Obama Admin: "Criminal" no longer "Politically Correct"

"Justice-Involved Individuals"

archive.is/SZ9xO

“Government official” no longer politically correct. “To be hung by his entrails” is the proper term.

hmmmm…

And I thought "Undocumented American" was bad.

6 million get

...

What's next? "Rapist" will be re-named "sexual impulsed individual"?

A person suffering from both impulse control disorder and sexual addiction.

For the PC bullshit you have to remember to "put the person first".

I really hate Obama.

Muslim rapefugees call it having a "sexual emergency".

But constitutionalists are right wing extremists…

...

What's the newspeak phrase for criminal record?

"voter registration"

next year "justice" will be too triggering and they will change it to "behavioral-assistance"

Next year is the Golden Don, fam. If he puts Giuliani in his cabinet, that's not happening.

Is that the Tiger was was made by Porshe?

Post more tank porn.

Looks like a Tiger to me. It was a little bit boxier on the front as it was focused towards urban combat. The panther took better advantage of a sloped frontal plate and behaved more like a sniper.

This has to be bullshit. Criminals are people who need psychiatric help for whatever issue their dealing with - violence or theft, these people are morally corrupt, usually unable to distinguish right from wrong.

Label them what they are until recovery has been made.

No you fool thats a normal tiger.


Second pic is how you into tank.

Panther is a sniper…
Holla Forumsak wot is not how you should apply tanks in real life.

Thomas Jentz's 'Tiger I & II: Combat Tactics' and 'Germany's Panther Tank' state the 8,8cm KwK36 L/56, KwK43 L/71 (Pzgr.39), and KwK42 L/70 (Pzgr.39/42) (APCBC) penetration performance as:

(KwK36/KwK43/KwK42)

100m 120/202/138 (mm of homogenous rolled steel plate at 30deg.)
500m 110/185/124
1000m 100/165/111
1500m 91/148/99
2000m 84/132/89

And the 8,8cm Gr.39Hl (HEAT) is stated to penetrate 90mm at all ranges.

Thanks for reminding me I need to spend more time on /k/.

There's a whole bunch of these. Just search "German War Files" on jewtube. Entire docs with autism level of detail to individual tank models, Light tanks, Panzer III, Panzer IV, the Panther, Tiger, one devoted just to Stugs, Mobile Artillery, Tank Destroyers, Field Artillery, 2 on fighter aricraft, 2 on bomber aircraft, 2 on special forces, and I think a couple more. If you haven't jerked off to them yet you will.

This one is just the general Panzer one which isn't great, but has some unedited Wehrmacht training vids in it that will make you bust.

So, how much is this little wordplay stunt going to cost the taxpayers?

Holy shit. I did not expect this level of stupid. I really didn't think I could be shocked by anything these days, but I was wrong.

If they force them to change it, even if its only for documents printed in the future - billions, easily. Ink is really fucking expensive.

Is this going to be some kind of gradual legal move, where the common useage of the word used in a piece of law is changed over 2-3 generations, to alter a judicial verdict due to that word-change in the future?

Kinda like they are trying to indoctrinate kids in school to think that the second amendment isn't about individual ownership of firearms, but about collectivism, or something….

RWDS when?

"Justice-Involved Individuals"

Oh for fugg sake.

RWDS NOW!!!

It's always darkest before the dawn.

THEY SAID THE SLIPPERY SLOPE WAS JUST A FALLACY

How does this word change from "Criminal" to "Justice-Involved Individuals", solve/prevent crime?

Wow, that's really racist, user. "Crime" is a white heteropatriarchal construct that disproportionately oppresses POC.

George Carlin is rolling in his grave.

Or laughing.

Rip and Tear buddy, Rip and Tear

How much is a cheap side/side 12g over there??


It doesn't

It's a just stupid fluff that lame duck administration is throwing out to make it seem "Social Progressive"

Reality is Obama and his administration couldn't give a fuck about "justice" if he did, He would have ended the stupid war of drugs.

But that's a whole other kettle of fish.

TL:DR version

State Quo likes the war of drugs for heaps of reasons.

So, you are saying that there shouldn't be any laws?

Maybe a red herring?

A person suffering from extreme narcissism coupled with an extreme case of a delusional disorder.


A person who chooses to be free instead of submitting to restrictive documentation.

A person suffering from paranoid schizophrenia coupled with anti-social behavioral patterns.


A person suffering from the systemic effects of a hostile learning environment.


CHOICE WORDS FELLOW user


The leader in that picture has convinced his followers to submit to his will through the use of underhanded psychological tactics. Had they been better educated at a state backed college, they would be able to see through his lies and follow a good man like Bernie Sanders.
:^)

Most people think that means restricted by laws.
It really means, "common(regular) militia" or "commonly armed civilians".


Looks like the Department of Homeland security is unconstitutional, because the second amendment already provides for that.

Yeah, see what I mean about them changing the general usage of a word for legislative effect?

Think again.
It means a well supplied, well trained, or both well supplied and well trained militia.

not unless they're applied equally. Laws are unfair and prejudiced and oppressive unless all male demographics are imprisoned at equal rates. :^) :^(

I CANNOT LIVE
I CANNOT DIE
TRAPPED IN MYSELF
BODY MY HOLDING CELLLLLLL

Either way it doesn't mean restricted by law.

Why we need the constitutional protection.

What is protected.

Suicide bombers are now detonation-involved individuals.

a person who thinks their opinion has any merit

I Think it's ironic that picture was made by Ubisoft "globalist company" for a game where you play as the "Rainbow team" and shoot disenfranchised Americans.

It's now one of the most posted images on Holla Forums

A girl has no name…

The sad fact is that once you claim U.S. Citizenship the constitution no longer applies to you.

Are policemen not also justice-involved individuals?
Shouldn't they call them justice-executing individuals now to not mix that up?

I think you just found the angle we all missed user.

Police = Criminals

That is the goal.

Well considering I've never even heard this SJW bullshit term, I did a quick jewgle search to see how widespread this shit is.

Looks like the game has been going on for quite some time.

That's the thing, the second amendment means the exact opposite.


The portion, "A well supplied or trained militia being necessary to the security of a free state…" encourages all levels of the government to train citizens and provide weapons to citizens to "enhance the security of a free state".


Call them Judges, because they judge citizens.
Judges that roam the streets will be called "Street Judges", while Judges that inhabit courtrooms will be call "Justices".

what the absolute fuck are you blabbering about

If you change the general usage of the word, over time, over a generation, the laws will start to be adjudicated in a wholly different way, following the new general usage of that specific word, within law and its application.

Super heros are fucking justice involved individuals.

People who are in trouble with the law are fucking criminals. The end.

...

Can't wait to join Trump's elite deportation force

Pretty much what I thought when I read OP's post. This is some orwellian type newspeak startin to happen.

Are the purposefully hanging themselves by the neck or what? This genuinely seems like internal sabotage to wake people up to how ridiculous the leftist agenda is. "We're being too mean to rapists and murderers" right as they get an alternative in the general election is a good idea in their eyes how?

Huma was Hillary's full time scissor action.

shit wrong thread xD

I'm not arguing with you, I'm just saying that the second amendment explicitly states that "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed", and implicitly states that the best way to secure our nation is to throw weapons and training at citizens.

The NFA and GCA are both completely unconstitutional, as well as every other restriction placed on firearms.

Completely right friendo, I just wanted to share that since it's a good way to redpill normies on the government infringement on the constitution.

vid related


14th Amendment created the concept of a "U.S. Citizen". This means you are a citizen of the federal government. This makes you a citizen of Washington D.C. and the congress has complete legislative control over those in Washington D.C. without regard to the constitution.

Fuck off faggot.

So, they just pick a few words from some of the laws they don't like (The ones that guarantee our rights), and they start teaching (in "School") different meanings of the words, so that decades hence, the new judges will rule differently on the laws, because of the new common usage of the word.

It is linguistic, memetic, loophole creation.

Ex Post Facto.

Does that mean we get to vote twice?

...

It means your vote doesn't count.

This is what the civil war was fought over.
"States rights" has gradually replaced "State Sovereignty" in the history books.

Ramzpaul,Stefan Molyneux,Black Pigeon have all finally come to the concussion that it is pointless to argue facts to the modern individual and that the vast bulk of the human population is driven by"Feelings/emotions" and that a sob story will always win out against a well thought out argument backed with facts to the normal individual.

This is primary why Alex Jones is SO "Vocal" lets leave it at that. It's no coincidences either, he is EX-CIA.

Justice involved individuals :DDDDDDDD:DDDDDDDDD

Eat shit and die, blank post.

I think it could be entirely possible Alex Jones is just a snake oil salesman who is being subverted by the kikes, rather than created by them.

Then again the Bill Hicks argument is kind of convincing.

Carlin would have a field day with that one.

I'm going to need to see an interpretation of the amendment that supports this claim.

From section 1:
This places federal law regarding privileges or immunities above state law.

From section 5:
This gives congress the ability to enforce the amendment.

It doesn't explicitly state that you're federal chattel, and doesn't implicitly state you're citizens of DC.
If you can point me to multiple interpretations of the 14th that cover this idea, I would be happy to entertain it.

He's really doing as much harm as he can with this last year isn't he?

Of course that's where they go to first. They'll bow down to all of this Newspeak.

Fucking Western academia needs to be completely purged and rebuilt from the ground up. It's been subverted beyond recognition.

At this point, expect anti-intellectualism to be inevitable if/when the pendulum swings back. They've gone far enough that all the professors will have targets painted on their back by the common populace once everyone realizes the magnitude of what they've done.


Emotional manipulation was the most obvious solution to the goyim question. All that was missing was instant media to accelerate its reach within less than a century.

——————-
Article I, Section 8, Clause 17
The Congress shall have Power To …exercise exclusive Legislation
in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles
square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance
of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States….
——————-
Washington D.C., Military Bases, etc.. are the only areas or "enclaves"
that the Federal Government has any Authority over.

——————-
Amendment 14, Section 1:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
wherein they reside….
——————-

If there was a concept of being a "United States Citizen" before the 14th Amendment please show me where. This created "United States Citizens". You were a citizen of ONE OF THE UNITED STATES being New York, Florida, Texas, or somewhere else.

You know how your mail still gets to the right place even if you don't use a Zip Code?
Using a Zip Code is essentially making a claim that you are within a "federal territory"
as opposed to being within one of the sovereign States that are united.

I am kind of tired so I am half-assing this argument by the way.

Shills are hitting this thread pretty badly.

IMO the King Nigger is preparing the phrasing that will downplay the americans sent to FEMA camps.
"Yesterday another 20000 justice involved individuals were sent to the safe space zones established in temporary death labour camps"

Get used to these scenes murrica. It's coming to the town near you when the financial collapse hits!

Additionally, you have to entertain the idea that there are two constitutions. The first one written by the framers and the second one that was created after the civil war during reconstruction that had a single word changed.

"The constitution for the united States"
"The constitution of the united States"

Couldn't agree more.

This might sound horrible but whats happening in Venezuela needs to happen pretty much all of the west. People need a double dose of reality.

I see we're already getting invaded by cucks from Reddit.

Nobody likes you, Reddit. Fuck off. If you don't even understand why every household in every white nation on earth needs to have three guns in it minimum, then you don't belong here.

Did you just call me a kike for saying there should be no restrictions on firearm ownership?

I've personally always liked the slogan "A Militia of One"

The national anthem of niggers is "Fuck the Police".

...

Good start.

What you're skirting around is that prior to the civil war, "The United States" was a group of independent states that come to an agreement through the use of the three branches of a higher government.
During and after the civil war, the "united" states relinquished their individual powers to the governors operating at the federal level.
The concept of "The United States" shifted from a gathering of individuals (E pluribus unum), to a singular entity (Ex uno plures).

From the declaration of independence:

So we have a historical example of one word changing the entirety of these United States.

They'd say that about their own mother.

I fucked up reading it. My mistake. It's early where I am.