From an purely evolutionary-success of an individual lower-tier guy (or even average guy) - what would be the contemporary most effective and efficient way to reproduce/have lots of kids/becoming an evolutionary success?
I say:
Rape.
One would have to catch fine specimen of women, then lock them up and knock them up.
You keep them a few months locked and feed them well, so that the embryo grows and cannot be aborted (per law abortion is only allowed and medicinally relatively low-risk for women).
After that, a man has achieved all his really relevant goals in life (from an evolutionary standpoint). He can go to prison (nice prison like Norway, chat up Breivik or so) or kill himself (bad prison like USA).
Because of social welfare, the children the grand master rapist would have sired will be cared for by the social welfare system, they would have an even more reliable resource-provider in the tax money welfare state "father" than any single real man could provide.
Think about this:
All a man would need to do is kidnap a few dozen genetically superior princesses;
lock up and knock up them in some rented-for-a-couple-of-months remote warehouse,
until they cannot have an abortion anymore;
OK, feeding them would be necessary, healthy stuff so the kids develop perfectly, but this
would be negligible in cost.
If a man would do such a thing, he would instantly be a dozens-of-times more successful male than all the other men who toil all their life for rearing maybe two measly children of not so much superior genetic stock.
I could not care less for the women, they get pregnant anyway, but I would really achieve a most mighty victory over all other men (whom I am at war with, evolutionary) - not only would I monopolize the superior genetic reproduction units (most attractive girls) - and DOZENS of them - no, I would, by the beauty of the social welfare system, also cuck-hold all other tax-paying men in providing for my offspring.
I would be an extremely successful man, only Ghengis Khan with his harem of 50.000 women for him alone could compete.
Calculating roughly, I think one could pull that one off with costs of not much more than about 20.000%, and manageable levels of preparation and skills.
I mean - such a success would be more meaningful, more rewarding, and much easier to achieve than, say, a successful bank heist.
What do you say?