Most people want to accept refugees, survey finds

...

If they are genuine victims of war, we can confirm that they are genuine victims of war, we can identify them, keep track of them and send them back home when their homeland is safe, then I don't see the problem tbh providing you can meet all those criteria

i find it very hard to believe

No it is true. What you thought the media always told the truth?

(((Surveys))).

Anyway, if Europeans want to be destroyed, nothing we can do about it.

Fundamentally flawed survey since the question being asked isn't "will you welcome shitskins into your nation to prey on your women and children while parasiting off your pathological altruism and generous welfare system?"

I'm calling

BULLSHIT
U
L
L
S
H
I
T

I conducted a survey of 27 countries this morning and the results stated that 97% of people want to gas the kikes.

Hmm

America well past 70% too, my Americuck friend.

yeah sure

While on the face of it this may seem like a clever solution it is still fucking awful nonetheless because almost every developed nation on earth has a small minority of shitskins who would fucking jump at the opportunity of accelerating the collapse of their host's society.

Shitskins shall only be sent to one of the following:
- Back whence they came
- The ovens

I never trust lefty NGOs

It's obviously fake. If you live in Europe you know that a huge majority of Europeans want closed borders and deportations.

Look at those heartless Russians smack at the bottom. Those Russians are truly the most evil people on the planet. I bet they use kittens instead of sand in their punching bags.

This is the most bullshit "survey" I've ever seen.

This is some serious "department of truth" level brainwashing. The goal is to trick all the people who are critical of their nation's suicide into believing there is something "wrong" with them for committing those anti-marxist thought crimes.

I'm gonna guess that this is the percent of single women in the UK.

Chinese people hate niggers. This survey is bollocks.

Most people are uninformed about muslims or too cowardly to take a stand.

Poland 56%? Seriously? Cool survey, data is so pulled out of the ass I can smell the shit through the monitor - and I highly dislike that fucking odour

Unless they meant 5,6% but I think even that'd be too high

I know, the right wing shitlord party won, there's no possible way that the majority is cucked.

What was the sample size of each country and actually I wouldn't be surprised that low sample included muslims, niggers, recent refugees and other non-natives. Statistics are so easy to manipulate for an intended purpose.

These graphs might as well be listing countries by media freedom.

Countries like Russia where people get to see the truth about rapefugees are against having them.

Viceversa, in countries where the media is pozzed people are welcoming to rapefugees because they've been successfully brainwashed into considering them poor victims.

If anything the graphs represent a map describing the current state of the narrative war.

Alt-Right portal: nxx14.blogspot.com

Here's the link to the actual 'study'.

They only interviewed about 1000 people from each nation. Read page six for the bullshit demographic section and scroll to the bottom to see the two women that kicked this off.

Slavs confirmed for master race once again.

They have all but admitted that they have gamed the results right in the fucking title.

I fucking live here. I can tell you it would not be that 90% mark. The only possible way it would be that way is if it were white refugees.
They love white people, and hate Muslims and Niggers.
Seriously blacks are treated terrible here, must of been some loaded questions.

Not buying it, m8

Guess what's the founder of amnesty international.

~1000 people for each nation. A few are a little more/little less.

I posted some stuff earlier but this goddamn shitty site isn't showing it.

Bullshit questions, bullshit answers. Real, actual refugees, from neighbouring countries?. Sure, let's not be monsters, camps near the border, provided food and shelter - and that's it - they're safe, waiting for war to end. Done. But economic migrants because oligarchs need to suppress wages, or jewish whitegenocide?. Get fucked.

Time to start learning Russian

themoscowtimes.com/business/article/sberbank-says-average-russian-salary-lower-than-chinese/569882.html

see, there is a very important distinction to be made here.
the actual refugees are a tiny minority.
pakistanis, nigerians,bengali. moroccans, tunisians, senegalese, ivorians and so on and so on… do not qualify. and they are the vast vast majority.

Actual refugees should go back to their country, pick up a rifle and fight.

Who are they for we to feed them?

i completely agree.

The survey is fucking garbage.

disagree with each of the following statements:
a. People should be able to take refuge in other countries to escape from war or
persecution.
b. Our government should do more to help refugees fleeing war or persecution.
2. How closely would you personally accept people fleeing war or persecution? Would you let
them live…? CHOOSE ONE [RESPONDENT SHOULD CHOOSE THE FIRST ONE ON THE LIST
THAT APPLIES TO THEM]
1. in your household
2. in your neighbourhood
3. in your city, town or village
4. in your country
5. Or would you refuse them entry to your country

persecution) in their country, city, neighbourhood or home. Thirty per cent would accept
refugees in their household or neighbourhood, and 10 per cent would accept refugees in
their home.

archive.is/5ujeV

lel

Those are all lies.

There is no possible way, even before the invasion of Europe that 97% of people said yes to accepting invaders.

Absolutely none.

OP is a shill, consensus cracking nigger. Also;

REPORT + HIDE + SAGE
REPORT + HIDE + SAGE
REPORT + HIDE + SAGE
REPORT + HIDE + SAGE
REPORT + HIDE + SAGE

Then you keep them in your home and you are responsible for anything they do. when they are arrested you are also arrested. Take responsibility for your full grown retarded pets or fuckoff back to faggot town.

this

It doesn't say what refugees, it just asked would you accept "war refugees". I would have no problem at all accepting say Hungarian refugees, or Swiss, any other white, christian european country refugees. But I would absolutely not accept muslims or niggers

What retardedly biased questions…

Personally accept? Meaning what? Like, if they're already here, would I be friendly with them instead of spitting in their face?

Do more what? Making a safe zone for them in Syria? Or how about helping them by blowing ISIS off the face of the earth so they can have their country back?

Which people? What kind of people? Friendly white christians?

Great survey.

What a lack of civics and patriotism.
I can't talk for Chile, for example, but in Argentina it's actually becoming a serious problem. Politics became more about egos than actually helping the country, even if coming from a different ideological background.
It reflects on citizenship, and it seems it's actually a plot to destroy the country. After all, if you start doubting whether yours is okay, then you won't be willing to help it.
Also, there was an upsurge of globalist propaganda lately in media. Sickening.

shouldn't they ask kikeland about it too i'm sure the result would be 100%

Only whites from Africa and maybe Ukraine can come here. The rest should be shot on sight.

Also, this survey was obviously based on the more urban, pozzed areas.

In the suburbs in Buenos Aires either you hate immigrants, or you are one. And in the inner country I suppose it's similar.

Media freedom? But silly go- user! That the media joins in cartels and is mostly pushing a certain agenda only shows their freedom of association! Concentration of the media is desirable, as it's a side effect of liberalism! Or are you saying that some freedoms aren't desirable? That'd be a very racist thing to say, goy!

You forgot the link.

If they're forced to host them the morons that are currently for it would quickly change their opinions and it'd be a hell of a lot easier to force them back.

Oh for fucks sake!

"Yes Minister" blew the lid on pollsters and their leading questions in the 80s.

The first question every pollster tries to ascertain from the person commissioning the poll: "What would you like the answer to be?"

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE fucking lefitsts. Eager to destroy their own country in order to satisfy their conscience - as long as (they think) that destruction won't reach them personally. Fucking hell.

Nationalism will never catch on among shits like these.

Speaking about this, something extremely peculiar happened to me on the way home today

Usually, ever since the refugee shit, my town's been invaded by squeegee boys and overall negroes from North Africa, but today I was able to see just one beggar the whole time I was out.

My guess is that the silent mafia cleansing from a couple of weeks ago is finally happening.

loved that show.

Would the Chinese be paying for welfare?

Feminized men and women.

Fuck, white people need another Black Plague.

They probably also polled people in major cities. Lefties and nonwhites probably made up a good amount of the survey.

It's funny that Russia recently got a huge wave of refugees fleeing Ukraine, and pretty much everyone there is fine with it.

yeah, but look at the stats: over 75% of people who want refugees in their country won't put them in their own home. its another case of NIMBY virtue signalling.

well how many of those refugees are Russian anyway

Pretty much all Ukrainians speak Russian as a second language, although modern Ukraine is trying very hard to supress the Russian language. A lot of them also have relatives in Russia.

amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/

Wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Benenson

PURE COINCIDENCE
And that is all you need to know about this survey, OP.

China seems to want more refuge so why don't we ship them over there.

Those are biased questions, I mean let's not talk about theoretical refugees, let's about the rapy dune coons coming to Europe, possible while dodging military service or justice for prior war crimes. Do you want those specific sand niggers in your country?

Okay seriously, is Holla Forums ever wrong?

The problem is that they don't think their country, their fatherland, is their home. For them, there's only individualism, their home is just what they own, and not their community, nor their country.
There's a problem with civics and patriotism in education.

I don't doubt it's partly a problem with being educated (by schools and media) to not consider your country to be your home. But I think modern selfism is at least as great a factor. People don't mind screwing others over as long as it doesn't affect themselves, and that's what leads to rich sheltered liberals voting for refugees and welfare increases to make themselves feel morally enlightened at little cost to themselves.

Good catch.

no

Most surveys are. The kind of people who have nothing better to do than talk to telemarketers are exactly the kind of people who should not be voting or making policy decisions.

...

It seems like the more I learn, the more I realize that Holla Forums is right.

It's not just a meme, it seems to actually be true. Which is hilarious.

YES SEND THE POOR MUSLUM REFUGEES TO WESTERN COUNTRIES AND NOT ISLAMIC ONES GOYIM

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amnesty_International

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Benenson

der juden?

yup

Pretty sure that you have to be retarded to believe those stats.

Isn't Will Smith a hit there though?

Of course. It's individualism to the nth power: the one to my side is my fellow countryman, in his time of need I should help him. These people will tell you "why not extend that feel to cultures that are incompatible in a fundamental level with ours :^)", but their very answers to the questions demonstrates their hypocrisy.
Why would one support half-heartedly "everyone in the world", if you can support completely your people with whom you actually share values? It's like a zero-sum game (and even if it shouldn't be, something tells me it's ingrained in our biology).

>WASHINGTON POST
BEZOS NEEDS MORE SWEATSHOP WORKERS
OBEY BEZOS

Okay. This is the best country in the world.

based Russia at the bottom every time

...

Pack of lies, probably based on rigged online polls

The problem is they don't ask "do you want 10 Million refugees in Poland or Spain."

They ask "do you want to save some."

Ask the 10 Million Nigger question and they flat out refuse.

OH COME ON, Ukrainian to Russian is like Swiss German mixed with Swedish swearing to written German.

These.

What people hear:

What pro-refugee governments and NGOs mean

To boot "fleeing war and persecution" re:the Middle East/North Africa is so large a requirement as to be practically meaningless, since almost anyone from Morocco to Pakistan can argue that they're suffering from persecution and/or the effects of war

And we all know the grey bureaucrats sifting through the hordes of Middle Easterners flooding Europe aren't going to go out of their way to determine who would actually meet that definition - fuck, they basically assume that the age the "refugees" give them is automatically correct

This survey can't be correct. We had a survey here in Aus about 5 days ago asking the same question, and the results were 3/4 people say we shouldn't take any refugees whatsoever and that immigration in general has been far too high for the last 10 years.

SOURCE

I noticed that aswell, at least we know one country will still stand well the rest are swarmed in shitskins, well until all of the residence of japan die out do too old age seeing how birth rates are shit there.

sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/05/17/most-australians-against-boosting-refugee-intake-despite-eu-crisis-poll

I wasn't asked.

Japan is highly populated nation, 127.3 million people live in that tiny fucking island. They won't die out anytime soon.

Compare that to Norway - 5 million, Sweden - 9 million, Denmark 5 million and Finland - 5 million.

Nordics will die out before slant eyed japs ever will.

top kek

Why is Russia so based? I want to move there.

The last two are believable based on the very specific parameters of the question being asked (emphasis on "help" and "refugees fleeing war or persecution").

But most poles, wanting immigration as a solution to stateless people? Not buying it at all.

Something strange going on here

funny how most people who are fine with bringing in refugees don't want them living in their homes

because they know the muds will be placed in their own government funded ghettos away from their gated communities

You are such a braindead subhuman retard I dont know where to start.

Another retarded Jewtin shill.

"I literally don't have an argument" - You

it's all fine and dandy until massive faggots decide to conflate actual war refugees with whatever the fuck.

I dont have to write down any argument when the subhuman retard Im pitying is actually believing an AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL's "survey".
Of course you might just be another retarded piece of shit Jewtin shills who think that by capitalizing this hilariously false info you can elevate the image of the Ex USSR shithole.
But nope.
To me, Jewtin, Amerikikes, both are the same.
Get fucked.

...

meh, 2/10

Good to know that they will out live us all.

Is this the best the mongol subhumans can deliver?

This means nothing.

Sounds like a legitimate scientific survey OP

...

...

I don't know what you are implying, but every time socialists want to manipulate surveys about opinions in Europe they put up Spain instead of Italy or Belgium instead of France etc. etc.

The big four of Europe have always been Great Britain, Germany, France and Italy, people should be wary of surveys about stuff in Europe that doesn't show one of these countries.

Look at the difference between 'welcome in my country' and 'welcome in my home.'

It's not surprising people are ok with it when they don't have to live with the consequences.

No and they never did. Guangzhou is literally Little Africa now. Drunk aggressive niggers walk about with impunity in most major Chinese cities, Chinese people don't care.

LIES

The only way that survey is believable is if they showed a picture like this and labeled it as a refugee

The question is clearly not refering to the current "refugees", the brown ones.

refugees are great!!! let them in! XDDDDDD

Couldn't help but notice that your pepe isn't properly calibrated there, friend. Here's one that's been calibrated. Consider it a freebee. :)