The reporter asks the factory owner why should the workers get low pay when they make the product.
The factor owner goes into a long explanation in which he brings up the many costs.
At the end of the explanation he insults the reporter by telling him to get a job.
Other urls found in this thread:
wikiwand.com
twitter.com
Sorry for low quality
Oops, that's uncropped
thanks.
...
Thanks man, I was hoping someone would have a more high quality version
...
...
...
It's called property you commies.
People invest their own money in capital acquisition and then pay people a wage to produce goods using that capital.
If there was no capitalist then the worker wouldn't be able to work.
Nobody really denies this (except hardcore commies).
What is reprehensible is the attitude of the capitalist, which has existed forever & was noted by Adam Smith himself:
"The proprietor of stock is necessarily a citizen of the world, and is not necessarily attached to any particular country. He would be apt to abandon the country in which he was exposed to a vexatious inquisition, in order to be assessed to a burdensome tax, and would remove his stock to some other country where he could either carry on his business, or enjoy his fortune more at his ease." – Adam Smith
"As soon as the land of any country has all become private property, the landlords, like all other men, love to reap where they never sowed, and demand a rent even for its natural produce." – Adam Smith
"In the long-run the workman may be as necessary to his master as his master is to him, but the necessity is not so immediate." – Adam Smith
"A man must always live by his work, and his wages must at least be sufficient to maintain him. They must even upon most occasions be somewhat more, otherwise it would be impossible for him to bring up a family, and the race of such workmen could not last beyond the first generation." – Adam Smith
"Our merchants and master-manufacturers complain much of the bad effects of high wages in raising the price, and thereby lessening the sale of their goods both at home and abroad. They say nothing concerning the bad effects of high profits. They are silent with regard to the pernicious effects of their own gains. They complain only of those of other people." – Adam Smith
"With the greater part of rich people, the chief enjoyment of riches consists in the parade of riches, which in their eye is never so complete as when they appear to possess those decisive marks of opulence which nobody can possess but themselves." – Adam Smith
"A merchant, it has been said very properly, is not necessarily the citizen of any particular country." – Adam Smith
"All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind." – Adam Smith
"Labour was the first price, the original purchase-money that was paid for all things. It was not by gold or by silver, but by labour, that all the wealth of the world was originally purchased" – Adam Smith
"The government of an exclusive company of merchants is, perhaps, the worst of all governments for any country whatever." – Adam Smith
"Wherever there is great property, there is great inequality." – Adam Smith
"Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defence of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all." – Adam Smith
"We rarely hear, it has been said, of the combinations of masters, though frequently of those of workmen. But whoever imagines, upon this account, that masters rarely combine, is as ignorant of the world as of the subject. Masters are always and everywhere in a sort of tacit, but constant and uniform combination, not to raise the wages of labor above their actual rate." – Adam Smith
So how about the actual net gain of the company is then divided equally between all employees? Then everyone involved has some skin in the game, and they all equally share the benefits of their hard labor, or the loss of the market response.
The manager is doing no more work than anyone on the production line. Everyone would work like they owned the company (and not like union workers) if they actually owned part of the company.
Those at the top are not paid for their labor, which they delegate, anyway. They are paid for their connections, throughout government as well as industry.
Yet it is exceedingly clear that they, as well as the stockholders, have become excessively greedy in this regard, as anyone can see the national engine of progress and consumer security is breaking down in the U.S. by the year.
Their greed is driving us to destitution & third-world status, and a worldwide economic catastrophe is imminent, given the massive balloons of debt the world's remaining economies are floating on.
You didn't even mention automation, which will replace the labor entirely or almost entirely. When there is no middle or lower class needed, who do you think the robot army is going to come for first?
The zionists golem is almost complete.
Reverse image search you lazy fuck. Go back to Reddit.
but who will buy all their shit when there are no more working goym around who are employed?
The logic of money, the endless process valorization in time and space is what's causing all this. Conquer new market in space, make more profit in time. Do this first on a local, then national, then global level. Globalists are not ideologues, they are just greedy people that follow the logic dictated by the Capital.
Money is quantitative relationship to the world that has no limit in itself, because it's purely quantitative. George Soros won't stop investing tomorrow, he'll still want more. But if Mr. X got the pair of shoes he need, he'll stop buying shoes. That's the difference between the value of an object and its use.
The more we delve into modernity (global Capital), the more turn away from the use and the more we turn towards the quantitative trading value.
EU, TAFTA, immigration (create an uprooted class of low-paid brainwashed mixed-race consumers), etc. are just that.
Reverse image search brought me to the original image. Kill yourself for making me look at this you faggot.
National technocracy it is then.
And YOU did not mention that with the advent of the technology to make your own energy, plus the advent of 3D printers that can build anything out of energy, including themselves, owners will no longer be needed, taxes will no longer exist to pay for police or soldiers to protect them, so squatters will take their land & they'll be outnumbered & helpless little nobodies.
It is just as realistic a scenario as your plan to replace humans with robots. And even if your scenario actually comes to pass, you will have done nothing more than usher in the age of socialism & the downfall of mankind.
Machines can be hacked and set to turn on you.
"I'm lucky to pocket a few pennies after all my expenses"
here is your new necklace, try it on
As jewish as it gets.