed and always end up making over a billion dollars.

Mulan is GOAT though, nothing wrong with it.

This is a kids movie, that is the most tragic part. Kids soak up themes like this. It's poison.

Thank you for the great movie observation here.


Lol

GOAT?

The only jungle with mudslimes near in India is in Bangladesh aka Bengal.

That list isn't very good since the vast majority of the "kike" films featured were actually pretty fucking great. Try updating with Disney's more recent films.

Greatest Of All Time

Yeah, that one was probably them trying out a newbie writer.

The preferred nomenclature is dot vs. feather Indian.

Especially the TV shows. Those are pretty trashy.

It is a good list

Mulan - Girl power
Pocahontas - Ebil whitey

Mulan is based on actual history. It is less of a stronk feminist movie and more like a traditional shield-maiden similar to old Germanic culture. Capable and strong women != muh grrl power

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hua_Mulan

I'm not talking about the original story but about the movie produced by kikels

The "Disney Renaissance" was pretty fucking horrific tbh

Forgot Mulan.

Mulan was ok, essentially a Chink equivalent to our Joan of Arc

It depends, really. It's not the same having Schlomo as writer than having him as actor, or in photography

MISTER I'LL MAKE A LAMP OUT OF YOU

Why doesn't it surprise me that Holla Forums's only frame of reference is the Disney movie and not Kipling's novel?

WATCHING NOW
WILL REPORT BACK ON CUCKHOLDING IN CHILDREN'S MOVIES
streamin.to/gf9grqkpgb0k

I can't into webms, but if someone could webm that cuckoo bird scene it would be much appreciated

I just checked, It's 46 minutes in

How is it?

It's bad, fam. Just watch it yourself.

Life is cruel.

Dubs confirm Mulan is OK. I liked it anyway.

...

she's ugly as fuck

nigga you gay or something? smdh.

I was hoping the other guy might give his own opinion

I shouldn't have expected to be able to see this degeneracy for free. Disney is pretty keen on scrubbing any of their new stuff from the internet

I just want a sugar momma kike.

I just realized the original movie isn't even that Jewish. They counted the modern CEO of Disney, but Walt was in charge back than. The only Jew is Phil Harris, who's just a random Jazz singer.

Retard. Turbans means he is sikh. Sikhs absolutely detest muslims, they are the anti-thesis to muslims and have been fighting muslims for years.