In short, the alt-right doesn't recognize its behavior as immoral, misogynist or racist...

In short, the alt-right doesn't recognize its behavior as immoral, misogynist or racist. It sees itself as a persecuted intellectual movement.

Twitter dealing with Yiannopoulos instead of treating the bigger problem of widespread harassment allows the alt-right to claim, as it has, that its views aren't morally wrong or hateful, but threatening to an establishment.

Attempting to wipe alt-right leadership from public spaces bolsters the narrative that this group is not a hate mob — it's a persecuted school of thought curtailed by authoritarian thought police that fear its power. Through this, the alt-right generates further mistrust in the establishment — making anti-establishment candidates like Trump all the more appealing.

Banning Yiannopoulos, and agitators like him, isn't just fuel for the alt-right's fire — it's water for its roots.
archive.is/dhoi1

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1480510/
archive.is/kAHNB
veganhealth.org/articles/soy_wth
articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/12/04/soy-dangers-summarized.aspx
archive.is/0PjYL
utne.com/science-and-technology/the-dark-side-of-soy.aspx?PageId=4
archive.is/a7sh4
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

wew

Sage goes in all fields

Oh and maybe you should head to Holla Forums and enjoy your meltdown a bit more as well as enjoying that cultural immersion in germany.

go on

Gas yourself, kike.

so youre against the intellectual movement?

The only way to stop the alt-right is to bash in their heads with a rock.

This is definitely not Holla Forumschan and you can fuck right off. However and their ilk are much worse. So I guess please stay until some sane centrists show up to BTFO the both of you frothing extremists.

you mean pseudo-intellectual movement?

We demand the freedoms

...

I am a centrist between gassing the kikes and deporting them

t. centrist


oh look, not an argument, just parroting buzzwords.
go back leftypol and prepare your suicides for november.

...

...

hi

Sounds like they are learning, does this mean we won't have our freedom of speech threatened for a couple of years?
ha, I know they will never stop trying to silence those that dare question them

It just means that the left will double up the biological warfare on you. Flouride. Soy. High Fructose Corn Syrup. Heavy Metals in the air water and food. High salt and Sugar advertising in all areas. Bailouts of failing corporations. Constant spending on feminization of men and defeminization of women. The neuter gender. 24/7 PMS females and males with tender breasts.

I'm no conspiratard, I'm just a libertarian that sees the extreme left as a much greater threat to my liberty than the extreme right.
for now, whoever holds power for too long is always corrupted by it

Nobody is forgetting that this is polchan. Draw your own conclusions, I'm sure your intellect will be sufficient for completing this task. :^)

cumskin nigger this is Holla Forums, not Holla Forums

Flooding enema eminent

So as a bisexual, autistic white male who enjoys video games and internet pornography, I fall into enough categories of quote-unquote "deviance" to upset the alt-right but I'm also in enough quote-unquote "privileged demographics" to upset the social justice warriors. Thing is, both far-left and far-right politics are a serious threat to me.

If the alt-right makes one vaguely valid point it's that well-meaning progressives mistakenly believe that Muslims are their friends. The funny thing is that actually, there's VERY little difference between Islamists and the alt-right - they're both moralistic, authoritarian traditionalists who desire society to be strictly controlled according to their specific desires. Ironically, Islamists and the alt-right have fewer differences to set aside than either group does with the left wing. And yet the left wing continues to import them.

The thing is, I'm not going to be very much better off under the rulership of an alt-right hegemony than I am under an Islamic caliphate. The best thing I can say for them is they *might* - emphasis on *might* - allow me to live, but given the sort of fiery rhetoric I've seen from alt-right sources regarding homosexuality, I somehow doubt that when they were done with the forcible deportations of Muslims they'd stop there. I don't trust authoritarians to stop at just one group of "undesirables" because history has not furnished us one single example of that actually happening.

This is why I object to social justice rhetoric so strongly: not just because it's as unegalitarian and hateful as the philosophies it claims to fight, but because its excesses throw fuel on the far-right's fire. Every time an SJW says something retarded, it allows the alt-right to paint anyone left-of-centre (hell, anyone left-of-far-right) as idiotic, drooling hypocrites. Every time a Tumblrina howls obscenities at a person for being straight or white or male, the idea that straight people or white people or men are being oppressed becomes a little less ridiculous. Their overreach inevitably causes a pushback.

I didn't spend my entire adult life fighting for gay rights just to have them snatched away from me and the people I love, and that applies just as much to my fellow white people as it does to third-world immigrants. I'm not going to simply lay down and relinquish the rights to marry, to adopt, or to serve without shame in my country's military or law enforcement - whether it's Muslims or the alt-right trying to take them away.

Yeah if you are a libertarian than you show signs of intelligence, tell me what soy does to the human body?

What a conspiritard.

...

A wall of text t b h f a m

tbh

All sides are immoral. All sides are stupid. Anything that reinforces their foolish beliefs isn't just fuel for their fires, but water for their roots.

...

Maybe there could be made a compromise that is better then either?

I believe he means there are more than two sides but he also thinks they are all foolish.

...

The fire rises.
Claim your stake in this game.

...

As I'm not a dietitian, biologist, chemist or doctor I won't claim to have any idea what soy does to the human body.
I have never taken an interest in that topic and have never read papers regarding it so can't offer a meaningful answer.

If you think it's worth knowing could you link a couple of papers on it? actual scientific papers please, the press manages to get it wrong even when they claim solid papers as their source

soy mimics estrogen
it is especially bad to men but due to the amounts of it and the use of things like birth control it is significantly damaging to women also


>The dominant isoflavone in soy is genistein, with daidzein and glycitein composing the remainder. Within soy, isoflavones are almost entirely bound to sugars, producing the respective compounds genistin, daidzin, and glycitin. Soy isoflavones have been linked with numerous health effects, but the strength of the relationships and whether the effects are beneficial are strongly debated.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1480510/
archive.is/kAHNB

try these other links

veganhealth.org/articles/soy_wth
articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/12/04/soy-dangers-summarized.aspx
archive.is/0PjYL

The literature is extensive on the benefits of soy, and that should always be stated, just as the hazards should be. That's science. These studies are not ridiculous or contrived, but take a look at them. Who's funding them?' asks Bauman.
'There are a lot of problems with these studies,' Daniel says, adding that the 1999 heart health claim was an industry-funded initiative. 'Even if there is positive information, and even if these studies are well designed, we need to weigh that against the fact that we've also got really good studies showing the dangers. Better safe than sorry is the precautionary principle. Possible bene-fits are far outweighed by proven risks.'
utne.com/science-and-technology/the-dark-side-of-soy.aspx?PageId=4
archive.is/a7sh4

the alt-right drones of Holla Forums like to pat themselves on the back and think they do a good job, when in fact they are killing it faster than ever, in recent months the movement is losing momentum and dying down,and Holla Forums is actually the main cause of this, when you become isolated from the rest of society you have no basis to determine the best action and you think you are doing so well when you are actually losing so bad.

they think that because their board is no 2 on Holla Forums they must be so great and mighty, thinking that because there are many people supporting trump then they must share their ideals.
it does not work like that, and they don't even hear the voice of logic because they removed themselves from reality and set sail for fail.

I agree.

we must step outside of the left right paradigm if we are to advance as a species.

uh huh
nationalists are the only ones breeding anymore kid
unless sentient drones are coming out in the next decade, nationalists win

You realize how retarded that statement is?
that's exactly what I am talking about, so removed from reality.

Thanks for proving my point retard.

...

the statistics and the ideology both support my point
what do you have to show for your random insults?

there is no such thing ass the alt right that's just a label some moron made up to cover a huge swath of people.

Way to mix metaphors, jackass.

its a switch of metaphors asshole

re

LAIN

But they don't.

yeah but they do
leftists typically have 0 zero nil children

Except that isn't at all the case. Statistics do not show that, and if they did, you would be posting them.

The fact that you aren't clearly demonstrates this fact.

The statistics show that leftists hate reproduction.

The statistics show nothing of the sort, as your continued refusal to actually provide any clearly shows.

Watch you don't catch those roots on fire.

reeding is for straight people, leftists are all either homosexuals or cucks.

Not even close, ut thanks for playing.

rere

lol

Thank god children always are ideologically identical to their parents. Like all those kids who grew up in the Eisenhower and Reagan eras.

This place is filled with children who were banned from 4chan.

what kids decide to do was not discussed yet, thank god for strawmen arguments!
children that see their families succeeding and others failing are more likely to do what their parents have done than ones that come from broken homes

Are you trying to claim that the party of fags, aging hippies, teenage hipsters, SJWs, and welfare recipients also has a bunch of strong, powerful alpha males floating around its ranks?

Because actually I agree, gangsters and other criminals can be pretty alpha dudes.

Milo is an agitator, though. I used to love him, but then he literally hated on some obese fuck in a gym. There's nothing wrong with being obese and being in a gym. Milo is one to speak- he's not muscular in the least.

You can't call yourself an intellectual if you don't believe in science.

could you please be more clear
who is it that does not believe in science ?

Aren't most alt-righters climate deniers?

grouping people and labelling them based on your perceptions is the best way to never understand any of them
how can anyone deny climate? the sun shines and the skies rain whats to deny?

I like you.

that's exactly what the alt-right does, all leftists are cucks and homos. amirite guise?

all liberals sure be pansies though, i mean who the fuck do they think they be?

if the shoe fits

I think you are making a mistake here friend, liberalism is the belief of liberty.

you are mixing terms not all liberals are hippies you know?

The only shoe you will be getting is one up your ass if he wins.

However, I am actually looking forward to see him fuck you over
Would be amusing.

listen pal, im not playing your game of choosing which words i get to use
and if these plain terms are difficult for you to understand then maybe you are inadequate in your intellectual capacity?
pic related are liberals

lol, gotta love that Holla Forums defense reaction.

nah its more like you're trolling with your lesagememe and trying to make an argument about what words mean instead of communicating what you want to say
its okay, im having a good discussion in another thread and you have no power here

You still gotta put it in all fields dude

those are sjws.
anyways they are also as bad as you are.


yes, you need to get your definitions right otherwise your shit gets all messed up.

kill yourself

if it quacks like a duck.

Stop dodging faggot im talking to you

...

by you I mean those you associate with.

You as in me.
You dont know me you cant know me we are on an imageboard.
Wake up.

and I am replying to you, not my fuckin problem you are too retarded to understand.

here we go

take your meds
>>>/krillcen/

>>>Holla Forums your the pills guy.
I can say take your meds too.

That's true I don't know you but I see the ideas you spew, same ideas that comes from any alt-right drone.

You converse like a 12 year old spanish child.
Because ive talked to one.
You just chant your insult of the day and do the very same generalising you claim to be so sworn against.

take
your
meds

kek, I wasn't even trying to insult you, grow a thicker skin faggot.

...

See you are implying im upset but you dont know me.
This is how stupid it is, you use your hillary talking points and then when someone points out that you are just labeling people you resort to circle jerk memes and LOL GROWE A THICKER SKIN IM DA SMART ONE HERE!

Take your foodstamps

I can write narratives too.
Once upon a time there was a boy named Abdul and he was a good boy who didnt do nothing.
I sure hope nobody replies and points out that he definetly did something and il have to call them inbred or something

I don't have to know you to see you are upset, it shows in your posts.
you are only upset with yourself for being a dumb shit incapable of making a proper argument for your claims.
and that's not my problem.

Here he goes projecting again

How about I write your bio seeing as you are writing mine?

Your name is now Lopez and you are a factory worker from newport, I can tell from what your posting.
;)

"You just chant your insult of the day and do the very same generalising you claim to be so sworn against."
Is that not a fair assesment?
Could you say you are upset with my argument?

No, you were just saying that all liberals are hippie sjws, and you didn't come up with any proof and then got butthurt when someone pointed out you are wrong.

That's all.

Nice assumption, but I didnt say that.
The posts are up there you can go look.
Dont twist my words or my politics I have identified with neither.

Do you think im the other guy you were calling a retard?
Because I got here 15 minutes ago and saw you faggots shittying up the board

Also is "That's all." supposed to be a victory term?
Oh choice.
Reminds me of 2006 when everyone ended arguments with you are just stupid i win and then leave the board so they dont have to engage in debate

ok, then there is hope for you.
So what politics you affiliate with?

it isn't.

...

I dont.
I just despise fools who think conflict and cursing is going to move anything politically.
Putting your faith behind another person is just irresponsible.
You will be used, and then discarded.

Go back to sleep or post

I agree, tell that to the people who think an election will change anything and keep on arguing which puppet is better.

Ive been trying my friend, but sadly the youth of today are just as politically ignorant as the ringleaders that push them.
All the bloodshed as of late has been for nothing, and neither intended result will ever come to fruition.
We have so much historic information to date this kind of shit back to the earliest movements in history and they all share and borrow traits from each other.
I hope logic wins, as I approve of logic.

Me too, but they aren't moved by logic we need to use feels to support logic.

exactly this
which is why even if ballots chose their owners, voters would not be in power of shit

as long as the logic is true you can use any feels you like

...

leftypol must have a lot of NEETs
its usually like this

The sheer level of cognitive dissonance and argument by assertion in this image is absolutely astounding

But whatever propaganda reels in the YouTube Vloggers works I guess

according to the narrative, if you dont follow the narrative you have no evidence
any evidence you post is from biased or discredited sources and any evidence they post (including meta analysis of cherry picked studies to prove a point - an unscientific concept) is irrefutable

It's funny how anytime someone posts something anti-Holla Forums, people assume it was made by Holla Forums.

thats not the assumption "anytime"
the problem is you are wasting your time hating while you could be making your life better
logic dictates that this means you waste a significant time of your life and are therefore a loser because of the net result of your actions wasting your precious 24 hours each day
its a certainty

...

How did you manage to come up with all that from a single post? And who is "you" supposed to be?

sure, you could pretend that "anonymous" means we can never identify your posting habits :^) goy

bump

...

spooks

but it is you dumb fucking chimp