This is what Holla Forums actually believes

> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes
> This is what Holla Forums actually believes

Other urls found in this thread:

xvideos.com/?k=gape lesbians
minoritiesofindia.org/gandhi-spreads-racial-hatred-of-africans/
debunkingrelativity.com/muons-time-dilation/
conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity
carbontax.org/where-carbon-is-taxed/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

He's right, there's still no proof of relativity to this day, in fact we've found plenty of things wrong with the theory.

Not to sound like Dysnomia, but are you fucking retarded or a trumpfag?

Neither, I voted for Carson.
Relativity is literally just a theory, and plenty of advances in physics and astrology have shown inconsistencies in the theory, that's fact.

OP is a faggot as usual.

What a stupid cunt.

Nice buzzwords. Full stop. Go read a book nigger

Wait, I know this guy. I haven't seen him for like a decade though, who is it?

What buzzword?

Dr. Steel, he was disappeared a while back.

Wait, he was never doxed and continues not to have been? How spooky.

He was disappeared nigger.

jews did it

Yeah, fuck gravity!

jews invented it

Found the groundie
Why don't you go kiss your precious ground groundie, why don't you marry it

You're a loser you know that? Why don't you go back to freech where someone might give a shit.

Seriously though, if you can't accept that actual scientists have found inconsistencies in the theory thought up by a patent stealing faggot, you are just living in denial of reality in order to keep up the image that Einstein was some god.

He was a man, a smart man, but not infallible.

jews

What a pleb

Total jew maneuver. amateurs.

All me

liar, you're a jew

Me again

no u

All me

no jew

But it's true.

Relativity is math and doesn't help actually make anything.

Like String Theory and that shit.

...

No it's what one poster (probably OP does)

relativity theory is false,
evolution is false,
earth is hollow,
god created white man,
devil created kikes, niggers, spics and mudslimes

take the final redpill

I ask myself whenever I see a post like this:


Would this Holla Forumsack bend over and allow Der Furher to pound his ass and use his face as a cumrag?

If he asked nicely.

dem Führer

All me again.
I am a one man shitposting extravaganza.

...

This was me.

All those things sound pretty cool tbh fam, except I like eating kebabs and science is pretty cool. Also Holla Forums is bretty boring these days.

Eclipses + space time = JEWS!

My, my, oh my……

These Alt-right Neonazi Neanderthals are a fucking waste of life.

Fucking common core

The guy's right.
There is no proof of relativity.

Being this Salty.

I would literally bet all of my shekels that you do not fully understand relativity, nor the arguments against it – and I'm not talking about whether or not you've read the Wikipedia pages.

It's been proven that atomic time is slower in space than it is on earth. It has been proven that light bends around gravitational forces. Spin precession, time dilation in lasers – these things have also confirmed that Relativity is sound.

Go outside, user. Do something with your life.

Jokes on you faggot, I am outside.

...

Well then stop breathing in whatever pollution you're inhaling – it's obviously killing brain cells.

Shots: Fired

KENNEDI CHECK EM
E
N
N
E
D
I

C
H
E
C
K

E
M

Jokes on you faggot, I don't breathe.

outside outside or relatively outside?

Fuck you.

wow

In that case, it's a relief that I'm debating a Troll Bot and not a retarded human. Or a ghost… you a ghost, mane?

Hey guys, you know what, it's right - you can't directly see a black hole.

You can't directly see a car either, what you see is light bouncing off a car, and your eye takes it in, your brain interprets it etc. I realize this sounds very condescending to you, you know how your eyes work, how light works, so why am I saying this?

I'm pointing out that "observable" doesn't mean what this chap seems to think it means. It doesn't mean "I can directly sense the true nature of this object" - it means "I can use my brain to infer from sensory input the nature of this object".

So yes, to a point it isn't "objective" - your senses or your interpretation may be off. But to suggest that something as well understood by the human race as black holes, or evolution is "not empirical" is laughable.

It's the same weak logic of "you can't PROVE there isn't an invisible tiger in the room"… It is proven beyond reasonable doubt, that's how scientific "theories" work… It may be refined and tweaked with new findings over time, but at this point in time we can reasonably assume the laws of physics etc. are correct.

Anyone who uses the "your truth and my truth are different" logic can also fuck off.

Zombie.

actually you're wrong too, just like anti-matter and black matter, black holes have never been witnessed or truly understood, best we have is mere assumptions.

...

...

they have been observed in the sense that their effects have been observed, hence the analogy in the previous post

thanks for playing though

Same with dark matter yet we have no evidence of it being correct, thus we can't even know for sure if black holes were the ones responsible for such effects.

We can merely assume they were.

You're attempting to reason with schizophrenics, morons, and pathological Anti-Semites who distrust any scientific theory that a Jew is behind; the latter of which is referred to as Paranoid Personality Disorder.

That said, good on you for tryin.

No, one "assumes" that aliens have visited earth. I "assume" that you are relatively uneducated. One "DEDUCES" that black holes exist, given certain observations and mathematical theories that you do not have the capacity to understand.

That's what we call praying on a star user, you can't just skip the scientific method like that.

...

it's beyond reasonable doubt, in the same way that I cannot prove that OP has a black cock in his mouth, but we can take it as a fact for all intents and purposes of discussion

apply the elephant test - if it looks like an elephant, acts like an elephant, you can assume it is an elephant


worst case scenario is that I waste a few minutes typing it out, and it winds up some muppets and gives me a laugh, so worth it I guess

Explain THIS then.

xvideos.com/?k=gape lesbians

No, God is a hopeful wish. Heaven is a hopeful wish. I stand nothing to gain from belief in the existence of Black Holes or Relativity; however, the logic seems sound, and the evidence seems to be honestly and scrupulously analyzed.


Most of those individuals were great men (some, not so much). You forgot Ezra Pound and Heidegger – both of whom I greatly respect and admire. Why? Because they were brilliant men who made remarkable contributions to the human race – something that has never been said for a single Holla Forumstard.

Correction: I don't think GPS would work very well if it wasn't for relativity, so I guess there's that

Black Holes: confirmed

inb4 wild Holla Forums conspiracies about how it's the devil and jews killing faith in muh god using evil science and logic

or you either.
Nixon is totally unnecessary there, but worth the spot just for hearing him being honest for once.

Lesbians are magical, and not bound by the laws of nature.

Hope you're Ghandi himself talking because otherwise you'll need to look into a mirror before making that sort of accusations.

fuck that faggot

I'm well aware of the fact that I'm about as worthless as they come, and that I'm a thoroughly unproductive member of society – but at least I don't try to pretend otherwise, while criticizing theories that are are currently accepted by people who are generally smarter and more industrious than I am.


You shot yourself in the foot on that one.

...

> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em
> Kennedi check em

From india, actually true.
Dude grew to hate Africans after serving for the British and witnessing their antics first hand.

I can check em in ways you can't even imagine.

>minoritiesofindia.org/gandhi-spreads-racial-hatred-of-africans/
People usually white-wash his racism towards blacks because he's so well liked.

What if Liberals liked Ghandi because he hated blacks?

Lol. I know, I was saying that by implying that was a bad thing, you discredited yourself.

Imagine a world without them… ahhhh, one can only dream.

Liberals don't like things based on factual information. They only follow ideologies and like certain people to virtue signal or wear their opinions like clothes as a fashion statement.

Liberals are literally retards.

that's modern liberals though, they're the anti-thesis of liberalism.

Classical liberalism isn't even a thing anymore. People who claim to be classical liberals are usually just libertarians that are more left leaning.

I agree, but Conservatives have their bullshit too. Don't act like Climate Change deniars aren't just acting as shills for the fossil fuel industry. They claim to hate federal overreach and government control, but in many respects, they often simply favor a Corporatocracy.

It's not only conservatives who are climate change deniers, it's just people that look at the data objectively. I've seen anarchists who are climate change deniers (vid related). Climate change deniers aren't based on the left or right, it's based on facts and scientific data.

I find that topic honestly pretty confusing.
There's good proof for both sides.
The weather is clearly changing but there's fossilized evidence that this isn't the first time it has happened and that in fact the entire thing is cyclical.

That still doesn't reassure me that human activity isn't related at all with the weather change or if we are truly accelerating it beyond what is natural.

It depends on your definition of "conservatives". Most so-called conservatives these days are neo-cons who pander to the left and don't truly stand for capitalism. True conservatives support capitalism and a free market and don't support "Corporatocracy".

Fixed

No one is disputing the fact that the planet has been going through warming periods and cooling periods for millions of years; however, the primary concern is not the fact that the planet is getting warmer, but rather the rate at which the planet is warming (~10 times faster than after previous cooling periods).

Another misconception is that the data has been "manipulated" by scientists, cause "muh climate change industry conspiracy"; this is another example of conservative shills cherrypicking information. Data from climate monitoring stations have been ADJUSTED because they have to factor in certain weather conditions which affect their ability to properly measure the climate; however, nearly just as many adjustments have been made to the cooling degrees than the warming.

~97% of scientists who know A LOT more than we do about this subject agree that climate change is occurring and that its a big problem. On top of that, there are trillions of dollars invested in Fossil Fuels – use your fucking common sense, user, and stop being a shill for billionaires.

There is little difference.

I'm not saying that socialism is the way to go, but I believe a balance between socialist policies and capitalism is essential the prevention of a collapse; however, there is no such thing as a "free market"… and there never was.

There are literally paid scientists who manipulate data (usually by obfuscation and other techniques) and who are paid to say certain things that they haven't actually proven yet. Look up "The Rockefeller Foundation" and "Sierra Club".


They are paid shills, that 97% figure represents a certain set of scientists (all controlled by the government). Like I said, read up about the Sierra Club. That "muh 97%" shit is a fallacy.

Ok, I can see that you're too far gone. Stay dumb, m8.

Stay brainwashed m8

Fuck off, kike.

To make you realize how physicists misinterpret experimental data to support their superstitious belief of time dilation, first I let you solve one puzzle and then present you how physicists would solve the same.

Imagine that a team of scientists have discovered a special animal species on Earth. After carefully studying the species, they found that the members of the species as soon as they are born go on flying at a constant speed of 1000km/day until they die exactly after 10days. The scientists, many of whom were Nobel laureates, having noted their speed and their lifespan, rightly concluded that the species would travel a total distance of 10,000km in their life time.

Then came the biggest challenge for the scientists- they have discovered an identical species coming from Heaven to Earth. They have all the experimental evidence to believe that these species soon after taking birth in Heaven head straight to Earth and die as soon as they reach our ‘deadly’ Planet. Also our scientists very well know that the distance between the heaven and the earth is 100,000km.

Here is the puzzle for you to solve. We were told by our great scientists that the members of the above species can only travel a total distance of 10,000km in their life time considering their travel speed of 1000km/day and life span of 10days. But how come the members from heaven were able to travel 100,000km and reach our deadly planet? This is 10 times more than the distance that is normally possible for the species to travel in their lifetime. How can we explain this odd observation?

To make things easier I will give you 3 options to select from-

Heavenly species travel faster than the earthly species
Heavenly species live longer than the earthly species
Both heavenly species and earthly species travel at the same speed and live for the same number of days, but the heavenly species experience time dilation i.e. time runs slower for them because they are moving at very high velocity i.e 1000km/day

I am sure people with commonsense go with the first two options – our scientists have only noted the speed and life span of the earthly species. Obviously the same parameters can’t be blindly extrapolated to the heavenly species. Even though both ‘earthly’ and ‘heavenly’ members belong to the same species and look identical, the speed and life span of the ‘earthly’ species can’t be said to be true for the ‘heavenly’ species, especially having seen them travel a much longer distance than their ‘earthly’ cousins. This implies that either the ‘heavenly’ species travel faster and/ or live longer than their ‘earthly’ cousins. I don’t see any great difficulty or logical obstruction to make such conclusion.

But let me present you how relativists would solve the puzzle- they swear that both ‘earthly’ and ‘heavenly’ species travel with the same speed and live for the same number of days because they both are identical and belong to the same species. So they don’t agree with options 1 and 2 and rather go to option 3 and insist that the ‘heavenly’ species experience time dilation because of their high velocity and hence are able to travel the much longer distance noted.

Now Let me explain their delusion of time dilation: Relativists believe that time ‘dilates’ or runs slower for fast moving objects. So what is one day for somebody moving slower may just be 1hr for someone travelling at a very high speed on a spaceship. So they argue that because the heavenly members travel at a very high velocity (don’t ask with reference to whom), they experience time dilation i.e. time runs slower or clocks tick slower for them. So even though they live for only 10days, each day is ‘stretched’ for them and hence they are able to travel a longer distance each day. “That’s how the heavenly species are able to cover the much longer distance of 100,000km between the heaven and earth” relativists declare.

Pt2

Anybody with least commonsense will surely ask them “if both heavenly species and earthly species travel at the same velocity, why not the earthly species experience the same weird phenomenon of time dilation and travel the same long distance as their heavenly cousins?”.

Well, don’t think that the relativists will have no answer for this question- we just have to be prepared for more stupid explanations. The more you question them the more stupid they speak. The more stupid they speak, the more difficult it becomes to keep arguing with them. So we will surely give up arguing with them at some point – the stupid flock ‘wins’ at the end.

Believe me, I haven’t at all exaggerated about their weird thinking- that’s exactly how they prove time dilation with their cosmic muon decay observations. debunkingrelativity.com/muons-time-dilation/

But how come scientists go so stupid while interpreting such simple and straight forward observations and draw weird conclusions out of them? Well, that is because they are affected by a disorder called ‘Relativity mania’ and those affected by this mania hold delusional beliefs like- speed of light is constant, time dilates for fast moving things, space gets warped near heavier objects and so on. Because of their delusional preoccupation, they ‘interpret’ every experiment as strong proof of their delusional beliefs.

conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity

Reading through these is fucking hilarious.

That 97% thing is literally a meme and has already been disproved. The liberals who made it up were so dumb that they couldn't even explain the true roots of where that number actually came from. You're just being a shill by trying to defend it, fucking leftycuck.

Lol

I provided actual information that was much more substantial than "duuuh, all of the scientists are controlled by the Jooz". And I could also post some reputable sources, but that thought is almost laughable.

You realize that the endgame for the global warming meme is to create even more taxes, right? If you support global warming, you are supporting the system 100%.

You are both claiming exactly the same thing, you're both calling whoever doesn't agree with your theory liars.

...

this

carbontax.org/where-carbon-is-taxed/

It's already happening in certain parts of the world. Leftyfaggots are so cucked that they want to pay more taxes. All of their arguments stem from propaganda.

I wasn't using that video as a primary source, dumb nigger. It was just an example of how retarded the people who work in the Sierra Club are. Do your own research and stop reciting shit you learned on CNN.

Oh, ok, don't bother with any evidence to support that, user.


No, the difference is that there have been countless peer-reviewed studies that support the assertion that climate change is a problem.

I'll accept the overwhelming consensus of scientists who have dedicated their lives to studying this issue, and I have the humility to admit that I don't have the qualifications to debate this issue in much more detail.


Lol. Compelling evidence, user

...

It is evidence, you dumbass. Governments are creating more taxes based on global warming.


Stay cucked, faggot.

Oh, you're the guy who tells everyone you disagree with that they definitely get all their news from CNN.

That's your new name, shill

Correct. Very good.

Oh sorry, do you watch MSNBC? Which mainstream news source do you use? I know you don't use alternative media, obviously.

Talking with you is like talking with some mallrat normalfag who shops at Hot Topic and thinks he's a rebel.

good goy, I create the propaganda, you pay the shekels.

...

yes, normalfags like you buy ICP shirts at Hot Topic and think you are being rebellious while you guzzle Faygo like nigger cum.

...

It keeps getting better

Would you like to embarrass yourself any further, or are you about finished?

It's called an argument. People disagree with opinions about global warming. This isn't a hugbox, faggot. What should we do? Just find a middle ground and agree with each other? Would that make you hard? What if we kissed each other too?

...

Kek

Both sides are exactly the same.

He's right. Global Warming is probably one of the biggest debates in human history, people disagree.

You're being a hippie faggot by saying "can't we all just get along guize".

You're so smart. How do I become neutral like you? Should I cut off my balls first?

I'm only pointing both sides are calling scientists that doesn't back up their side are shills or bribed faggots lying.

No, one side is saying that the "97%" number was manufactured by a specific group of scientists who are being paid and the other side is basically all for the scientists. Can you not into reading comprehension?

No, one side is saying the scientists are paid by the gov so they can raise taxes and the other side said everyone denying global warming is being paid by oil magnates too.

TL;DR both sides are claiming the other side is lying with 0 evidence, all the proof they have of their lies is how they are disagreeing with them and that it's simply logical they'd be lying because they can profit from it

This is not a topic that should be politicized – gee, I wonder why it is.
I'll go with the latter… and the vast majority of scientists who agree.

That 97% number isn't based on all of the scientists in the world, or even all scientists within a certain country. It's based on a select group of highly paid scientists who may or may not have a political bias in their "research".

Read about the Sierra Club, i'm not going to spoonfeed you.

This does not make sense, most of those scientists are not qualified to talk about weather change either.

Jesus Christ, would you shut the fuck up with the 97% being bullshit; whether it's 97 or 95 or 85, the vast majority think you're a dumbass.

user, what's with all the doublethink?

Yeah, those dumb brain-havin, smartypants, know-all-scientists. It's ain't nuthin but some mumbo jumbo dickerydoolittle ta get me ta pay em more taxes.

and Jooz

I keep bringing it up because it is extremely fucking important, as is the Sierra Club. If a number is manufactured then it should cause your common sense to kick in and find out why it was manufactured in the first place. Gee, maybe it's because they are trying to hide something?

Show me an actual poll with all of the scientists in the world or even half of them from various different universities or organizations and then maybe I'll agree that most scientists agree that global warming is a thing.

I'm not not the one refuting their claims.

user, what's with the logic?